Mahmoud Abu-Amara

Liver ischemia/reperfusion injury: Processes in inflammatory networks—A review

Liver ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury is typified by an inflammatory response. Understanding the cellular and molecular events underpinning this inflammation is fundamental to developing therapeutic strategies. Great strides have been made in this respect recently. Liver IR involves a complex web of interactions between the various cellular and humoral contributors to the inflammatory response. Kupffer cells, CD4+ lymphocytes, neutrophils, and hepatocytes are central cellular players. Various cytokines, chemokines, and complement proteins form the communication system between the cellular components. The contribution of the danger‐associated molecular patterns and pattern recognition receptors to the pathophysiology of liver IR injury are slowly being elucidated. Our knowledge on the role of mitochondria in generating reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, in contributing to ionic disturbances, and in initiating the mitochondrial permeability transition with subsequent cellular death in liver IR injury is continuously being expanded. Here, we discuss recent findings pertaining to the aforementioned factors of liver IR, and we highlight areas with gaps in our knowledge, necessitating further research. Liver Transpl 16:1016–1032, 2010.

The nitric oxide pathway – evidence and mechanisms for protection against liver ischaemia reperfusion injury

Ischaemia reperfusion (IR) injury is a clinical entity with a major contribution to the morbidity and mortality of liver surgery and transplantation. A central pathway of protection against IR injury utilizes nitric oxide (NO). Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) enzymes manufacture NO from L‐arginine. NO generated by the endothelial NOS (eNOS) isoform protects against liver IR injury, whereas inducible NOS (iNOS)‐derived NO may have either a protective or a deleterious effect during the early phase of IR injury, depending on the length of ischaemia, length of reperfusion and experimental model. In late phase hepatic IR injury, iNOS‐derived NO plays a protective role. In addition to NOS consumption of L‐arginine during NO synthesis, this amino acid may also be metabolized by arginase, an enzyme whose release is increased during prolonged ischaemia, and therefore diverts L‐arginine away from NOS metabolism leading to a drop in the rate of NO synthesis. NO most commonly acts through the soluble guanylyl cyclase‐cyclic GMP‐ protein kinase G pathway to ameliorate hepatic IR injury. Both endogenously generated and exogenously administered NO donors protect against liver IR injury. The beneficial effects of NO on liver IR are not, however, universal, and certain conditions, such as steatosis, may influence the protective effects of NO. In this review, the evidence for, and mechanisms of these protective actions of NO are discussed, and areas in need of further research are highlighted.

Role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in remote ischemic preconditioning of the mouse liver

Hindlimb remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reduces liver ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury in wild‐type mice. The underlying mechanisms of RIPC are currently unknown. In this study, we investigated the role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in mediating the protective effects of RIPC. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase knockout (eNOS−/−) mice were divided into 4 groups: (1) a sham surgery group, (2) an RIPC group (6 cycles of 4 minutes of hindlimb ischemia and 4 minutes of hindlimb reperfusion), (3) an IR group [40 minutes of lobar (70%) hepatic ischemia and 2 hours of reperfusion], and (4) an RIPC+IR group (RIPC followed by the IR group procedures). Plasma liver aminotransferases, hepatic histopathological injury scores, transmission electron microscopy studies, and hepatic microcirculatory blood flow (MBF) were assessed. eNOS protein expression was analyzed in the livers and hindlimb muscles of wild‐type mice. Hindlimb RIPC did not protect against subsequent liver IR injury in eNOS−/− mice; this was demonstrated by the lack of reduction in the plasma aminotransferase levels, histopathological scores, or ultrastructural features of IR injury in the RIPC+IR group versus the IR group. Hepatic MBF did not recover during liver reperfusion in the RIPC+IR group versus the IR group. eNOS protein expression was similar among all wild‐type groups. In conclusion, eNOS is essential for the protective effects of hindlimb RIPC on liver IR injury. eNOS exerts its protective effects through the preservation of hepatic MBF. At 2 hours of reperfusion, eNOS protection is likely due to the increased activation of eNOS rather than increased expression. Liver Transpl 17:610‐619, 2011.

Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on hepatic microcirculation and function in a rat model of hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury

BACKGROUND Liver transplantation involves a period of ischemia and reperfusion to the graft which leads to primary non-function and dysfunction of the liver in 5-10% of cases. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been shown to reduce ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) injury to the liver and increase hepatic blood flow. We hypothesized that RIPC may directly modulate hepatic microcirculation and have investigated this using intravital microscopy. METHODS A rat model of liver IRI was used with 45 min of partial hepatic ischemia (70%) followed by 3 h of reperfusion. Four groups of animals (Sham, IRI, RIPC+IRI, RIPC+Sham) were studied (n= 6, each group). Intravital microscopy was used to measure red blood cell (RBC) velocity, sinusoidal perfusion, sinusoidal flow and sinusoidal diameter. Neutrophil adhesion was assessed by rhodamine labeling of neutrophils and cell death using propidium iodide. RESULTS RIPC reduced the effects of IRI by significantly increasing red blood cell velocity, sinusoidal flow and sinusoidal perfusion along with decreased neutrophil adhesion and cell death. CONCLUSIONS Using intravital microscopy, this study demonstrates that RIPC modulates hepatic microcirculation to reduce the effects of IRI. HO-1 may have a key role in the modulation of hepatic microcirculation and endothelial function.

Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on liver ischemia/reperfusion injury using a new mouse model.

Ischemic preconditioning of remote organs (RIPC) reduces liver ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury in the rabbit and rat. Mice are the only species available with a large number of transgenic strains. This study describes development and validation of a mouse model of hindlimb RIPC that attenuates liver IR injury. Mice were allocated to 4 groups: (1) Sham surgery; (2) RIPC: 6 cycles of 4 × 4 minutes ischemia/reperfusion of hindlimb; (3) IR: 40 minutes lobar (70%) hepatic ischemia and 2 hours reperfusion; (4) RIPC+IR: RIPC followed by IR group procedures. Plasma liver aminotransferases and hepatic histopathological and transmission electron microscopy studies were performed at the end of the experiment. Hepatic microcirculatory blood flow was measured throughout the experiment. Postoperative complications and animal survival were evaluated. Hindlimb RIPC using a tourniquet resulted in limb paralysis. Hindlimb RIPC using direct clamping of the femoral vessels showed no side effects. Compared to liver IR alone, RIPC+IR reduced plasma aminotransferases (P < 0.05) and histopathological and ultrastructural features of injury. Hepatic microcirculatory blood flow was preserved in the RIPC+IR compared to IR group (P < 0.05). There was no mortality in any of the groups. By demonstrating a consistent improvement in these features of liver IR injury with antecedent hindlimb RIPC and by minimizing experimental confounding variables, we validated this mouse model. In conclusion, we describe a validated mouse model of hindlimb RIPC that reduces liver IR injury. With the availability of transgenic mice strains, this model should prove useful in unraveling the mechanisms of protection of hindlimb RIPC. Liver Transpl 17:70–82, 2011.

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of pharmacological interventions to reduce ischaemia-reperfusion injury in elective liver resection with vascular occlusion

BACKGROUND Vascular occlusion during liver resection results in ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) injury, which can lead to liver dysfunction. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the benefits and harms of using various pharmacological agents to decrease IR injury during liver resection with vascular occlusion. METHODS Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating pharmacological agents in liver resections conducted under vascular occlusion were identified. Two independent reviewers extracted data on population characteristics and risk of bias in the trials, and on outcomes such as postoperative morbidity, hospital stay and liver function. RESULTS A total of 18 RCTs evaluating 17 different pharmacological interventions were identified. There was no significant difference in perioperative mortality, liver failure or postoperative morbidity between the intervention and control groups in any of the comparisons. A significant improvement in liver function was seen with methylprednisolone use. Hospital and intensive therapy unit stay were significantly shortened with trimetazidine and vitamin E use, respectively. Markers of liver parenchymal injury were significantly lower in the methylprednisolone, trimetazidine, dextrose and ulinastatin groups compared with their respective controls (placebo or no intervention). DISCUSSION Methylprednisolone, trimetazidine, dextrose and ulinastatin may have protective roles against IR injury in liver resection. However, based on the current evidence, they cannot be recommended for routine use and their application should be restricted to RCTs.

Modulation of microcirculatory changes in the late phase of hepatic ischaemia–reperfusion injury by remote ischaemic preconditioning

BACKGROUND   Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a novel method of protecting the liver from ischaemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury. Protective effects in the early phase (4-6 h) have been demonstrated, but no studies have focused on the late phase (24 h) of hepatic I-R. This study analysed events in the late phase of I-R following RIPC and focused on the microcirculation, inflammatory cascade and the role of cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-1 (CINC-1). METHODS   A standard animal model was used. Remote preconditioning prior to I-R was induced by intermittent limb ischaemia. Ischaemia was induced in the left and median lobes of the liver (70%). The animals were recovered after 45 min of liver ischaemia. At 24 h, the animals were re-evaluated under anaesthesia. Hepatic microcirculation, sinusoidal leukocyte adherence and hepatocellular death were assessed by intravital microscopy, hepatocellular injury by standard biochemistry and serum CINC-1 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS   At 24 h post I-R, RIPC was found to have improved sinusoidal flow by increasing the sinusoidal diameter. There was no effect of preconditioning on the velocity of red blood cells, by contrast with the early phase of hepatic I-R. Remote ischaemic preconditioning significantly reduced hepatocellular injury, neutrophil-induced endothelial injury and serum CINC-1 levels. CONCLUSIONS   Remote ischaemic preconditioning is amenable to translation into clinical practice and may improve outcomes in liver resection surgery and transplantation.

The hepatic soluble guanylyl cyclase-cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway mediates the protection of remote ischemic preconditioning on the microcirculation in liver ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Background Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) protects against liver ischemia reperfusion (IR) injury. An essential circulating mediator of this protection is nitric oxide (NO) induced by lower limb RIPC. One of the mechanisms through which NO generally acts is the soluble guanylyl cyclase-cyclic GMP (sGC-cGMP) pathway. The present study aimed to assess the role of hepatic sGC-cGMP in lower limb RIPC-induced protection against liver IR injury. Methods Mice were allocated to 4 groups: 1.Sham; 2.IR: 40 min of lobar hepatic ischemia and 2 hr reperfusion; 3.RIPC+IR: 6 cycles of 4x4 min IR of the lower limb followed by IR group procedure; (4) 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazole[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ)+RIPC+IR: ODQ (sGC inhibitor) was administered followed by RIPC+IR group procedure. Hepatic microcirculatory blood flow (MBF) was measured throughout the experiment. Plasma transaminases, hepatic histopathological and transmission electron microscopy studies were performed at the end of the experiment. Hepatic cGMP levels were measured in groups 1–3 in addition to an RIPC alone group. Results Compared to liver IR alone, RIPC+IR increased hepatic MBF during liver reperfusion (P<0.05), and reduced plasma transaminases (P<0.05) and ultrastructural markers of injury. In contrast compared to RIPC+IR, ODQ+RIPC+IR decreased hepatic MBF (P<0.05) and ultrastructural markers of injury. However, plasma transaminases were not significantly different in the ODQ+RIPC+IR compared to the RIPC+IR group. Hepatic cGMP levels were significantly elevated in the RIPC compared to sham group. Conclusions The hepatic sGC-cGMP pathway is required for mediating the protective effects of lower limb RIPC on hepatic MBF in liver IR injury.

Haemoxygenase modulates cytokine induced neutrophil chemoattractant in hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury

AIM To investigate the hepatic microcirculatory changes due to Haemoxygenase (HO), effect of HO inhibition on remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) and modulation of CINC. METHODS Eight groups of animals were studied - Sham, ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) the animals were subjected to 45 min of hepatic ischemia followed by three hours of reperfusion, RIPC (remote ischemic preconditioning) + IRI group, remote ischemic preconditioning in sham (RIPC + Sham), PDTC + IR (Pyridodithiocarbamate, HO donor), ZnPP + RIPC + IRI (Zinc protoporphyrin prior to preconditioning), IR-24 (45 min of ischemia followed by 24 h of reperfusion), RIPC + IR-24 (preconditioning prior to IR). After 3 and 24 h of reperfusion the animals were killed by exsanguination and samples were taken. RESULTS Velocity of flow (160.83 ± 12.24 μm/s), sinusoidal flow (8.42 ± 1.19) and sinusoidal perfusion index (42.12 ± 7.28) in hepatic IR were lower (P < 0.05) in comparison to RIPC and PDTC (HO inducer). RIPC increased velocity of flow (328.04 ± 19.13 μm/s), sinusoidal flow (17.75 ± 2.59) and the sinusoidal perfusion index (67.28 ± 1.82) (P < 0.05). PDTC (HO induction) reproduced the effects of RIPC in hepatic IR. PDTC restored RBC velocity (300.88 ± 22.109 μm/s), sinusoidal flow (17.66 ± 3.71) and sinusoidal perfusion (82.33 ± 3.5) to near sham levels. ZnPP (HO inhibition) reduced velocity of flow of RBC in the RIPC group (170.74 ± 13.43 μm/s and sinusoidal flow in the RIPC group (9.46 ± 1.34). ZnPP in RIPC (60.29 ± 1.82) showed a fall in perfusion only at 180 min of reperfusion. Neutrophil adhesion in IR injury is seen in both postsinusoidal venules (769.05 ± 87.48) and sinusoids (97.4 ± 7.49). Neutrophil adhesion in RIPC + IR injury is reduced in both postsinusoidal venules (219.66 ± 93.79) and sinusoids (25.69 ± 9.08) (P < 0.05). PDTC reduced neutrophil adhesion in both postsinusoidal venules (89.58 ± 58.32) and sinusoids (17.98 ± 11.01) (P < 0.05) reproducing the effects of RIPC. ZnPP (HO inhibition) increased venular (589.04 ± 144.36) and sinusoidal neutrophil adhesion in preconditioned animals (121.39 ± 30.65) (P < 0.05). IR after 24 h of reperfusion increased venular and sinusoidal neutrophil adhesion in comparison to the early phase and was significantly reduced by RIPC. Hepatocellular cell death in IRI (80.83 ± 13.03), RIPC + IR (17.35 ± 2.47), and PTDC + IR (11.66 ± 1.17) reduced hepatocellular death. ZnPP + RIPC + IR (41.33 ± 3.07) significantly increased hepatocellular death (P < 0.05 PTDC/RIPC vs ZnPP and IR). The CINC cytokine levels in sham (101.32 ± 6.42). RIPC + sham (412.18 ± 65.24) as compared to sham (P < 0.05). CINC levels in hepatic IR were (644.08 ± 181.24). PDTC and RIPC CINC levels were significantly lower than hepatic IR (P < 0.05). HO inhibition in preconditioned animals with Zinc protoporphyrin increased serum CINC levels (521.81 ± 74.9) (P < 0.05). The serum CINC levels were high in the late phase of hepatic IR (15306 ± 1222.04). RIPC reduced CINC levels in the late phase of IR (467.46 ± 26.06), P < 0.05. CONCLUSION RIPC protects hepatic microcirculation by induction of HO and modulation of CINC in hepatic IR.