Maija Halme

Airway inflammation and basement membrane tenascin in newly diagnosed atopic and nonatopic asthma

Previous studies have shown both similar and distinct inflammatory changes in atopic and nonatopic asthma. This study was set to investigate the bronchial inflammatory cell infiltrate and subepithelial basement membrane (BM) tenascin deposition in subjects with newly diagnosed asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Seventy-nine asthmatic subjects (age 18-60 years) were recruited and 58 were atopic according to skin prick testing. The patients recorded asthma symptoms and peak flow measurements for 14 days. Lung function and BHR were measured by spirometry and histamine challenge. Serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and blood eosinophils were assessed. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed to obtain bronchial biopsies. Serum ECP was higher in the atopic group but eosinophil counts did not differ. There were no differences in inflammatory cells studied (activated eosinophils, T-lymphocytes, mast cells or macrophages) between nonatopic and atopic subjects. BM tenascin layer was significantly thicker in atopic compared with nonatopic subjects (7.6 vs 6.3 microm, P = 0.007). The thickness of tenascin correlated with eosinophil, T-lymphocyte, and macrophage counts, as well as with IL-4-positive cell counts and the correlation was seen only in atopic asthmatics. These findings suggest that inflammatory cells may have a regulatory role in tenascin expression in atopic asthma.

Phase II study of vinorelbine and gemcitabine for inoperable stage IIIB-IV non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of the combination of vinorelbine and gemcitabine as a non-platinum chemotherapy regimen in patients with inoperable locally-advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Efficacy was assessed primarily in terms of response rate, and secondarily in terms of toxicity, time to progression and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with cytologically- or histologically-proven stage IIIB-IV NSCLC, bi-dimensionally measurable lesions, adequate haematological, hepatic and renal function, WHO performance status < or = 2 and no previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy were eligible. The first 12 patients were entered in a pilot study and received vinorelbine (VNR) 30 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, and gemcitabine (GEM) 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15, of a 28-day cycle. Subsequently, patients were entered in a phase II trial of VNR 35 mg/m2 and GEM 1200 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Treatment consisted of three cycles of the chemotherapy, with a further three cycles for those patients who achieved stable disease or a complete or partial response (CR/PR) to the first three cycles. Patients who had achieved CR or PR after six cycles continued with the treatment until relapse. RESULTS The dosage and scheduling of VNR and GEM in the pilot study resulted in neutropenia necessitating reductions or delays in treatment, and consequently low dose intensity. The schedule was thus modified to VNR 35 mg/m2 and GEM 1200 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for the phase II trial. Thirty-three patients were enrolled in the phase II trial, and 28 were evaluable for response. The overall intent-to-treat response rate of all 45 patients was 40% (18 of 45), comprising 4 CR (9%) and 14 PR (31%). For the 28 evaluable patients who received the fortnightly chemotherapy the response rate was 46% (13 of 28), CR 11% (3 of 28) and PR 36% (10 of 28). Seven patients (25%) had stable disease. The one-year cumulative survival rate for the 33 patients receiving the fortnightly chemotherapy was 24% and median time-to-progression 4 months (range 1-16 months). Median survival for these patients was eight months. Nine out of twelve patients in the pilot study (75%) suffered grade 3-4 neutropenia. There was one toxic death, attributed to neutropenic fever and sepsis, and two cases of pulmonary embolism. One patient suffered Grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Only eight patients (24%) on the fortnightly schedule suffered grade 3-4 neutropenia, resulting in dose reductions or delays for three of them (9%). None of the patients on the fortnightly schedule suffered thrombocytopenia or anaemia. CONCLUSIONS The fortnightly schedule of gemcitabine and vinorelbine was a well-tolerated out-patient regimen, producing response and survival rates comparable to those of cisplatin combination regimens, but with a more favourable toxicity profile. Gemcitabine and vinorelbine should now be tested in a triplet combination with a taxane as the third drug, or against a platinum-containing regimen in a phase III study.

The clinical importance of magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in malignant pleural mesothelioma

There is no standard therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), but recent reports have shown that extensive surgery combined with chemo- and radiotherapy prolongs the survival of selected patients with early stage disease. This emphasises the need for accurate staging procedures at diagnosis and reliable imaging methods to assess response to treatment. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest has been the standard imaging method for these purposes for the last decade, but it is limited in its ability to demonstrate accurately the platelike growth pattern of MPM within the thorax due to the partial volume effect on curved surfaces. In order to define the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the imaging of MPM, we have compared the findings from 26 parallel paired CT and MRI scans of mesothelioma patients at various stages of the disease. MRI showed tumour spread into the interlobar fissures, tumour invasion of the diaphragm and through the diaphragm, and invasion of bony structures better than CT. Invasion of the chest wall and mediastinal soft tissue and tumour growth into the lung parenchyma were equally well seen on both imaging methods. CT was better for detecting the inactive pleural calcifications. MRI is a sensitive detector of the characteristic growth pattern and extension of MPM and we recommend its use more widely for the clinical management of MPM especially when evaluating tumour resectability and in research protocols when an accurate evaluation of disease extent is essential.

Natural alpha-interferon in combination with hyperfractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Our previous study in patients with small-cell lung cancer indicated that natural alpha interferon might be a radiosensitiser. In this study we considered 20 patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer, who were randomly assigned to receive either hyperfractionation radiotherapy alone, 1.25 Gy twice a day (6 hr interval), 60 Gy/48F/32d; or the same radiotherapy concurrently with alpha interferon. Patients in the radiotherapy+alpha interferon arm received 3 x 10(6) IU natural alpha interferon intramuscularly and 1.5 x 10(6) IU inhaled via a dosimeter-equipped jet nebulizer 30 min before each radiotherapy session. Tumor response and radiation-induced lung injury were assessed by serial chest radiographs, computerized tomography scans and lung function studies, during a 1 year follow-up period. No patient in either arm achieved complete response. On the other hand, five patients in the radiotherapy arm and six in the radiotherapy+interferon arm experienced partial response, and the corresponding figures for stable disease were three and one. Combined treatment with radiotherapy and inhaled and intramuscular interferon proved feasible but laborious, for both patients and staff. Pneumonitis and/or oesophagitis in the radiotherapy+interferon arm were moderate to severe, and only two patients tolerated the treatment without any modifications. No treatment modifications were necessary in the radiotherapy arm. The early deaths in the radiotherapy+interferon arm may have been treatment-related. The optimal way to combine interferon and radiotherapy to further evaluate its role as a radiosensitiser needs further studies in larger series.

Docetaxel and irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma--a feasibility study.

We chose to treat malignant pleural mesothelioma with a combination of docetaxel and irinotecan (CPT-11), because there have been preliminary reports that CPT-11 is active against mesothelioma, and docetaxel and CPT-11 were the most active agents in our in vitro experiments in human mesothelioma cell lines. Fifteen previously untreated patients with pleural mesothelioma (IMIG Stage III-IV) were given docetaxel 60 mg/m2 followed by CPT-11 190 mg/m2 on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. All the patients were evaluable for toxicity and 13 patients were evaluated for response. No objective responses (complete or partial) were achieved, but there were two minor responses (overall response rate 15%) each of a duration of 4 months. Three patients had stable disease (23%); median time to progression was 7 months. Median survival in all the patients was 8.5 months from the first chemotherapy cycle and 11 months from diagnosis. Toxicity was severe with seven of 15 patients suffering neutropenic fever and six of 15 patients grade 3-4 diarrhea. The trial was discontinued because of toxicity and lack of activity. We do not recommend the combination of docetaxel and CPT-11 using the schedule presented here for further investigation in malignant mesothelioma. However, CPT-11 and docetaxel, individually, still warrant further study in this disease, especially in combination with cisplatin.

Concomitant chemotherapy and IFN-alpha for small cell lung cancer : a randomized multicenter phase III study

Patients with any stage of small cell lung cancer were given low-dose interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) from the first day of treatment as long as possible irrespective of changes in treatment dictated by disease progression. All patients received 6 cycles of the chemotherapy (CT): cisplatin 70 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v. days 1, 2, 3 every 28 days. Seventy-eight patients were assigned to arm 1: CT alone, 75 patients to arm 2: CT + natural IFN-alpha (3 MU three times a week i.m.), and 66 patients to arm 3: CT + recombinant IFN alpha-2a (3 MU three times a week i.m.). There was no difference in median survival between the arms (10.2 months, 10.0 months, 10.1 months, respectively), p = 0.32. The 2-year survival rates were 15%, 3%, and 11%, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 leukopenia occurred more frequently in the IFN arms than in the CT alone arm and resulted in dose reductions. Antibodies occasionally developed to recombinant IFN. We conclude that IFN-alpha can be administered concomitantly with chemotherapy but is probably better kept for maintenance therapy so that optimal full doses of induction CT can be given.

Interferon-alpha and 13-cis-retinoic acid as maintenance therapy after high-dose combination chemotherapy with growth factor support for small cell lung cancer--a feasibility study.

This randomized phase II multi-center study was designed to determine the time to progression, duration of response and the feasibility of an intensified maintenance regime consisting of a combination of interferon (IFN)-alpha and retinoic acid after high-dose combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer. The patients received four courses of combination chemotherapy consisting of ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide, with higher doses of ifosfamide and carboplatin given in the first course, with routine growth factor support. Responding patients were then randomly assigned to one of three maintenance therapy arms. All patients with limited disease (LD) were given thoracic radiotherapy before maintenance therapy and those who had also achieved a complete response (CR) or minimal residual disease (MRD) received prophylactic cranial irradiation. In Arm 1 patients received IFN-alpha-2a, 6 MIU s.c. TIW for 4 weeks, followed by 3 MIU s.c. TIW, and 13-cis-retinoic acid 1 mg/kg/day p.o. BID daily. In Arm 2 patients received trophosphamide 100-150 mg/day p.o. BID. No maintenance treatment was given in Arm 3, the control group. Maintenance therapy was continued for 1 year. Eighty-five patients were treated according to the protocol. Twenty-one patients achieved CR, four achieved MRD and forty-two achieved partial responses to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Sixty patients (71%) were randomly assigned for maintenance treatment. Median survival was 17.1 months in the IFN-alpha-retinoic acid arm, 12.4 months in the trophosphamide arm and 13.5 months in the control arm. One-year survival rates were 82, 56 and 55%, respectively. Duration of response was 6.5, 5.5 and 4.7 months, respectively. Time to progression was 8.6, 8.0 and 6.8 months, respectively The differences were not statistically significant. The IFN-alpha-retinoic acid maintenance treatment was well tolerated. Patients who received IFN-alpha-retinoid maintenance therapy lived longer after the onset of progressive disease. The treatment regime was effective, feasible and well tolerated.

Cytological monitoring of peripheral blood, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and transbronchial biopsy specimens during acute rejection and cytomegalovirus infection in lung and heart–lung allograft recipients

Study objectives: Acute rejection and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection are important complications after lung and heart–lung transplantation. We sought to investigate whether acute rejection and CMV infection demonstrated as CMV antigenemia had an effect on the cell profiles of peripheral blood (PB), bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL‐F), or TBB histology. 
Patients and design: In this prospective study, composition of cells in PB, BAL‐F, and TBB samples from 20 lung or heart–lung transplantation patients were analyzed during episodes of acute rejection or CMV antigenemia. Rejection was graded according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation criteria. As controls, samples with no evidence of rejection or infection were used. To evaluate the effect of time on cellular findings, samples were divided into three groups according to time after transplantation: 1–30, 31–180, and more than 180 d after transplantation. 
Results: Acute rejection was associated with mild blood basophilia (p<0.05; specificity 94%, sensitivity 42%). In BAL‐F during rejection, the number of basophils (p<0.05), eosinophils (p<0.05), and lymphocytes (p<0.05; specificity 77%, sensitivity 64%) was increased compared to controls during the post‐operative month 1. Later‐occurring rejections were associated with increased amounts of neutrophils in BAL‐F (p<0.05; specificity 82%, sensitivity 74%). In TBB histology, acute rejections were associated with perivascular and/or peribronchial infiltration of lymphocytes (p<0.001) and plasma cells (p<0.05) compared to controls. In our patients receiving gancyclovir prophylaxis, CMV antigenemia did not significantly alter the cell profiles in PB and BAL‐F nor the inflammatory cell picture in TBB histology. 
Conclusion: TBB histology remains the ‘gold standard’ for diagnosing rejection in lung and heart–lung transplantation patients, as the inflammatory cell findings in TBB specimens are highly specific for rejection. The cellular changes associated with rejection, mild PB basophilia and increased proportions of lymphocytes in early‐ and neutrophils in later‐occurring rejection, observed in BAL‐F cannot be considered specific for rejection, but may warrant clinical suspicion of rejection.

Bronchoscopy in the diagnosis and surveillance of respiratory infections in lung and heart–lung transplant recipients

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and transbronchial biopsies (TBB) is a widely used method to detect respiratory infections and to differentiate them from other postoperative complications in lung transplant (LTX) recipients, but the usefulness of surveillance FOBs is not yet established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of FOB in the diagnosis and surveillance of infections in LTX recipients. We reviewed all the consecutive 609 FOBs performed on 40 lung or heart–LTX recipients between February 1994 and November 2002. The overall diagnostic yield was 115/190 (61%) and 43/282 (15%) for clinically indicated and surveillance FOBs respectively (P < 0.001). Infection was established by bronchoscopic samples in 96/190 (50.5.%) of the clinically indicated FOBs and 34/282 (12.1%) of the surveillance FOBs (P < 0.001). The diagnostic yield of the clinically indicated FOBs was highest (72%) from 1 to 6 months post‐transplant (P = 0.04). Pneumocystis carinii was detected in 23 (4.9%) of the bronchoscopic specimens and 15 (65%) of the P. carinii infections were detected during adequate chemoprophylaxis. To conclude, in LTX recipients clinically indicated FOB has a good diagnostic yield in detecting infections and other postoperative complications, whereas the information received from surveillance FOB has remained less significant. With current prophylaxis and screening strategies FOB is still required to detect P. carinii infections.

Long-term follow-up of lung and heart transplant recipients with pre-transplant malignancies

BACKGROUND Concern regarding recurrence of pre-transplant (Tx) malignancy has disqualified patients from Tx. Because this has been poorly studied in lung and heart Tx recipients our aim was to investigate the influence of pre-Tx malignancy on post-Tx recurrence and long-term survival, focusing on pre-operative cancer-free intervals. METHODS From our lung and heart Tx programs (1983 to 2011) we retrospectively identified 111 (lung, 37; heart, 74) of 3,830 recipients with 113 pre-Tx malignancies. The patients were divided into 3 groups by pre-Tx cancer-free interval: Group I, <12 months (n = 24); Group II, ≥12 to<60 months (n = 18); and Group III, ≥60 months (n = 71). RESULTS Mean age at pre-Tx malignancy was 35±18 years. Mean post-Tx follow-up time was 70±63 months (range, 0-278 months), and malignancy recurrence was 63% in Group I, 26% in Group II, and 6% in Group III. Kaplan-Meier analysis of freedom from post-Tx recurrence revealed the following differences among the groups: Group I vs II, p = 0.08; II vs III, p = 0.002; and I vs III, p<0.001. Overall survival (51 deaths) was significantly poorer in Group I than in Groups II and III (p = 0.044). Survival between Groups II and III did not differ significantly (p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS Cancer-free survival of ≥5 years pre-Tx is associated with the lowest recurrence. However, recurrence is related to the time the patients were cancer-free, as seen in Groups I and II.