Maireade E. McSweeney

Rates of Medical Errors and Preventable Adverse Events Among Hospitalized Children Following Implementation of a Resident Handoff Bundle

IMPORTANCE Handoff miscommunications are a leading cause of medical errors. Studies comprehensively assessing handoff improvement programs are lacking. OBJECTIVE To determine whether introduction of a multifaceted handoff program was associated with reduced rates of medical errors and preventable adverse events, fewer omissions of key data in written handoffs, improved verbal handoffs, and changes in resident-physician workflow. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective intervention study of 1255 patient admissions (642 before and 613 after the intervention) involving 84 resident physicians (42 before and 42 after the intervention) from July-September 2009 and November 2009-January 2010 on 2 inpatient units at Boston Childrens Hospital. INTERVENTIONS Resident handoff bundle, consisting of standardized communication and handoff training, a verbal mnemonic, and a new team handoff structure. On one unit, a computerized handoff tool linked to the electronic medical record was introduced. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes were the rates of medical errors and preventable adverse events measured by daily systematic surveillance. The secondary outcomes were omissions in the printed handoff document and resident time-motion activity. RESULTS Medical errors decreased from 33.8 per 100 admissions (95% CI, 27.3-40.3) to 18.3 per 100 admissions (95% CI, 14.7-21.9; P < .001), and preventable adverse events decreased from 3.3 per 100 admissions (95% CI, 1.7-4.8) to 1.5 (95% CI, 0.51-2.4) per 100 admissions (P = .04) following the intervention. There were fewer omissions of key handoff elements on printed handoff documents, especially on the unit that received the computerized handoff tool (significant reductions of omissions in 11 of 14 categories with computerized tool; significant reductions in 2 of 14 categories without computerized tool). Physicians spent a greater percentage of time in a 24-hour period at the patient bedside after the intervention (8.3%; 95% CI 7.1%-9.8%) vs 10.6% (95% CI, 9.2%-12.2%; P = .03). The average duration of verbal handoffs per patient did not change. Verbal handoffs were more likely to occur in a quiet location (33.3%; 95% CI, 14.5%-52.2% vs 67.9%; 95% CI, 50.6%-85.2%; P = .03) and private location (50.0%; 95% CI, 30%-70% vs 85.7%; 95% CI, 72.8%-98.7%; P = .007) after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Implementation of a handoff bundle was associated with a significant reduction in medical errors and preventable adverse events among hospitalized children. Improvements in verbal and written handoff processes occurred, and resident workflow did not change adversely.

Patient Handoffs: Pediatric Resident Experiences and Lessons Learned

Background: Within pediatrics, there is a paucity of data on pediatric resident handoff systems. Methods: Seventy-seven of 139 eligible pediatric housestaff participated in a cross-sectional survey that was distributed at an annual residency fall retreat in September 2007. Results: Seventy-three percent of the respondents noted uncertainty regarding patient care plans due to receipt of an incomplete verbal handoff. Nursing questions, phone, and page interruptions were noted barriers to giving an effective verbal sign-out. Personal fatigue was also reported to affect the accuracy of housestaff’s written sign-outs more than verbal sign-outs (43% vs 23%, P = .026). Only 19% of the residents reported that written sign-outs were reflective of current patient information and care plans. Conclusion: Written and verbal patient handoffs were perceived by pediatric housestaff to be important parts of patient care but often incomplete. New systems that provide a more protected handoff environment, reduce housestaff fatigue, and standardize the handoff procedure may be useful.

Long-term outcomes of infants and children undergoing percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy tube placement.

Objectives: Little is known about long-term outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement. The purpose of this study was to examine tube-related major complications in pediatric patients undergoing PEG placement during a 10-year follow-up period. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing PEG placement from April 1999 through December 2000 at Boston Childrens Hospital was performed. Cumulative incident rates of major complications (defined by additional hospitalization, surgical or interventional radiology procedures) as well as time between PEG placement and major complications were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Time to elective tube removal and patient mortality was also assessed. Results: One hundred thirty-eight patients (59% [n = 82] boys [median age 22.5 months] [interquartile range, IQR 9–72.5], weight 9.2 kg [IQR 6.1–15.8]), underwent PEG placement during the study period and were followed at our hospital for a median of 4.98 years (IQR 1.5–8.7) years. Median time to elective tube removal was 10.2 years, with approximately half of the patients estimated to still have an indwelling enteral tube 10 years after placement. Fifteen patients (11%) had at least 1 major complication related to their gastrostomy tubes during the examined time period. The cumulative incidence of patients having a major complication was 15% (95% confidence interval 8.9–24.5) by 5.4 years. Conclusions: Children undergoing PEG placement have a long-term high risk of morbidity related to enteral tubes. Major complications can occur many years after PEG placement. Larger prospective studies may be useful to assess risk factors for PEG-related complications in pediatrics.

Risk Factors for Complications in Infants and Children with Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tubes

OBJECTIVE To identify risk factors associated with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube complications in a large cohort of infants and children. STUDY DESIGN We performed a chart review of 591 pediatric patients undergoing PEG tube placement between 2006 and 2010 at Boston Childrens Hospital. Frequency and type of major and minor complications associated with PEG tubes in children were identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses were then conducted to determine potential risk factors for complications. RESULTS A total of 198 PEG-related complications (72 major and 126 minor) were noted in our cohort of 591 patients. Approximately 10.5% of patients experienced at least one major complication and 16.4% experienced at least one minor complication, with the great majority of complications occurring after discharge postplacement. Age <6 months (P = .003), American Society of Anesthesiologists class III (P = .02), and presence of a neurologic disorder (P = .05) were found to be protective against experiencing a major complication, whereas the presence of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt was confirmed to be a risk factor (P = .01) for major complications. CONCLUSION Both minor and major complications are common in children after PEG tube placement, with most complications occurring several months postoperatively. Certain patient factors, including age, neurologic status, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class, may be protective, and the presence of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt may be associate with an increased risk of complications after PEG tube placement.

Advances in Pediatric Gastrostomy Placement

Placement of gastrostomy tubes in infants and children has become increasingly commonplace. A historical emphasis on use of open gastrostomy has been replaced by less invasive methods of placement, including percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and laparoscopically assisted gastrostomy procedures. Various complications, ranging from minor to the more severe, have been reported with all methods of placement. Many pediatric patients who undergo gastrostomy tube placement will require long-term enteral therapy. Given the prolonged time pediatric patients may remain enterally dependent, further quality improvement and education initiatives are needed to improve long-term care and outcomes of these patients.

Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy Tube Placement in Infants with Congenital Cardiac Disease

INTRODUCTION Gastrojejunostomy (GJ) tubes are an option for durable enteral access for critically ill infants with congenital cardiac disease who struggle with obtaining adequate nutrition. MATERIALS AND METHODS Infants weighing less than 10 kg with cardiac disease who received placement of a laparoscopic GJ tube from November 2011 to January 2015 were reviewed. The operative technique used an umbilical port for the camera and a single stab incision for the gastric access site. After insufflation to 5-8 mm Hg, the stomach was suspended to the abdominal wall, after which a dilator was maneuvered into a postpyloric position using laparoscopic visualization and fluoroscopy, and a glidewire was passed into the duodenum. The GJ tube was then fluoroscopically threaded over the glidewire; final position was confirmed by contrast injection. RESULTS There were 32 laparoscopic GJ tube placement operations performed; 7 (21.9%) of these tubes were standard single-unit GJ tubes, and 25 (78.1%) were low-profile gastrostomy tubes modified with a nasojejunal feeding tube threaded through the feeding port. Median patient age was 3.5 months (range, 0.75-11 months), with a median weight of 4.2 kg (range, 2.4-7.4 kg). Congenital defects were varied, including hypoplastic left heart syndrome and pulmonary vein stenosis. Median operative time was 62 minutes for isolated GJ placement (range, 35-114 minutes). There were three postoperative complications, resulting in a 30-day complication rate of 9.4%. Thirty-day mortality was 9.4% with no mortality related to the operation. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic GJ tube placement may be performed safely in infants with cardiac disease and allows these patients to receive adequate nutrition despite intolerance of gastric feeding.

Primary laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy tubes as a feeding modality in the pediatric population

PURPOSE Outcomes associated with primary laparoscopic gastrojejunal (GJ) tube placement in the pediatric population were evaluated. METHODS A single-institution, retrospective review examined patients undergoing laparoscopic GJ tube placement between June 2011 and December 2014. Outcomes included gastric feeding tolerance, subsequent fundoplication, complications, and mortality. RESULTS Ninety laparoscopic GJ tubes were placed. Median follow-up was 342days (interquartile range [IQR]=141-561days). Median patient age was 5months (IQR=3-11months) and weight was 5.2kg (IQR=4-8.4kg). The most common indications for placement were gastroesophageal reflux (n=85, 94.4%) and/or aspiration (n=40, 44.4%). Most common comorbidities included cardiac (n=34, 37.8%) and respiratory (n=29, 32.2%) diseases. The complication rate was 17.8%, including one case of intestinal perforation. Thirty-four (37.7%) patients transitioned to gastric feeding within 1year; time to conversion was 156days (IQR=117-210days); of those, 18.9% patients transitioned to oral feedings. A fundoplication was later performed in 4 children for persistent reflux. Mortality was 23.3% with no procedural-related deaths. CONCLUSION Primary laparoscopically placed GJ tubes are a reliable means of enteral access for pediatric patients with gastric feeding intolerance. Many of these children are successfully transitioned to gastric and/or oral feedings over time. Further studies are needed to characterize which patients are best served with a GJ tube versus alternatives such as fundoplication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III (treatment) TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective.

Association of Proton Pump Inhibitors With Hospitalization Risk in Children With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia

Importance Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are commonly prescribed to children with oropharyngeal dysphagia and resultant aspiration based on the assumption that these patients are at greater risk for reflux-related lung disease. There is little data to support this approach and the potential risk for increased infections in children treated with PPI may outweigh any potential benefit. Objective The aim of this study was to determine if there is an association between hospitalization risk in pediatric patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia and treatment with PPI. Design, Setting, and Participants We performed a retrospective cohort study to compare the frequency and length of hospitalizations for children who had abnormal results on videofluoroscopic swallow studies that were performed between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2015, and who were or were not treated with PPI, with follow-up through December 31, 2016. Records were reviewed for children who presented for care at Boston Children’s Hospital, a tertiary referral center. Participants included 293 children 2 years and younger with evidence of aspiration or penetration on videofluoroscopic swallow study. Exposures Groups were compared based on their exposure to PPI treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were hospital admission rate and hospital admission nights and these were measured as incident rates. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine predictors of hospitalization risk after adjusting for comorbidities. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to determine the association of PPI prescribing with time until first hospitalization. Results A total of 293 patients with a mean (SD) age of 8.8 (0.4) months and a mean (SD) follow-up time of 18.15 (0.20) months were included in the analysis. Patients treated with PPI had higher admission rates (Incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.77; 95% CI, 1.16-2.68) and admission nights (IRR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.36-4.62) even after adjustment for comorbidities. Patients with enteral tubes who were prescribed PPIs were at the highest risk for admission (hazard ratio [HR], 2.31; 95% CI, 1.24-4.31). Conclusions and Relevance Children with aspiration who are treated with PPI have increased risk of hospitalization compared with untreated patients. These results support growing concern about the risks of PPI use in children.

Are We Using Abdominal Radiographs Appropriately in the Management of Pediatric Constipation

Objective To identify the reasons why pediatric gastroenterologists obtain abdominal radiographs in the management of pediatric constipation. Study design This was a prospective study surveying providers regarding their rationale, interpretation, resultant change, and confidence in their management before and after obtaining KUBs in patients seen for suspected constipation. Demographics and clinical findings were obtained from medical records. Results A total of 24 providers were surveyed after 72 patient encounters. Reasons for obtaining an abdominal radiograph included evaluation of stool burden (70%), need for a clean out (35%), fecal impaction (27%), cause of abdominal pain (24%), demonstration of stool burden to families (14%), assessment of response to therapy (13%), or encopresis (10%). The plan was changed in 47.6% of cases based on radiographic findings. In cases in which a plan was outlined before obtaining the radiograph (69%), the initial plan was implemented on average in 52.5%. In cases with no plans before obtaining the radiograph, previously unconsidered plans were implemented in 8.7%. Provider confidence in the management plan increased from 2.4 ± 2.7 to 4.1 ± 1.8 (P < .05) after the abdominal radiograph. Conclusion Abdominal radiographs commonly are obtained by pediatric gastroenterologists in the evaluation and management of constipation. The majority used it to make a diagnosis, and nearly one‐half changed their management based on the imaging findings. Overall, they reported an improved confidence in their management plan, despite evidence that radiographic findings poorly correlate with clinical severity. This study highlights the need for further provider education regarding the recommendations delineated in existing constipation guidelines.