Makoto Hyodo

Incidence and Clinical Impact of Stent Fracture After Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation

Background—Stent fracture (SF) after drug-eluting stent implantation has recently become an important concern because of its potential association with in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. However, the incidence and clinical impact of SF after everolimus-eluting stent implantation remain unclear. Methods and Results—A total of 1035 patients with 1339 lesions undergoing everolimus-eluting stent implantation and follow-up angiography 6 to 9 months after index procedure were analyzed. SF was defined as complete or partial separation of the stent, as assessed by plain fluoroscopy or intravascular ultrasound during follow-up. We assessed the rates of SF and major adverse cardiac events, defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization within 9 months. SF was observed in 39 of 1339 lesions (2.9%) and in 39 of 1035 patients (3.8%). Ostial stent location and lesions with hinge motion, tortuosity, or calcification were independent predictors of SF. The rate of myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization were significantly higher in the SF group than in the non-SF group (5.1% versus 0.4%; P=0.018 and 25.6% versus 2.0%; P<0.001, respectively). Stent thrombosis was more frequently observed in the SF group than in the non-SF group (5.1% versus 0.4%; P=0.018). Major adverse cardiac events within 9 months were significantly higher in the SF group than in the non-SF group (25.6% versus 2.3%; P<0.001). Conclusions—SF after everolimus-eluting stent implantation occurs in 2.9% of lesions and is associated with higher rate of major adverse cardiac events, driven by higher target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis.

Bare Metal Stent Thrombosis and In-Stent Neoatherosclerosis

Background— Very late stent thrombosis (VLST) was reported to occur even in patients with bare metal stent (BMS) implantation, although the annual incidence of VLST after BMS was much lower than that after drug-eluting stent implantation. Pathophysiologic mechanisms of VLST after BMS implantation remain largely unknown. Methods and Results— From September 2002 to February 2010, we identified 102 patients with definite stent thrombosis (ST) of BMS and 42 control patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) unrelated to ST who underwent thrombus aspiration with histopathologic evaluation. There were 40 patients with early ST (EST, within 30 days), 20 patients with late ST (LST, between 31–365 days), and 42 patients with VLST (>1 year). Evidence for fragments of atherosclerotic plaques, such as foamy macrophages, cholesterol crystals, and thin fibrous cap, was more commonly seen in patients with EST (23%) and VLST (31%), whereas these findings were rarely observed in patients with LST (10%). Atherosclerotic fragments were predominantly seen in patients who had EST within 7 days or VLST beyond 3 years. The aspirated thrombi harvested from patients with ST and those with ACS were histologically indistinguishable from each other. Eosinophils were very rarely observed. Plasma level of total cholesterol and triglyceride were significantly higher in VLST cases with atherosclerotic fragments as compared with those without. Conclusions— Fragments of atherosclerotic plaque were highly prevalent in patients with VLST beyond 3 years. Disruption of in-stent neoatherosclerosis could play an important role in the pathogenesis of VLST of BMS occurring beyond 3 years after implantation.

Incidence and Clinical Impact of Stent Fracture After the Nobori Biolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation

Background Stent fracture (SF) after drug‐eluting stent implantation has become an important concern. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of SF after biolimus‐eluting stent. Methods and Results A total of 1026 patients with 1407 lesions undergoing the Nobori biolimus‐eluting stent implantation and follow‐up angiography within 9 months after index procedure were analyzed. SF was defined as complete or partial separation of the stent, as assessed by using plain fluoroscopy, intravascular ultrasound, or optical coherence tomography during the follow‐up. We assessed the rate of SF and the cumulative incidence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization and definite stent thrombosis within 9 months. SF was observed in 58 (4.1%) of 1407 lesions and 57 (5.5%) of 1026 patients. Lesions with hinge motion (OR 8.90, 95% CI 3.84 to 20.6, P<0.001), tortuosity (OR 4.16, 95% CI 1.75 to 9.88, P=0.001), and overlapping stents (OR 2.41, 95% CI 0.95 to 6.10, P=0.06) were predictors of SF. Cumulative incidence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization within 9 months was numerically higher in the SF group than that in the non‐SF group (12.0% versus 1.0%). Cumulative incidence of definite stent thrombosis within 9 months tended to be higher in the SF group than that in the non‐SF group (1.7% versus 0.5%). Conclusions SF after biolimus‐eluting stent occurs in 4.1% of lesions and appears to be associated with clinically driven target lesion revascularization.

Two-Year Clinical Outcomes of Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Following Rotational Atherectomy for Heavily Calcified Lesions

BACKGROUND Clinical outcomes of implantation of the newer-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) following rotational atherectomy for heavily calcified lesions remain unclear in the real-world setting. METHODSANDRESULTS We enrolled 252 consecutive patients (273 lesions) treated with newer-generation DES following rotational atherectomy. The primary endpoint was the cumulative 2-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, clinically-driven target lesion revascularization, and definite stent thrombosis. Complete clinical follow-up information at 2-year was obtained for all patients. The mean age was 73.2±9.0 years and 155 patients (61.5%) were male. Cumulative 2-year incidence of MACE (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, clinically-driven target lesion revascularization and definite stent thrombosis) was 20.3% (7.0%, 2.1%, 18.1% and 2.1%, respectively). Predictors of MACE were presenting with acute coronary syndrome (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29-11.2, P=0.02), hemodialysis (HR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.04-3.56, P=0.04) and previous coronary artery bypass graft (HR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.02-5.00, P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS PCI for calcified lesions requiring rotational atherectomy is still challenging even in the era of newer-generation DES.

Long-term coronary arterial response to biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents in comparison with durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents and bare-metal stents: Five-year follow-up optical coherence tomography study

OBJECTIVE The long-term coronary arterial response of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BES) remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the coronary arterial response of biodegradable polymer BES at 5 years after stent implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT) as compared with that of durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and bare-metal stents (BMS). METHODS Five-year follow-up OCT was performed in 30 patients with 33 stents (10 with 12 BES; 10 with 11 SES; 10 with 10 BMS). Quantitative parameters and qualitative characteristics of the neointima were evaluated. A total of 5178 struts (BES, n = 2056; SES, n = 1410; BMS, n = 1712) were analyzed. RESULTS Uncovered struts were found in 15 out of 2055 struts in the BES (weighted estimate 0.01%, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.00-0.33%) and 54 out of 1410 struts in the SES (0.11%, 95% CI: 0.00-3.33%) (odds ratio [OR] 0.12, 95% CI: 0.01-1.95, p = 0.13). None of 1712 struts were uncovered in the BMS. Cross-sectional qualitative analysis of neointimal tissue showed that the frequency of lipid-laden neointima tended to be lower in the BES (2.26%, 95% CI: 0.38-12.3%) compared with the SES (9.90%, 95% CI: 4.37-20.9%; OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.03-1.16, p = 0.07), and was similar to the BMS (2.23%, 95% CI: 0.54-8.74%; OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.13-7.14, p = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS Biodegradable polymer BES shows a favorable coronary arterial response compared with SES, but different response with BMS at 5 years follow-up. The observed frequency of in-stent neoatherosclerosis within BES was similar to BMS and tended to be lower than SES.

Difference of Tissue Characteristics Between Early and Late Restenosis After Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation ― An Optical Coherence Tomography Study ―

BACKGROUND The mechanism and time course of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after implantation of second-generation DES have not yet been fully elucidated. We sought to evaluate the differences in tissue characteristics between the different phases of ISR after second-generation DES implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT).Methods and Results:From June 2010 to December 2015, 324 consecutive patients with 337 ISR lesions underwent OCT. Of these, we analyzed 53 lesions in 53 patients who had their first ISR after second-generation DES implantation and underwent OCT before any procedures. According to the timing of ISR, the patients were divided into the early group (within 1 year: E-ISR, n=30) and late group (beyond 1 year: L-ISR, n=23). Quantitative parameters and qualitative characteristics of the neointima were evaluated. In the minimum lumen area site analysis, the E-ISR group had more frequently homogeneous intima than the L-ISR group (26.7% vs. 4.4%, P=0.02). The frequencies of neointima with lipid-laden, thin-cap fibroatheroma, neovascularization and macrophage infiltration were significantly higher in the L-ISR group than in the E-ISR group (30.0% vs. 69.6%, P<0.01; 0.0% vs. 26.1%, p <0.01; 6.7% vs. 26.1%, P=0.049; 3.3% vs. 26.1%, P=0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Neointimal tissue characteristics differed between E-ISR and L-ISR after second-generation DES implantation. E-ISR was mainly caused by neointimal hyperplasia, whereas neoatherosclerosis was the main mechanism of L-ISR.

Incidence and Clinical Impact of Stent Fracture After PROMUS Element Platinum Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the incidence and clinical impact of stent fracture (SF) after the PROMUS Element platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (PtCr-EES). BACKGROUND SF remains an unresolved, clinically relevant issue, even in the newer-generation drug-eluting stent era. METHODS From March 2012 to August 2013, 816 patients with 1,094 lesions were treated only with PtCr-EES and 700 patients (85.7%) with 898 lesions undergoing follow-up angiography within 9 months after the index procedure were analyzed. SF was defined as complete or partial separation of the stent, as assessed by plain fluoroscopy, intravascular ultrasound, or optical coherence tomography during the follow-up. We assessed the rate of SF and the cumulative incidence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization and definite stent thrombosis within 9 months after the index procedure. RESULTS SF was observed in 16 of 898 lesions (1.7%) and 16 of 700 patients (2.2%). Lesions with in-stent restenosis at baseline (odds ratio [OR]: 14.2, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 5.09 to 39.7; p < 0.001) or hinge motion (OR: 4.31, 95% CI: 1.12 to 16.5; p = 0.03), and total stent length (per 10-mm increase; OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.57; p = 0.001) were predictors of SF. Cumulative incidence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization within 9-months was numerically higher in the SF group than that in the non-SF group (18.7% vs. 2.3%). Cumulative incidence of definite stent thrombosis within 9 months after the index procedure was similar between the SF and non-SF groups (0.0% vs. 0.23%). CONCLUSIONS SF after PtCr-EES occurs in 1.7% of lesions and appears to be associated with clinically driven target lesion revascularization.

Five-Year Clinical Outcomes After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Following Rotational Atherectomy for Heavily Calcified Lesions

BACKGROUND Percutaneous coronary intervention for heavily calcified lesions requires rotational atherectomy (RA). Long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation following (RA) for heavily calcified lesions remain unclear. We assessed 5-year clinical outcomes after DES implantation following RA.Methods and Results:Between March 2006 and September 2011, 219 consecutive patients with 219 lesions treated with DES following RA, were retrospectively enrolled. The cumulative 5-year incidence of target-lesion revascularization (TLR) and definite stent thrombosis (ST) were assessed. The cumulative incidence of TLR within (≤) the first year was 18.6%. Late TLR beyond (>) 1 year continued to occur at 1.9% per year without a decrease in the rate (5-year incidence, 26.0%). The cumulative incidence of definite ST at 30 days, 1 and 5 years was 0.9%, 2.3% and 2.9%, respectively. The annual rate of definite ST beyond 1 year was 0.15%. On multivariate analysis, the significant predictor of TLR within 1 year was use of first-generation DES (hazard ratio [HR], 2.09; 95% CI: 1.10-4.03, P=0.02) and that of TLR beyond 1 year was hemodialysis (HR, 3.29; 95% CI: 1.06-10.55, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS Late TLR beyond 1 year continued to occur up to 5 years at a constant annual incidence, whereas very late ST was rare. Careful long-term clinical follow-up is continually needed in patients who have already received DES following RA for heavily calcified lesions.

Incidence and Long-Term Clinical Impact of Late-Acquired Stent Fracture After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in Narrowed Coronary Arteries

The incidence and long-term clinical impact of stent fracture (SF) occurred beyond 1 year after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation remains unclear. From April 2004 to March 2008, 985 consecutive patients with 1,307 lesions were treated only with SES. Of these, 868 patients (88.1%) with 1,140 lesions underwent follow-up angiography within 1 year after the index procedure, and 646 patients (65.6%) with 872 lesions underwent it both within and beyond 1 year after the index procedure. According to the diagnosed timing of SF, we divided the patients into the 2 groups: early SF (<1 year after the index procedure) and late-acquired SF (>1 year after the index procedure). Early- and late-acquired SFs were observed in 64 of 868 patients (7.4%) and 66 of 1,140 lesions (5.8%); 12 of 646 patients (1.9%) and 12 of 872 lesions (1.4%), respectively. Cumulative 10-year incidence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization and definite stent thrombosis were numerically higher in the early- and late-acquired SF groups than in the non-SF group (41.6% vs 45.5% vs 19.0%; 8.0% vs 8.3% vs 2.0%, respectively). In conclusion, late-acquired SF after SES implantation occurred in 1.4% of lesions, which was lower than that of early SF. However, both early- and late-acquired SFs appeared to be associated with clinically driven target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis during the long-term follow-up.

TCT-292 Three-year clinical outcome of patients treated with the Nobori biolimus-eluting stent and Xience/Promus cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent for unprotected left main disease

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate 3-year clinical outcome of patients treated with the Nobori biolimus-eluting stent (BES) compared to those with the Xience/Promus cobalt-chromium...