Makoto Saka

Platelet reactivity and hemorrhage risk in neurointerventional procedures under dual antiplatelet therapy

Background and purpose Hemorrhagic complications during neurointerventional procedures have various etiologies and can result in severe morbidity and mortality. This study investigated the possible association between low platelet reactivity measured by the VerifyNow assay and increased hemorrhagic complications during elective neurointervention under dual antiplatelet therapy. Methods From May 2010 to April 2013 we recorded baseline characteristics, P2Y12 reaction units (PRU), and aspirin reaction units using VerifyNow. The primary endpoint was post-procedural hemorrhagic complications. Results A total of 279 patients were enrolled and 31 major hemorrhagic complications (11.1%) were identified. From receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, PRU values could discriminate between patients with and without major hemorrhagic complications (area under the curve 0.63). Aspirin reaction unit values had no association with the primary outcome. The optimal cut-off for the primary outcome (PRU ≤175) was used to identify the low platelet reactivity group. The incidence of hemorrhagic complications was 20.0% in this group and 8.9% in the non-low platelet reactivity group. Multivariate analysis identified low platelet reactivity as an independent predictor for hemorrhagic complications. Conclusions The risk of hemorrhagic complications during elective neurointervention including cerebral aneurysm coil embolization and carotid artery stenting under dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with the response to clopidogrel but not to aspirin. A PRU value of ≤175 discriminates between patients with and without hemorrhagic complications. Future prospective studies are required to validate whether a specific PRU value around 170–180 is predictive of hemorrhagic complications.

Improving treatment times for patients with in-hospital stroke using a standardized protocol

BACKGROUND Previous reports have shown significant delays in treatment of in-hospital stroke (IHS). We developed and implemented our IHS alert protocol in April 2014. We aimed to determine the influence of implementation of our IHS alert protocol. METHODS Our implementation processes comprise the following four main steps: IHS protocol development, workshops for hospital staff to learn about the protocol, preparation of standardized IHS treatment kits, and obtaining feedback in a monthly hospital staff conference. We retrospectively compared protocol metrics and clinical outcomes of patients with IHS treated with intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular therapy between before (January 2008-March 2014) and after implementation (April 2014-December 2016). RESULTS Fifty-five patients were included (pre, 25; post, 30). After the implementation, significant reductions occurred in the median time from stroke recognition to evaluation by a neurologist (30 vs. 13.5min, p<0.01) and to first neuroimaging (50 vs. 26.5min, p<0.01) and in the median time from first neuroimaging to intravenous thrombolysis (45 vs. 16min, p=0.02). The median time from first neuroimaging to endovascular therapy had a tendency to decrease (75 vs. 53min, p=0.08). There were no differences in the favorable outcomes (modified Rankin scale score of 0-2) at discharge or the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between the two periods. CONCLUSION Our IHS alert protocol implementation saved time in treating patients with IHS without compromising safety.

Dural and Pial Arteriovenous Fistulas Connected to the Same Drainer in the Middle Cranial Fossa: A Case Report

BACKGROUND Dural arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) in the middle cranial fossa are rare. Pial AVFs are similarly rare but differ from dural AVFs in that they derive their arterial supply from pial or cortical arterial vessels and do not lie within the intradural region. We report an extremely rare case of dural and pial AVF connected to the same drainer in the middle cranial fossa. CASE DESCRIPTION In a 58-year-old man with a subcortical hemorrhage in the right temporal lobe, digital subtraction angiography showed a dural AVF in the middle cranial fossa fed by the middle meningeal artery (MMA) and draining into the sphenopetrosal vein. A combination with a small pial AVF connected to the same sphenopetrosal vein was suspected. Open surgery was performed to directly observe the shunt points. Transarterial indocyanine green (ICG) angiography using the MMA via the superficial temporal artery on a skin flap was performed to repeatedly and distinctly evaluate the dural shunt points and to prevent cerebral thromboembolism. Although the dural supply was completely disconnected, the sphenopetrosal vein remained arterialized. ICG angiography revealed pial AVF, which was fed by the cortical arteries draining into the same drainer. The pial supply was completely disconnected, and disappearance of the dural and pial AVF was confirmed. CONCLUSIONS We report an extremely rare case of dural and pial AVF connected to the same drainer in the middle cranial fossa. To our knowledge, this is the first such case report described in the literature.