Malik Y. Kahook
University of Pittsburgh
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Malik Y. Kahook.
British Journal of Ophthalmology | 2007
Tara H Cronin; Malik Y. Kahook; Kira L. Lathrop; Robert J. Noecker
Aim: To evaluate the recently introduced Travatan Dosing Aid (TDA) for its accuracy in recording and dispensing eyedrops. Methods: The number of eyedrops dispensed with each lever depression and agreement of total number of drops dispensed with that recorded by the device was evaluated in a controlled setting. Results: The TDA correctly recorded a drop being dispensed 100% of the time with full TDA lever depression for <3 s. Under these conditions, agreement between numbers of drops dispensed and recorded was 99%. However, failure to fully depress the lever or prolonged lever depression for >4 s resulted in unreliable TDA recording. Conclusion: Eyedrops were reliably recorded by the TDA after each full lever depression. However, patients need to be instructed about optimal technique so that evaluation of compliance is not confounded by mechanical factors.
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | 2007
M. Pantcheva; Malik Y. Kahook; Joel S. Schuman; Marc Rubin; Robert J. Noecker
Background:u2003 The objective of this study is to investigate the acute histological effects of transscleral cyclophotocoagulation and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation on the ciliary body and other structures of porcine eyes compared with untreated controls.
British Journal of Ophthalmology | 2006
Malik Y. Kahook; Robert J. Noecker; M. Pantcheva; Joel S. Schuman
Background: Limited data are available to guide optimal positioning of glaucoma drainage devices (GDD) in relation to the limbus and optic nerve. The authors aim to provide guidelines for appropriate and safe GDD implantation. Method: The optimal positioning of five different GDD were evaluated using necropsy eyes of varying axial lengths. The dependent variable that was measured was the maximum distance that a GDD could be placed posterior to the limbus while remaining 2 mm away from the optic nerve. Results: The average maximum distance posterior to the limbus of the anterior plate edge ranged between 9.0–15.0 mm in the superotemporal quadrant for the GDD tested. The distances for superonasal, inferonasal, and inferotemporal quadrants ranged between 8.0–14.0 mm, 9.0–14.0 mm, and 11.0–17.0 mm, respectively. The Molteno device could be placed most posteriorly while remaining 2 mm away from the nerve. The Ahmed FP7 and S2 were the least amenable to posterior placement before encroaching on the 2 mm limit. Conclusion: The maximum distance that a GDD can be placed posterior to the limbus, before encroachment around the optic nerve, varies between different devices and quadrants of placement. Taking a measurement of the exact distance of the plate from the limbus during GDD surgery is recommended.
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 2007
Malik Y. Kahook; Robert J. Noecker; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; Larry Kagemann; Maciej Wojtkowski; Jay S. Duker; Vivek J. Srinivasan; James G. Fujimoto; Joel S. Schuman
Archive | 2008
Joel S. Schuman; Viki Christopoulos; Deepinder K. Dhaliwal; Malik Y. Kahook; Robert J. Noecker
Archive | 2008
Malik Y. Kahook; Joel S. Schuman
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery | 2006
Malik Y. Kahook; Joel S. Schuman; Robert J. Noecker
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2006
L. Camejo; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Robert J. Noecker; Malik Y. Kahook; Joel S. Schuman
Archive | 2015
Malik Y. Kahook; Joel S. Schuman
Glaucoma (Second Edition) | 2015
Malik Y. Kahook; Joel S. Schuman