Manabu Nukaya

The role of the dioxin-responsive element cluster between the Cyp1a1 and Cyp1a2 loci in aryl hydrocarbon receptor biology.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) plays a central role in 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (dioxin) hepatotoxicity, regulation of xenobiotic metabolism, and hepatovascular development. Each of these processes appears to be dependent on binding of the AHR to dioxin- responsive elements (DREs) within the genome. The Cyp1a1 and Cyp1a2 loci represent linked genes thought to play important roles in AHR biology. In the mouse, 8 DREs are located in the 14-kb intergenic region between the Cyp1a1 and Cyp1a2 genes. Seven of these DREs, collectively known as the DRE cluster (DREC), are located 1.4 kb upstream of the Cyp1a1 transcriptional start site and 12.6 kb upstream of the Cyp1a2 start site. To investigate the role of the DREC in each aspect of AHR biology, we generated a DREC-deficient mouse model through homologous recombination. Using this mouse model, we demonstrate that the DREC controls the adaptive up-regulation of both Cyp1a1 and Cyp1a2 genes in vivo. Using selected aspects of acute hepatic injury as endpoints, we also demonstrate that DREC null mice are more sensitive to dioxin-induced hepatotoxicity than WT mice. The results of parallel toxicologic studies using individual Cyp1a1 and Cyp1a2 null mice support the observation that up-regulation of these P450s is not the cause of many aspects of dioxin hepatotoxicity. Finally, we observed normal closure of the ductus venosus (DV) in DREC null mice. Given the 100% penetrance of patent DV in Ahr null mice, these results indicate that Cyp1a1 and Cyp1a2 do not play a dominant role in AHR-mediated vascular development.

The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor-interacting Protein (AIP) Is Required for Dioxin-induced Hepatotoxicity but Not for the Induction of the Cyp1a1 and Cyp1a2 Genes

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) plays an essential role in the toxic response to environmental pollutants such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (dioxin), in the adaptive up-regulation of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes, and in hepatic vascular development. In our model of AHR signaling, the receptor is found in a cytosolic complex with a number of molecular chaperones, including Hsp90, p23, and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP), also known as ARA9 and XAP2. To understand the role of AIP in adaptive and toxic aspects of AHR signaling, we generated a conditional mouse model where the Aip locus can be deleted in hepatocytes. Using this model, we demonstrate two important roles for the AIP protein in AHR biology. (i) The expression of AIP in hepatocytes is essential to maintain high levels of functional cytosolic AHR protein in the mammalian liver. (ii) Expression of the AIP protein is essential for dioxin-induced hepatotoxicity. Interestingly, classical AHR-driven genes show differential dependence on AIP expression. The Cyp1b1 and Ahrr genes require AIP expression for normal up-regulation by dioxin, whereas Cyp1a1 and Cyp1a2 do not. This differential dependence on AIP provides evidence that the mammalian genome contains more than one class of AHR-responsive genes and suggests that a search for AIP-dependent, AHR-responsive genes may guide us to the targets of the dioxin-induced hepatotoxicity.

SU5416, a VEGF Receptor Inhibitor and Ligand of the AHR, Represents a New Alternative for Immunomodulation

The experimental compound SU5416 went as far as Phase III clinical trials as an anticancer agent, putatively because of its activity as a VEGFR-2 inhibitor, but showed poor results. Here, we show that SU5416 is also an aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) agonist with unique properties. Like TCDD, SU5416 favors induction of indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase (IDO) in immunologically relevant populations such as dendritic cells in an AHR-dependent manner, leading to generation of regulatory T-cells in vitro. These characteristics lead us to suggest that SU5416 may be an ideal clinical agent for treatment of autoimmune diseases and prevention of transplant rejection, two areas where regulatory ligands of the AHR have shown promise. At the same time, AHR agonism might represent a poor characteristic for an anticancer drug, as regulatory T-cells can inhibit clearance of cancer cells, and activation of the AHR can lead to upregulation of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes that might influence the half-lives of co-administered chemotherapeutic agents. Not only does SU5416 activate the human AHR with a potency approaching 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, but it also activates polymorphic murine receptor isoforms (encoded by the Ahrd and Ahrb1 alleles) with similar potency, a finding that has rarely been described and may have implications in identifying true endogenous ligands of this receptor.

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated suppression of GH receptor and Janus kinase 2 expression in mice

Differential mRNA display revealed that a cDNA encoding the major urinary protein 2 (MUP2) that belongs to the lipocalin superfamily was absent in livers of mice treated with 3‐methylcholanthrene (MC). The expression of MUP2 is known to be stimulated by growth hormone (GH), through the GH receptor (GHR), Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5) signal transduction pathway. Since MC is an aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligand, the effects of MC treatment on the expression of GHR, JAK2 or STAT5 in the livers of wild‐type or AhR‐null mice were examined. The result indicated that the expression of GHR and JAK2 mRNA was greatly decreased by MC in wild‐type mice but not in AhR‐null mice. In addition, the binding activity of STAT5 bound to STAT5‐binding element was reduced after MC treatment in wild‐type mice but not in AhR‐null mice. Based on these results, we conclude that the suppression of MUP2 mRNA expression by MC is caused by the AhR‐mediated disruption of the GH signaling pathway. Possible mechanism(s) by which exposure to aromatic hydrocarbons causes a decrease in the body weight of mice, which has been referred to as wasting syndrome, will also be discussed.

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-dependent apoptotic cell death induced by the flavonoid chrysin in human colorectal cancer cells

The polyphenolic flavone chrysin has been evaluated as a natural chemopreventive agent due to its anti-cancer effects in a variety of cancer cell lines. However, the mechanism of the chemopreventive effect has been not well established, especially in human colorectal cancer cells. We evaluated the chemopreventive effect of chrysin in three different human colorectal cancer cell lines. We found that chrysin treatment consequently reduced cell viability via induction of apoptosis. We identified that the involvement of up-regulation of pro-apoptotic cytokines tumor necrosis factor (Tnf) α and β genes and consequent activation of the TNF-mediated transcriptional pathway in chrysin-induced apoptosis. Using our generated AHR siRNA expressing colorectal cancer cells, we demonstrated that the chrysin-induced up-regulation of Tnfα and β gene expression was dependent on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), which is a ligand-receptor for chrysin. Subsequently, we found that the AHR siRNA expressing colorectal cancer cells were resistant to chrysin-induced apoptosis. Therefore, we concluded that AHR is required for the chrysin-induced apoptosis and the up-regulation of Tnfα and β gene expression in human colorectal cancer cells.

The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor is a Repressor of Inflammation-associated Colorectal Tumorigenesis in Mouse

Objective: To determine the role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) in colitis-associated colorectal tumorigenesis. Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in United States. Chronic intestinal inflammation increases the risk for the development of CRC. We investigated the involvement of AHR, a ligand-activated transcriptional regulator, in colitis-associated colorectal tumorigenesis. Methods: We used a mouse model of colitis-associated colorectal tumorigenesis that employs treatment with azoxymethane and dextran sodium sulfate. We examined the role of AHR using both an Ahr-deletion mouse model (Ahr&Dgr;2/&Dgr;2) and treatment with the AHR pro-agonist indole-3-carbinol (I3C). Incidence, multiplicity, and location of tumors were visually counted. Tumors were defined as neoplasms. Intestinal inflammation was assessed by quantitative PCR for proinflammatory markers and colon length. Data were evaluated and compared using GraphPad Prism software (version 6, La Jolla, CA). Results: Tumor incidence was increased 32% in Ahr null mice and tumor multiplicity was approximately increased 3-fold compared with wild-type mice (2.4 vs 7; P < 0.05). Furthermore, tumor multiplicity was reduced 92% by treatment of I3C in wild-type mice, whereas the suppressor effect of I3C was not observed in Ahr null mice (P < 0.05). Conclusions: We found that AHR plays a protective role in colitis-associated colorectal tumorigenesis. This conclusion is based on the observations that Ahr null mice showed increased number of colorectal tumors, and mice treated with I3C exhibited fewer tumors. This study supports the use of AHR agonists such as I3C as a chemopreventive therapy for IBD-associated CRC in human patients.

Indole-3-carbinol induces tumor cell death: function follows form

BACKGROUND Even with colonoscopy screening and preventive measures becoming more commonplace, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the third leading cause of oncologic death in the United States as of 2014. Many chemotherapeutics exist for the treatment of colorectal cancer, though they often come with significant side effect profiles or narrow efficacy ranges in terms of patient profile. Dietary phytochemicals such as glucobrassicin and its metabolite indole-3-carbinol (I3C) have been implicated in tumor prevention in many preclinical models across a variety of gastrointestinal tumors and represent an intriguing new class of natural chemotherapeutics for CRC. I3C has been identified as a ligand of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), and we aimed to characterize this AHR activation in relation to its cytotoxic properties. METHODS Human colorectal cancer cell lines DLD1, HCT116, HT-29, LS513, and RKO were treated with indole-3-carbinol or vehicle. Cell viability was assessed via a fluorescent product assay, and apoptotic activity was assessed via a luminescent signal tied to a ratio of caspase-3 and caspase-7 activity. Gene expression of AHR and CYP1A1 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) was measured using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Small interfering RNA stable expression lines were established on a HCT116 background using a laboratory-developed transfection protocol as published elsewhere. RESULTS Multiple colorectal cancer cell types express increased CYP1A1 mRNA levels (a specific marker of AHR-driven activity) after treatment with I3C, characterizing I3C treatment as agonistic of this pathway. Also, I3C induced a dose-dependent decrease in cell viability as well as inducing apoptosis. Furthermore, using small interfering RNA interference to knockdown AHR responsiveness generated a significant resistance to the chemotherapeutic actions of indole-3-carbinol regarding both cell viability and apoptotic activity. CONCLUSIONS Some degree of the cytotoxic and proapoptotic effects of indole-3-carbinol on colon cancer cells is dependent on activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. This represents a novel mechanism for the molecular action of indole-3-carbinol and enhances our understanding of its effects in the context of colorectal cancer. Continued preclinical study of both indole-3-carbinol and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway is warranted, which may one day lead to novel diet-derived colon cancer treatments that enlist the AHR.

621 Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Is Required for Induction of Apoptosis by the Flavonoid Chrysin in Colon Tumor Cells

INTRODUCTION Gastroparesis is a functional disorder resulting in debilitating nausea, overflow esophageal reflux & abdominal pain and is frequently refractory to medical treatment. Surgical therapies such as pyloroplasty and neurostimulators aim to facilitate emptying. When treatments to facilitate gastric emptying fail, subtotal gastrectomy has been employed with varying success. Herein, we examined outcomes after gastrectomy for diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis. METHODS A prospective database was queried for gastrectomies with Roux-en-Y reconstruction performed for gastroparesis from 1993-2013. Primary outcomes were improvements in preversus post-operative symptoms at last followup, measured on a 5-point scale. Secondary outcomewas operative morbidity. RESULTS Thirty-five patients underwent total or near-total gastrectomies for idiopathic (23%), post-operative(43%), or diabetic (34%) gastroparesis. Anti-emetics and pro-kinetics afforded no relief in 34.5% of patients. There were no operative mortalities. Six patients suffered a leak requiring anastomotic revision. With a median follow-up of 11.4 months, nausea improved or resolved in 70% after surgery. Chronic abdominal pain improved or resolved in 69% of patients. Belching and bloating resolved for 75% & 81%, respectively (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Regardless of etiology, medically-refractrory gastroparesis is a chronic and devastating disease. Surgery can ameliorate, and often relieve symptoms of nausea, excessive belching and gas bloat. Chronic abdominal pain commonly resolved or improved with resection. Despite attendant morbidity, gastrectomy can palliate symptoms of gastroparesis.