Manjit McNeill
Biogen Idec
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Manjit McNeill.
Lancet Neurology | 2014
Gavin Giovannoni; Ralf Gold; Krzysztof Selmaj; Eva Havrdova; Xavier Montalban; Ernst-Wilhelm Radue; Dusan Stefoski; Manjit McNeill; Lakshmi Amaravadi; Marianne Sweetser; Jacob Elkins; Gilmore O'neill
BACKGROUND In the SELECT trial, disease activity was reduced in patients with multiple sclerosis who received daclizumab high-yield process (HYP) for 52 weeks. The primary aim of the SELECTION extension study was to assess the safety and immunogenicity of extended treatment with daclizumab HYP. METHODS A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, 52-week extension trial was done in 74 centres in the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, India, Poland, Russia, Ukraine, and the UK between Feb 13, 2009, and Oct 3, 2012. Eligible patients were aged 18-55 years, had relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, and had completed the SELECT study. Patients who received placebo in SELECT were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 150 mg or 300 mg subcutaneous daclizumab HYP every 4 weeks for 52 weeks (treatment initiation group); those who had received daclizumab HYP were randomly assigned (1:1) to continue their present dose with (washout and re-initiation group) or without (continuous treatment group) a washout period of 20 weeks. All randomisation was done with a centralised, interactive voice-response system. Patients and personnel were masked to treatment assignment, except for the site pharmacist who prepared the study drug but had no interaction with patients. The primary endpoints were the safety and immunogenicity of daclizumab HYP. Analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00870740. FINDINGS 517 (91%) of 567 patients who completed the SELECT trial entered SELECTION, of whom 170 were in the treatment initiation group, 173 in the continuous treatment group, and 174 in the washout and re-initiation group. 11 patients in the treatment initiation group (6%), 13 in the continuous treatment group (8%), and ten in the washout and re-initiation group (6%) had any serious adverse event other than relapse of multiple sclerosis. One patient in the washout and re-initiation group (300 mg daclizumab HYP) died because of autoimmune hepatitis; a contributory role of daclizumab HYP could not be excluded. Seven patients tested positive for neutralising antidrug antibodies: one (1%) of 128 for whom data were available in the continuous treatment group (this patient also tested positive at SELECTION baseline), four (2%) in the treatment initiation group, and two (2%) of 129 in the washout and re-initiation group. INTERPRETATION Adverse events and immunogenicity were not increased in the second year of continuous treatment with daclizumab HYP or during treatment washout and re-initiation. These results support further assessment of daclizumab HYP for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. FUNDING Biogen Idec and AbbVie Biotherapeutics.
Multiple Sclerosis Journal | 2016
Raymond Hupperts; Jan Lycke; Christine Short; Claudio Gasperini; Manjit McNeill; Rossella Medori; Agata Tofil-Kaluza; Maria Hovenden; Lahar Mehta; Jacob Elkins
Background: Mobility impairment is a common disability in MS and negatively impacts patients’ lives. Objective: Evaluate the effect of prolonged-release (PR) fampridine (extended-release dalfampridine in the United States) on self-assessed walking disability, dynamic/static balance and safety in patients with MS. Methods: MOBILE was a randomised, double-blind, exploratory, placebo-controlled trial. Patients with progressive/relapsing-remitting MS and Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 4.0–7.0 were treated with PR-fampridine or placebo twice daily for 24 weeks. Efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in the 12-item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Results: 132 patients were randomised at 24 sites in six countries. PR-fampridine therapy resulted in greater median improvements from baseline in MSWS-12 score, TUG speed and BBS total score versus placebo over 24 weeks. A higher proportion of patients receiving PR-fampridine versus placebo experienced significant improvements at MSWS-12 improvement thresholds ⩾7 (p = 0.0275), ⩾8 (p = 0.0153) and ⩾9 points (p = 0.0088) and TUG speed thresholds ⩾10% (p = 0.0021) and ⩾15% (p = 0.0262). PR-fampridine was well tolerated. Conclusions: PR-fampridine therapy resulted in early and sustained improvements in broad measures of walking and balance over six months.
Multiple Sclerosis Journal – Experimental, Translational and Clinical | 2015
Lahar Mehta; Manjit McNeill; Jeremy Hobart; Kathleen W. Wyrwich; Jiat-Ling Poon; Priscilla Auguste; John Zhong; Jacob Elkins
Background The 12-question Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12v1) is a widely-used patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure of walking ability in multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective To estimate the magnitude of an important change in MSWS-12v1 scores for the interpretation of meaningful subject-level improvements across a 6-month trial of MS patients with walking disability. Methods MOBILE was a 6-month exploratory study assessing fampridine’s effect on walking ability in 132 people with MS. Three PRO measures assessed walking ability: MSWS-12v1, EuroQol 5-Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) mobility question, and a patient global impression of change (PGIC) in overall walking ability. Pre-specified anchor- and distribution-based analyses estimated the MSWS-12v1 change scores representing an important change for participants. Results were triangulated to propose a single best value indicating meaningful improvement. Results Using baseline to week 2 through week 24 change scores, anchor-based analyses demonstrated mean and median improvements of 5.2–6.6 (PGIC) and 9.7–13.4 (EQ-5D-5L mobility) points on the MSWS-12v1, indicating meaningful improvements. The distribution-based estimate was 6.8 points. Triangulation across the results suggested an 8-point reduction in MSWS-12v1 score represents an important subject-level change in these participants. Conclusion In similar MS clinical trials, an 8-point improvement on the MSWS-12v1 is a reasonable estimate of meaningful improvement in walking ability.
Journal of the Neurological Sciences | 2016
Claudio Gasperini; Raymond Hupperts; Jan Lycke; Christine Short; Manjit McNeill; John Zhong; Lahar Mehta
Prolonged-release (PR) fampridine is approved to treat walking impairment in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS); however, treatment benefits may extend beyond walking. MOBILE was a phase 2, 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory study to assess the impact of 10mg PR-fampridine twice daily versus placebo on several subject-assessed measures. This analysis evaluated the physical and psychological health outcomes of subjects with progressing or relapsing MS from individual items of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29). PR-fampridine treatment (n=68) resulted in greater improvements from baseline in the MSIS-29 physical (PHYS) and psychological (PSYCH) impact subscales, with differences of 89% and 148% in mean score reduction from baseline (n=64) at week 24 versus placebo, respectively. MSIS-29 item analysis showed that a higher percentage of PR-fampridine subjects had mean improvements in 16/20 PHYS and 6/9 PSYCH items versus placebo after 24weeks. Post hoc analysis of the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) improver population (≥8-point mean improvement) demonstrated differences in mean reductions from baseline of 97% and 111% in PR-fampridine MSIS-29 PHYS and PSYCH subscales versus the overall placebo group over 24weeks. A higher percentage of MSWS-12 improvers treated with PR-fampridine showed mean improvements in 20/20 PHYS and 8/9 PSYCH items versus placebo at 24weeks. In conclusion, PR-fampridine resulted in physical and psychological benefits versus placebo, sustained over 24weeks.
Archive | 2016
Jeremy Hobart; Tjalf Ziemssen; Peter Feys; Michael Linnebank; Andrew D. Goodman; Rachel Farrell; V. Englishby; Manjit McNeill; Ih Chang; Lahar Mehta; Jacob Elkins
Neurology | 2017
Jeremy Hobart; Tjalf Ziemssen; Peter Feys; Michael Linnebank; Andrew D. Goodman; Rachel Farrell; Veronica Englishby; Manjit McNeill; Ih Chang; Lahar Mehta; Jacob Elkins
Journal of the Neurological Sciences | 2017
Jeremy Hobart; Raymond Hupperts; Michael Linnebank; C. Acosta; Manjit McNeill; G. Lima
European Journal of Neurology | 2017
Jeremy Hobart; Tjalf Ziemssen; Peter Feys; Michael Linnebank; Andrew D. Goodman; R. Farrell; Raymond Hupperts; V. Englishby; Manjit McNeill; Ih Chang; G. Lima
Value in Health | 2014
Y Liu; Manjit McNeill; A. Lee; John Zhong; Lahar Mehta
Neurology | 2014
Jacob Elkins; Eva Havrdova; Manjit McNeill; Katherine Riester; Ernst-Wilhelm Radue