Manoj J. Raval

Advances in minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the USA. Surgery is the primary treatment for most patients with CRC. Over the past 15 years, minimally invasive techniques for colorectal surgery have been developed. There is growing evidence that these techniques have significant advantages in short-term outcomes (e.g., postoperative pain and length of hospital stay) with similar long-term recurrence and overall survival. While transanal local excision has been shown to be inferior to radical resection for early rectal cancer, transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive technique that appears to facilitate local excision in appropriate patients. TEM combined with radiotherapy has demonstrated promising early results and is currently being investigated in clinical trials as a potential alternative to radical surgery. We summarize the current literature on these minimally invasive approaches to CRC.

Outcomes of unselected patients with pathologic T3N0 rectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This study compares the outcomes of patients with pathological (p) T3N0 rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (S), surgery and radiation (SR) or surgery, radiation and chemotherapy (SRC), in a population based setting. MATERIALS Three hundred and seven patients with operable, macroscopically resected pT3N0 rectal cancer referred to the BC Cancer Agency between 2000 and 2004 were segregated by treatment type: S (n=65), SR (n=97) and SRC (n=145). Patient characteristics, 5-year locoregional recurrence (LRR) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared between treatment cohorts. RESULTS Median age differed significantly between S, SR and SRC patient cohorts: 76, 72 and 64 years respectively. Five-year LRR differed by treatment group, with 29% for S, 6.3% for SR and 3.84% for SRC patients. DSS was superior in SRC compared to S patients (hazard ratio=0.31 [0.17, 0.60]). Co-morbidities and patient preference were most common reasons for omission of radiation. CONCLUSIONS Unselected patients with pT3N0 rectal cancer not treated with peri-operative radiation experience a high rate of LRR and reduced DSS in comparison to patients treated with bimodality and trimodality therapies. Advanced age is significantly associated with omission of therapy in patients with early stage rectal cancer.

The accuracy of endorectal ultrasound in staging rectal lesions in patients undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery

BACKGROUND Endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) is used to preoperatively assess locoregional stage in patients with rectal neoplasms. This study evaluates the accuracy of ERUS in determining the T stage of rectal neoplasms treated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). METHODS All patients in the St Pauls Hospital TEM database were evaluated and excluded if they had been treated with neoadjuvant therapy. ERUS results were compared with gold-standard postoperative histopathology reports. Tumor height from anal verge was measured by ERUS and endoscopic techniques. RESULTS Fifty-three patients were eligible to participate in the study. A Friedman test demonstrated significant difference in the T stage between ERUS and the histopathology reports (P < .001). The tumor height measured by ERUS is significantly higher than the height measured by endoscopy (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS This study confirms that ERUS often overstages rectal neoplasms and suggests that ERUS findings should not preclude TEM in clinically appropriate patients.

Tattooing or not? A review of current practice and outcomes for laparoscopic colonic resection following endoscopy at a tertiary care centre

Background Because small colonic tumours may not be visualized or palpated during laparoscopy, location of the lesion must be identified before surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the current recommendation of endoscopic tattooing of lesions prior to laparoscopic colonic resections. Methods All consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic resection for a colonic lesion at a single tertiary institution between 2013 and 2015 were identified for chart review. Results In total, 224 patients underwent laparoscopic resection for a benign or malignant colonic lesion during the study period. All patients had a complete colonoscopy preoperatively. In all, 148 patients (66%) had their lesion tattooed at endoscopy. Most lesions were tattooed distally, but 15% were tattooed either proximally, both proximally and distally, or tattooed without specifying location as proximal or distal. Tattoo localization was accurate in 69% of cases. Tattooed lesions were not visible during surgery 21.5% of time; 2 cases were converted to open surgery to identify the lesion. Inaccuracy in endoscopic localization led to change in surgical plan in 16% of surgeries. In the nontattooed group, 1 case was converted to open surgery to localize the lesion, 3 required intraoperative colonoscopy and 1 had positive margins on final pathology. Conclusion To improve surgical planning, we recommend the practice of endoscopic tattooing of all colon lesions at a location just distal to the lesion using multiple injections to cover the circumference of the bowel wall.