Manoli Vourvahis

Genital Tract, Cord Blood, and Amniotic Fluid Exposures of Seven Antiretroviral Drugs during and after Pregnancy in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected Women

ABSTRACT The objective of the study was to measure antiretroviral exposures in four physiological compartments during pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum. This prospective, open-label, longitudinal study collected paired blood plasma (BP) and genital tract (GT) aspirates antepartum, at delivery, and up to 12 weeks postpartum. Antiretroviral cord BP and amniotic fluid concentrations were also measured. Drug concentrations were analyzed by validated high-performance liquid chromatography/UV and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry methods, with secondary compartment concentrations presented as the percentage of BP. Fourteen women taking lamivudine plus zidovudine and either lopinavir-ritonavir (n = 7), nelfinavir (n = 6), or nevirapine (n = 1) were enrolled; four also received tenofovir. GT penetration relative to BP was highest for the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors compared to the protease inhibitors and nevirapine. Only antepartum nelfinavir GT penetration was significantly higher than in the second trimester (geometric mean ratio [GMR], 179.3) or third trimester (GMR, 41.9). Compared to nonpregnant historical controls, antepartum GT penetration was significantly lower (P < 0.05) for zidovudine (GMR, 0.25) and lopinavir (GMR, 0.03); postpartum lopinavir GT penetration continued to be significantly lower (GMR, 0.27). Cord BP exposures were highest for lamivudine and tenofovir (≥100%), with cord BP levels of the remaining drugs ranging from 49 to 86% of that of the respective BP level. Amniotic exposures for lamivudine, zidovudine, tenofovir, and nelfinavir were ≥100%, nevirapine exposure was 53%, and lopinavir and ritonavir exposures were ≤6% that of BP. We conclude that GT, cord BP, and amniotic fluid exposures vary within and between antiretroviral drug classes and biologic sites. Measurement of antiretroviral exposure in maternal genital secretions, cord BP, and amniotic fluid may be needed to identify signals of subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic drug exposure.

Excretion and Metabolism of Lersivirine (5-{[3,5-Diethyl-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)(3,5-14C2)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]oxy}benzene-1,3-dicarbonitrile), a Next-Generation Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor, after Administration of [14C]Lersivirine to Healthy Volunteers

Lersivirine [UK-453,061, 5-((3,5-diethyl-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)(3,5-14C2)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)oxy)benzene-1,3-dicarbonitrile] is a next-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, with a unique binding interaction within the reverse transcriptase binding pocket. Lersivirine has shown antiviral activity and is well tolerated in HIV-infected and healthy subjects. This open-label, Phase I study investigated the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of a single oral 500-mg dose of [14C]lersivirine (parent drug) and characterized the plasma, fecal, and urinary radioactivity of lersivirine and its metabolites in four healthy male volunteers. Plasma Cmax for total radioactivity and unchanged lersivirine typically occurred between 0.5 and 3 h postdose. The majority of radioactivity was excreted in urine (∼80%) with the remainder excreted in the feces (∼20%). The blood/plasma ratio of total drug-derived radioactivity [area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero extrapolated to infinite time (AUCinf)] was 0.48, indicating that radioactive material was distributed predominantly into plasma. Lersivirine was extensively metabolized, primarily by UDP glucuronosyltransferase- and cytochrome P450-dependent pathways, with 22 metabolites being identified in this study. Analysis of precipitated plasma revealed that the lersivirine-glucuronide conjugate was the major circulating component (45% of total radioactivity), whereas unchanged lersivirine represented 13% of total plasma radioactivity. In vitro studies showed that UGT2B7 and CYP3A4 are responsible for the majority of lersivirine metabolism in humans.

Once-daily maraviroc versus tenofovir/emtricitabine each combined with darunavir/ritonavir for initial HIV-1 treatment.

Objective:The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of maraviroc along with darunavir/ritonavir, all once daily, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 infected individuals. Design:MODERN was a multicentre, double-blind, noninferiority, phase III study in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral-naive adults with plasma HIV-1 RNA at least 1000 copies/ml and no evidence of reduced susceptibility to study drugs. Methods:At screening, participants were randomized 1 : 1 to undergo either genotypic or phenotypic tropism testing. Participants with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 were randomized 1 : 1 to receive maraviroc 150 mg once daily or tenofovir/emtricitabine once daily each with darunavir/ritonavir once daily for 96 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml (Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm) at Week 48. A substudy evaluated bone mineral density, body fat distribution and serum bone turnover markers. Results:Seven hundred and ninety-seven participants were dosed (maraviroc, n = 396; tenofovir/emtricitabine, n = 401). The Data Monitoring Committee recommended early study termination due to inferior efficacy in the maraviroc group. At Week 48, the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml was 77.3% for maraviroc and 86.8% for tenofovir/emtricitabine [difference of −9.54% (95% confidence interval: −14.83 to −4.24)]. More maraviroc participants discontinued for lack of efficacy, which was not associated with non-R5 tropism or resistance. Discontinuations for adverse events, Category C events, Grade 3/4 adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were similar between groups. Conclusion:A once-daily nucleos(t)ide-sparing two-drug regimen of maraviroc and darunavir/ritonavir was inferior to a three-drug regimen of tenofovir/emtricitabine and darunavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral-naive adults.

Excretion and Metabolism of Lersivirine (UK-453,061), a Next Generation NNRTI, Following Administration of [14C] Lersivirine to Healthy Volunteers

Lersivirine [UK-453,061, 5-((3,5-diethyl-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)(3,5-14C2)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)oxy)benzene-1,3-dicarbonitrile] is a next-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, with a unique binding interaction within the reverse transcriptase binding pocket. Lersivirine has shown antiviral activity and is well tolerated in HIV-infected and healthy subjects. This open-label, Phase I study investigated the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of a single oral 500-mg dose of [14C]lersivirine (parent drug) and characterized the plasma, fecal, and urinary radioactivity of lersivirine and its metabolites in four healthy male volunteers. Plasma Cmax for total radioactivity and unchanged lersivirine typically occurred between 0.5 and 3 h postdose. The majority of radioactivity was excreted in urine (∼80%) with the remainder excreted in the feces (∼20%). The blood/plasma ratio of total drug-derived radioactivity [area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero extrapolated to infinite time (AUCinf)] was 0.48, indicating that radioactive material was distributed predominantly into plasma. Lersivirine was extensively metabolized, primarily by UDP glucuronosyltransferase- and cytochrome P450-dependent pathways, with 22 metabolites being identified in this study. Analysis of precipitated plasma revealed that the lersivirine-glucuronide conjugate was the major circulating component (45% of total radioactivity), whereas unchanged lersivirine represented 13% of total plasma radioactivity. In vitro studies showed that UGT2B7 and CYP3A4 are responsible for the majority of lersivirine metabolism in humans.

The effects of boceprevir and telaprevir on the pharmacokinetics of maraviroc: an open-label, fixed-sequence study in healthy volunteers.

Objective:To evaluate the effects of boceprevir (BOC) and telaprevir (TVR) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of maraviroc (MVC) in healthy volunteers. Methods:In this open-label, fixed-sequence study, 14 volunteers received MVC 150 mg twice daily alone for 5 days (period 1), followed by MVC + BOC 800 mg 3 times daily and MVC + TVR 750 mg 3 times daily, each for 10 days in periods 2 and 3, respectively, with a ≥10-day wash-out. PK was analyzed on day 5 of period 1 and day 10 of periods 2 and 3. Safety was also assessed. Results:Ratios of the adjusted geometric means (90% confidence intervals) for MVC area under the curve from predose to 12 hours, maximum plasma concentration, and plasma concentration at 12 hours were 3.02 (2.53 to 3.59), 3.33 (2.54 to 4.36), and 2.78 (2.40 to 3.23), respectively, for MVC + BOC versus MVC alone, and 9.49 (7.94 to 11.34), 7.81 (5.92 to 10.32), and 10.17 (8.73 to 11.85), respectively, for MVC + TVR versus MVC alone. PK profiles for MVC + BOC or TVR were consistent with historic values for BOC and TVR monotherapy. Adverse event incidence was higher with MVC + BOC and MVC + TVR versus MVC alone. Dysgeusia (50%) and pruritus (29%) occurred most commonly with MVC + BOC, and fatigue (46%) and headache (31%) with MVC + TVR. There were no serious adverse events. Conclusions:MVC exposures were significantly increased with BOC or TVR, therefore MVC should be dosed at 150 mg twice daily when coadministered with these newly approved hepatitis C protease inhibitors. No dose adjustment for BOC or TVR is warranted with MVC. MVC + BOC or TVR was generally well tolerated with no unexpected safety findings.

Effect of lersivirine co-administration on pharmacokinetics of methadone in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND Lersivirine is a next-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor under development for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. HIV-1-infected patients receiving methadone may have a limited choice of antiretroviral agents due to drug-drug interactions. As methadone is metabolized by CYP3A4 and lersivirine is a weak CYP3A4 inducer, it is possible that lersivirine may decrease methadone concentrations. This study evaluated the effect of lersivirine on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of R- and S-methadone enantiomers. METHODS An open-label, single-sequence study was performed in 13 HIV-negative volunteers receiving stable methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) (50-150 mg QD) for ≥3 months. Healthy volunteers received their methadone to steady-state on day 1 and lersivirine (1000 mg QD) plus their same methadone dose on Days 2-11. Assessments included PK, safety, short opiate withdrawal scale (SOWS), desires for drugs questionnaire (DDQ) and pupillary diameter measurements (PDMs). RESULTS Following administration of methadone alone or in combination with lersivirine, R- and S-methadone concentrations did not appear different (ratios of adjusted geometric means for PK parameters: 95-104%). Following co-administration of lersivirine and methadone, adverse events (AEs) were generally mild to moderate in severity. One patient discontinued due to nausea. An examination of objective (vital signs, AEs, PDM), subjective (SOWS and DDQ scores) and PK data suggested that subjects did not experience opioid withdrawal during the study. CONCLUSIONS Co-administration of lersivirine (1000 mg QD) with methadone did not result in clinically relevant changes in R-/S-methadone concentrations or opioid withdrawal symptoms. No methadone dose adjustment is required when lersivirine is administered alongside MMT.

Effects of ketoconazole and valproic acid on the pharmacokinetics of the next generation NNRTI, lersivirine (UK‐453,061), in healthy adult subjects

AIMS To investigate the effect of inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and glucuronidation (UGT2B7) on the pharmacokinetics of lersivirine (UK-453,061), a next generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor with a unique resistance profile, and to investigate the safety and tolerability of co-administration of lersivirine with these inhibitors. METHODS Two open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover studies were conducted in healthy subjects. Study 1 investigated the effect of ketoconazole (400 mg once daily) on the pharmacokinetics of lersivirine (250 mg once daily). Subjects received ketoconazole 400 mg once daily or placebo on days 1-2 and received lersivirine 250 mg once daily and ketoconazole 400 mg once daily or placebo on days 3-9. Study 2 investigated the effect of valproic acid (VPA, sodium valproate, 1000 mg once daily) on the PK of lersivirine (500 mg once daily). On days 1-7, subjects received lersivirine 500 mg once daily plus either VPA 1000 mg or placebo. RESULTS Compared with lersivirine alone, co-administration with ketoconazole increased the lersivirine mean area under the curve (AUC(0,24 h)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max) ) by 82% (90% CI 74%, 91%) and 61% (90% CI 41%, 83%), respectively. VPA increased the mean lersivirine AUC(0,24 h) by 25% (90% CI 16%, 35%), with little effect on C(max) (2.5%, 90% CI -9%, 16%). There were no serious adverse events and no treatment-related discontinuations from either study. CONCLUSIONS Inhibition of CYP3A4 and UGT2B7 by ketoconazole increased lersivirine exposure. Inhibition of UGT2B7-mediated glucuronidation by VPA had a modest effect on lersivirine exposure. Co-administration of lersivirine with either ketoconazole or VPA appeared to be well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Maraviroc in HIV-Negative Subjects with Impaired Renal Function

Abstract Purpose: This open-label, nonrandomized, parallel-group study was conducted to explore the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of maraviroc in renally impaired subjects.Methods: Subjects with normal renal function; mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment; or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (n = 6 per group) were enrolled. Subjects with normal function (period 1), severe impairment, and ESRD received a single 300 mg dose of maraviroc. Subjects with normal function (period 2), mild impairment, and moderate impairment received 150 mg for 7 days at adjusted intervals of twice daily, once daily, and every 48 hours, respectively, with saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/r). Maraviroc was quantified in plasma, urine, and dialysate by tandem high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry.Results: With SQV/r, geometric mean steady-state maraviroc area under the plasma concentration-time curve for the dosing interval (AUCtau) was 5,341 (coefficient of variation [CV], 27%), 8,119 (35%), and 6,193 (27%) h•ng/mL, in normal function, mild, and moderate impairment groups, respectively. Without SQV/r, 2% to 3% of the maraviroc dose was recovered in urine versus 15% to 25% of steady-state dose when given with SQV/r. Moderate to high intersubject variability in exposure was noted. AUC from zero to infinity (AUCinf) was similar to historical single-dose data in subjects with ESRD: low in those with normal function, and high in those with severe impairment. Dialysis did not influence maraviroc exposure. Maraviroc was well tolerated.Conclusions: The data suggest that no dosing interval adjustments are required in subjects with renal impairment when maraviroc is administered alone. However, maraviroc dosing interval adjustment is warranted in renally impaired patients receiving potent CYP3A4 inhibitors. Reference to local prescribing information is recommended, because dose recommendations in renally impaired patients may differ between regions.

Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Maraviroc and Fosamprenavir-Ritonavir: an Open-Label, Fixed-Sequence Study in Healthy Subjects

ABSTRACT This open-label, fixed-sequence, phase 1 study evaluated the pharmacokinetic interaction between maraviroc (MVC) and ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir (FPV/r) in healthy subjects. In period 1, subjects received 300 mg of MVC twice daily (BID; cohort 1) or once daily (QD; cohort 2) for 5 days. In period 2, cohort 1 subjects received 700/100 mg of FPV/r BID alone on days 1 to 10 and then FPV/r at 700/100 mg BID plus MVC at 300 mg BID on days 11 to 20; cohort 2 subjects received FPV/r at 1,400/100 mg QD alone on days 1 to 10 and then FPV/r at 1,400/100 mg QD plus MVC at 300 mg QD on days 11 to 20. Pharmacokinetic parameters, assessed on day 5 of period 1 and on days 10 and 20 of period 2, included the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the concentration at end of dosing interval (Cτ), and the area under the curve over dosing interval (AUCτ). Safety and tolerability were also assessed. MVC geometric mean AUCτ, Cmax, and Cτ were increased by 149, 52, and 374%, respectively, after BID dosing with FPV/r, and by 126, 45, and 80%, respectively, after QD dosing. Amprenavir (the active form of the prodrug fosamprenavir) and ritonavir exposures were decreased in the presence of MVC with amprenavir AUCτ, Cmax, and Cτ decreased by 34 to 36% in the presence of FPV/r plus maraviroc BID and by 15 to 30% with FPV/r plus MVC QD both compared to FPV/r alone. The overall all-causality adverse-event (AE) incidence rate was 96.4%; all AEs were of mild or moderate severity. Commonly reported treatment-related AEs (>20% of patients overall) included diarrhea, fatigue, abdominal discomfort, headache, and nausea. No serious AEs or deaths occurred. In summary, maraviroc exposure increased in the presence of FPV/r, whereas MVC coadministration decreased amprenavir and ritonavir exposures. MVC dosed at 300 mg BID with FPV/r is not recommended due to concerns of lower amprenavir exposures; however, no dose adjustment is warranted with MVC at 150 mg BID in combination with FPV/r based on the available clinical data. MVC plus FPV/r was generally well tolerated; no new safety signals were detected.

Perspective: 4β-hydroxycholesterol as an emerging endogenous biomarker of hepatic CYP3A

Abstract A key goal in the clinical development of a new molecular entity is to quickly identify whether it has the potential for drug–drug interactions. In particular, confirmation of in vitro data in the early stage of clinical development would facilitate the decision making and inform future clinical pharmacology study designs. Plasma 4β-hydroxycholesterol (4β-HC) is considered as an emerging endogenous biomarker for cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A), one of the major drug metabolizing enzymes. Although there are increasing reports of the use of 4β-HC in academic- and industry-sponsored clinical studies, a thorough review, summary and consideration of the advantages and challenges of using 4β-HC to evaluate changes in CYP3A activity has not been attempted. Herein, we review the biology of 4β-HC, its response to treatment with CYP3A inducers, inhibitors and mixed inducer/inhibitors in healthy volunteers and patients, the association of 4β-HC with other probes of CYP3A activity (e.g. midazolam, urinary cortisol ratios), and present predictive pharmacokinetic models. We provide recommendations for studying hepatic CYP3A activity in clinical pharmacology studies utilizing 4β-HC at different stages of drug development.