Manpreet S. Tiwana

25 Year survival outcomes for squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck: Population-based outcomes from a Canadian province

OBJECTIVES Long term outcomes of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are rarely reported, but of potential benefit to clinicians and researchers. Squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the head and neck represent a heterogeneous group of cancers. The purpose of this population based study is to describe primary site specific, long term outcomes of HNC. METHODS All patients from a Canadian province diagnosed between 1986 and 1990 with SCC of the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx were identified. Chart review and patient data were abstracted through the provincial cancer registry database. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan Meier methods, while differences in survival between groups were assessed with log-rank tests. Multivariable analysis was performed using Cox-regression. RESULTS 1657 patients were analyzed during the study period. Almost half (50.9%) of the cases were advanced stage (stage III IV) at presentation. Two, 5, 15 & 25year overall survival (OS) and HNC specific survival for all the patients were 64%, 46%, 21%, 11% and 74%, 63%, 53% & 49%, respectively. OS and HNC-specific mortality were statistically inferior among men, older age at diagnosis, advanced stages of disease, and was primary cancer site specific, with worse survival in oropharyngeal & hypopharyngeal sites, p<0.001. CONCLUSIONS Survival rates vary by primary HNC site, and the overall survival & HNC specific survival differ over this long follow up assessment. Head and neck cancer specific death is most common in the first five years, and is subsequently dominated by competing causes of mortality. These results are useful as a reference tool for clinicians, researchers, and trainees.

Impact of Using Audit Data to Improve the Evidence-Based Use of Single-Fraction Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastases in British Columbia

PURPOSE To assess the impact of a population-based intervention to increase the consistency and use of single-fraction radiation therapy (SFRT) for bone metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS In 2012, an audit of radiation therapy prescriptions for bone metastases in British Columbia identified significant interphysician and -center (26%-73%) variation in the use of SFRT. Anonymous physician-level and identifiable regional cancer center SFRT use data were presented to all radiation oncologists, together with published guidelines, meta-analyses, and recommendations from practice leaders. The use of SFRT for bone metastases from 2007 through 2011 was compared with use of SFRT in 2013, to assess the impact of the audit and educational intervention. Multilevel logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the usage of SFRT and the timing of the radiation while controlling for potentially confounding variables. Physician and center were included as group effects to account for the clustered structure of the data. RESULTS A total of 16,898 courses of RT were delivered from 2007 through 2011, and 3200 courses were delivered in 2013. The rates of SFRT use in 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2013 were 50.5%, 50.9%, 48.3%, 48.5%, 48.0%, and 59.7%, respectively (P<.001). Use of SFRT increased in each of 5 regional centers: A: 26% to 32%; B: 36% to 56%; C: 39% to 57%; D: 49% to 56%; and E: 73% to 85.0%. Use of SFRT was more consistent; 3 of 5 centers used SFRT for 56% to 57% of bone metastases RT courses. The regression analysis showed strong evidence that the usage of SFRT increased after the 2012 intervention (odds ratio 2.27, 95% confidence interval 2.06-2.50, P<.0001). CONCLUSION Assessed on a population basis, an audit-based intervention increased utilization of SFRT for bone metastases. The intervention reversed a trend to decreasing SFRT use, reduced costs, and improved patient convenience. This suggests that dissemination of programmatic quality indicators in oncology can lead to increased utilization of evidence-based practice.

Incidence and treatment patterns of complicated bone metastases in a population-based radiotherapy program

INTRODUCTION There is abundant evidence in support of single fraction (SF) radiation therapy (RT) for uncomplicated bone metastases (BoM). We sought to determine the proportion of BoM that is complicated in a population-based RT program in order to act as a potential guide for assessing SFRT utilization rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 3200 RT courses were prescribed to 1880 consecutive patients diagnosed with BoM in 2013. Associations between choice of RT fractionation and BoM characterization, whether complicated or not, were assessed with logistic regression. RESULTS The incidence of complicated BoM was 34.4%, resulting most often from adverse features of actual pathological fracture (42.1%), and neurological compromise (36.3%). Complicated BoM were most common in lung cancers (24.2%) and in the spine (68.5%), followed by extremity (15.2%) and pelvis (14.4%). SFRT was prescribed less commonly in complicated versus un-complicated BoM (39.4% vs. 70.4%; p<0.001), which was confirmed on multivariable analysis (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.28-0.61; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study found that 34.4% of BoM are complicated by fracture, or neurological compromise (i.e. 65.6% were un-complicated), and that they were less likely to receive SFRT. A reasonable benchmark for SFRT utilization should be at least 60%.

Incidence of second metachronous head and neck cancers: Population‐based outcomes over 25 years

The primary objective was to determine the incidence of second metachronous head and neck cancers (HNC) following an index HNC and estimate their overall survival.

Palliative radiotherapy fractionation schedules prescribed are dependent on the distance a patient travels to receive treatment.

This study assessed the impact of the distance a patient travelled to the treatment centre on the use of single fraction RT for bone metastases. There was significant variability in the prescription of SFRT by distance at which the patient lives from a cancer centre (p<0.001).

Programmatic Comparison and Dissemination of an Audit of Single-fraction Radiation Therapy Prescribing Practices for Bone Metastases is Associated with a Meaningful and Lasting Change in Practice on a Population Level

PURPOSE There is ample evidence that single-fraction radiation therapy (SFRT) is as efficacious as more costly and morbid multifraction regimens. We previously demonstrated that an audit-based intervention increased the use of SFRT in all regional cancer centers the following year. However, other investigators have demonstrated that interventions were only associated with a transient 1-year change in prescribing practices. We sought to determine whether our intervention resulted in a more lasting impact. METHODS AND MATERIALS In 2012, we performed an audit of the prescribing practices of individual physicians, which was then presented to leaders and oncologists as an intervention to increase SFRT. We compared the use of SFRT between 2007 to 2011 (preintervention) and 2013 to 2016 (postintervention) in all 31,192 patients treated in our provincial program. RESULTS The use of SFRT increased from 49.2% to 58.9% postintervention (P < .001). Rates from 2007 to 2011 were 51%, 51%, 48%, 49%, and 48%, respectively, whereas the postintervention rates from 2013 to 2016 were 60%, 62%, 59%, and 56%, respectively. Postintervention, half of the centers prescribed SFRT in a relatively narrow range (55%-58%). However, across all centers, there was still a broad range, with the lowest and highest users at 35% and 81%, respectively, although the lowest-using center still showed a significant increase (26% to 35%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Our audit and education-based intervention resulted in a lasting and meaningful 10% change in practice. Our provincial rate is similar to that of a previously recommended benchmark rate of 60%, but we continue to see significant variation by center, suggesting further room for improvement in provincial standardization. With emerging evidence in support of ablative radiation therapy for select populations of patients with bone metastases, future benchmark rates of SFRT should be readdressed. However, our data suggest that programmatic comparison and dissemination of SFRT prescribing practices can achieve a population-based SFRT utilization rate near 60%.

Incidence of distal bone metastases in patients treated for palliative radiotherapy and associations with primary tumour types.

Purpose This study assesses the incidence of distal bone metastases in palliative radiotherapy (RT) patients. Material and methods All courses of RT for bone metastases from 2007–2011 for patient living in British Columbia (BC) were identified in a provincial RT programme. Treated bone metastases (BoM) were categorized as distal if the BoM was located within or distal to the elbow or knee. Patients were grouped by primary tumour site as breast, lung, prostate gastrointestinal, haematological, melanoma, and other. The incidence of distal bone metastases and associations with primary tumour types were determined. Results From 2007 to 2011, 8008 patients were treated with 16,277 courses of RT, of which 425 (3%) were courses of RT for distal BoM. The incidence of distal BoM in decreasing order by primary tumour type was melanoma (5%), haematological (3%), lung (2%), other (2%), prostate (2%), breast (1%) and gastrointestinal (1%). Distal BoM where more commonly identified in the lower extremity (87%, p<0.001). Single fraction RT was used more commonly for distal vs non-distal BoM (66% vs. 49%; p<0.001). Conclusion The incidence of distal BoM among patients treated with palliative RT was 3% and most commonly identified in patients with melanoma and haematological malignancies.