Manuel Lorenzo

Continuous intercostal nerve blockade for rib fractures: ready for primetime?

BACKGROUND Providing analgesia for patients with rib fractures continues to be a management challenge. The objective of this study was to examine our experience with the use of a continuous intercostal nerve block (CINB). Although this technique is being used, little data have been published documenting its use and efficacy. We hypothesized that a CINB would provide excellent analgesia, improve pulmonary function, and decrease length of stay (LOS). METHODS Consecutive adult blunt trauma patients with three or more unilateral rib fractures were prospectively studied over 24 months. The catheters were placed at the bedside in the extrathoracic, paravertebral location, and 0.2% ropivacaine was infused. Respiratory rate, preplacement (PRE) numeric pain scale (NPS) scores, and sustained maximal inspiration (SMI) lung volumes were determined at rest and after coughing. Parameters were repeated 60 minutes after catheter placement (POST). Hospital LOS comparison was made with historical controls using epidural analgesia. RESULTS Over the study period, 102 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 69 (21-96) years, mean injury severity score was 14 (9-16), and the mean number of rib fractures was 5.8 (3-10). Mean NPS improved significantly (PRE NPS at rest = 7.5 vs. POST NPS at rest = 2.6, p < 0.05, PRE NPS after cough = 9.4, POST after cough = 3.6, p < 0.05) which was associated with an increase in the SMI (PRE SMI = 0.4 L and POST SMI = 1.3 L, p < 0.05). Respiratory rate decreased significantly (p < 0.05) and only 2 of 102 required mechanical ventilation. Average LOS for the study population was 2.9 days compared with 5.9 days in the historical control. No procedural or drug-related complications occurred. CONCLUSION Utilization of CINB significantly improved pulmonary function, pain control, and shortens LOS in patients with rib fractures.

Geriatric trauma service: A one-year experience

Background: Trauma centers nationwide have been experiencing an increase in their elderly trauma patients because of an ever growing elderly population within the United States. Many studies have demonstrated the physiologic differences between an older trauma patient versus a younger trauma patient. Coupling these differences with their coexisting medical comorbidities, makes caring for this population extremely challenging. To meet these challenges, we organized a geriatric trauma unit specifically designed with a multidisciplinary approach to take a more aggressive stance to the care of the geriatric trauma patient. Methods: We created a geriatric trauma unit at our Level II trauma facility, called the G-60 unit. This unit opened for admission in August 2009. Inclusion criteria included all trauma patients older than 60 years. Data were abstracted from our G-60 unit from the period of August 2009 to July 2010. We compared these data to a similar patient population (control group) from January 2008 to December 2008. Results: Our Trauma Data Bank yielded 673 patients for the above queried time period. The G-60 group contained 393 patients, while the control group had 280 patients. A decrease was seen among the G-60 group in all categories: average emergency department length of stay (LOS), average emergency department to operating room time, average surgical intensive care unit LOS, and average hospital LOS. A 3.8% mortality rate was found in the G-60 group compared with a 5.7% mortality rate in the control group. Our analysis also showed rate of 0% pneumonia, 1.3% respiratory failure, and 1.5% urinary tract infection in the G-6O group, while the control group had a rate of 1.8% pneumonia, 6.8% respiratory failure, and 3.9% urinary tract infection. Conclusion: Our data from the 1-year experience of our G-60 unit show that addressing the specific needs of elderly trauma patients will lead to better outcomes. Level of Evidence: II.

Should age be a factor to change from a level II to a level I trauma activation

BACKGROUND Elderly trauma patients have a higher incidence of medical comorbidities when compared with their younger cohorts. Currently, the minimally accepted criteria established by the Committee on Trauma for the highest level of trauma activation (Level I) does not include age as a factor. Should patients older than 60 years with multiple injuries and/or a significant mechanism of injury be considered as part of the criteria for Level I activation? Would these patients benefit from a higher level of activation? METHODS The National Trauma Data Bank was queried for the period of January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2008, for all trauma patients and associated injury severity score (ISS). The data abstracted were based on age and ISS. RESULTS The National Trauma Data Bank contained 802,211 trauma patients. Seventy-nine percent were younger than 60 years, and 21% were older than 60 years. Our analysis shows that in all levels of injury, patients older than 60 years have an increased risk for morbidity and mortality. We found a threefold increase in morbidity and a fivefold increase in mortality among the older (age >60 years) population with a minor ISS. Elderly patients with a major ISS demonstrated a twofold increase in morbidity and a fourfold increase in mortality. CONCLUSION Patients with an ISS between 0 and 15 are often triaged to Level II activation. Our data would suggest that patients older than 60 years should be a criterion for the highest level of trauma activation.

A major metropolitan "field amputation" team: a call to arms ... and legs.

BACKGROUND As early as 1979, suggestions were made to establish amputation teams and protocols in major metropolitan areas. It was recognized that preplanning on such calls would be valuable to carrying out rescues of that nature. Since then, questionnaires and collegial conversations reveal the existence of such teams remains the exception in our nations cities. METHODS Our team was formed in 1984 after an emergency medical service request for a surgeon to perform an amputation on a person who had become entrapped with both arms in an industrial candy press was made. In its current form, the team consists of an attending trauma surgeon, a resident surgeon, a registered nurse, and a pilot, all hospital based. Equipment is limited to medications for sedation and pain control, two units of uncross-matched blood, and a prebundled duffle bag of bandages, a scalpel, various saws, and hemostats. Transportation to the scene is provided by the helicopter based at our level II trauma center. RESULTS Since its inception, the team has been activated three to four times per year, resulting in nine amputation rescues. Three of these cases, presented here, are from an unusually busy 5 weeks during the spring of 2008. The first case involves a tree shredding device, the second, an industrial auger, and the third, a forklift and a steel toed boot. In these cases, the utilization of the amputation team resulted in successful patient rescues and outcomes. CONCLUSION A field amputation team can be an integral part of any emergency medical service system, filling an infrequently used but helpful adjunct to emergency care.

Surgery for Obesity

Obesity affects almost 50% of the population in the United States. Obesity is more accurately expressed using the body mass index (BMI), which is calculated as the body weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared. An individual with BMI over 40, more than twice his or her ideal body weight, is considered morbidly obese. Recent estimates indicate that 4% of the general population, or more than 10 million Americans, are morbidly obese. The National Institutes of Health Consensus established that obesity is correlated to many health problems (1). Hypertension, cardiomyopathy, noninsulin-dependent diabetes, sleep apnea, infertility, ovarian tumors, prostate tumors, depression, and other psychological alterations are among the most commonly associated conditions. Life expectancy is significantly shorter for the morbidly obese than for those with normal weight.