Manuela Cireddu

Late Potentials Abolition as an Additional Technique for Reduction of Arrhythmia Recurrence in Scar Related Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

Late Potentials Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation. Rationale: To evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation targeting complete late potential (LP) activity.

Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy: anteroseptal versus inferolateral scar sub-types.

Background—The aim was to relate distinct scar distributions found in nonischemic cardiomyopathy with ventricular tachycardia (VT) morphology, late potential distribution, ablation strategy, and outcome. Methods and Results—Eighty-seven patients underwent catheter ablation for drug-refractory VT. Based on endocardial unipolar voltage, 44 were classified as predominantly anteroseptal and 43 as inferolateral. Anteroseptal patients more frequently fulfilled diagnostic criteria for dilated cardiomyopathy (64% versus 36%), associated with more extensive endocardial unipolar scar (41 [22–83] versus 9 [1–29] cm2; P<0.001). Left inferior VT axis was predictive of anteroseptal scar (positive predictive value, 100%) and right superior axis for inferolateral (positive predictive value, 89%). Late potentials were infrequent in the anteroseptal group (11% versus 74%; P<0.001). Epicardial late potentials were common in the inferolateral group (81% versus 4%; P<0.001) and correlated with VT termination sites (&kgr;=0.667; P=0.014), whereas no anteroseptal patient had an epicardial VT termination (P<0.001). VT recurred in 44 patients (51%) during a median follow-up of 1.5 years. Anteroseptal scar was associated with higher VT recurrence (74% versus 25%; log-rank P<0.001) and redo procedure rates (59% versus 7%; log-rank P<0.001). After multivariable analysis, clinical predictors of VT recurrence were electrical storm (hazard ratio, 3.211; P=0.001) and New York Heart Association class (hazard ratio, 1.608; P=0.018); the only procedural predictor of VT recurrence was anteroseptal scar pattern (hazard ratio, 5.547; P<0.001). Conclusions—Unipolar low-voltage distribution in nonischemic cardiomyopathy allows categorization of scar pattern as inferolateral, often requiring epicardial ablation mainly based on late potentials, and anteroseptal, which frequently involves an intramural septal substrate, leading to a higher VT recurrence.Background— The aim was to relate distinct scar distributions found in nonischemic cardiomyopathy with ventricular tachycardia (VT) morphology, late potential distribution, ablation strategy, and outcome. Methods and Results— Eighty-seven patients underwent catheter ablation for drug-refractory VT. Based on endocardial unipolar voltage, 44 were classified as predominantly anteroseptal and 43 as inferolateral. Anteroseptal patients more frequently fulfilled diagnostic criteria for dilated cardiomyopathy (64% versus 36%), associated with more extensive endocardial unipolar scar (41 [22–83] versus 9 [1–29] cm2; P <0.001). Left inferior VT axis was predictive of anteroseptal scar (positive predictive value, 100%) and right superior axis for inferolateral (positive predictive value, 89%). Late potentials were infrequent in the anteroseptal group (11% versus 74%; P <0.001). Epicardial late potentials were common in the inferolateral group (81% versus 4%; P <0.001) and correlated with VT termination sites (κ=0.667; P =0.014), whereas no anteroseptal patient had an epicardial VT termination ( P <0.001). VT recurred in 44 patients (51%) during a median follow-up of 1.5 years. Anteroseptal scar was associated with higher VT recurrence (74% versus 25%; log-rank P <0.001) and redo procedure rates (59% versus 7%; log-rank P <0.001). After multivariable analysis, clinical predictors of VT recurrence were electrical storm (hazard ratio, 3.211; P =0.001) and New York Heart Association class (hazard ratio, 1.608; P =0.018); the only procedural predictor of VT recurrence was anteroseptal scar pattern (hazard ratio, 5.547; P <0.001). Conclusions— Unipolar low-voltage distribution in nonischemic cardiomyopathy allows categorization of scar pattern as inferolateral, often requiring epicardial ablation mainly based on late potentials, and anteroseptal, which frequently involves an intramural septal substrate, leading to a higher VT recurrence.

Noninducibility and Late Potential Abolition A Novel Combined Prognostic Procedural End Point for Catheter Ablation of Postinfarction Ventricular Tachycardia

Background— Successful late potential (LP) abolition and postprocedural ventricular tachycardia (VT) noninducibility constitute significant end points after catheter ablation for VT. We investigated the prognostic impact of a combined procedural end point of VT noninducibility and LP abolition in a large series of post–myocardial infarction patients with VT. Methods and Results— A total of 160 (154 men, 94% with implantable cardioverter defibrillators) consecutive post–myocardial infarction patients undergoing first-time ablation procedures from 2010 to 2012 were included. Of the 159 patients surviving the procedure, 137 (86%) were either inducible or in VT at baseline and 103 (65%) had baseline LP presence, of which 79 (77%) underwent successful LP abolition. The combined end point was assessable in 155 (97%) patients. There were 50 (32%) patients with VT recurrences and 17 (11%) cardiac deaths during follow-up. Patients who fulfilled the combined end point of VT noninducibility and LP abolition compared with inducible patients exhibited a significantly lower incidence of VT recurrence (16.4% versus 47.4%; log-rank P <0.001) and cardiac death (4.1% versus 42.1%; log-rank P <0.001). Among noninducible patients, those with additional LP abolition also had a lower incidence of VT recurrence (16.4% versus 46.0%; log-rank P <0.001). After multivariate analysis, the combined end point of VT noninducibility and LP abolition (hazard ratio, 0.205, P <0.001) was independently associated with VT recurrence and cardiac death (hazard ratio, 0.106; P =0.001). Conclusions— Achieving a combined catheter ablation procedural end point of VT noninducibility and LP abolition reduces VT recurrence rates to low levels (16%). The overall strategy was associated with a significant impact on cardiac survival.Background—Successful late potential (LP) abolition and postprocedural ventricular tachycardia (VT) noninducibility constitute significant end points after catheter ablation for VT. We investigated the prognostic impact of a combined procedural end point of VT noninducibility and LP abolition in a large series of post–myocardial infarction patients with VT. Methods and Results—A total of 160 (154 men, 94% with implantable cardioverter defibrillators) consecutive post–myocardial infarction patients undergoing first-time ablation procedures from 2010 to 2012 were included. Of the 159 patients surviving the procedure, 137 (86%) were either inducible or in VT at baseline and 103 (65%) had baseline LP presence, of which 79 (77%) underwent successful LP abolition. The combined end point was assessable in 155 (97%) patients. There were 50 (32%) patients with VT recurrences and 17 (11%) cardiac deaths during follow-up. Patients who fulfilled the combined end point of VT noninducibility and LP abolition compared with inducible patients exhibited a significantly lower incidence of VT recurrence (16.4% versus 47.4%; log-rank P<0.001) and cardiac death (4.1% versus 42.1%; log-rank P<0.001). Among noninducible patients, those with additional LP abolition also had a lower incidence of VT recurrence (16.4% versus 46.0%; log-rank P<0.001). After multivariate analysis, the combined end point of VT noninducibility and LP abolition (hazard ratio, 0.205, P<0.001) was independently associated with VT recurrence and cardiac death (hazard ratio, 0.106; P=0.001). Conclusions—Achieving a combined catheter ablation procedural end point of VT noninducibility and LP abolition reduces VT recurrence rates to low levels (16%). The overall strategy was associated with a significant impact on cardiac survival.

Electrical Storm Induced by Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Is Determined by Pacing on Epicardial Scar and Can be Successfully Managed by Catheter Ablation

Background—The mechanism of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)–induced proarrhythmia remains unknown. We postulated that pacing from a left ventricular (LV) lead positioned on epicardial scar can facilitate re-entrant ventricular tachycardia. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between CRT-induced proarrhythmia and LV lead location within scar. Methods and Results—Twenty-eight epicardial and 63 endocardial maps, obtained from 64 CRT patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation, were analyzed. A positive LV lead/scar relationship, defined as a lead tip positioned on scar/border zone, was determined by overlaying fluoroscopic projections with LV electroanatomical maps. CRT-induced proarrhythmia occurred in 8 patients (12.5%). They all presented early with electrical storm (100% versus 39% of patients with no proarrhythmia; P<0.01), requiring temporary biventricular pacing discontinuation in half of cases. They more frequently presented with heart failure/cardiogenic shock (50% versus 7%; P<0.01), requiring intensive care management. Ventricular tachycardia was re-entrant in all. The LV lead location within epicardial scar was significantly more frequent in the proarrhythmia group (60% versus 9% P=0.03 on epicardial bipolar scar, 80% versus 17% P=0.02 on epicardial unipolar scar, and 80% versus 17% P=0.02 on any-epicardial scar). Ablation was performed within epicardial scar, close to the LV lead, and allowed CRT reactivation in all patients. Conclusions—CRT-induced proarrhythmia presented early with electrical storm and was associated with an LV lead positioning within epicardial scar. Catheter ablation allowed for resumption of biventricular stimulation in all patients.

Electroanatomical Voltage and Morphology Characteristics in Postinfarction Patients Undergoing Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Pragmatic Approach Favoring Late Potentials Abolition

Background—Catheter ablation is an important therapeutic option in postmyocardial infarction patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT). We analyzed the endo–epicardial electroanatomical mapping (EAM) voltage and morphology characteristics, their association with clinical data and their prognostic value in a large cohort of postmyocardial infarction patients. Methods and Results—We performed total and segmental analysis of voltage (bipolar dense scar [DS] and low voltage areas, unipolar low voltage and penumbra areas) and morphology characteristics (presence of abnormal late potentials [LPs] and early potentials [EPs]) in 100 postmyocardial infarction patients undergoing electroanatomical mapping–based VT ablation (26 endo–epicardial procedures) from 2010–2012. All patients had unipolar low voltage areas, whereas 18% had no identifiable endocardial bipolar DS areas. Endocardial bipolar DS area >22.5 cm2 best predicted scar transmurality. Endo–epicardial LPs were recorded in 2/3 patients, more frequently in nonseptal myocardial segments and were abolished in 51%. Endocardial bipolar DS area >7 cm2 and endocardial bipolar scar density >0.35 predicted epicardial LPs. Isolated LPs are located mainly epicardially and EPs endocardially. As a primary strategy, LPs and VT-mapping ablation occurred in 48%, only VT-mapping ablation in 27%, only LPs ablation in 17%, and EPs ablation in 6%. Endocardial LP abolition was associated with reduced VT recurrence and increased unipolar penumbra area predicted cardiac death. Conclusions—Endocardial scar extension and density predict scar transmurality and endo–epicardial presence of LPs, although DS is not always identified in postmyocardial infarction patients. LPs, most frequently located in nonseptal myocardial segments, were abolished in 51% resulting in improved outcome.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Hemodynamic Support of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

Background—We report the experience in a cohort of consecutive patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during catheter ablation of unstable ventricular tachycardia (VT) at our center. Methods and Results—From 2010 to 2015, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was initiated in 64 patients (average age: 63±15 years; left ventricular ejection fraction in 27±9%; cardiogenic shock in 23%, and electrical storm in 62% of patients) undergoing 74 unstable VT catheter ablation procedures. At least one VT was terminated in 81% of procedures with baseline inducible VT, and VT noninducibility was achieved in 69%. Acute heart failure occurred in 5 patients: 3 underwent emergency heart transplantation, 1 had left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, and 1 patient eventually died because of subsequent mesenteric ischemia. All other patients were discharged alive. After a median follow-up of 21 months (13–28 months), VT recurrence was 33%; overall survival was 56 out of 64 patients (88%). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation–supported ablation was the bridge to LVAD in 6.9% and to heart transplantation in 3.5% of patients. VT recurrence was related to ablation success (after 180 days of follow up: 19% when VT was noninducible, 42% if nonclinical VT was inducible, 75% when clinical VT was inducible, and 75% in untested patients, P<0.001). Incidence of all-cause death, heart transplantation, and LVAD was independently related to ablation outcome (at 180 days of follow-up: 9% when noninducibility was achieved, 50% in case of inducible VT, and 75% in untested patients, P<0.001). At multivariable analyses, noninducibility (hazard ratio 0.198; P=0.001) and left ventricular ejection fraction (hazard ratio 0.916; P=0.008) correlated with all-cause death, LVAD, and heart transplantation. Conclusions—Ablation of unstable VTs can be safely supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, which allows rhythm stabilization with low procedure mortality, bridging decompensated patients to permanent LVAD or heart transplantation. Successful ablation is associated with better outcomes than unsuccessful ablation.

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmia in Non-Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy: Anteroseptal versus Inferolateral Scar Sub-Types

Background—The aim was to relate distinct scar distributions found in nonischemic cardiomyopathy with ventricular tachycardia (VT) morphology, late potential distribution, ablation strategy, and outcome. Methods and Results—Eighty-seven patients underwent catheter ablation for drug-refractory VT. Based on endocardial unipolar voltage, 44 were classified as predominantly anteroseptal and 43 as inferolateral. Anteroseptal patients more frequently fulfilled diagnostic criteria for dilated cardiomyopathy (64% versus 36%), associated with more extensive endocardial unipolar scar (41 [22–83] versus 9 [1–29] cm2; P<0.001). Left inferior VT axis was predictive of anteroseptal scar (positive predictive value, 100%) and right superior axis for inferolateral (positive predictive value, 89%). Late potentials were infrequent in the anteroseptal group (11% versus 74%; P<0.001). Epicardial late potentials were common in the inferolateral group (81% versus 4%; P<0.001) and correlated with VT termination sites (&kgr;=0.667; P=0.014), whereas no anteroseptal patient had an epicardial VT termination (P<0.001). VT recurred in 44 patients (51%) during a median follow-up of 1.5 years. Anteroseptal scar was associated with higher VT recurrence (74% versus 25%; log-rank P<0.001) and redo procedure rates (59% versus 7%; log-rank P<0.001). After multivariable analysis, clinical predictors of VT recurrence were electrical storm (hazard ratio, 3.211; P=0.001) and New York Heart Association class (hazard ratio, 1.608; P=0.018); the only procedural predictor of VT recurrence was anteroseptal scar pattern (hazard ratio, 5.547; P<0.001). Conclusions—Unipolar low-voltage distribution in nonischemic cardiomyopathy allows categorization of scar pattern as inferolateral, often requiring epicardial ablation mainly based on late potentials, and anteroseptal, which frequently involves an intramural septal substrate, leading to a higher VT recurrence.Background— The aim was to relate distinct scar distributions found in nonischemic cardiomyopathy with ventricular tachycardia (VT) morphology, late potential distribution, ablation strategy, and outcome. Methods and Results— Eighty-seven patients underwent catheter ablation for drug-refractory VT. Based on endocardial unipolar voltage, 44 were classified as predominantly anteroseptal and 43 as inferolateral. Anteroseptal patients more frequently fulfilled diagnostic criteria for dilated cardiomyopathy (64% versus 36%), associated with more extensive endocardial unipolar scar (41 [22–83] versus 9 [1–29] cm2; P <0.001). Left inferior VT axis was predictive of anteroseptal scar (positive predictive value, 100%) and right superior axis for inferolateral (positive predictive value, 89%). Late potentials were infrequent in the anteroseptal group (11% versus 74%; P <0.001). Epicardial late potentials were common in the inferolateral group (81% versus 4%; P <0.001) and correlated with VT termination sites (κ=0.667; P =0.014), whereas no anteroseptal patient had an epicardial VT termination ( P <0.001). VT recurred in 44 patients (51%) during a median follow-up of 1.5 years. Anteroseptal scar was associated with higher VT recurrence (74% versus 25%; log-rank P <0.001) and redo procedure rates (59% versus 7%; log-rank P <0.001). After multivariable analysis, clinical predictors of VT recurrence were electrical storm (hazard ratio, 3.211; P =0.001) and New York Heart Association class (hazard ratio, 1.608; P =0.018); the only procedural predictor of VT recurrence was anteroseptal scar pattern (hazard ratio, 5.547; P <0.001). Conclusions— Unipolar low-voltage distribution in nonischemic cardiomyopathy allows categorization of scar pattern as inferolateral, often requiring epicardial ablation mainly based on late potentials, and anteroseptal, which frequently involves an intramural septal substrate, leading to a higher VT recurrence.

Late potentials abolition reduces ventricular tachycardia recurrence after ablation especially in higher-risk patients with a chronic total occlusion in an infarct-related artery

Late potentials (LP) abolition is recognized as an effective strategy for substrate ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT). The presence of a chronic total occlusion in a coronary artery responsible for a previous myocardial infarction (infarct related artery CTO, IRA‐CTO) is emerging as a predictor of ventricular arrhythmias and VT recurrence after ablation. We sought to analyze the effects of LP abolition, focusing on the high‐risk subgroup of patients with IRA‐CTO.

Electrical Storm Induced by Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Is Determined by Pacing on Epicardial Scar and Can be Successfully Managed by Catheter AblationCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Background—The mechanism of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)–induced proarrhythmia remains unknown. We postulated that pacing from a left ventricular (LV) lead positioned on epicardial scar can facilitate re-entrant ventricular tachycardia. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between CRT-induced proarrhythmia and LV lead location within scar. Methods and Results—Twenty-eight epicardial and 63 endocardial maps, obtained from 64 CRT patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation, were analyzed. A positive LV lead/scar relationship, defined as a lead tip positioned on scar/border zone, was determined by overlaying fluoroscopic projections with LV electroanatomical maps. CRT-induced proarrhythmia occurred in 8 patients (12.5%). They all presented early with electrical storm (100% versus 39% of patients with no proarrhythmia; P<0.01), requiring temporary biventricular pacing discontinuation in half of cases. They more frequently presented with heart failure/cardiogenic shock (50% versus 7%; P<0.01), requiring intensive care management. Ventricular tachycardia was re-entrant in all. The LV lead location within epicardial scar was significantly more frequent in the proarrhythmia group (60% versus 9% P=0.03 on epicardial bipolar scar, 80% versus 17% P=0.02 on epicardial unipolar scar, and 80% versus 17% P=0.02 on any-epicardial scar). Ablation was performed within epicardial scar, close to the LV lead, and allowed CRT reactivation in all patients. Conclusions—CRT-induced proarrhythmia presented early with electrical storm and was associated with an LV lead positioning within epicardial scar. Catheter ablation allowed for resumption of biventricular stimulation in all patients.

Therapy is determined by pacing on epicardial scar and can be successfully managed by catheter ablation

Background—The mechanism of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)–induced proarrhythmia remains unknown. We postulated that pacing from a left ventricular (LV) lead positioned on epicardial scar can facilitate re-entrant ventricular tachycardia. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between CRT-induced proarrhythmia and LV lead location within scar. Methods and Results—Twenty-eight epicardial and 63 endocardial maps, obtained from 64 CRT patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation, were analyzed. A positive LV lead/scar relationship, defined as a lead tip positioned on scar/border zone, was determined by overlaying fluoroscopic projections with LV electroanatomical maps. CRT-induced proarrhythmia occurred in 8 patients (12.5%). They all presented early with electrical storm (100% versus 39% of patients with no proarrhythmia; P<0.01), requiring temporary biventricular pacing discontinuation in half of cases. They more frequently presented with heart failure/cardiogenic shock (50% versus 7%; P<0.01), requiring intensive care management. Ventricular tachycardia was re-entrant in all. The LV lead location within epicardial scar was significantly more frequent in the proarrhythmia group (60% versus 9% P=0.03 on epicardial bipolar scar, 80% versus 17% P=0.02 on epicardial unipolar scar, and 80% versus 17% P=0.02 on any-epicardial scar). Ablation was performed within epicardial scar, close to the LV lead, and allowed CRT reactivation in all patients. Conclusions—CRT-induced proarrhythmia presented early with electrical storm and was associated with an LV lead positioning within epicardial scar. Catheter ablation allowed for resumption of biventricular stimulation in all patients.