Manuela Neumann

Ataxin-2 as potential disease modifier in C9ORF72 expansion carriers.

Repeat expansions in chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9ORF72) are an important cause of both motor neuron disease (MND) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Currently, little is known about factors that could account for the phenotypic heterogeneity detected in C9ORF72 expansion carriers. In this study, we investigated 4 genes that could represent genetic modifiers: ataxin-2 (ATXN2), non-imprinted in Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome 1 (NIPA1), survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1), and survival motor neuron 2 (SMN2). Assessment of these genes, in a unique cohort of 331 C9ORF72 expansion carriers and 376 control subjects, revealed that intermediate repeat lengths in ATXN2 possibly act as disease modifier in C9ORF72 expansion carriers; no evidence was provided for a potential role of NIPA1, SMN1, or SMN2. The effects of intermediate ATXN2 repeats were most profound in probands with MND or FTD/MND (2.1% vs. 0% in control subjects, p = 0.013), whereas the frequency in probands with FTD was identical to control subjects. Though intermediate ATXN2 repeats were already known to be associated with MND risk, previous reports did not focus on individuals with clear pathogenic mutations, such as repeat expansions in C9ORF72. Based on our present findings, we postulate that intermediate ATXN2 repeat lengths may render C9ORF72 expansion carriers more susceptible to the development of MND; further studies are needed, however, to validate our findings.

Mechanisms of disease in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: gain of function versus loss of function effects

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is clinically, pathologically and genetically heterogeneous. Three major proteins are implicated in its pathogenesis. About half of cases are characterized by depositions of the microtubule associated protein, tau (FTLD-tau). In most of the remaining cases, deposits of the transactive response (TAR) DNA-binding protein with Mw of 43xa0kDa, known as TDP-43 (FTLD-TDP), are seen. Lastly, about 5–10xa0% of cases are characterized by abnormal accumulations of a third protein, fused in sarcoma (FTLD-FUS). Depending on the protein concerned, the signature accumulations can take the form of inclusion bodies (neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions and neuronal intranuclear inclusions) or dystrophic neurites, in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus and subcortex. In some instances, glial cells are also affected by inclusion body formation. In motor neurone disease (MND), TDP-43 or FUS inclusions can present within motor neurons of the brain stem and spinal cord. This present paper attempts to critically examine the role of such proteins in the pathogenesis of FTLD and MND as to whether they might exert a direct pathogenetic effect (gain of function), or simply act as relatively innocent witnesses to a more fundamental loss of function effect. We conclude that although there is strong evidence for both gain and loss of function effects in respect of each of the proteins concerned, in reality, it is likely that each is a single face of either side of the coin, and that both will play separate, though complementary, roles in driving the damage which ultimately leads to the downfall of neurons and clinical expression of disease.

Molecular neuropathology of frontotemporal dementia: insights into disease mechanisms from postmortem studies

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a clinical syndrome with a heterogeneous molecular basis. The past decade has seen the discovery of several new FTD‐causing genetic mutations and the identification of many of the relevant pathological proteins. The current neuropathological classification is based on the predominant protein abnormality and allows most cases of FTD to be placed into one of three broad molecular subgroups; frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau, TDP‐43 or FET protein accumulation. This review will describe our current understanding of the molecular basis of FTD, focusing on insights gained from the study of human postmortem tissue, as well as some of the current controversies.

Genetic modifiers in carriers of repeat expansions in the C9ORF72 gene

BackgroundHexanucleotide repeat expansions in chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9ORF72) are causative for frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and motor neuron disease (MND). Substantial phenotypic heterogeneity has been described in patients with these expansions. We set out to identify genetic modifiers of disease risk, age at onset, and survival after onset that may contribute to this clinical variability.ResultsWe examined a cohort of 330 C9ORF72 expansion carriers and 374 controls. In these individuals, we assessed variants previously implicated in FTD and/or MND; 36 variants were included in our analysis. After adjustment for multiple testing, our analysis revealed three variants significantly associated with age at onset (rs7018487 [UBAP1; p-value = 0.003], rs6052771 [PRNP; p-value = 0.003], and rs7403881 [MT-Ie; p-value = 0.003]), and six variants significantly associated with survival after onset (rs5848 [GRN; p-value = 0.001], rs7403881 [MT-Ie; p-value = 0.001], rs13268953 [ELP3; p-value = 0.003], the epsilon 4 allele [APOE; p-value = 0.004], rs12608932 [UNC13A; p-value = 0.003], and rs1800435 [ALAD; p-value = 0.003]).ConclusionsVariants identified through this study were previously reported to be involved in FTD and/or MND, but we are the first to describe their effects as potential disease modifiers in the presence of a clear pathogenic mutation (i.e. C9ORF72 repeat expansion). Although validation of our findings is necessary, these variants highlight the importance of protein degradation, antioxidant defense and RNA-processing pathways, and additionally, they are promising targets for the development of therapeutic strategies and prognostic tests.

Comparison of extent of tau pathology in patients with frontotemporal dementia with Parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP‐17), frontotemporal lobar degeneration with Pick bodies and early onset Alzheimer’s disease

In order to gain insight into the pathogenesis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), the mean tau load in frontal cortex was compared in 34 patients with frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP‐17) with 12 different mutations in the tau gene (MAPT), 11 patients with sporadic FTLD with Pick bodies and 25 patients with early onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD). Tau load was determined, as percentage of tissue occupied by stained product, by image analysis of immunohistochemically stained sections using the phospho‐dependent antibodies AT8, AT100 and AT180. With AT8 and AT180 antibodies, the amount of tau was significantly (Pu2003<u20030.001 in each instance) less than that in EOAD for both FTDP‐17 (8.5% and 10.0% respectively) and sporadic FTLD with Pick bodies (16.1% and 10.0% respectively). With AT100, the amount of tau detected in FTDP‐17 was 54% (Pu2003<u20030.001) of that detected in EOAD, but no tau was detected in sporadic FTLD with Pick bodies using this particular antibody. The amount of insoluble tau deposited within the brain in FTDP‐17 did not depend in any systematic way upon where the MAPT mutation was topographically located within the gene, or on the physiological or structural change generated by the mutation, regardless of which anti‐tau antibody was used. Not only does the amount of tau deposited in the brain differ between the three disorders, but the pattern of phosphorylation of tau also varies according to disease. These findings raise important questions relating to the role of aggregated tau in neurodegeneration – whether this represents an adaptive response which promotes the survival of neurones, or whether it is a detrimental change that directly, or indirectly, brings about the demize of the affected cell.

Reappraisal of TDP-43 pathology in FTLD-U subtypes

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau-negative, ubiquitin-immunoreactive (-ir) pathology (FTLD-U) is subclassified based on the type and cortical laminar distribution of neuronal inclusions. Following the discovery of the transactive response DNA-binding protein Mr 43 kD (TDP-43) as the ubiquitinated protein in most FTLD-U, the same pathological criteria have been used to classify FTLD cases based on TDP-43-ir changes. However, the fact that immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ubiquitin and TDP-43 each recognizes slightly different pathological changes in these cases means that the original FTLD-U subtype criteria may not be directly applicable for use with TDP-43 IHC. We formally re-evaluated the TDP-43-ir pathological features that characterize the different FTLD-U subtypes to see if the current classification could be refined. In our series of 78 cases, 81% were classified as one of the common FTLD-U subtypes (29% A, 35% B, 17% C). With TDP-43 IHC, each subtype demonstrated consistent intra-group pathological features and clear inter-group differences. The TDP-43-ir changes that characterized type A and C cases were similar to those seen with ubiquitin IHC; specifically, compact neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions (NCI), short thick dystrophic neurites (DN), and lentiform neuronal intranuclear inclusions concentrated in cortical layer II in type A cases, and a predominance of long thick DN in type C. However, type B cases showed significant differences with TDP-43 compared with ubiquitin IHC; with many diffuse granular NCI and wispy thread and dots-like profiles in all cortical layers. The remaining 15 cases (12 with C9orf72 mutations) showed changes that were consistent with combined type A and type B pathology. These findings suggest that the pathological criteria for subtyping FTLD cases based on TDP-43 IHC might benefit from some refinement that recognizes differences in the morphologies of NCI and neurites. Furthermore, there is a significant subset of cases (most with the C9orf72 mutation) with the pathological features of multiple FTLD-TDP subtypes for which appropriate classification is difficult.

Fused in Sarcoma Neuropathology in Neurodegenerative Disease.

Abnormal intracellular accumulation of the fused in sarcoma (FUS) protein is the characteristic pathological feature of cases of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) caused by FUS mutations (ALS-FUS) and several uncommon disorders that may present with sporadic frontotemporal dementia (FTLD-FUS). Although these findings provide further support for the concept that ALS and FTD are closely related clinical syndromes with an overlapping molecular basis, important differences in the pathological features and results from experimental models indicate that ALS-FUS and FTLD-FUS have distinct pathogenic mechanisms.

Frontotemporal dementia: from molecular mechanisms to therapy

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome characterized by frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Neuropathologically, FTLD is characterized by abnormal protein deposits and almost all cases can now be classified into three major molecular subgroups based on specific accumulating proteins with the most common being FTLD‐tau and FTLD‐TDP (accounting for ~40% and 50%, respectively) and FTLD‐FET (accounting for ~5–10%). In this special issue, the molecular and genetic basics as well as clinical approaches and therapeutics are reviewed in a series of articles.

Neuropathology of non-tau frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) as a relatively consistent neuropathological hallmark feature. However, the discoveries in the past decade of many of the relevant pathological proteins aggregating in human FTD brains in addition to several new FTD causing gene mutations underlined that FTD is a diverse condition on the neuropathological and genetic basis. This resulted in a novel molecular classification of these conditions based on the predominant protein abnormality and allows most cases of FTD to be placed now into one of three broad molecular subgroups; FTLD with tau, TAR DNA‐binding protein 43 or FET protein accumulation (FTLD‐tau, FTLD‐TDP and FTLD‐FET respectively). This review will provide an overview of the molecular neuropathology of non‐tau FTLD, insights into disease mechanisms gained from the study of human post mortem tissue as well as discussion of current controversies in the field.