Marc A.A.M. Schepens

Brain protection using antegrade selective cerebral perfusion: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND To evaluate the results of antegrade selective cerebral perfusion as a method of brain protection during surgery of the thoracic aorta and to determine predictors of hospital mortality and adverse neurologic outcome. METHODS Between October 1995 and March 2002, 588 patients underwent aortic surgery with the aid of antegrade selective cerebral perfusion. There were 334 men (56.8%); the mean age was 63.7 +/- 11.8 years. One hundred sixty-two patients (27.6%) underwent urgent operation. The separated graft technique was employed to reimplant the arch vessels in 230 patients (65.3%) of the 352 requiring aortic arch replacement. Associated procedures were performed in 254 patients (43.2%). One hundred twelve patients underwent elephant trunk procedure. The mean cerebral perfusion time was 67 +/- 37 minutes. RESULTS The overall hospital mortality rate was 8.7%. A logistic regression analysis revealed urgent operation, recent central neurologic event, tamponade, unplanned coronary artery revascularization and pump time to be independent predictors of hospital mortality (p < 0.05). The permanent neurologic dysfunction rate was 3.8%. A logistic regression analysis showed tamponade to be independent predictor of permanent neurologic dysfunction (p < 0.05). The transient neurologic dysfunction rate was 5.6%. Recent central neurologic event, tamponade, coronary disease, and aortic valve replacement were indicated as independent predictors of transient neurologic dysfunction by logistic regression (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In our experience the utilization of antegrade selective cerebral perfusion resulted in encouraging results in terms of hospital mortality and brain complications. Neither the extent of the replacement nor the duration of the cerebral perfusion had an impact on hospital mortality and neurologic outcome.

Multimodality Imaging of Diseases of the Thoracic Aorta in Adults: From the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Steven A. Goldstein, MD, Co-Chair, Arturo Evangelista, MD, FESC, Co-Chair, Suhny Abbara, MD, Andrew Arai, MD, Federico M. Asch, MD, FASE, Luigi P. Badano, MD, PhD, FESC, Michael A. Bolen, MD, Heidi M. Connolly, MD, Hug Cu ellar-Cal abria, MD, Martin Czerny, MD, Richard B. Devereux, MD, Raimund A. Erbel, MD, FASE, FESC, Rossella Fattori, MD, Eric M. Isselbacher, MD, Joseph M. Lindsay, MD, Marti McCulloch, MBA, RDCS, FASE, Hector I. Michelena, MD, FASE, Christoph A. Nienaber, MD, FESC, Jae K. Oh, MD, FASE, Mauro Pepi, MD, FESC, Allen J. Taylor, MD, Jonathan W. Weinsaft, MD, Jose Luis Zamorano, MD, FESC, FASE, Contributing Editors: Harry Dietz, MD, Kim Eagle, MD, John Elefteriades, MD, Guillaume Jondeau, MD, PhD, FESC, Herv e Rousseau, MD, PhD, and Marc Schepens, MD, Washington, District of Columbia; Barcelona and Madrid, Spain; Dallas and Houston, Texas; Bethesda and Baltimore, Maryland; Padua, Pesaro, and Milan, Italy; Cleveland, Ohio; Rochester, Minnesota; Zurich, Switzerland; New York, New York; Essen and Rostock, Germany; Boston, Massachusetts; Ann Arbor, Michigan; New Haven, Connecticut; Paris and Toulouse, France; and Brugge, Belgium

Evidence, lack of evidence, controversy, and debate in the provision and performance of the surgery of acute type A aortic dissection

Acute type A aortic dissection is a lethal condition requiring emergency surgery. It has diverse presentations, and the diagnosis can be missed or delayed. Once diagnosed, decisions with regard to initial management, transfer, appropriateness of surgery, timing of operation, and intervention for malperfusion complications are necessary. The goals of surgery are to save life by prevention of pericardial tamponade or intra-pericardial aortic rupture, to resect the primary entry tear, to correct or prevent any malperfusion and aortic valve regurgitation, and if possible to prevent late dissection-related complications in the proximal and downstream aorta. No randomized trials of treatment or techniques have ever been performed, and novel therapies-particularly with regard to extent of surgery-are being devised and implemented, but their role needs to be defined. Overall, except in highly specialized centers, surgical outcomes might be static, and there is abundant room for improvement. By highlighting difficulties and controversies in diagnosis, patient selection, and surgical therapy, our over-arching goal should be to enfranchise more patients for treatment and improve surgical outcomes.

The elephant trunk technique: operative results in 100 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVES To describe morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing the elephant trunk (ET) implantation as the first stage in the repair of their mega aorta and to assess determinants for the occurrence of complications. METHODS One hundred consecutive patients undergoing an ET implantation between 1984 and June 2001 were retrospectively analyzed. The ET was implanted as an extension of an isolated aortic arch (1%), an aortic valve replacement+ascending aorta+arch (14%), a root replacement+ascending aorta+arch (37%) and an ascending aorta+arch (48%). Indications for surgery were acute aortic dissection (1%), an inflammatory aneurysm (3%), chronic post-dissection (31%) or degenerative (65%) aneurysm. Marfan syndrome was present in six patients. For cerebral protection, we used isolated deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (7%), deep hypothermic circulatory arrest combined with uni- or bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (18%) or isolated uni- or bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (75%). Uni- and multivariate analysis was used. RESULTS There were no intraoperative deaths. Hospital mortality was 8%. The causes of death were cardiac in one, rupture of a remote aneurysm in three, tamponade in one and sepsis in three. After multivariate analysis, no single factor emerged as a risk factor for hospital mortality. Permanent and transient neurologic dysfunction occurred in 4 and 2%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed the operative period before 1990 (P=0.029) and emergency (P=0.018) as significant factors for postoperative neurologic dysfunction; after stepwise logistic regression analysis, only emergent operation retained significance (P=0.005). Permanent hoarseness, total atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker implantation and re-thoracotomy for bleeding occurred in 17, 2 and 30%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The first step in the repair of a mega aorta, the implantation of an ET, can be performed with a low mortality and an acceptable morbidity. The risk of central neurologic damage is higher in emergency interventions.

Acute Aortic Dissection Complicating Pregnancy

BACKGROUND Acute aortic dissection occurring during pregnancy represents a lethal risk to both the mother and fetus. Our purpose was to study the prevalence, treatments, and outcome of this rare problem and to suggest therapeutic guidelines. METHODS During the past 12 years, 6 pregnant women were admitted with an acute aortic dissection. Four had a type A and 2 had a type B dissection (Stanford classification). RESULTS Two of the 4 patients with a type A dissection underwent a combined emergency operation consisting of first cesarean section and then ascending aortic repair. Cesarean section was carried out 5 days after the emergency procedure on the aorta in the third patient, and 16 weeks later in the fourth patient. All 4 fetuses were delivered alive. One fetus died 6 days later, but the other 3 are alive and well at long-term follow-up. Of the 2 patients with a type B dissection, 1 was operated on for celiac ischemia; the other was treated medically. In both cases the fetus died in utero. There were no maternal deaths in either group. CONCLUSIONS Cesarean section with concomitant aortic repair is recommended for pregnant women with a type A dissection, depending on the gestational age. The maternal hemodynamic status will determine the sequence of the two procedures. Medical treatment is advised for patients with a type B dissection, but surgical repair is indicated if complications such as bleeding or malperfusion of major side branches occur.

Durability of aortic valve preservation and root reconstruction in acute type A aortic dissection

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to determine the durability of aortic valve preservation and root reconstruction in type A aortic dissection with involvement of the aortic root. METHODS From November 1976 to February 1999, 246 patients underwent surgical treatment for acute type A aortic dissection at our institution. In 121 patients (49%), all with acute type A dissection and aortic root involvement, the aortic valve was preserved and one or more of the sinuses of Valsalva were reconstructed. The mean age of this group was 59 +/- 11 years and 70 (58%) were men. Thirty patients (25%) were operated in cardiogenic shock. Criteria for aortic root reconstruction were technical feasibility and surgeon preference. Techniques used for reconstruction were valve resuspension in all patients and additional reinforcement of the aortic root with Teflon (L.R. Bard, Tempe, AZ) felt (n = 21), gelatin-resorcinol-formaldehyde-glue (GRF-glue, Fii, Saint-Just-Malmont, France) (n = 103), or fibrinous glue (Tissu-col, Immuno AG, Vienna, Austria) (n = 5). Mean follow-up was 43.5 +/- 46 months. RESULTS The operative mortality was 21.5% (n = 26). Actuarial survival was 72% +/- 4%, 64% +/- 5%, and 53% +/- 6% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Median aortic regurgitation in patients with retained native aortic valve at follow-up was 1+. All root reoperations included aortic valve replacement (n = 12). Freedom from aortic root reoperation was 95% +/- 2% at 1 year, 89% +/- 4% at 5 years, and 69% +/- 9% at 10 years. The incidence of aortic root reoperation was 23%, 11%, and 40%, respectively, when Teflon felt, GRF-glue, and fibrinous glue were used for root reconstruction. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed the use of fibrinous glue (RR = 8.7; p = 0.03) as well as the presence of an aortic valve annulus more than 27 mm (RR = 4.2; p = 0.04) as independent risk factors for aortic root reoperation. CONCLUSIONS Aortic valve preservation in acute type A dissection provides relatively durable results. The use of fibrinous glue for root reconstruction seems to compromise the long-term durability of the repair compared with Teflon felt and GRF-glue. A dilated aortic annulus requires a more extensive root procedure.

Systematic review of clinical outcomes in hybrid procedures for aortic arch dissections and other arch diseases

OBJECTIVE Available data on clinical outcomes of hybrid aortic arch repair are limited, especially for patients with aortic dissection. The objective of this review was to provide pooled analysis of periprocedural mortality and neurologic outcomes in hybrid procedures involving the aortic arch for dissection and other aortic diseases. METHODS Studies involving hybrid aortic arch procedures (2002-2011) were systematically searched and reviewed. End points were periprocedural mortality, stroke, and spinal cord ischemia. RESULTS A total of 50 studies including 1886 patients were included. Perioperative mortality ranged from 1.6% to 25.0% with a pooled event ratio of 10.8% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 9.3-12.5). Perioperative stroke, regardless of severity, ranged from 0.8% to 25.0% (pooled ratio 6.9%; 95% CI, 5.7%-8.4), and spinal cord ischemia, including permanent and transitory events, ranged from 1.0% to 25.0% (pooled ratio, 6.8%; 95% CI, 5.6-8.2). Neurologic but no mortality risk was affected by timing and center volume with decreased rates in more recent and higher volume studies. In dissected aorta, perioperative mortality rate was 9.8% (95% CI, 7.7-12.4), stroke 4.3% (95% CI, 3.0-6.3), and spinal cord ischemia 5.8% (95% CI, 4.2-7.9). Perioperative mortality was higher in diseases that extended to the ascending aorta (15.1% vs 7.6%; odds ratio, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.17-6.7; P = .021), whereas there were no significant differences in the neurologic risks of stroke or spinal cord ischemia. CONCLUSIONS Hybrid repair of the aortic arch carries not negligible risks of perioperative mortality and neurologic morbidity. Risk of neurologic complications has decreased with timing and center volume and may be limited in dissection repairs. However, contemporary information on aortic hybrid arch procedures is mainly provided by small case series or retrospective studies with wide range of results.

Antegrade selective cerebral perfusion in operations on the proximal thoracic aorta.

BACKGROUND To determine the factors that influence hospital death and neurologic complications after surgery on the thoracic aorta using circulatory arrest and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion. METHODS From May 1989 through April 1997, 106 patients underwent surgery on the thoracic aorta using circulatory arrest and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion. Mean age was 64.0 +/- 11.5 years. Unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion was used in 37 patients (35%), bihemispheric antegrade cerebral perfusion in 69 patients (65%). Mean antegrade cerebral perfusion time was 50.5 +/- 20.5 minutes. Indication for surgery was atherosclerotic aneurysm in 60 (56.5%) patients, postdissection aneurysm in 26 (24.4%), acute type A dissection in 16 (15.1%), other in 4 (4.0%). RESULTS Hospital mortality was 8.5% (n = 9; 70% CL: 5.8%-11.2%). Independent predictors of hospital mortality were rethoracotomy (odds ratio 5.7, p = 0.02), postoperative temporary (odds ratio 17.3, p = 0.02) or permanent (odds ratio 7.5, p = 0.03) neurologic dysfunction, postoperative dialysis (odds ratio 9.9, p = 0.008). Bilateral antegrade selective cerebral perfusion had a favorable impact on hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.08, p = 0.007). Temporary neurologic dysfunction occurred in 3.8% of patients (n = 4; 70% CL: 2.0%-5.6%); preoperative hemodynamic instability (odds ratio 14.8, p = 0.05) and perioperative technical problems (odds ratio 22.2, p = 0.033) were independent determinants of temporary neurologic dysfunction. Permanent central neurologic damage occurred in 5.4% of patients (n = 6; 70% CL: 3.2%-7.6%). Preoperative hemodynamic instability (odds ratio 18.9, p = 0.009) and approach through a left thoracotomy (odds ratio 9.4, p = 0.031) were significant predictors of permanent neurologic damage. CONCLUSIONS Hospital mortality is affected significantly by the choice of technique used for antegrade cerebral perfusion. The incidence of both temporary and permanent postoperative central neurologic damage is influenced by preoperative hemodynamic instability. Duration of cerebral perfusion had no influence on the postoperative neurologic outcome.

Endovascular stent-grafting for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVE Endoluminal placement of covered stent-grafts emerges as a less-invasive alternative to open surgical repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA). The present report describes our experience with endovascular stent-grafting in the treatment of descending TAA. METHODS From 1997 to 2001, 28 descending TAAs were treated in 27 patients (17 male, mean age 70 years) by endovascular stent-grafting. The aneurysms (mean diameter, 6.6 cm) had diverse causes, but the majority were due to atherosclerosis (71%). They were predominantly localized in the proximal (32%), central (39%), and distal part (22%) of the descending thoracic aorta. In two patients (7%), the entire thoracic aorta was treated. Preliminary subclavian-carotid artery transposition was performed in five patients. AneurX (n=6), Talent (n=9), and Excluder (n=13) stent-grafts were used. In 13 cases (46%), multiple stents were necessary for complete aneurysm exclusion. RESULTS In 27 of 28 cases (96%), the endovascular stent-grafts were successfully deployed. In one patient, stent dislocation into the aneurysm required open surgical repair in a subsequent procedure. There was no operative mortality. None of the patients developed paraplegia or paraparesis. No distal embolization occurred. After a median follow-up of 21 months (range, 1-49 months), there was one non-related late death. There was no aneurysm rupture. Maximal aneurysm diameter either remained stable or decreased slightly over time in all but one patient with evidence of an endoleak. Endoleaks occurred in eight patients (29%) during follow-up. In five of them the endoleaks sealed spontaneously, whereas in two patients a distal extension was inserted. CONCLUSIONS Endovascular repair of descending TAAs is a promising less-invasive alternative to open repair. Extended follow-up is necessary to determine its definite efficacy in the longer term.

Reoperations on the ascending aorta and aortic root: pitfalls and results in 134 patients

BACKGROUND This analysis was performed to evaluate the results of reoperations on the ascending aorta and aortic root. METHODS All reoperations (n = 134) on the aortic root and ascending aorta performed between February 1981 and April 1998 were retrospectively analyzed. Indications for reintervention were a true or false aneurysm (35%), acute dissection (3.0%), aortic valve stenosis and/or insufficiency (23.1%), prosthetic valve endocarditis (32.8%), and combinations (4.5%). The principal reoperations performed were aortic root replacement (composite graft, freestyle, aortic allograft, or pulmonary autograft) in 116 patients, ascending aortic replacement in 10 patients, and closure of a false aneurysm in 5 patients. Results were analyzed using univariate statistical methods. RESULTS Hospital mortality was 6.6% (8 patients). Univariate predictors of hospital death were preoperative functional class III or IV (p = 0.02), an interval of less than 6 months between the primary and actual operation (p = 0.02), preoperative creatinine level of more than 200 micromol/L (p = 0.001), acute aortic dissection (p = 0.001), intraoperative technical problems (p = 0.001), and postoperative dialysis (p = 0.001). Freedom from repetitive reoperation was 99% at 1 year and 98% at 5 and 10 years. CONCLUSIONS Reoperations on the aortic root and ascending aorta can be performed with an early mortality which is very acceptable.