Marc A. Seelen

Anti-C1q autoantibodies deposit in glomeruli but are only pathogenic in combination with glomerular C1q-containing immune complexes

Anti-C1q autoantibodies are present in sera of patients with several autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Strikingly, in SLE the presence of anti-C1q is associated with the occurrence of nephritis. We have generated mouse anti-mouse C1q mAbs and used murine models to investigate whether anti-C1q autoantibodies actually contribute to renal pathology in glomerular immune complex disease. Administration of anti-C1q mAb JL-1, which recognizes the collagen-like region of C1q, resulted in glomerular deposition of C1q and anti-C1q autoantibodies and mild granulocyte influx, but no overt renal damage. However, combination of JL-1 with a subnephritogenic dose of C1q-fixing anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) antibodies enhanced renal damage characterized by persistently increased levels of infiltrating granulocytes, major histological changes, and increased albuminuria. This was not observed when a non-C1q-fixing anti-GBM preparation was used. Experiments with different knockout mice showed that renal damage was dependent not only on glomerular C1q and complement activation but also on Fcgamma receptors. In conclusion, anti-C1q autoantibodies deposit in glomeruli together with C1q but induce overt renal disease only in the context of glomerular immune complex disease. This provides an explanation why anti-C1q antibodies are especially pathogenic in patients with SLE.

Local renal complement C3 induction by donor brain death is associated with reduced renal allograft function after transplantation

BACKGROUND Kidneys derived from brain-dead donors have inferior outcomes after transplantation compared to kidneys from living donors. Strikingly, early and profound serum levels of IL-6 in brain-dead donors are observed. IL-6 is the main regulator of the acute phase response (APR). The aim of this translational study was to investigate the expression of renal acute phase proteins (APPs) following brain death (BD) and to assess the association with renal allograft outcome after transplantation. METHODS BD was induced in rats by inflating a subdurally placed balloon catheter. Kidney biopsies were obtained from human living and brain-dead donors at donation, after cold preservation and reperfusion. In vitro, renal proximal tubular epithelial cells (HK-2 cells) were stimulated with IL-6. RESULTS Both in human and rat brain-dead donors, C3 and FBG expression was enhanced at donation compared to living donors and sham-operated animals. In human donors, no additional expression was found after cold ischaemia or reperfusion. C3 expression after reperfusion was independently associated with decreased short-term function after transplantation in grafts from brain-dead donors. In cultured HK-2 cells, C3 production was induced in the presence of IL-6. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, BD induces renal C3 and FBG expression. Moreover, C3 expression is associated with a worse allograft function early after transplantation. Therefore, targeting renal APPs in brain-dead donors, especially complement C3, may improve transplant outcome.

Crosstalk between Complement and Toll‐like Receptor Activation in Relation to Donor Brain Death and Renal Ischemia‐Reperfusion Injury

Two central pathways of innate immunity, complement and Toll‐like receptors (TLRs), play an important role in the pathogenesis of renal injury inherent to kidney transplantation. Recent findings indicate close crosstalk between complement and TLR signaling pathways. It is suggested that mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPKs) might be the key molecules linking both the complement and TLR pathways together. Complement and TLRs are important mediators of renal ischemia‐reperfusion injury (IRI). Besides IRI, complement C3 can also be upregulated and activated in the kidney before transplantation as a direct result of brain death (BD) in the donor. This local upregulation and activation of complement in the donor kidney has been proven to be detrimental for renal allograft outcome. Also TLR4 and several of its major ligands are upregulated by donor BD compared to living donors. Important and in line with the observations above, kidney transplant recipients have a benefit when receiving a kidney from a TLR4 Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile genotypic donor. The role of complement and TLRs and crosstalk between these two innate immune systems in relation to renal injury during donor BD and ischemia‐reperfusion are focus of this review. Future strategies to target complement and TLR activation in kidney transplantation are considered.

Systemic complement activation in deceased donors is associated with acute rejection after renal transplantation in the recipient.

Background. Acute rejection after renal transplantation has been shown to be negatively associated with long-term graft survival. Identifying donor factors that are associated with acute rejection in the recipient could help to a better understanding of the relevant underlying processes that lead to graft injury. Complement activation has been shown to be an important mediator of renal transplant related injury. In this study, we analyzed the effect of systemic complement activation in deceased donors before transplantation of their kidneys on posttransplant outcome in the recipient. Methods. Plasma from 232 deceased brain-dead and deceased cardiac-dead donors were analyzed for the complement activation markers C5b-9, C4d, Bb, and complement component mannan binding lectin by ELISA. The association of these parameters with posttransplant outcome in recipients was analyzed in a multivariate regression model. Results. It was found that C5b-9 level in donor plasma is associated with biopsy-proven acute rejection in the recipient during the first year after renal transplantation (P=0.035). Both in deceased brain-dead and deceased cardiac-dead donors increased complement activation was found. Conclusions. In conclusion, we found C5b-9 in the donor to be associated with acute rejection of renal transplants in the recipient. Whether targeting complement activation in the donor may ameliorate acute rejection in the recipient needs to be studied.

Complement and renal transplantation: from donor to recipient.

Long-term kidney graft survival is affected by different variables including donor condition, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and graft rejection during the transplantation process. The complement system is an important mediator of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury and in rejecting allografts. However, donor complement C3 seems to be crucial in renal transplantation-related injury as renal injury is attenuated in C3 deficient kidney grafts. Interestingly, before ischemia-reperfusion induced C3 expression, C3 is already induced in donors suffering from brain death. Therefore, strategies targeting complement activation in the brain-dead donor may increase graft viability and transplant outcome.

Targeting complement activation in brain-dead donors improves renal function after transplantation.

Kidneys recovered from brain-dead donors have inferior outcomes after transplantation compared to kidneys from living donors. Since complement activation plays an important role in renal transplant related injury, targeting complement activation in brain-dead donors might improve renal function after transplantation. Brain death (BD) was induced in Fisher rats by inflation of an epidurally placed balloon catheter and ventilated for 6h. BD animals were treated with soluble complement receptor 1 (sCR1) 1h before or 1h after BD. Kidney transplantation was performed and 7 days after transplantation animals were sacrificed. Plasma creatinine and urea were measured at days 0, 1, 3, 5 and 7 after transplantation. Renal function was significantly better at day 1 after transplantation in recipients receiving a sCR1 pre-treated donor kidney compared to recipients of a non-treated donor graft. Also treatment with sCR1, 1h after the diagnosis of BD, resulted in a better renal function after transplantation. Gene expression of IL-6, IL-1beta and TGF-beta were significantly lower in renal allografts recovered from treated donors. This study shows that targeting complement activation, during BD in the donor, leads to an improved renal function after transplantation in the recipient.

Identification of tubular heparan sulfate as a docking platform for the alternative complement component properdin in proteinuric renal disease.

Properdin binds to proximal tubular epithelial cells (PTEC) and activates the complement system via the alternative pathway in vitro. Cellular ligands for properdin in the kidney have not yet been identified. Because properdin interacts with solid-phase heparin, we investigated whether heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG) could be the physiological ligands of properdin. Kidneys from proteinuric rats showed colocalization of syndecan-1, a major epithelial HSPG, and properdin in the apical membranes of PTEC, which was not seen in control renal tissue. In vitro, PTEC did not constitutively express properdin. However, exogenous properdin binds to these cells in a dose-dependent fashion. Properdin binding was prevented by heparitinase pretreatment of the cells and was dose-dependently inhibited by exogenous heparin. ELISA and surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy (BIAcore) showed a strong dose-dependent interaction between heparan sulfate (HS) and properdin (Kd = 128 nm). Pretreatment of HSPG with heparitinase abolished this interaction in ELISA. Competition assays, using a library of HS-like polysaccharides, showed that sulfation pattern, chain length, and backbone composition determine the interaction of properdin with glycosaminoglycans. Interestingly, two nonanticoagulant heparin derivatives inhibited properdin-HS interaction in ELISA and BIAcore. Incubation of PTEC with human serum as complement source led to complement activation and deposition of C3 on the cells. This C3 deposition is dependent on the binding of properdin to HS as shown by heparitinase pretreatment of the cells. Our data identify tubular HS as a novel docking platform for alternative pathway activation via properdin, which might play a role in proteinuric renal damage. Our study also suggests nonanticoagulant heparinoids may provide renoprotection in complement-dependent renal diseases.

Hypoxia and Complement-and-Coagulation Pathways in the Deceased Organ Donor as the Major Target for Intervention to Improve Renal Allograft Outcome.

Background In the last few decades, strategies to improve allograft survival after kidney transplantation have been directed to recipient-dependent mechanisms of renal injury. In contrast, no such efforts have been made to optimize organ quality in the donor. Optimizing deceased donor kidney quality opens new possibilities to improve renal allograft outcome. Methods A total of 554 kidney biopsies were taken from donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidneys before donation, after cold ischemia and after reperfusion. Healthy living donor kidney biopsies served as controls. Transcriptomics was performed by whole genome microarray analyses followed by functional pathway analyses. Results Before organ retrieval and before cessation of blood circulation, metabolic pathways related to hypoxia and complement-and-coagulation cascades were the major pathways enhanced in DBD donors. Similar pathways were also enriched in DCD donors after the first warm ischemia time. Shortly after reperfusion of DCD grafts, pathways related to prolonged and worsening deprivation of oxygen were associated with delayed graft function in the recipient. Conclusion In conclusion, this large deceased donor study shows enrichment of hypoxia and complement-and-coagulation pathways already in DBD donors before cessation of blood flow, before organ retrieval. Therefore, future intervention therapies should target hypoxia and complement-and-coagulation cascades in the donor to improve renal allograft outcome in the recipient.

Factor H and Properdin Recognize Different Epitopes on Renal Tubular Epithelial Heparan Sulfate

Background: Alternative pathway (AP) of complement is involved in proteinuria-derived tubular injury. Results: Factor H and properdin recognize different nonoverlapping epitopes on tubular heparan sulfates. Conclusion: Tubular heparan sulfate play an important role in renal AP regulation. Significance: Low anticoagulant heparinoids can control AP-derived tubular injury. During proteinuria, renal tubular epithelial cells become exposed to ultrafiltrate-derived serum proteins, including complement factors. Recently, we showed that properdin binds to tubular heparan sulfates (HS). We now document that factor H also binds to tubular HS, although to a different epitope than properdin. Factor H was present on the urinary side of renal tubular cells in proteinuric, but not in normal renal tissues and colocalized with properdin in proteinuric kidneys. Factor H dose-dependently bound to proximal tubular epithelial cells (PTEC) in vitro. Preincubation of factor H with exogenous heparin and pretreatment of PTECs with heparitinase abolished the binding to PTECs. Surface plasmon resonance experiments showed high affinity of factor H for heparin and HS (KD values of 32 and 93 nm, respectively). Using a library of HS-like polysaccharides, we showed that chain length and high sulfation density are the most important determinants for glycosaminoglycan-factor H interaction and clearly differ from properdin-heparinoid interaction. Coincubation of properdin and factor H did not hamper HS/heparin binding of one another, indicating recognition of different nonoverlapping epitopes on HS/heparin by factor H and properdin. Finally we showed that certain low anticoagulant heparinoids can inhibit properdin binding to tubular HS, with a minor effect on factor H binding to tubular HS. As a result, these heparinoids can control the alternative complement pathway. In conclusion, factor H and properdin interact with different HS epitopes of PTECs. These interactions can be manipulated with some low anticoagulant heparinoids, which can be important for preventing complement-derived tubular injury in proteinuric renal diseases.

Lectin complement pathway gene profile of the donor and recipient does not influence graft outcome after kidney transplantation.

In kidney transplantation, complement activation was found to be induced by donor brain death, renal ischemia-reperfusion injury and allograft rejection. There are three known pathways of complement activation: the classical, lectin and the alternative pathway. The lectin complement pathway can be activated upon pattern recognition by mannan binding lectin (MBL) or ficolins (FCN). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the genes encoding the lectin pathway proteins determine their functional activity and serum levels. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the lectin gene profile of the donor and recipient on post-transplant outcome. A total of 12 functional SNPs in the MBL2, FCN2 and MBL-associated serine proteases 2 (MASP2) genes of 1271 donor-recipient pairs were determined. Lectin genotypic variants were analyzed for association with primary non-function (PNF), delayed graft function (DGF), biopsy proven acute rejection, death-censored graft survival and patient survival. Multivariate analyses found no association of donor and recipient MBL2 and MASP2 genotype with allograft outcome. Analysis of separate functional SNPs and haplotypes in the FCN2 gene of the donor and recipient did not reveal an association with transplant outcome. Also, the joint effect of the MBL2 and FCN2 genotype was not associated with allograft outcome.This study shows that the genetic profile of the lectin pathway of complement activation of the donor and recipient is not associated with allograft outcome after kidney transplantation.