Marc Bifano

Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of variants resistant to hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 5A replication complex inhibitor BMS‐790052 in Humans: In Vitro and In Vivo Correlations

The NS5A replication complex inhibitor, BMS‐790052, inhibits hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication with picomolar potency in preclinical assays. This potency translated in vivo to a substantial antiviral effect in a single‐ascending dose study and a 14‐day multiple‐ascending dose (MAD) monotherapy study. However, HCV RNA remained detectable in genotype 1a–infected patients at the end of the MAD study. In contrast, viral breakthrough was observed less often in patients infected with genotype 1b, and, in several patients, HCV RNA declined and remained below the level of quantitation (<25 IU/mL) through the duration of treatment. Here, we report on the results of the genotypic and phenotypic analyses of resistant variants in 24 genotype 1–infected patients who received BMS‐790052 (1, 10, 30, 60, and 100 mg, once‐daily or 30 mg twice‐daily) in the 14‐day MAD study. Sequence analysis was performed on viral complementary DNA isolated from serum specimens collected at baseline and days 1 (4, 8, and 12 hours), 2, 4, 7, and 14 postdosing. Analyses of the sequence variants (1) established a correlation between resistant variants emerging in vivo with BMS‐790052 treatment and those observed in the in vitro replicon system (major substitutions at residues 28, 30, 31, and 93 for genotype 1a and residues 31 and 93 for genotype 1b); (2) determined the prevalence of variants at baseline and the emergence of resistance at different times during dosing; and (3) revealed the resistance profile and replicative ability (i.e., fitness) of the variants. Conclusion: Although resistance emerged during monotherapy with BMS‐790052, the substantial anti‐HCV effect of this compound makes it an excellent candidate for effective combination therapy. (HEPATOLOGY 2011)

Multiple ascending dose study of BMS‐790052, a nonstructural protein 5A replication complex inhibitor, in patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1

The antiviral activity, resistance profile, pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of BMS‐790052, a nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) replication complex inhibitor, were evaluated in a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, sequential panel, multiple ascending dose study. Thirty patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection were randomized to receive a 14‐day course of BMS‐790052 (1, 10, 30, 60, or 100 mg once daily or 30 mg twice daily) or placebo in a ratio of 4:1. The mean maximum decline from baseline in HCV RNA ranged from 2.8 to 4.1 log10 IU/mL; the placebo group showed no evidence of antiviral activity. Most patients experienced viral rebound on or before day 7 of treatment with BMS‐790052 monotherapy; viral rebound was associated with viral variants that had been previously implicated in resistance development in the in vitro replicon system. The PK profile was supportive of once‐daily dosing with median peak plasma concentrations at 1‐2 hours postdose and mean terminal half‐life of 12‐15 hours. Steady state was achieved following 3‐4 days of daily dosing. BMS‐790052 was well tolerated in all dose groups, with adverse events occurring with a similar frequency in BMS‐790052‐ and placebo‐treated groups. There were no clinically relevant changes in vital signs, laboratory, or electrocardiogram parameters. Conclusion: BMS‐7590052 is the first NS5A replication complex inhibitor with multiple dose proof‐of‐concept in clinic. At doses of 1‐100 mg daily, BMS‐790052 was well tolerated, had a PK profile supportive of once‐daily dosing, and produced a rapid and substantial decrease in HCV‐RNA levels in patients chronically infected with HCV genotype 1. (HEPATOLOGY 2011

Sofosbuvir and Daclatasvir Combination Therapy in a Liver Transplant Recipient With Severe Recurrent Cholestatic Hepatitis C

Recurrent HCV infection following liver transplantation can lead to accelerated allograft injury that is difficult to treat with interferon. The aim of this study is to describe the first ever use of an interferon‐free, all oral regimen in a liver transplant recipient with severe recurrent HCV. A 54‐year‐old male with HCV genotype 1b developed severe cholestatic HCV at 6 months posttransplant with ascites, AST 503 IU/mL, alkaline phosphatase of 298 IU/mL, HCV RNA of 12 000 000 IU/mL, and histological cholestasis with pericellular fibrosis. Sofosbuvir, an HCV polymerase inhibitor (400 mg/day), and daclatasvir, an HCV NS5A replication complex inhibitor (60 mg/day), were co‐administered for 24 weeks. Within 4 weeks of initiating treatment, serum HCV RNA levels became undetectable and liver biochemistries normalized with concomitant resolution of ascites. The patient achieved a sustained virological response with undetectable HCV RNA at 9 months posttreatment. During and following treatment, the daily dose and blood level of tacrolimus remained stable and unchanged. The rapid and sustained suppression of HCV replication in this liver transplant recipient provides great promise for the use of combination oral antiviral regimens in other immunosuppressed and interferon refractory HCV patients.

Case Report of Successful Peginterferon, Ribavirin, and Daclatasvir Therapy for Recurrent Cholestatic Hepatitis C After Liver Retransplantation

A recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) can lead to accelerated allograft injury and fibrosis. The aim of this article is to report the first ever use of daclatasvir (DCV; also known as BMS‐790052), a potent orally administered nonstructural 5A replication complex inhibitor, in combination with peginterferon α (PEG‐IFNα) and ribavirin in an LT recipient. A 49‐year‐old female developed a severe recurrent HCV genotype 1b infection 4 months after transplantation with severe cholestasis on biopsy, an HCV RNA level of 10,000,000 IU/mL, an alkaline phosphatase level of 1525 IU/mL, and a total bilirubin level of 8.4 mg/dL. Despite partial virological suppression with PEG‐IFNα and ribavirin, progressive allograft failure ensued and culminated in retransplantation at 9 months. Three months after the second transplant, DCV (20 mg/day), PEG‐IFNα2a (180 μg/week), and ribavirin (800 mg/day) were prescribed for early recurrent cholestatic HCV. Serum HCV RNA became undetectable at week 3 of treatment and remained undetectable during 24 weeks of triple therapy and during the posttreatment follow‐up. DCV was well tolerated, and the trough drug levels were within the targeted range throughout the treatment. The cyclosporine trough levels were also stable during and after therapy. In conclusion, the lack of anticipated drug‐drug interactions between DCV and calcineurin inhibitors and the potent antiviral efficacy of DCV make this agent (in combination with PEG‐IFN and ribavirin) an attractive antiviral regimen worthy of further study in LT recipients with recurrent HCV. Liver Transpl, 2012.

Assessment of pharmacokinetic interactions of the HCV NS5A replication complex inhibitor daclatasvir with antiretroviral agents: ritonavir-boosted atazanavir, efavirenz and tenofovir.

BACKGROUND Approximately one-third of all HIV-infected individuals are coinfected with HCV, many of whom will receive concomitant treatment for both infections. With the advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for HCV, potential drug interactions between antiretrovirals and DAAs require evaluation prior to co-therapy. METHODS Three open-label studies were conducted in healthy subjects to assess potential interactions between the investigational first-in-class HCV NS5A replication complex inhibitor daclatasvir and representative antiretrovirals atazanavir/ritonavir, efavirenz and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. RESULTS Target exposure was that of 60 mg daclatasvir alone. Dose-normalized (60 mg) geometric mean ratios of daclatasvir AUCτ for 20 mg ± atazanavir/ritonavir (2.10 [90% CI 1.95, 2.26]) and 120 mg ± efavirenz (0.68 [0.60, 0.78]) showed less than the three-fold elevation and two-fold reduction, respectively, in systemic exposure predicted by prior interaction studies with potent inhibitors/inducers of CYP3A4. Daclatasvir dose adjustment to 30 mg once daily with atazanavir/ritonavir and 90 mg once daily with efavirenz is predicted to normalize AUCτ relative to the target exposure (geometric mean ratios 1.05 [0.98, 1.13] and 1.03 [0.90, 1.16], respectively). Atazanavir exposure (Cmax, AUCτ and C24 trough) and efavirenz Ctrough under coadministration were similar to historical data without daclatasvir. No clinically relevant interactions between daclatasvir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate were observed for either drug, and no dosing adjustments were indicated. Daclatasvir was well tolerated in all three studies. CONCLUSIONS The pharmacokinetic data support coadministration of daclatasvir with atazanavir/ritonavir, efavirenz and/or tenofovir. A Phase III study in HIV-HCV coinfection has commenced using the described dose modifications.

Entecavir Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability After Multiple Ascending Doses in Healthy Subjects

A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multiple oral dose escalation study was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of entecavir in healthy subjects. Eight subjects were assigned to each of the 3 dose panels (0.1 mg, 0.5 mg, and 1 mg or matched placebo once daily for 14 days). Blood and urine samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analyses. Entecavir was rapidly absorbed, with peak plasma concentration occurring within 1 hour of dosing. Steady‐state plasma concentrations of entecavir were achieved by 10 days following the initial dose. At steady state, the mean area under the plasma concentration‐time curve over 1 dosing interval, increased approximately proportional to dose. Entecavir had a mean terminal half‐life ranging from 128 to 149 hours and an effective half‐life of approximately 24 hours. Elimination was predominantly through renal excretion, with mean urinary recovery ranging from 62% to 73%. Entecavir was safe and well tolerated when administered at doses ranging from 0.1 mg to 1 mg/d for 14 days.

A functional interaction of ICP8, the herpes simplex virus single-stranded DNA-binding protein, and the helicase-primase complex that is dependent on the presence of the UL8 subunit.

The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV) single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB, ICP8) stimulates the viral DNA polymerase (Pol) on an oligonucleotide-primed single-stranded DNA template. This stimulation is non-specific since other SSBs also increase Pol activity. However, only ICP8 was stimulatory when Pol activity was dependent upon priming by the viral helicase-primase complex. ICP8 also specifically stimulated the primer synthesis and ATPase activities of the helicase-primase. The mechanism of stimulation was different from that of Pol; helicase-primase stimulation required much lower amounts of ICP8 than the amount that saturates the DNA and optimally stimulates Pol. Furthermore, ICP8 did not act by removing secondary structure as stimulation also occurred on homopolymer templates. While the UL8 component of the helicase-primase is not required for enzymatic activities by a subassembly of the UL5 and UL52 proteins, only the holoenzyme (UL5/8/52) was stimulated by ICP8. These results identify a unique, functional interaction between the ICP8 SSB and the helicase-primase complex, mediated by the UL8 subunit.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of daclatasvir in subjects with renal function impairment.

BACKGROUND Daclatasvir (DCV) is a pangenotypic inhibitor of the HCV NS5A replication complex approved in Japan and Europe for combination treatment of HCV. AI444-063 was an open-label, two-stage, adaptive study assessing DCV pharmacokinetics and safety in HCV-uninfected subjects with renal impairment. METHODS Stage 1 included 12 subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis and 12 healthy controls (creatinine clearance [CLcr]≥90 ml/min, Cockcroft-Gault) matched by sex, age and weight. All participants received a single DCV 60-mg dose on day 1. DCV plasma levels were measured through day 4. Prespecified criteria for study expansion (ESRD versus control area under the curve extrapolated to infinite time [AUC∞] geometric mean ratio [GMR] upper 90% CI>1.5) were met; therefore, 12 subjects with moderate or severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 30-59 and 15-29 ml/min/1.73m(2), respectively) were included in stage 2. RESULTS All 36 participants (30 male, mean age 54 years) completed the study. DCV AUC∞ was higher in ESRD subjects versus controls (GMR 1.264, 90% CI 0.989, 1.616). Compared with normal CLcr (90 ml/min), GMR and 90% CI for unbound DCV AUC∞ at CLcr 60, 30 and 15 ml/min were 1.18 (1.07, 1.30), 1.39 (1.14, 1.70) and 1.51 (1.18, 1.94), respectively. DCV was generally well tolerated in subjects with normal renal function, ESRD, or moderate or severe renal impairment. CONCLUSIONS Observed DCV exposure increases were within the normal range of variability and were not associated with an elevated risk of adverse events. DCV can be administered in subjects with renal impairment, including ESRD, without dose modification. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01830205.

Daclatasvir plus simeprevir with or without ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection

BACKGROUND & AIMS We evaluated the combination of daclatasvir (pan-genotypic NS5A inhibitor) and simeprevir (NS3/4A protease inhibitor), with or without ribavirin, in hepatitis C virus genotype 1-infected patients. METHODS This phase II, open-label study enrolled treatment-naive patients or prior null responders with genotype 1b (n=147) or 1a (n=21) infection. Genotype 1b-infected patients were randomized 1:1 to receive daclatasvir 30mg plus simeprevir 150mg once daily with or without ribavirin; those who completed the initial 12-week treatment were re-randomized 1:1 to stop treatment or continue treatment through to week 24. Genotype 1a-infected patients received daclatasvir plus simeprevir with ribavirin for 24weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12). RESULTS For genotype 1b, 84.9% (45/53) and 74.5% (38/51) of treatment-naive patients and 69.6% (16/23) and 95.0% (19/20) of prior null responders to peginterferon and ribavirin achieved SVR12 with daclatasvir plus simeprevir alone and with ribavirin, respectively. Treatment duration did not have a well-defined impact on response. For genotype 1a, daclatasvir plus simeprevir with ribavirin provided a 66.7% (8/12) response rate in treatment-naive patients and was not effective in prior null responders. Data suggest that baseline resistance polymorphisms influenced SVR12 rates. Daclatasvir plus simeprevir was well tolerated with or without ribavirin with low incidences of serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS Daclatasvir plus simeprevir, with or without ribavirin, was effective with a 12- or 24-week duration in genotype 1b-infected patients and was well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01628692.

The herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA polymerase accessory protein, UL42, contains a functional protease-resistant domain

Herpes simplex virus type 1 encodes its own DNA polymerase (Pol), the product of the UL30 gene, and a polymerase accessory subunit, the product of the UL42 gene, both of which are required for viral DNA replication. Pol and the UL42 protein associate to form a heterodimeric complex (Pol/UL42) which is more active and has a higher processivity than the Pol catalytic subunit alone. The Pol/UL42 complex has been reconstituted by mixing together highly purified Pol and UL42 subunits obtained from recombinant baculovirus-infected cells. We have used polymerase activity on poly(dA):oligo(dT20), a template that the Pol subunit utilizes with low efficiency, to measure the formation of the Pol/UL42 complex. Our data indicate that the association constant for the Pol/UL42 complex is 1 x 10(8) M-1. Proteolytic digestions of UL42 were performed to determine whether structural domains of UL42 could be disclosed by differential amino acid accessibilities. The ability of these protease-resistant domains to form a functional complex with Pol was determined by measuring their ability to stimulate Pol activity on poly(dA):oligo(dT20). We have found that trypsin digestion of UL42 in the presence of DNA generates protease-resistant fragments of 28K and 8K which co-elute from a MonoQ column and are able to stimulate Pol activity on poly(dA):oligo(dT20). Complex formation of the 28K and 8K tryptic fragments with Pol was also shown by their co-immunoprecipitation with antibody to Pol. It was determined that the 28K fragment of UL42 comprised amino acids 1 to 245 or 1 to 254 of UL42, whereas the 8K fragment started at amino acid 255. Thus, controlled proteolysis of UL42 revealed two closely contiguous structural domains that retained the ability to complex with Pol and stimulate Pol activity.