Marc Carrier

Consensus Statements on the Risk, Prevention, and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Canadian Association of Gastroenterology

BACKGROUND & AIMSnGuidelines for the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) from the American College of Chest Physicians do not address patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a group with a high risk of both VTE and gastrointestinal bleeding. We present recommendations for the prevention and treatment of VTE in patients with IBD.nnnMETHODSnA systematic literature search was performed to identify studies on VTE in IBD. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Statements were developed through an iterative online platform, then finalized and voted on by a working group of adult and pediatric gastroenterologists and thrombosis specialists.nnnRESULTSnIBD patients have an approximately 3-fold higher risk of VTE compared with individuals without IBD, and disease flares further increase this risk. Anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis is recommended for IBD patients who are hospitalized with IBD flares without active bleeding and is suggested when bleeding is nonsevere. Anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis is suggested during moderate-severe IBD flares in outpatients with a history of VTE provoked by an IBD flare or an unprovoked VTE, but not otherwise. The recommended duration of anticoagulation after a first VTE is based on the presence of provoking factors. Specific suggestions are made for the prevention and treatment of VTE in pediatric and pregnant IBD patients.nnnCONCLUSIONSnUsing the American College of Chest Physicians guidelines as a foundation, we have integrated evidence from IBD studies to develop specific recommendations for the management of VTE in this high-risk population.

Does the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index accurately identify low risk patients eligible for outpatient treatment

INTRODUCTIONnThe pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI) and the recently derived simplified PESI prognostic model have been developed to estimate the risk of 30-day mortality in patients with acute PE. We sought to assess if the PESI and simplified PESI prognostic models can accurately identify adverse events and to determine the rates of events in patients treated as outpatients.nnnMETHODSnA retrospective cohort study of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) presenting at the Ottawa Hospital (Canada) was conducted between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2008.nnnRESULTSnTwo hundred and forty three patients were included. A total of 118 (48.6%) and 81 (33.3%) were classified as low risk patients using the original and simplified PESI prognostic models respectively. None of the low risk patients died within the 3months of follow-up. One hundred and fifteen (47.3%) patients were safely treated as outpatients with no deaths or bleeding episodes and only 1 recurrent event within the first 14days or after 30days of follow-up. Thirty four (29.6%) of these outpatients were classified as high risk patients according to the original PESI and 54 (47.0%) to the simplified PESI prognostic model.nnnCONCLUSIONnBoth PESI strategies accurately identify patients with acute PE who are at low risk and high risk for short-term adverse events. However, 30 to 47% of patients with acute PE and a high risk PESI score were safely managed as outpatients. Future research should be directed at developing tools that predict which patients would benefit from inpatient management.

Outcomes of saddle pulmonary embolism: a nested case-control study

Correctly stratifying the risk of death in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) has been a matter of debate in the literature; and certain forms of presentation, such as central saddle emboli, have been considered to lead to increased risk,

Thrombotic and bleeding outcomes following perioperative interruption of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolic disease

Essentials Studies evaluating the procedural interruption of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are lacking. We conducted a study of the interruption of DOACs for prior venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). The post‐operative risks of recurrent VTE and major bleeding are low in this patient population. A scheme based on half‐life and procedure‐related bleeding appears safe and efficacious.

Epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of catheter-related thrombosis in children and adults

In this narrative review, the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention strategies, and management of catheter-related thrombosis are outlined. Central venous catheters have significantly improved the quality of life of patients requiring chemotherapy, parenteral nutrition, and chronic transfusions. Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) complicates between 1-5% of inserted catheters, with incidence varying between patient population, catheter type, and vein cannulated. Strategies to prevent CRT, including anticoagulation and locking solutions, have largely been ineffective. Using clinical decision tools and D-dimer testing can limit radiographic testing for patients with suspected CRT. Although most patients with CRT are treated with anticoagulation, the most effective type and duration of treatment have not been established for adults or children. Many unanswered questions remain concerning risk stratification, prevention, and management of CRT. National and international collaborative research networks could be harnessed to perform these much needed studies.

Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Management of Anemia: A Scoping Review

Anemia is a frequently diagnosed condition that may be a symptom of or complication of many illnesses affecting patients of all demographics. Anemia can lead to both worsened clinical outcomes and reduced quality of life. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are methodological tools used to capture the impact of disease on patient well-being. Use of PROMs in medical research is becoming more common as it is increasingly recognized that disease outcomes of interest to researchers and clinicians are not always consistent with patients greatest concerns related to their diseases. We conducted a scoping review to characterize the studies that have evaluated patient-centered outcomes using PROMs in patients undergoing treatment for anemia. We conducted a search of Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PsychINFO, and CINAHL databases for studies published until January 2017 that investigated an intervention to treat anemia in any patient population and used at least 1 PROM to evaluate patient-centered outcomes. A descriptive synthesis was performed to characterize the PROMs used and to evaluate the quality of patient-centered outcome (PCO) reporting. Of the 3224 studies identified in the initial search, 130 met all eligibility criteria. We found that the population most frequently studied was oncology patients (46.2% of studies). The therapy for anemia evaluated in the most studies was erythropoietin-stimulating agents (77.7% of studies). The most commonly used PROM was the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy tool (46.9%), and the majority of studies used only 1 PROM tool (53.1%). We found significant variability in the quality of PCO reporting across all included studies. Improved methodologic rigor in the assessment of PCOs in anemia management is needed in future studies.

The importance of post thrombotic syndrome as an outcome after deep venous thrombosis: A survey of Canadian thrombosis clinicians

OBJECTIVESnThe development of post thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a major source of morbidity and reduced quality of life. We sought to determine the value assigned by clinicians to post thrombotic syndrome and whether clinicians believe that any post thrombotic syndrome or severe post thrombotic syndrome are important outcomes to assess after deep vein thrombosis (DVT) as compared to other outcomes.nnnDESIGNnThe design of the study was a self-responded electronic survey. Questions for the online survey were designed by two authors (R.I. and E.G.).nnnMETHODSnThe survey was distributed to 233 members of Thrombosis Canada and the Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery between August 2014 and October 2014.nnnRESULTSnThere were 84 responses to the survey with complete responses were obtained from 71 respondents for a response rate of 36%. PTS was ranked as a significantly less important outcome after DVT than recurrent DVT, pulmonary embolism during treatment, major bleeding, death, quality of life, venous ulceration and severe post thrombotic syndrome (all comparisons p<0.05 by two sample t-test).nnnCONCLUSIONSnOur survey determined that any post thrombotic syndrome is perceived by physicians as less important than other DVT outcomes. Thus, Severe PTS and not Any PTS should be included as an outcome measure in studies investigating acute DVT.