Marc de Gasparo

Preliminary biochemical characterization of two angiotensin II receptor subtypes

Two angiotensin II receptor subtypes (A and B) are described from rat and human tissues. They have been characterised using specific peptidic and non-peptidic ligands with affinities differing by 1000 fold or more. These subtypes are present in adrenal glomerulosa of both species. Human uterus contains only subtype A, whereas both subtypes are found in rat uterus. Vascular smooth muscle cells in culture express only subtype B. Dithio-threitol totally inhibits binding to subtype B, but enhances the affinity to subtype A. There is a good correlation between the affinities of the selected agonists and antagonists for the two subtypes in the various tissues tested which is a usual requirement for receptor classification.

Angiotensin II receptor subtypes: characterization, signalling mechanisms, and possible physiological implications

Thanks to the recent discovery of angiotensin II (ANG II) receptor subtypes linked to different signalling pathways, research in the different areas related to this peptide has regained a strong interest. In the following review, we first describe the biochemistry and actions of angiotensin peptides formed both in the circulation and locally at the tissue and organ level. Evidence for the existence and distribution of ANG II receptor subtypes in mammalian as well as in nonmammalian species and lower organisms is presented. The changes in receptor subtype expression during development and disease are described. The signal transduction mechanisms and biological actions of ANG II mediated by the recently cloned AT1 receptor are reviewed and the recent data concerning the signalling pathways linked to the AT2 receptor are discussed. Finally, based upon their molecular pharmacology, we present evidence and also speculate upon the physiological function of the ANG II receptor subtypes.

The angiotensin AT2 receptor stimulates protein tyrosine phosphatase activity and mediates inhibition of particulate guanylate cyclase

The signalling mechanism and cellular targets of the AT2 receptor are still unknown. We report that angiotensin II (Ang II) inhibits basal and atrial natriuretic peptide stimulated particulate guanylate cyclase (pGC) activity through AT2 receptors in rat adrenal glomerulosa and PC12W cells. This inhibition is blocked by the phosphotyrosine phosphatase (PTPase) inhibitor orthovanadate but not by the Ser/Thr phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid, suggesting the involvement of a PTPase in this process. Moreover, Ang II induces a rapid, transient and orthovanadate sensitive dephosphorylation of phosphotyrosine containing proteins in PC12W cells. Our findings suggest that AT2 receptors signal through stimulation of a PTPase and that this mechanism is implicated in the regulation of pGC activity. This observation is also the first example of hormonal inhibition of basal pGC activity.

Pharmacological profile of valsartan: a potent, orally active, nonpeptide antagonist of the angiotensin II AT1-receptor subtype

1 The pharmacological profile of valsartan, (S)‐N‐valeryl‐N‐{[2′‐(1H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl)biphenyl‐4‐yl]‐methyl}‐valine, a potent, highly selective, and orally active antagonist at the angiotensin II (AII) AT1‐receptor, was studied in vitro and in vivo. 2 Valsartan competed with [125I]‐AII at its specific binding sites in rat aortic smooth muscle cell membranes (AT1‐receptor subtype) with a Ki of 2.38 nm, but was about 30,000 times less active in human myometrial membranes (AT2‐receptor subtype). 3 In rabbit aortic rings incubated for 5 min with valsartan, at concentrations of 2, 20 and 200 nm, the concentration‐response curve of AII was displaced to the right and the maximum response was reduced by 33%, 36% and 40%, respectively. Prolongation of the incubation time with valsartan to 1 h or 3 h, further reduced the maximum response by 48% or 59% (after 20 nm) and by 59% or 60% (after 200 nm) respectively. After 3 h incubation an apparent pKB value of 9.26 was calculated. Contractions induced by noradrenaline, 5‐hydroxytryptamine, or potassium chloride were not affected by valsartan. No agonistic effects were observed in the rabbit aorta at concentrations of valsartan up to 2 μm. 4 In bovine adrenal glomerulosa, valsartan inhibited All‐stimulated aldosterone release without affecting the maximum response (pA2 8.4). 5 In the pithed rat, oral administration of valsartan (10 mg kg−1) shifted the All‐induced pressor response curves to the right, without affecting responses induced by the electrical stimulation of the sympathetic outflow or by noradrenaline. Animals treated with valsartan 24 h before pithing also showed significant inhibition of the response to AII. 6 In conscious, two‐kidney, one‐clip renal hypertensive rats (2K1C), valsartan decreased blood pressure in a dose‐dependent manner after single i.v. or oral administration. The respective ED30 values were 0.06 mg kg−1 (i.v.) and 1.4 mg kg−1 (p.o.). The antihypertensive effect lasted for at least 24 h after either route of administration. After repeated oral administration for 4 days (3 and 10 mg kg−1 daily), in 2K1C renal hypertensive rats, systolic blood pressure was consistently decreased, but heart rate was not significantly affected. 7 In conscious, normotensive, sodium‐depleted marmosets, valsartan decreased mean arterial pressure, measured by telemetry, after oral doses of 1–30 mg kg−1. The hypotensive effect persisted up to 12 h after 3 and 10 mg kg−1 and up to 24 h after 30 mg kg−1. 8 In sodium‐depleted marmosets, the hypotensive effect of valsartan lasted longer than that of losartan (DuP 753). In renal hypertensive rats, both agents had a similar duration (24 h), but a different onset of action (valsartan at 1 h, losartan between 2 h and 24 h). 9 These results demonstrate that valsartan is a potent, specific, highly selective antagonist of AII at the AT1‐receptor subtype and does not possess agonistic activity. Furthermore, it is an efficacious, orally active, blood pressure‐lowering agent in conscious renal hypertensive rats and in conscious normotensive, sodium‐depleted primates.

Proposed Update of Angiotensin Receptor Nomenclature

Angiotensin II exerts a wide range of actions on the heart, blood vessels, adrenals, kidneys, and nervous system and plays a major role in blood pressure maintenance and volume homeostasis. Its effects are mediated mainly by plasma membrane receptors. Efforts to elucidate the nature and distribution of these receptors have involved intensive research on the part of pharmacologists, molecular biologists, and clinicians, and to avoid confusion it is therefore important that a uniform nomenclature be adopted by all disciplines concerned. The International Union of Pharmacology (IUPHAR) Nomenclature Subcommittee for Angiotensin Receptors met in Oxnard, Calif, in February 1994. At this meeting, scientists working in the field were invited to exchange views on new issues relating to angiotensin receptor subtypes, their functions, and appropriate amendments to the nomenclature proposed in 1991.1 The committee has not yet been able to put forward a definitive recommendation in this fast-moving area, but the simple and workable guidelines suggested in this article reflect the opinion of many specialists. Comments from the scientific community are welcome to help in formulating a proposal that could be endorsed by the IUPHAR. To avoid any ambiguity, it is recommended that Ang should be used as the standard abbreviation for the hormone angiotensin, in conformity with a previous report2 from the Joint Nomenclature and Standardization Committee of the International Society of Hypertension, American Heart Association, and the …

Angiotensin II AT2 receptors do not interact with guanine nucleotide binding proteins.

We have studied the effect of GTP gamma S on the affinity and binding kinetics of angiotensin II in plasma membrane particulate prepared from tissues expressing either only AT1 (human renal artery smooth muscle cells), only AT2 (human myometrium and bovine cerebellar cortex) or both angiotensin II receptor subtypes (rat adrenal glomerulosa). We also examined the ability of angiotensin II to stimulate GTP gamma[35S] incorporation in these membrane preparations. In contrast to its effects on angiotensin II binding to the AT1 receptor, GTP gamma S does not affect binding parameters to the AT2 receptor. Moreover, in tissues expressing solely AT2 receptors, angiotensin II was unable to induce GTP gamma[35S] incorporation. These findings indicate that AT2 receptors do not interact with G-proteins and that angiotensin II must therefore mediate some of its effects through G-protein-independent mechanisms.

Angiotensin type 2 receptor antagonism confers renal protection in a rat model of progressive renal injury.

The role of the angiotensin type 2 (AT(2)) receptor in the pathogenesis of progressive renal injury has not been previously elucidated. The renal expression of the AT(1) and AT(2) receptors in subtotally nephrectomized rats (STNx) and the effects of AT(2) receptor blockade on renal injury were explored. Reduced renal expression of the AT(1) but not the AT(2) receptor was observed in STNx by reverse transcription-PCR, by in vitro autoradiography, and by immunohistochemical staining. The STNx rats were randomly assigned to AT(1) receptor antagonist valsartan, AT(2) receptor antagonist PD123319, or the combination of both for 4 wk. Increased proteinuria in STNx rats was reduced by PD123319 but to a lesser degree when compared with valsartan. Reduced gene and protein expression of the slit diaphragm protein nephrin was prevented by either valsartan or PD123319. Expression of osteopontin, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and monocyte/macrophage infiltration was increased in STNx rats and was reduced by both AT(1) and AT(2) receptor antagonists. These effects of AT(2) receptor antagonism were observed in the presence of increased BP in STNx rats. These findings suggest that blockade of the AT(2) receptor alone confers a degree of renal protection; in particular, it seems that the combination of the AT(1) and AT(2) receptor antagonists may confer additive renal effects than either receptor antagonist as monotherapy.

The angiotensin AT2 receptor modulates T‐type calcium current in non‐differentiated NG108‐15 cells

We report here that angiotensin II (AII) and the AT2 receptor‐selective ligand, CGP 42112, modulate the T‐type calcium current in non‐differentiated NG108‐15 cells, which express only AT2 receptors. Both peptides decrease the T‐type calcium current at membrane potentials above −40 mV and shift the current—voltage curve at lower potentials with maximal effect between 5 and 10 min after application. These data describe a new cellular response to AII and suggest that the AT2 receptor mediates certain neurophysiological actions of this hormone.

Identification and characterization of angiotensin II receptor subtypes in rabbit ventricular myocardium

CGP 42 112 A and DuP 753 block [125I]-angiotensin II binding in rabbit ventricular myocardial membranes in a clearly biphasic manner, indicating the existence of high- and low-affinity sites for these highly selective agents. Assays using concentrations of either agent large enough to prevent high-affinity binding show that their respective high-affinity sites are distinct, and each corresponds to the low-affinity site of the other. The two receptor subsets, present in nearly equal proportions, are also distinguishable by their different sensitivities to dithiothreitol. These findings afford strong evidence for the existence of two distinct angiotensin II receptors in rabbit myocardium, corresponding to the A and B subtypes recently described in adrenals.

Distribution of angiotensin II receptor subtypes in rat brain nuclei

Angiotensin II (ANG II) receptor subtypes in rat brain were characterized and quantified by competitive radioligand binding using [125I]Sar1 Ile8 angiotensin II ([125I]sarilesin) as a tracer and ANG II, sarilesin and the subtype selective ligands DuP 753 (AT1) and CGP 42112A (AT2) as competitors. The distribution of AT1 and AT2 receptors was determined in midbrain, brainstem, hypothalamus as well as in individual hypothalamic and periventricular nuclei. Whereas in midbrain and brainstem the AT1: AT2 ratio was 40%: 60% and 70%: 30% respectively, the AT1 receptors were by far predominant in hypothalamus and in the nuclei investigated. Interestingly, we found that approximately 25% of the ANG II receptors in hypothalamus did not bind DuP 753 even at 0.1 mM. These sites which bind CGP 42112A, ANG II and sarilesin may represent a third ANG II receptor subtype.