Marc Edwards

Distinct Roles for CARMIL Isoforms in Cell Migration

Molecular mechanisms for cell migration, especially how signaling and cytoskeletal systems are integrated, are not understood well. Here, we examined the role of CARMIL (capping protein, Arp2/3, and Myosin-I linker) family proteins in migrating cells. Vertebrates express three conserved genes for CARMIL, and we examined the functions of the two CARMIL genes expressed in migrating human cultured cells. Both isoforms, CARMIL1 and 2, were necessary for cell migration, but for different reasons. CARMIL1 localized to lamellipodia and macropinosomes, and loss of its function caused loss of lamellipodial actin, along with defects in protrusion, ruffling, and macropinocytosis. CARMIL1-knockdown cells showed loss of activation of Rac1, and CARMIL1 was biochemically associated with the GEF Trio. CARMIL2, in contrast, colocalized with vimentin intermediate filaments, and loss of its function caused a distinctive multipolar phenotype. Loss of CARMIL2 also caused decreased levels of myosin-IIB, which may contribute to the polarity phenotype. Expression of one CARMIL isoform was not able to rescue the knockdown phenotypes of the other. Thus, the two isoforms are both important for cell migration, but they have distinct functions.

Altering the threshold of an excitable signal transduction network changes cell migratory modes

The diverse migratory modes displayed by different cell types are generally believed to be idiosyncratic. Here we show that the migratory behaviour of Dictyostelium was switched from amoeboid to keratocyte-like and oscillatory modes by synthetically decreasing phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate levels or increasing Ras/Rap-related activities. The perturbations at these key nodes of an excitable signal transduction network initiated a causal chain of events: the threshold for network activation was lowered, the speed and range of propagating waves of signal transduction activity increased, actin-driven cellular protrusions expanded and, consequently, the cell migratory mode transitions ensued. Conversely, innately keratocyte-like and oscillatory cells were promptly converted to amoeboid by inhibition of Ras effectors with restoration of directed migration. We use computational analysis to explain how thresholds control cell migration and discuss the architecture of the signal transduction network that gives rise to excitability.

Excitable Signal Transduction Networks in Directed Cell Migration

Although directed migration of eukaryotic cells may have evolved to escape nutrient depletion, it has been adopted for an extensive range of physiological events during development and in the adult organism. The subversion of these movements results in disease, such as cancer. Mechanisms of propulsion and sensing are extremely diverse, but most eukaryotic cells move by extending actin-filled protrusions termed macropinosomes, pseudopodia, or lamellipodia or by extension of blebs. In addition to motility, directed migration involves polarity and directional sensing. The hundreds of gene products involved in these processes are organized into networks of parallel and interconnected pathways. Many of these components are activated or inhibited coordinately with stimulation and on each spontaneously extended protrusion. Moreover, these networks display hallmarks of excitability, including all-or-nothing responsiveness and wave propagation. Cellular protrusions result from signal transduction waves that propagate outwardly from an origin and drive cytoskeletal activity. The range of the propagating waves and hence the size of the protrusions can be altered by lowering or raising the threshold for network activation, with larger and wider protrusions favoring gliding or oscillatory behavior over amoeboid migration. Here, we evaluate the variety of models of excitable networks controlling directed migration and outline critical tests. We also discuss the utility of this emerging view in producing cell migration and in integrating the various extrinsic cues that direct migration.

Physiological Role of the Interaction between CARMIL1 and Capping Protein

The CARMIL1–capping protein (CP) interaction is essential for lamellipodial function and the processes of ruffling and macropinocytosis. CARMIL1’s capping-binding region can inhibit CP in cells. Evidence suggests that CARMIL1’s ability to bind CP in cells is regulated.

Insight from the maximal activation of the signal transduction excitable network in Dictyostelium discoideum

Significance Directed cell migration is at the center of the pathophysiology of many diseases such as cancer. It requires the coordination of a signal transduction network and an underlying cytoskeleton. Understanding the composition of these networks and the mechanism by which they are coupled is critical to furthering our understanding of how cells move. Here, we have developed a cell-based tool which maximizes the activation of the signal transduction system. This has provided us with insight into its composition and the mechanism by which it controls the activity of the actin cytoskeletal activity, which drives migration. Most striking, the persistent activation of the signal transduction apparatus was discovered to have severe consequences for cell viability. Cell migration requires the coordination of an excitable signal transduction network involving Ras and PI3K pathways with cytoskeletal activity. We show that expressing activated Ras GTPase-family proteins in cells lacking PTEN or other mutations which increase cellular protrusiveness transforms cells into a persistently activated state. Leading- and trailing-edge markers were found exclusively at the cell perimeter and the cytosol, respectively, of the dramatically flattened cells. In addition, the lifetimes of dynamic actin puncta were increased where they overlapped with actin waves, suggesting a mechanism for the coupling between these two networks. All of these phenotypes could be reversed by inhibiting signal transduction. Strikingly, maintaining cells in this state of constant activation led to a form of cell death by catastrophic fragmentation. These findings provide insight into the feedback loops that control excitability of the signal transduction network, which drives migration.

Mutually inhibitory Ras-PI(3,4)P2 feedback loops mediate cell migration

Significance Cell migration is central in physiological and pathological conditions such as immune response and cancer metastasis. The excitable network hypothesis can account for recent observations of propagating waves of signal transduction and cytoskeleton events as well as behaviors of migrating cells. However, the molecular feedback loops involved in these networks that bring about excitability are poorly understood. Here, we provide evidence for a positive-feedback loop based on a mutual inhibitory interaction between Ras and phosphatidylinositol (3,4)-bisphosphate [PI(3,4)P2]. Our results uncover an important role of PI(3,4)P2 in the regulation of Ras activity, which may extend well beyond cell migration. Signal transduction and cytoskeleton networks in a wide variety of cells display excitability, but the mechanisms are poorly understood. Here, we show that during random migration and in response to chemoattractants, cells maintain complementary spatial and temporal distributions of Ras activity and phosphatidylinositol (3,4)-bisphosphate [PI(3,4)P2]. In addition, depletion of PI(3,4)P2 by disruption of the 5-phosphatase, Dd5P4, or by recruitment of 4-phosphatase INPP4B to the plasma membrane, leads to elevated Ras activity, cell spreading, and altered migratory behavior. Furthermore, RasGAP2 and RapGAP3 bind to PI(3,4)P2, and the phenotypes of cells lacking these genes mimic those with low PI(3,4)P2 levels, providing a molecular mechanism. These findings suggest that Ras activity drives PI(3,4)P2 down, causing the PI(3,4)P2-binding GAPs to dissociate from the membrane, further activating Ras, completing a positive-feedback loop essential for excitability. Consistently, a computational model incorporating such a feedback loop in an excitable network model accurately simulates the dynamic distributions of active Ras and PI(3,4)P2 as well as cell migratory behavior. The mutually inhibitory Ras-PI(3,4)P2 mechanisms we uncovered here provide a framework for Ras regulation that may play a key role in many physiological processes.

The Function of CARMIL1 in Migrating Cells

97 Introduction 98 Results 99 Discussion 103 Materials and Methods 105 References 109 Legends and Figures 112 Chapter 4: Conclusions 122 Summary 123 Discussion and Future Directions 125 References 133