Marc Faget

Root-root interactions: extending our perspective to be more inclusive of the range of theories in ecology and agriculture using in-vivo analyses

BACKGROUND There is a large body of literature on competitive interactions among plants, but many studies have only focused on above-ground interactions and little is known about root-root dynamics between interacting plants. The perspective on possible mechanisms that explain the outcome of root-root interactions has recently been extended to include non-resource-driven mechanisms (as well as resource-driven mechanisms) of root competition and positive interactions such as facilitation. These approaches have often suffered from being static, partly due to the lack of appropriate methodologies for in-situ non-destructive root characterization. SCOPE Recent studies show that interactive effects of plant neighbourhood interactions follow non-linear and non-additive paths that are hard to explain. Common outcomes such as accumulation of roots mainly in the topsoil cannot be explained solely by competition theory but require a more inclusive theoretical, as well as an improved methodological framework. This will include the question of whether we can apply the same conceptual framework to crop versus natural species. CONCLUSIONS The development of non-invasive methods to dynamically study root-root interactions in vivo will provide the necessary tools to study a more inclusive conceptual framework for root-root interactions. By following the dynamics of root-root interactions through time in a whole range of scenarios and systems, using a wide variety of non-invasive methods, (such as fluorescent protein which now allows us to separately identify the roots of several individuals within soil), we will be much better equipped to answer some of the key questions in root physiology, ecology and agronomy.

Disentangling who is who during rhizosphere acidification in root interactions : combining fluorescence with optode techniques

Plant–soil interactions can strongly influence root growth in plants. There is now increasing evidence that root–root interactions can also influence root growth, affecting architecture and root traits such as lateral root formation. Both when species grow alone or in interaction with others, root systems are in turn affected by as well as affect rhizosphere pH. Changes in soil pH have knock-on effects on nutrient availability. A limitation until recently has been the inability to assign species identity to different roots in soil. Combining the planar optode technique with fluorescent plants enables us to distinguish between plant species grown in natural soil and in parallel study pH dynamics in a non-invasive way at the same region of interest (ROI). We measured pH in the rhizosphere of maize and bean in rhizotrons in a climate chamber, with ROIs on roots in proximity to the roots of the other species as well as not-close to the other species. We found clear dynamic changes of pH over time and differences between the two species in rhizosphere acidification. Interestingly, when roots of the two species were interacting, the degree of acidification or alkalization compared to bulk soil was less strong then when roots were not growing in the vicinity of the other species. This cutting-edge approach can help provide a better understanding of plant–plant and plant–soil interactions.

Novel multiscale insights into the composite nature of water transport in roots

- MECHA is a novel mathematical model that computes the flow of water through the walls, membranes and plasmodesmata of each individual cell throughout complete root cross-sections, from a minimal set of cell level hydraulic properties and detailed root anatomical descriptions. - Using the hydraulic anatomical framework of the Zea mays root reveals that hydraulic principles at the cell and root segment scales, derived independently by Katchalsky and Curran [1967] and Fiscus and Kramer [1975], are fully compatible, irrespective of apoplastic barriers leakiness. - The hydraulic anatomy model accurately predicts empirical root radial permeability (kr) from relatively high cell wall hydraulic conductivity and low plasmodesmatal conductance reported in the literature. - MECHA brings novel insights into contradictory interpretations of experiments from the literature by quantifying the impact of intercellular spaces, cortical cell permeability and plasmodesmata among others on root kr, and suggests new experiments efficiently addressing questions of root water relations. Symbols KPD single plasmodesma hydraulic conductance kr root radial hydraulic conductivity kw cell wall hydraulic conductivity Lp cell plasma membrane hydraulic conductivity

Going with the flow: multiscale insights into the composite nature of water transport in roots

A bio-physical model of the ”root hydraulic anatomy“ allows testing hypotheses related to radial water transport down to the cell level and proves complementary to current experimental approaches. As water often limits crop production, a more complete understanding of plant water capture and transport is necessary. Here, we developed MECHA, a mathematical model that computes the flow of water across the root at the scale of walls, membranes, and plasmodesmata of individual cells, and used it to test hypotheses related to root water transport in maize (Zea mays). The model uses detailed root anatomical descriptions and a minimal set of experimental cell properties, including the conductivity of plasma membranes, cell walls, and plasmodesmata, which yield quantitative and scale-consistent estimations of water pathways and root radial hydraulic conductivity (kr). MECHA revealed that the mainstream hydraulic theories derived independently at the cell and root segment scales are compatible only if osmotic potentials within the apoplastic domains are uniform. The results suggested that the convection-diffusion of apoplastic solutes explained most of the offset between estimated kr in pressure clamp and osmotic experiments, while the contribution of water-filled intercellular spaces was limited. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses quantified the relative impact of cortex and endodermis cell conductivity of plasma membranes on root kr and suggested that only the latter contributed substantially to kr due to the composite nature of water flow across roots. The explicit root hydraulic anatomy framework brings insights into contradictory interpretations of experiments from the literature and suggests experiments to efficiently address questions pertaining to root water relations. Its scale consistency opens avenues for cross-scale communication in the world of root hydraulics.