Marc H. E. de Lussanet

Hitting moving targets. Continuous control of the acceleration of the hand on the basis of the target's velocity

Abstract Previous studies on how we hit moving targets have revealed that the direction in which we move our hand is continuously adjusted on the basis of the target’s perceived position, with a delay of about 110 ms. In the present study we show that the acceleration of the hand is also under such continuous control. Subjects were instructed to hit moving targets (running spiders) as quickly as possible with a rod. We found that changing the velocity of the target influenced the speed with which the rod was moved. The influence was noticeable about 200 ms after the target’s velocity changed. The extent of the influence was consistent with a direct dependence of the acceleration of the hand on the target’s velocity. We conclude that the acceleration of the hand is continuously adjusted on the basis of the speed of the target, with a delay of about 200 ms.

Brain activity for peripheral biological motion in the posterior superior temporal gyrus and the fusiform gyrus: Dependence on visual hemifield and view orientation.

Biological motion, the movement of the human body presented by a small number of point lights, activates among other regions lining the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) and gyrus (pSTG) and of the fusiform gyrus. In previous studies with foveal stimuli the activity in the pSTS/pSTG was often confined to the right hemisphere and bilateral in fusiform gyrus. We presented biological motion stimuli in peripheral vision and measured the BOLD responses with functional MRI to test whether the right dominance in pSTS/pSTG also occurred with peripheral stimuli. We found activation exclusively in the right pSTG for both visual hemifields. In the fusiform gyrus activation was found in both hemispheres and for peripheral stimuli strongest for contralateral stimulation. However, in both fusiform gyri leftward-facing stimuli activated different subfields than rightward-facing stimuli, indicating a clustering of the selectivity for the orientation of the human body form. No such clustering was observed in the pSTG. The results indicate for the fusiform gyrus an organization with respect to the view orientation of the stimulus.

Interaction of visual hemifield and body view in biological motion perception

The brain network for the recognition of biological motion includes visual areas and structures of the mirror‐neuron system. The latter respond during action execution as well as during action recognition. As motor and somatosensory areas predominantly represent the contralateral side of the body and visual areas predominantly process stimuli from the contralateral hemifield, we were interested in interactions between visual hemifield and action recognition. In the present study, human participants detected the facing direction of profile views of biological motion stimuli presented in the visual periphery. They recognized a right‐facing body view of human motion better in the right visual hemifield than in the left; and a left‐facing body view better in the left visual hemifield than in the right. In a subsequent fMRI experiment, performed with a similar task, two cortical areas in the left and right hemispheres were significantly correlated with the behavioural facing effect: primary somatosensory cortex (BA 2) and inferior frontal gyrus (BA 44). These areas were activated specifically when point‐light stimuli presented in the contralateral visual hemifield displayed the side view of their contralateral body side. Our results indicate that the hemispheric specialization of ones own body map extends to the visual representation of the bodies of others.

Impairments of Biological Motion Perception in Congenital Prosopagnosia

Prosopagnosia is a deficit in recognizing people from their faces. Acquired prosopagnosia results after brain damage, developmental or congenital prosopagnosia (CP) is not caused by brain lesion, but has presumably been present from early childhood onwards. Since other sensory, perceptual, and cognitive abilities are largely spared, CP is considered to be a stimulus-specific deficit, limited to face processing. Given that recent behavioral and imaging studies indicate a close relationship of face and biological-motion perception in healthy adults, we hypothesized that biological motion processing should be impaired in CP. Five individuals with CP and ten matched healthy controls were tested with diverse biological-motion stimuli and tasks. Four of the CP individuals showed severe deficits in biological-motion processing, while one performed within the lower range of the controls. A discriminant analysis classified all participants correctly with a very high probability for each participant. These findings demonstrate that in CP, impaired perception of faces can be accompanied by impaired biological-motion perception. We discuss implications for dedicated and shared mechanisms involved in the perception of faces and biological motion.

The smaller your mouth, the longer your snout: predicting the snout length of Syngnathus acus, Centriscus scutatus and other pipette feeders

Like most ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii), pipefishes (Syngnathoidei) feed by suction. Most pipefishes reach their prey by a rapid dorso-rotation of the head. In the present study, we analysed the feeding kinematics of the razor fish, Centriscus scutatus, and of the greater pipefish, Syngnathus acus in detail. We found capture times of as little as 4–6 ms for C. scutatus and 6–8 ms for S. acus. We then hypothesized that the long snout of pipefishes is optimal for such fast feeding. To test this, we implemented in a mathematical model the following considerations. To reach the prey as fast as possible, a low moment of inertia increases the heads angular speed, whereas a long snout decreases the angle over which the head must be turned. The model accurately predicted the snout lengths of a number of pipefishes. We found that the optimal snout length, with which a prey will be reached fastest, is inversely related to its cross-section. In spite of the small cross-section, the development of a long snout can be an evolutionary advantage because this reduces the time to approach the prey.

The relation between task history and movement strategy

In the present study, we examine whether subjects hit identical moving targets differently when the task history is different. Twelve subjects each took part in four experimental sessions. Each session consisted of recurring targets that were the same in all sessions, randomly interleaved with context targets that differed per session. We compared the movements that subjects made towards the recurring targets. There were clear influences of the preceding target on the hitting movements within a session, and clear differences between movements towards the same targets between sessions, but the latter differences were not consistently related to the kind of sessions involved. This indicates that influences of task history are limited to the use of information from preceding trials rather than to changes in how information is used (movement strategy).

Action Recognition by Motion Detection in Posture Space

The visual recognition of action can be obtained from the change of body posture over time. Even for point-light stimuli in which the body posture is conveyed by only a few light points, biological motion can be perceived from posture sequence analysis. We present and analyze a formal model of how action recognition may be computed and represented in the brain. This model assumes that motion energy detectors similar to those well-established for the luminance-based motion of objects in space are applied to a cortical representation of body posture. Similar to the spatio-temporal receptive fields of regular motion detectors, these body motion detectors attain receptive fields in a posture–time space. We describe the properties of these receptive fields and compare them with properties of body-sensitive neurons found in the superior temporal sulcus of macaque monkeys. We consider tuning properties for 3D views of static and moving bodies. Our simulations show that key properties of action representation in the STS can directly be explained from the properties of natural action stimuli. Our model also suggests an explanation for the phenomenon of implied motion, the perceptual appearance, and neural activation of motion from static images.

Influence of delayed muscle reflexes on spinal stability: model-based predictions allow alternative interpretations of experimental data.

Model-based calculations indicate that reflex delay and reflex gain are both important for spinal stability. Experimental results demonstrate that chronic low back pain is associated with delayed muscle reflex responses of trunk muscles. The aim of the present study was to analyze the influence of such time-delayed reflexes on the stability using a simple biomechanical model. Additionally, we compared the model-based predictions with experimental data from chronic low back pain patients and healthy controls using surface-electromyography. Linear stability methods were applied to the musculoskeletal model, which was extended with a time-delayed reflex model. Lateral external perturbations were simulated around equilibrium to investigate the effects of reflex delay and gain on the stability of the human lumbar spine. The model simulations predicted that increased reflex delays require a reduction of the reflex gain to avoid spinal instability. The experimental data support this dependence for the investigated abdominal muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects. Reflex time-delay and gain dependence showed that a delayed reflex latency could have relevant influence on spinal stability, if subjects do not adapt their reflex amplitudes. Based on the model and the experimental results, the relationship between muscle reflex response latency and the maximum of the reflex amplitude should be considered for evaluation of (patho) physiological data. We recommend that training procedures should focus on speeding up the delayed reflex response as well as on increasing the amplitude of these reflexes.

Adaptation to biological motion leads to a motion and a form aftereffect

Recent models have proposed a two-stage process of biological motion recognition. First, template or snapshot neurons estimate the body form. Then, motion is estimated from body form change. This predicts separate aftereffects for body form and body motion. We tested this prediction. Observers viewing leftward- or rightward-facing point-light walkers that walked forward or backward subsequently experienced oppositely directed aftereffects in stimuli ambiguous in the facing or the walking direction. These aftereffects did not originate from adaptation to the motion of the individual light points, because they occurred for limited-lifetime stimuli that restrict local motion. They also occurred when the adaptor displayed a random sequence of body postures that did not induce the walking motion percept. We thus conclude that biological motion gives rise to separate form and motion aftereffects and that body form representations are involved in biological motion perception.

Independent control of acceleration and direction of the hand when hitting moving targets

Human subjects were asked to hit moving targets as quickly as they could. Nevertheless the speed with which the subjects moved toward identical stimuli differed between trials. We examined whether the subjects compensated for a lower initial acceleration by aiming further ahead of the target. We found that the initial acceleration of the hand and its initial direction were hardly correlated. Thus subjects did not aim further ahead when they hit more slowly. This supports our earlier suggestion that the acceleration of the hand and the direction in which it moves are controlled separately.