Marc J. Zuckerman

ASGE guideline: The role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and the management of cystic lesions and inflammatory fluid collections of the pancreas.

This is one of a series of statements discussing the utilization of GI endoscopy in common clinical situations. The Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy prepared this text. In preparing this guideline, a MEDLINE literature search was performed and additional references were obtained from the bibliographies of the identified articles and from recommendations of expert consultants. When little or no data exist from well-designed prospective trials, emphasis is given to results from large series and reports from recognized experts. Guidelines for appropriate utilization of endoscopy are based on a critical review of the available data and expert consensus. Further controlled clinical studies are needed to clarify aspects of this statement, and revision may be necessary as new data appear Clinical consideration may justify a course of action at variance to these recommendations.

ASGE guideline: complications of EUS.

This is one of a series of statements discussing the utilization of GI endoscopy in common clinical situations. The Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy prepared this text. In preparing this guideline, a MEDLINE literature search was performed, and additional references were obtained from the bibliographies of the identified articles and from recommendations of experts. When little or no data exist from well-designed prospective trials, emphasis is given to results from large series and reports from recognized experts. Guidelines for appropriate utilization of endoscopy are based on a critical review of the available data and expert consensus. Further controlled clinical studies are needed to clarify aspects of this statement and revision needed to clarify aspects of this statement and revision may be necessary as new data appear. Clinical consideration may justify a course of action at variance to the recommendations.

ASGE guideline: the management of low-molecular-weight heparin and nonaspirin antiplatelet agents for endoscopic procedures

This is one of a series of statements discussing the utilization of GI endoscopy in common clinical situations. The Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy prepared this text. In preparing this guideline, a MEDLINE literature search was performed, and additional references were obtained from the bibliographies of the identified articles and from recommendations of expert consultants. When little or no data exist from well-designed prospective trials, emphasis is given to results from large series and reports from recognized experts. Guidelines for appropriate use of endoscopy are based on a critical review of the available data and expert consensus. Further controlled clinical studies are needed to clarify aspects of this statement, and revision may be necessary as new data appear. Clinical consideration may justify a course of action at variance to these recommendations.

The role of endoscopy in ampullary and duodenal adenomas

This is one of a series of statements discussing the use of gastrointestinal endoscopy in common clinical situations. The Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy prepared this text. In preparing this guideline, MEDLINE and PubMed databases were used to search publications through the last 15 years related to ampullary and duodenal adenomas by using the keyword(s) ‘‘ampullary adenoma’’ and each of the following: ‘‘ampullectomy,’’ ‘‘duodenal adenoma,’’ and ‘‘familial adenomatous polyposis.’’ The search was supplemented by accessing the ‘‘related articles’’ feature of PubMed with articles identified on MEDLINE and PubMed as the references. Pertinent studies published in English were reviewed. Studies or reports that described fewer than 10 patients were excluded from analysis if multiple series with greater than 10 patients addressing the same issue were available. Recommendations were made on the basis of the reviewed studies and were graded as to the strength of the supporting evidence (Table 1). Guidelines for appropriate use of endoscopy are based on a critical review of the available data and expert consensus. Further controlled clinical studies may be needed to clarify aspects of this statement, and revision may be necessary as new data appear. Clinical consideration may justify a course of action at variance to these recommendations.

ASGE Guideline: Guidelines for endoscopy in pregnant and lactating women.

This is one of a series of statements discussing the utilization of GI endoscopy in common clinical situations. The Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy prepared this text. In preparing this guideline, a MEDLINE literature search was performed and additional references were obtained from the bibliographies of the identified articles and from recommendations of expert consultants. When little or no data exist from well-designed prospective trials, emphasis is given to results from large series and reports from recognized experts. Guidelines for appropriate utilization of endoscopy are based on a critical review of the available data and expert consensus. Further controlled clinical studies are needed to clarify aspects of this statement, and revision may be necessary as new data appear Clinical consideration may justify a course of action at variance to these recommendations.

A prospective controlled study of the risk of bacteremia in emergency sclerotherapy of esophageal varices

Reported incidences of bacteremia after endoscopy with esophageal variceal sclerotherapy are conflicting. A prospective controlled study was conducted to determine the frequency of bacteremia after emergency endoscopy with esophageal variceal sclerotherapy compared with frequency after elective esophageal variceal sclerotherapy and after emergency endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding from nonvariceal sources. A total of 126 endoscopies were studied in 72 patients. Groups consisted of (a) emergency endoscopy without esophageal variceal sclerotherapy, 37 sessions with 36 patients; (b) elective esophageal variceal sclerotherapy, 33 sessions with 14 patients; and (c) emergency esophageal variceal sclerotherapy, 56 sessions with 36 patients. Blood cultures were obtained before and 5 and 30 minutes after endoscopy. There was a higher frequency of preendoscopic bacteremia in emergency esophageal variceal sclerotherapy (13%) than in emergency endoscopy alone (0%) (P = 0.02). Clinically significant bacteremia in emergency esophageal variceal sclerotherapy was observed in 7 of 56 (13%) sessions, compared with 0 of 33 in elective esophageal variceal sclerotherapy (P = 0.03) and 1 of 36 (3%) in emergency endoscopy alone (P = 0.45). Of these cases, 3 (5.4%) were potentially caused by emergency esophageal variceal sclerotherapy, but not clinically significant postendoscopic bacteremia was attributable to the procedure in the other groups.

Assessment of Intestinal Permeability and Absorption in Cirrhotic Patients with Ascites Using Combined Sugar Probes

Gastrointestinal dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis may contribute to complications such as malnutrition and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. To determine whether cirrhotic patients with ascites have altered intestinal function, we compared intestinal permeability and absorption in patients with liver disease and normal subjects. Intestinal permeability and absorption were investigated in 66 cirrhotic patients (48 with ascites, 18 without ascites) and 74 healthy control subjects. Timed recovery of 3-O-methyl-D-glucose, D-xylose, L-rhamnose, and lactulose in urine following oral administration was measured in order to assess active and passive carrier-mediated, and nonmediated, absorptive capacity, as well as intestinal large-pore/small-pore (lactulose/rhamnose) permeability. Test sugars were measured by quantitative thin-layer chromatography and results are expressed as a percentage of test dose recovered in a 5-h urine collection. Sugar excretion ratios relating to small intestinal permeability (lactulose/rhamnose) and absorption (rhamnose/3-O-methyl-D-glucose) were calculated to avoid the effects of nonmucosal factors such as renal clearance, portal hypertension, and ascites on the recovery of sugar probes in urine. Compared with normal subjects, the mean lactulose/rhamnose permeability ratio in cirrhotic patients with ascites was significantly higher (0.058 vs. 0.037, P < 0.001) but not in cirrhotic patients without ascites (0.041 vs. 0.037). Cirrhotic patients with ascites had significantly lower mean recoveries of 3-O-methyl-D-glucose (23.0 vs. 49.1%; P < 0.001), D-xylose (18.8 vs. 34.5%; P < 0.001), L-rhamnose (4.0 vs. 9.1%; P < 0.001), and lactulose (0.202 vs. 0.337%; P < 0.001) than normal subjects. However, the mean rhamnose/3-O-methyl-D-glucose ratio was the same in cirrhotic patients with ascites as normal subjects (0.189 vs. 0.189), indicating that the reduction in probe recovery was due to nonmucosal factors. Compared with normal subjects, cirrhotic patients with ascites have abnormal intestinal permeability, measured by urinary lactulose/rhamnose excretion, and normal small intestinal absorption, assessed by the urinary rhamnose/3-O-methyl-D-glucose ratio. Low urine recovery of sugar probes found in cirrhotic patients appears to be the result of nonintestinal factors affecting clearance rather than reduced intestinal absorption.

ASGE guideline: guidelines for credentialing and granting privileges for capsule endoscopy.

This is one of a series of statements discussing the utilization of GI endoscopy in common clinical situations. The Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy prepared this text. In preparing this guideline, a MEDLINE literature search was performed and additional references were obtained from the bibliographies of the identified articles and from recommendations of expert consultants. When little or no data exist from welldesigned prospective trials, emphasis is given to results from large series and reports from recognized experts. Guidelines for appropriate utilization of endoscopy are based on a critical review of the available data and expert consensus. Further controlled clinical studies are needed to clarify aspects of this statement, and revision may be necessary as new data appear. Clinical consideration may justify a course of action at variance to these recommendations. This document is intended to provide the principles by which credentialing organizations may create policy and practical guidelines for granting privileges to perform capsule endoscopy. For information on credentialing for other endoscopic procedures, please refer to ‘‘Guidelines for Credentialing and Granting Privileges for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.’’

Health-care-seeking behaviors related to bowel complaints. Hispanics versus non-Hispanic whites.

Health-care-seeking behaviors related to bowel complaints may vary between ethnic groups. A survey of a nonpatient population in El Paso, Texas, was conducted in order to examine differences in health care behavior related to bowel dysfunction, and in the perception of health and bowel function, in Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites. Data from 905 subjects who were either Hispanic (580) or non-Hispanic white (325) given a forced-choice, self-report questionnaire were used for analysis. Data on health care behavior variables were studied using logistic regression, in ethnic and gender groups, controlling for age and socioeconomic status. A log-linear analysis was applied to health perception variables in ethnic and gender groups. Hispanics were less likely than non-Hispanic whites to have seen a physician for bowel symptoms (P<0.02). Of the subjects with symptoms compatible with irritable bowel syndrome. Hispanics were less likely to have seen a physican (P<0.05). More Hispanics reported buying folk remedies (P<0.001), and herbal teas were taken more often to maintain good bowel function (P<0.02) and to treat bowel problems (P<0.005). Additionally. Hispanics had a poorer perception of their health in general (P<0.001), reported more concern about their health (P<0.02), more concern about bowel function (P<0.001), and more time spent attending to bowel function (P<0.001). Therefore, data on health-care-seeking behaviors related to bowel dysfunction showed that Hispanics were less likely than non-Hispanic whites to seek health care for bowel complaints and that Hispanics were more likely to self-medicate with folk remedies to maintain good bowel function. The perception of health and bowel function is in part determined by ethnic differences.

ASGE guideline: The role of endoscopy in the diagnosis, staging, and management of colorectal cancer

This is one of a series of statements discussing the utilization of GI endoscopy in common clinical situations. The Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy prepared this text. In preparing this guideline, a MEDLINE literature search was performed, and additional references were obtained from the bibliographies of the identified articles and from recommendations of experts. When little or no data exist from well-designed prospective trials, emphasis is given to results from large series and reports from recognized experts. Guidelines for appropriate utilization of endoscopy are based on a critical review of the available data and expert consensus. Further controlled clinical studies are needed to clarify aspects of this statement and revision needed to clarify aspects of this statement and revision may be necessary as new data appear. Clinical consideration may justify a course of action at variance to the recommendations.