Marc Salzberg

Phase II Study of Temsirolimus (CCI-779), a Novel Inhibitor of mTOR, in Heavily Pretreated Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE In this study, two doses of temsirolimus (CCI-779), a novel inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, were evaluated for efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had been heavily pretreated. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (n = 109) were randomly assigned to receive 75 or 250 mg of temsirolimus weekly as a 30-minute intravenous infusion. Patients were evaluated for tumor response, time to tumor progression, adverse events, and pharmacokinetics of temsirolimus. RESULTS Temsirolimus produced an objective response rate of 9.2% (10 partial responses) in the intent-to-treat population. Median time to tumor progression was 12.0 weeks. Efficacy was similar for both dose levels but toxicity was more common with the higher dose level, especially grade 3 or 4 depression (10% of patients at the 250-mg dose level, 0% at the 75-mg dose level). The most common temsirolimus-related adverse events of all grades were mucositis (70%), maculopapular rash (51%), and nausea (43%). The most common, clinically important grade 3 or 4 adverse events were mucositis (9%), leukopenia (7%), hyperglycemia (7%), somnolence (6%), thrombocytopenia (5%), and depression (5%). CONCLUSION In heavily pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, 75 and 250 mg temsirolimus showed antitumor activity and 75 mg temsirolimus showed a generally tolerable safety profile.

Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors

We have recently shown that low intensity, intermediate frequency, electric fields inhibit by an anti-microtubule mechanism of action, cancerous cell growth in vitro. Using implanted electrodes, these fields were also shown to inhibit the growth of dermal tumors in mice. The present study extends these findings to additional cell lines [human breast carcinoma; MDA-MB-231, and human non-small-cell lung carcinoma (H1299)] and to animal tumor models (intradermal B16F1 melanoma and intracranial F-98 glioma) using external insulated electrodes. These findings led to the initiation of a pilot clinical trial of the effects of TTFields in 10 patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Median time to disease progression in these patients was 26.1 weeks and median overall survival was 62.2 weeks. These time to disease progression and OS values are more than double the reported medians of historical control patients. No device-related serious adverse events were seen after >70 months of cumulative treatment in all of the patients. The only device-related side effect seen was a mild to moderate contact dermatitis beneath the field delivering electrodes. We conclude that TTFields are a safe and effective new treatment modality which effectively slows down tumor growth in vitro, in vivo and, as demonstrated here, in human cancer patients.

Phase I immunotherapy with a modified vaccinia virus (MVA) expressing human MUC1 as antigen‐specific immunotherapy in patients with MUC1‐positive advanced cancer

The MUC1 protein is a highly glycosylated mucin normally found at the apical surface of mucin‐secreting epithelial cells in many types of tissues. MUC1 is expressed, but heavily underglycosylated, in different human tumors. TG4010 is a viral suspension of a recombinant vaccinia vector (MVA) containing DNA sequences coding for the human MUC1 antigen and interleukin‐2 (IL‐2). This product was developed for use as a vaccine in cancer patients whose tumors express the MUC1 antigen. The objective of the present study was to determine the safety of the product and to define the dose of TG4010 to be used in further clinical trials.

Combining Capecitabine and Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Phase I/II Trial

PURPOSE Preclinical studies indicate positive interactions between capecitabine, an oral fluorouracil precursor, and gemcitabine, the current standard treatment for advanced pancreatic carcinoma (APC). In this study, we investigated the addition of capecitabine to gemcitabine treatment for patients with APC. PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicenter study included patients naïve to chemotherapy who had histologically or cytologically confirmed, nonresectable or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma. Gemcitabine was given at a fixed dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Capecitabine was given in increasing doses orally bid for 14 days followed by a 1-week rest. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as one dose level below the dose causing dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in >or= one third of a cohort of six patients. We included an additional 15 patients at the MTD. RESULTS Thirty-six patients were included. DLT occurred at a dose of 800 mg/m(2) bid of capecitabine and consisted of myelotoxicity and mucositis. Hand-foot syndrome was not observed, and other toxic effects were mild. Thus, in this regimen, the recommended dose of capecitabine is 650 mg/m(2) bid. In 27 patients with measurable disease, we observed one complete and four partial remissions. In addition, significant drops (> 50% from baseline value) of the tumor marker CA 19-9 occurred in 14 of 24 assessable patients. CONCLUSION The combination of capecitabine and gemcitabine is well tolerated, with apparent efficacy in patients with APC. Therefore, it is currently being compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in a phase III study.

Current Concepts of Treatment Strategies in Advanced or Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cause of death from cancer in women. The standard first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer is a combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin or carboplatin alone. Sequential single-agent therapy is of particular interest in patients with symptom-free disease progression. Age, performance status and treatment preferences of the respective patient are further decisive factors which should be taken into account when selecting single or combination therapy. Second-line treatment depends, for instance, on the duration of response to first-line platinum therapy, previous treatment regimens used, tolerability, the patient’s performance status and preference of a particular treatment, and cost-effectiveness. If tumor recurrence occurs within 6 months following platinum-based therapy, other agents such as paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan or gemcitabine should be used. If the tumor recurs after 6 months, a combination therapy of platinum and paclitaxel has proven to be the most effective. Reasonable options in progressive disease are treatment with platinum, either alone or combined with other agents, especially investigational compounds.

A pilot study with very low-intensity, intermediate-frequency electric fields in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic solid tumors

Background: The transmission of electric fields using insulated electrodes has demonstrated that very low-intensity, properly tuned, intermediate-frequency electric fields, termed tumor-treating fields (TTFields), selectively stunts tumor cell growth and is accompanied by a decrease in tumor angiogenesis. Patients and Methods: This open, prospective pilot study was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy profile of TTFields treatment in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic solid tumors using the NovoTTF100ATM device. All 6 patients were heavily pre-treated with several lines of therapy; no additional standard treatment option was available to them. TTFields treatment using continuous NovoTTF-100A lasted a minimum of 14 days and was very well tolerated. Results: No related serious adverse events occurred. Outcomes showed 1 partial response of a treated skin metastasis from a primary breast cancer, 3 cases where tumor growth was arrested during treatment, and 1 case of disease progression. One mesothelioma patient experienced lesion regression near TTFields with simultaneous tumor stability or progression in distal areas. Conclusion: Although the number of patients in this study is small, the lack of therapy toxicity and the efficacy observed in data gathered to date indicate the potential of TTFields as a new treatment modality for solid tumors, definitely warranting further investigation.

An Open-Label, Noncomparative Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Docetaxel in Combination with Gefitinib in Patients with Hormone-Refractory Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common type of cancer in men, however, therapeutic options are limited. 50-90% of hormone-refractory prostate cancer cells show an overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which may contribute to uncontrolled proliferation and resistance to chemotherapy. In vitro, gefitinib, an orally administered tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown a significant increase in antitumor activity when combined with chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: In this phase II study, the safety and efficacy of gefitinib in combination with docetaxel, a chemotherapeutic agent commonly used for prostate cancer, was investigated in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). 37 patients with HRPC were treated continuously with gefitinib 250 mg once daily and docetaxel 35 mg/m2 i.v. for up to 6 cycles. PSA response, defined as a =50% decrease in serum PSA compared with trial entry, was the primary efficacy parameter. PSA levels were measured at prescribed intervals. Results: The response rate and duration of response were consistent with those seen with docetaxel monotherapy. The combination of docetaxel and gefitinib was reasonably well tolerated in this study. Conclusion: Future studies should investigate whether patients with specific tumor characteristics, e.g. EGFR protein overexpression, respond better to gefitinib than patients without, leading to a more customized therapy option.

A phase I Study with oral SU5416 in patients with advanced solid tumors: A drug inducing its clearance

SummaryVascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a potent stimulant of angiogenesis. SU5416, is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and a potent inhibitor of VEGF- mediated Flk-1 receptor signaling. Intravenous agent SU5416 has shown evidence of biological activity against a variety of tumor types. The current intravenous dosing regimen is not optimal for long-term administration, which is needed for optimal efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety profile and pharmacokinetics of a Nanocrystal Colloidal DispersionTM (NCD) SU5416 formulation in humans. Patients with advanced and/or metastatic solid organ tumors were included in the trial; various SU5416 regimens were tested for tolerability, safety and were evaluated concerning pharmacokinetics. The results of this study indicate that induction of clearance after oral dosing of NCD SU5416 in humans occurs and is greater than following IV administration. It has been confirmed that SU5416 is a high clearance compound, also as an oral NCD formulation. The NCD formulation was well tolerated, but no effective drug serum levels could be achieved. These data help to understand the ADME (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion) properties of indoline chemical class compounds. The lessons learned should be applied in the development of next generation indoline anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor compounds.

Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (Caelyx®) in Metastatic Breast Cancer : A Community-Based Observation Study

Objectives: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has improved therapy options significantly, as it causes less myelosuppression, nausea, vomiting, and alopecia than conventional doxorubicin, while maintaining efficacy. The goal of this survey was to determine whether the use of PLD in a community-based patient group is comparable regarding chemotherapeutic doses and side effects to preselected study patients. Methods: 100 questionnaires were randomly sent to Swiss oncologists in private practices, general hospitals and university hospitals. Results: The patient cohort was heterogeneous with respect to prior treatments. PLD was an active agent in metastatic breast cancer and was well tolerated by the majority of patients. The most common non-hematological side effects were hand-foot syndrome (HFS) and mucositis while only patients receiving a dose of 50 mg/m2 (recommended dose) experienced grade 4 HFS. The reported mean dose of PLD was 38.5 mg/m2. Conclusions: This community-based observational study supports previous reports indicating that PLD at a median dose of ≤40 mg/m2 every 4 weeks is an active, well-tolerated agent in non-selected, pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Phase I study of tomuzotuximab, a glycoengineered therapeutic antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor, in patients with advanced carcinomas

Background Changes in glycosylation of the constant domain (Fc) of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) enhance antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity independently of downstream effects following receptor blockade by the antibody, thus extending their indication. We investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and antitumour activity of tomuzotuximab, an IgG1 glycoengineered mAb against the epidermal growth factor receptor with enhanced tumour cytotoxicity in a phase I dose-escalation study (NTC01222637). Patients and methods Forty-one patients with advanced solid tumours refractory to standard therapies received tomuzotuximab weekly (12–1370 mg) or two-weekly (990 mg) on a three-plus-three dose escalation design. Results A maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were infusion-related reactions in 31 (76%) patients (grade 3, 12%), mainly confined to the first dose, and skin toxicities (grade 1 or 2) in 30 (73%) patients. Hypomagnesaemia was observed in 9 out of 23 evaluable patients (39%). Similar to cetuximab, tomuzotuximab concentrations increased proportionally to dose from doses≥480 mg with a median terminal half life (t½) of 82 hours, range 55–113 hours. Antitumour activity included one complete response ongoing since more than 4.5 years in a patient with non-small-cell lung cancer and one partial response lasting 353 days in a patient with colorectal cancer. Twelve patients achieved stable disease (median, 166 days, range, 71–414 days) and two patients had prolonged control (>1 year) of their non-measurable disease. Conclusion Tomuzotuximab was safe and showed promising antitumour activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced metastatic disease. A phase IIb trial of chemotherapy and weekly tomuzotuximab or cetuximab followed with maintenance therapy with the corresponding mAb in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is ongoing.