Marc Schindewolf

Incidence and causes of heparin-induced skin lesions

Background: Little is known about the incidence and causes of heparin-induced skin lesions. The 2 most commonly reported causes of heparin-induced skin lesions are immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions. Methods: We prospectively examined consecutive patients who received subcutaneous heparin (most often enoxaparin or nadroparin) for the presence of heparin-induced skin lesions. If such lesions were identified, we performed a skin biopsy, platelet count measurements, and antiplatelet-factor 4 antibody and allergy testing. Results: We enrolled 320 patients. In total, 24 patients (7.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7%–10.6%) had heparin-induced skin lesions. Delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions were identified as the cause in all 24 patients. One patient with histopathologic evidence of delayed-type hypersensitivity tested positive for antiplatelet-factor 4 antibodies. We identified the following risk factors for heparin-induced skin lesions: a body mass index greater than 25 (odds ratio [OR] 4.6, 95% CI 1.7–15.3), duration of heparin therapy longer than 9 days (OR 5.9, 95% CI 1.9–26.3) and female sex (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.1–8.8). Interpretation: Heparin-induced skin lesions are relatively common, have identifiable risk factors and are commonly caused by a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction (type IV allergic response). (ClinicalTrials.gov trial register no. NCT00510432.)

Heparin-induced skin lesions

Heparins are widely used for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic diseases. Besides bleeding complications, heparin-induced skin lesions are the most frequent unwanted adverse effects of subcutaneous heparin treatment. Evidence suggests that these lesions are more common than previously thought. Lesions are most frequently due to either allergic reactions or to possibly life-threatening heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Early recognition and adequate treatment are highly important, because although both complications initially show a similar clinical picture, their treatment should be fundamentally different. Furthermore, risk factors associated with the patient, drug, and treatment regimen have been identified. We review the clinical range of heparin-induced skin lesions, emphasise evidence and controversies in epidemiology, diagnosis, and differential diagnosis, and discuss the management of patients with these skin lesions.

Molecular weight determines the frequency of delayed type hypersensitivity reactions to heparin and synthetic oligosaccharides.

Eczematous lesions, resulting from type IV sensitizations are well-known and relatively frequent cutaneous adverse effects of s.c. heparin therapy. If anticoagulation is further required intravenous heparin, heparinoids or lepirudin may be used as a substitute. However, these alternatives are not optimal in terms of practicability and/or safety-profiles. As molecular weight of different heparin preparations has repetitively been implied to determine the frequency of sensitization, we hypothesized, that due to its low molecular weight the pentasaccharide fondaparinux may provide a practicable and safe anticoagulant therapy in patients with delayed type hypersensitivity reactions (DTH) to heparin and other oligosaccharides. To test this concept, patients referred for diagnosis of cutaneous reactions after s.c. anticoagulant treatment underwent a series of in vivo skin allergy- and challenge-tests with unfractionated heparin, a series of low molecular weight heparins (nadroparin, dalteparin, tinzaparin, enoxaparin and certoparin), the heparinoid danaparoid and the synthetic pentasaccharide fondaparinux. In total, data from twelve patients was evaluated. In accordance with previously published data, we report a high crossreactivity among heparins and heparinoids. In contrast--and in support of our initial hypothesis--sensitization towards the synthetic pentasaccharide fondaparinux was rarely observed. Plotting the cumulative incidence against the determined molecular weight of the individual anticoagulant preparations, shows that molecular weight generally is a key determinant of sensitization towards heparins and other oligosaccharides (r2 = 0.842, p = 0.009). Hence, fondaparinux may be used as a therapeutic alternative in patients with cutaneous DTH relations towards heparin and other polysaccharides.

Heparin‐induced non‐necrotizing skin lesions: rarely associated with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

See also Warkentin TE, Linkins L‐A. Non‐necrotizing heparin‐induced skin lesions and the 4T’s score. This issue, pp 1483–.

Management of cutaneous type IV hypersensitivity reactions induced by heparin

Localized hypersensitivity reactions to subcutaneous heparin injections have been described since 1952. Yet, the incidence of these reactions, which are distinct from skin lesions associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT II), remains uncertain. However, in the last 10 years an increasing number of patients have been reported, leading to the assumption that cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions towards heparin are underreported. Clinically patients present with itching, sometimes infiltrated, and blistering erythemas at the injection sites of heparins. The diagnosis of cutaneous heparin allergy may, on the one hand, lead to delay of required medical or surgical treatment. On the other hand, delayed initiation of treatment may lead to a generalized eczematous reaction. Hence, from review of 223 cases of patients with cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions to heparin, we here summarize the clinical picture of cutaneous type IV allergic reactions, define risk factors on both the patient- and drug-side, and give an overview of principle therapeutic alternatives, as well as recommendations for treatment options for emergency and elective patients. As the proposed management of patients with cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions to heparin may have fatal consequences when applied in patients with HIT type II, diagnosis of skin lesions in heparin-treated patients needs to be precise.

Hereditary and acquired thrombophilia in patients with upper extremity deep-vein thrombosis. Results from the MAISTHRO registry.

The prevalence of coagulation disorders in patients with upper extremity deep-vein thrombosis (UE-DVT) is unknown due to only a few observational studies of limited size reporting varying results. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of thrombophilia in patients with UE-DVT compared to patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LE-DVT). One hundred fifty consecutive patients (15 to 91 years of age) with UE-DVT were recruited from the MAISTHRO (MAin-ISar-THROmbosis) registry. Three hundred LE-DVT patients matched for gender and age served as controls. Thrombophilia screening included tests for the factor V Leiden mutation, the prothrombin G20210A mutation, antiphospholipid antibodies and factor VIII (FVIII), protein C, protein S and antithrombin activities. At least one thrombophilia was present in 34.2% of UE-DVT and 39.2% in UE-DVT that was unrelated to venous catheters relative to 55.3% in LE-DVT patients (p<0.001). In particular, a persistently elevated FVIII is less likely to be found in UE-DVT patients than in those with LE-DVT and is the only thrombophilia that is differentially expressed after controlling for established VTE risk factors [OR 0.46, (95% CI 0.25-0.83)]. Although less prevalent than in LE-DVT patients, thrombophilia is a common finding in patients with UE-DVT, especially in those with thrombosis that is unrelated to venous catheters.

Prevalence of thrombophilia according to age at the first manifestation of venous thromboembolism: results from the MAISTHRO registry

Thrombophilia is a well‐established risk factor for a venous thromboembolic event (VTE), and it has been proposed that hereditary thrombophilia may substantially contribute to the development of VTE in young patients. We aimed to analyse the prevalence of thrombophilia with special regard to the age of VTE manifestation. The study cohort consisted of 1490 patients (58% females) with a median age 43 years at the time of their first VTE. At least one thrombophilic disorder was identified in 50·1% of patients. The probability of detecting a hereditary thrombophilia declined significantly with advancing age (from 49·3% in patients aged 20 years and younger to 21·9% in patients over the age of 70 years; P < 0·001). This may be primarily attributed to the decreasing frequencies of the F5 R506Q (factor V Leiden) mutation and deficiencies of protein C or protein S with older age at the time of the initial VTE event. Moreover, thrombophilia was more prevalent in unprovoked compared with risk‐associated VTE (57·7% vs. 47·7%; P = 0·001). The decline in the prevalence of hereditary thrombophilia with older ages supports the use of a selected thrombophilia screening strategy dependent on age and the presence or absence of additional VTE risk factors.

Impact of sex and traditional cardiovascular risk factors on the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism: results from the German MAISTHRO Registry.

As arterial and venous thrombosis share common risk factors, a link between arterial and venous thrombosis has been suggested recently. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of established cardiovascular risk factors on the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). With a cross-sectional study design, we analyzed the data of 1006 patients (582 F, 424 M) consecutively treated in our outpatient department for VTE (i.e. lower extremity deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism) and registered in the MAISTHRO (MAin-ISar-THROmbosis) database. Of the total cohort, 324 (32.2%) patients suffered a recurrent VTE. Compared with the patients with a single thromboembolic event, patients with recurrent VTE were more frequently male (39.4 vs. 27.0%, P < 0.001). In univariate analysis, the relative risk of recurrent VTE was 1.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.53–2.39] for male sex and 1.6 (1.25–1.95) for age over 50 years (PAOD). After adjustments for age, sex, thrombophilia and other common VTE risk factors, male sex [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.7 (1.38–21.9)] and arterial hypertension [HR = 1.4 (1.05–1.78)] were independent risk factors of recurrent VTE. The higher risk in men than in women persisted even after the exclusion of women with transient hormonal risk factors [HR = 1.57 (1.19–2.07)]. In contrast, no association between the presence of diabetes, obesity, hypercholesterolemia or smoking and the risk of VTE recurrence was observed. Male sex and arterial hypertension are independently associated with an increased risk of recurrent VTE after termination of anticoagulant therapy for the first VTE event.

Etiology and VTE risk factor distribution in patients with inferior vena cava thrombosis.

INTRODUCTION Inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis is a rare event and data detailing the underlying etiology are scarce. MATERIALS AND METHODS Therefore, we reviewed all available cases of IVC thrombosis consecutively registered in the MAISTHRO (MAin-ISar-THROmbosis) database and described the prevalence of VTE risk factors and other conditions contributing to IVC thrombosis development. RESULTS 53 patients (35 F, 18 M) with IVC thrombosis aged 12 to 79 years were identified. 40 patients (75.5%) developed thrombosis under the age of 45. Local problems, such as IVC anomalies or external venous compression, contributed to the development of thrombosis in 12 cases (22.6%). Lupus anticoagulants (10.9 vs. 2.3%, p=0.013) and malignoma (17.0 vs. 6.4%, p=0.023) were more prevalent in IVC thrombosis patients compared to 265 age and sex matched controls with isolated lower extremity DVT. No difference was identified with regard to inherited thrombophilia or other known VTE risk factors. Symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) occurred in 32.1% of IVC thrombosis patients compared to 15.2% of controls (p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS Local problems such as IVC anomalies and external venous compression, malignancy and the presence of lupus anticoagulants contribute to the risk of IVC thrombosis. The risk of symptomatic pulmonary embolism in the acute setting is high.

Low Allergenic Potential With Fondaparinux: Results of a Prospective Investigation

OBJECTIVE To determine the incidence and causes of skin reactions to the synthetic pentasaccharide fondaparinux. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who received prophylactic/therapeutic subcutaneous fondaparinux treatment for more than 7 days were prospectively examined for cutaneous adverse effects between September 1, 2008, and April 30, 2009. When indicated, other procedures, such as skin biopsy, allergy testing, and clinical/laboratory assessment for thrombosis and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, were performed. RESULTS Overall, 231 patients were enrolled. No patient developed typical delayed type IV hypersensitivity (DTH) erythematous skin lesions. However, one female patient experienced abdominal pruritus at sites of injection. Histology revealed a mild lymphohistiocytic infiltrate, confirming a DTH reaction. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, as another possible underlying pathomechanism for cutaneous lesions, was ruled out clinically and serologically. Hence, the overall incidence of fondaparinux-induced allergic skin lesions was 0.4% (95% confidence interval, 0.01%-2.4%). No cross-allergies were observed in patients with DTH reaction to heparins. CONCLUSION Fondaparinux has a low allergenic potential. The incidence of allergic cutaneous DTH reactions is almost 20 times lower compared to that with commonly used heparins. These results, together with the known low prevalence of secondary thrombotic events or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia during fondaparinux therapy, suggest that in selected patients fondaparinux might substantially improve patient care, therapeutic safety, and cost-effectiveness of anticoagulant therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00510432.