Marc Shalit

Intranasal naloxone is a viable alternative to intravenous naloxone for prehospital narcotic overdose.

Objective. To compare the prehospital time intervals from patient contact and medication administration to clinical response for intranasal (IN) versus intravenous (IV) naloxone in patients with suspected narcotic overdose. Methods. This was a retrospective review of emergency medical services (EMS) and hospital records, before and after implementation of a protocol for administration of intranasal naloxone by the Central California EMS Agency. We included patients with suspected narcotic overdose treated in the prehospital setting over 17 months, between March 2003 and July 2004. Paramedics documented dose, route of administration, and positive response times using an electronic record. Clinical response was defined as an increase in respiratory rate (breaths/min) or Glasgow Coma Scale score of at least 6. Main outcome variables included time from medication to clinical response and time from patient contact to clinical response. Secondary variables included numbers of doses administered and rescue doses given by an alternate route. Between-group comparisons were accomplished using t-tests and chi-square tests as appropriate. Results. One hundred fifty-four patients met the inclusion criteria, including 104 treated with IV and 50 treated with IN naloxone. Clinical response was noted in 33 (66%) and 58 (56%) of the IN and IV groups, respectively (p = 0.3). The mean time between naloxone administration and clinical response was longer for the IN group (12.9 vs. 8.1 min, p = 0.02). However, the mean times from patient contact to clinical response were not significantly different between the IN and IV groups (20.3 vs. 20.7 min, p = 0.9). More patients in the IN group received two doses of naloxone (34% vs. 18%, p = 0.05), and three patients in the IN group received a subsequent dose of IV or IM naloxone. Conclusions. The time from dose administration to clinical response for naloxone was longer for the IN route, but the overall time from patient contact to response was the same for the IV and IN routes. Given the difficulty and potential hazards in obtaining IV access in many patients with narcotic overdose, IN naloxone appears to be a useful and potentially safer alternative.

Prehospital patients refusing care

In summary, many of the complex medicolegal and ethical issues surrounding the prehospital patient who refuses all or part of the care offered by the EMS system have been reviewed. The best outcome can be achieved using a sliding scale of capacity and a conservative approach to treatment rather than releasing the patient at the scene. Finally, the roles of collateral history, inquiries as to the origin of the patients refusal of care, direct physician interaction with the patient, a spirit of creativity and compromise in dealing with the patient, meticulous documentation, and policy issues have been discussed.

WILDERNESS EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES : THE EXPERIENCES AT SEQUOIA AND KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARKS

This article describes the National Park Service wilderness emergency medical services (EMS) system, as implemented at Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Park. EMS records on all 434 patients in the period from August 1, 1986, to July 31, 1987, were reviewed. Most patients had minor problems. Overall, 77% of patients contacting the EMS system were released at the scene, and base hospital contact was made in only 28% of cases. However, there were three deaths, 44 (10%) patients who received advanced life support, and 292 (67%) patients who received basic life support. Seven patients who received advanced life support were released without transport. Decisions regarding scope of practice in a low-volume, wilderness EMS system are complicated by long transport times and problems with skills maintenance. Differences between the times and problems with skills maintenance. Differences between the patients treated by a wilderness system and those seen in most urban systems may make it appropriate to release a greater portion of patients without ambulance transport. In a system with long response and transport times, use of personnel with different training than in the urban setting becomes necessary.

Use of the Gamow Bag by EMT-basic park rangers for treatment of high-altitude pulmonary edema and high-altitude cerebral edema.

As part of an emergency medical system protocol, national park service rangers certified at the level of an emergency medical technician-basic (EMT-B) are taught to recognize and treat high-altitude pulmonary edema and high-altitude cerebral edema. In Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, this is done with the assistance of physician on-line medical control as a backup. High-altitude pulmonary edema and high-altitude cerebral edema are both potentially fatal altitude illnesses that can be particularly problematic in the backcountry, where evacuation may be delayed. We report a case of high-altitude pulmonary edema and high-altitude cerebral edema occurring at moderate altitude that was successfully treated by park rangers with the Gamow Bag.

Biphasic Defibrillation Does not Improve Outcomes Compared to Monophasic Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Study Objective. To compare the outcomes of out-of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) victims treated with monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) versus biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) defibrillation in an urban EMS system. Methods. We conducted a retrospective review of electronic prehospital andhospital records for victims of OHCA between August 2000 andJuly 2004, including two years before andafter implementation of biphasic defibrillators by the Fresno County EMS agency. Main outcome measures included: return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), number of defibrillations required for ROSC, survival to hospital discharge, anddischarge to home versus an extended care facility. Results. There were 485 cases of cardiac arrest included. Baseline characteristics between the monophasic andbiphasic groups were similar. ROSC was achieved in 77 (30.6%, 95% CI 25.2–36.5%) of 252 patients in the monophasic group, andin 70 (30.0% 95% CI 24.5–36.2%) of 233 in the biphasic group (p =. 92). Survival to hospital discharge was 12.3% (95% CI 8.8–17%) for monophasic and10.3% (95% CI 7.0–14.9%) for biphasic (p =. 57). Discharge to home was accomplished in 20 (7.9%, 95% CI 5.1–12.0%) of the monophasic, andin 15 (6.4%, 95% CI 3.9–10.4%) of the biphasic group (p =. 60). More defibrillations were required to achieve ROSC (3.5 vs. 2.6, p =. 015) in the monophasic group. Conclusions. We found no difference in ROSC or survival to hospital discharge between MTE andBTE defibrillation in the treatment of OHCA, although fewer defibrillations were required to achieve ROSC in those treated with biphasic defibrillation.

Successful intubation with the Combitube® in acute asthmatic respiratory distress by a parkmedic

The Combitube is a relatively new device used for blind insertion emergency intubation. We report a case of successful Combitube treatment of an acute respiratory arrest secondary to an acute asthma exacerbation. An advanced EMT-II (National Park Service Parkmedic) utilized this device. Our review of the literature revealed no reported cases of an advanced EMT-II, nor any other cases, using the Combitube in asthma-related respiratory failure.

The esophageal detector bulb in the aeromedical setting

To determine the accuracy of the Esophageal Detector Bulb (EDB) in the aeromedical setting, we conducted a prospective, observational study of all intubated patients transported by an aeromedical program over two years. Flight personnel recorded the results of the EDB, clinical examination, pulse oximetry, and capnography (ETCO(2)). Endotracheal tube position was confirmed by prehospital ETCO(2) or by the receiving emergency physician. There were 104 EDB assessments in 53 patients. The EDB correctly identified four of five esophageal intubations and 96 of 99 tracheal intubations. The sensitivity and specificity of the EDB in the detection of an esophageal intubation were 80% (95% CI, 38-96%) and 97% (95% CI, 92-99%), respectively, and the overall accuracy was 96% (95% CI, 90-98%). The EDB augments the ability of an aeromedical crew to determine endotracheal tube position, but its results must be carefully interpreted in the context of other available means of confirmation of endotracheal tube position.

Subterranean medicine: an inquiry into underground medical treatment protocols in cave rescue situations in national parks in the United States.

Caving and spelunking have become increasingly popular over the years, with hundreds of thousands of amateur spelunkers across the country visiting caves. National parks in the United States offer hundreds of caves for all levels of spelunkers and, in fact, many national parks boast caves as either their main or major attraction. In an effort to increase visitor safety and establish subterranean medical treatment protocols, we began an investigation into cave rescue, medical protocols, previously published recommendations concerning cave safety, and visitor and rescue statistics in the national parks. Our inquiry provided little guidance from either the literature or the present US National Parks database for treating underground injuries. However, 2 predominant trends did appear. First, despite the nearly 2 million visitors to the caves in the 14 parks surveyed, there were only about 200 total calls for medical care. The vast number of those calls were for minor injuries. Second, no strict evidence-based treatment protocols for underground injuries exist, probably because they are not feasible. A caving incident database for the national parks would facilitate suggestions for preventative measures for the minor injuries and would help catalog the creative solutions for the rare serious subterranean medical incident.

An Experimental Study of Warming Intravenous Fluid in a Cold Environment

Abstract Objective.—Numerous studies support the use of warmed intravenous fluids in hypothermic patients. The most effective method to accomplish this goal in a cold prehospital, wilderness, or combat setting is unknown. We evaluated various methods of warming intravenous fluids for a bolus infusion in a cold remote environment. Methods.—One liter and 500 mL bags of intravenous fluid at 5°C were heated using various methods in a 5°C cold room. Methods included attachment of 3 types of chemical heat packs and heating the fluid in a pot on a camping stove. For all methods, fluids were run at a wide-open rate through an intravenous line with an 18-gauge catheter attached to the end to simulate a bolus infusion. The temperature of the fluid at the end of the intravenous line was measured. Each method was tested twice. Equipment weight and setup times are reported. Mean infusion temperatures for the various methods are compared. Results.—Equipment weights ranged from 19 to 665 gm. Setup times ranged from 5 to 11 minutes. The 2 methods which achieved the desired mean infusion temperature of 35 to 42°C without excessive maximum temperatures were 1) 2 Meal Ready to Eat hot packs attached to a 500 mL bag of fluid for 10 minutes prior to infusion, and 2) a camping stove heating the surface of a 500 mL bag of fluid to 75°C prior to infusion. Other methods, including the use of commonly available heat packs and a commercially available IV fluid warmer were ineffective, with mean infusion temperatures ranging from 7 to 12°C. Conclusions.—Heating of cold intravenous fluids in a cold environment is possible using either Meal Ready to Eat heat packs or a camping stove. Further study is needed to evaluate the ability of either method to consistently produce an appropriate fluid temperature given various ambient and initial fluid temperatures.

A Lightning Multiple Casualty Incident in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks

Multiple casualty incidents (MCIs) are uncommon in remote wilderness settings. This is a case report of a lightning strike on a Boy Scout troop hiking through Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (SEKI), in which the lightning storm hindered rescue efforts. The purpose of this study was to review the response to a lightning-caused MCI in a wilderness setting, address lightning injury as it relates to field management, and discuss evacuation options in inclement weather incidents occurring in remote locations. An analysis of SEKI search and rescue data and a review of current literature were performed. A lightning strike at 10,600 feet elevation in the Sierra Nevada Mountains affected a party of 5 adults and 7 Boy Scouts (age range 12 to 17 years old). Resources mobilized for the rescue included 5 helicopters, 2 ambulances, 2 hospitals, and 15 field and 14 logistical support personnel. The incident was managed from strike to scene clearance in 4 hours and 20 minutes. There were 2 fatalities, 1 on scene and 1 in the hospital. Storm conditions complicated on-scene communication and evacuation efforts. Exposure to ongoing lightning and a remote wilderness location affected both victims and rescuers in a lightning MCI. Helicopters, the main vehicles of wilderness rescue in SEKI, can be limited by weather, daylight, and terrain. Redundancies in communication systems are vital for episodes of radio failure. Reverse triage should be implemented in lightning injury MCIs. Education of both wilderness travelers and rescuers regarding these issues should be pursued.