Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Marc Spielmann is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Marc Spielmann.


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 1989

Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer

D. Sarrazin; Monique G. Lê; R. Arriagada; G. Contesso; Fontaine F; Marc Spielmann; F. Rochard; Th. Le Chevalier; J. Lacour

A randomized trial was conducted at the Institut Gustave-Roussy (IGR) between 1972 and 1980 comparing tumorectomy and breast irradiation with modified radical mastectomy. One hundred and seventy-nine patients with an infiltrating breast carcinoma up to 20 mm in diameter at macroscopic examination were included: 88 had conservative management, and 91 a mastectomy. All patients had a low-axillary dissection with immediate histological examination. For the patients with positive axillary nodes, a complete axillary dissection was undertaken. Overall survival, distant metastasis, contralateral breast cancer and locoregional recurrence rates were not significantly different between the two treatment groups.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2006

Sequential Adjuvant Epirubicin-Based and Docetaxel Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: The FNCLCC PACS 01 Trial

Henri Roché; Pierre Fumoleau; Marc Spielmann; Jean-Luc Canon; Thierry Delozier; Daniel Serin; Michel Symann; Pierre Kerbrat; Patrick Soulié; Francoise Eichler; Patrice Viens; Alain Monnier; Anita Vindevoghel; Mario Campone; Marie-Josèphe Goudier; Jacques Bonneterre; Jean-Marc Ferrero; Anne-Laure Martin; Jean Genève; Bernard Asselain

PURPOSE The PACS 01 trial compared six cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) with a sequential regimen of three cycles of FEC followed by three cycles of docetaxel (FEC-D) as adjuvant treatment for women with node-positive early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between June 1997 and March 2000, 1,999 patients with operable node-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned to either FEC every 21 days for six cycles, or three cycles of FEC followed by three cycles of docetaxel, both given every 21 days. Hormone-receptor-positive patients received tamoxifen for 5 years after chemotherapy. The primary end point was 5-year disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Median follow-up was 60 months. Five-year DFS rates were 73.2% with FEC and 78.4% with FEC-D (unadjusted P = .011; adjusted P = .012). Multivariate analysis adjusted for prognostic factors showed an 18% reduction in the relative risk of relapse with FEC-D. Five-year overall survival rates were 86.7% with FEC and 90.7% with FEC-D, demonstrating a 27% reduction in the relative risk of death (unadjusted P = .014; adjusted P = .017). The incidence of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, the need for hematopoietic growth factor, and incidence of nausea/vomiting were higher with FEC. Docetaxel was associated with more febrile neutropenia in the fourth cycle, stomatitis, edema, and nail disorders. Though rare overall, there were fewer cardiac events after FEC-D (P = .03), attributable mainly to the lower anthracycline cumulative dose. CONCLUSION Sequential adjuvant chemotherapy with FEC followed by docetaxel significantly improves disease-free and overall survival in node-positive breast cancer patients and has a favorable safety profile.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1996

Multicenter, randomized comparative study of two doses of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

J M Nabholtz; K Gelmon; M Bontenbal; Marc Spielmann; G Catimel; P Conte; U Klaassen; M Namer; Jacques Bonneterre; Pierre Fumoleau; B Winograd

PURPOSE AND METHODS The objective of this multicenter study was to compare the therapeutic index of two different doses of paclitaxel given as a 3-hour infusion in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), who had failed to respond to previous chemotherapy. A total of 471 patients with MBC were randomized to receive intravenous paclitaxel at a dose of 175 or 135 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. RESULTS Better treatment results were achieved with high-dose (HD) versus low-dose (LD) paclitaxel: overall response rate, 29% versus 22% (P = .108); complete response (CR) rate, 5% versus 2% (P = .088); median time to disease progression, 4.2 versus 3.0 months (P = .027); and median survival time, 11.7 versus 10.5 months (P = .321). Patients previously exposed or resistant to anthracyclines were as likely to respond as those without such prior exposure. Treatment was well tolerated, as documented by the number of administered treatment courses (median, six v five; range, one 17 v one to 18), the low frequency of dose reductions (14% v 7%, P = .024), and the small number of patients (n = 9 or 4% vn = 5 or 2%) who required treatment discontinuation for adverse reactions. The incidence and severity of neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy were dose-related. After quality-of-life-adjusted time-to-progression analysis, the HD arm (175 mg/m2) retained its advantage over the LD arm (135 mg/m2). CONCLUSION The results of this trial substantiate the activity of paclitaxel in the treatment of MBC. The observed superior efficacy with a dose of 175 mg/m2 over 135 mg/m2 suggests a dose-effect relationship. The clinical activity in anthracycline-resistant patients is particularly noteworthy. Paclitaxel in breast cancer needs further evaluation in large trials that use combination chemotherapy and involve earlier disease stages.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2004

Breast Cancer With Synchronous Metastases: Trends in Survival During a 14-Year Period

Fabrice Andre; Khemaies Slimane; Thomas Bachelot; Arianne Dunant; Moïse Namer; Alain Barrelier; Omar Kabbaj; Jean Philippe Spano; H. Marsiglia; Roman Rouzier; Suzette Delaloge; Marc Spielmann

PURPOSE Although new drugs were approved during the 1990s for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, it is not clear whether their use has changed the outcome of patients in daily practice. This study sought to determine whether survival has improved over time for breast cancer patients who had metastases at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 724 patients have been treated in three French cancer centers for an initially metastatic breast cancer between 1987 and 2000; 343 were diagnosed between 1987 and 1993, and 381 were diagnosed between 1994 and 2000. Tumor characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of these patients were compared by chi(2) test, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Characteristics were not different between the patients diagnosed from 1987 to 1993 and those diagnosed from 1994 to 2000. Ten percent of patients treated from 1987 to 1994 and 58% of patients treated from 1994 to 2000 have received either a taxane or a new aromatase inhibitor. The 3-year overall survival rates were 27% for patients treated from 1987 to 1993 and 44% for patients treated from 1994 to 2000 (P <.001). The treatment period (1994 to 2000 v 1987 to 1993) was a prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (relative risk, 0.6; P <.001). CONCLUSION The survival of breast cancer patients presenting with metastases at diagnosis has improved over time. This study strongly suggests that this improvement is related to treatment.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2009

Trastuzumab for Patients With Axillary-Node–Positive Breast Cancer: Results of the FNCLCC-PACS 04 Trial

Marc Spielmann; Henri Roché; Thierry Delozier; Jean-Luc Canon; Gilles Romieu; Hugues Bourgeois; Jean-Marc Extra; Daniel Serin; Pierre Kerbrat; Jean-Pascal Machiels; Alain Lortholary; Hubert Orfeuvre; Mario Campone; Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard; Bruno Coudert; Marie Maerevoet; Gilles Piot; Andrew Kramar; Anne-Laure Martin; Frédérique Penault-Llorca

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of trastuzumab in patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy if applicable. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three thousand ten patients with operable node-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy with or without docetaxel. Patients who presented human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -overexpressing tumors were secondary randomly assigned to either a sequential regimen of trastuzumab (6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) for 1 year or observation. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Overall 528 patients were randomly assigned between trastuzumab (n = 260) and observation (n = 268) arm. Of the 234 patients (90%) who received at least one administration of trastuzumab, 196 (84%) received at least 6 months of treatment, and 41 (18%) discontinued treatment due to cardiac events (any grade). At the date of analysis (October 2007), 129 DFS events were recorded. Random assignment to the trastuzumab arm was associated with a nonsignificant 14% reduction in the risk of relapse (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.22; P = .41, log-rank stratified on pathologic node involvement). Three-year DFS rates were 78% (95% CI, 72.3 to 82.5) and 81% (95% CI, 75.3 to 85.4) in the observation and trastuzumab arms, respectively. CONCLUSION After a 47-month median follow-up, 1 year of trastuzumab given sequentially after adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with a statistically significant decrease in the risk of relapse.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2005

Nomograms to predict pathologic complete response and metastasis-free survival after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Roman Rouzier; Lajos Pusztai; Suzette Delaloge; Ana M. Gonzalez-Angulo; Fabrice Andre; Kenneth R. Hess; Aman U. Buzdar; Jean Rémi Garbay; Marc Spielmann; Marie Christine Mathieu; W. Fraser Symmans; Peter Wagner; David Atallah; Vicente Valero; Donald A. Berry; Gabriel N. Hortobagyi

PURPOSE To combine clinical variables associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) after preoperative chemotherapy (PC) into a prediction nomogram. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from 496 patients treated with anthracycline PC at the Institut Gustave Roussy were used to develop and calibrate a nomogram for pCR based on multivariate logistic regression. This nomogram was tested on two independent cohorts of patients treated at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. The first cohort (n = 337) received anthracycline; the second cohort (n = 237) received a combination of paclitaxel and anthracycline PC. A separate nomogram to predict DMFS was developed using Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS The pCR nomogram based on clinical stage, estrogen receptor status, histologic grade, and number of preoperative chemotherapy cycles had good discrimination and calibration in the training and the anthracycline-treated validation sets (concordance indices, 0.77, 0.79). In the paclitaxel plus anthracycline group, when the predicted pCR rate was less than 14%, the observed rate was 7.5%; for a predicted rate of > or = 38%, the actual rate was 85%. For a predicted rate between 14% to 38%, the observed rates were 50% with weekly and 27% with 3-weekly paclitaxel. This indicates that patients with intermediate chemotherapy sensitivity benefit the most from the optimized schedule of paclitaxel. Patients unlikely to achieve pCR to anthracylines remain at low probability for pCR, even after inclusion of paclitaxel. The nomogram for DMFS had a concordance index of 0.72 in the validation set and outperformed other prediction tools (P = .02). CONCLUSION Our nomograms predict pCR accurately and can serve as a basis to integrate future molecular markers into a clinical prediction model.


Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2012

Ki-67: level of evidence and methodological considerations for its role in the clinical management of breast cancer: analytical and critical review

Elisabeth Luporsi; Fabrice Andre; F. Spyratos; Pierre-Marie Martin; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; Laurent Arnould; Anne Gompel; C. Egele; Bruno Poulet; Krishna B. Clough; Hubert Crouet; A. Fourquet; Jean-Pierre Lefranc; Carole Mathelin; Nicolas Rouyer; Daniel Serin; Marc Spielmann; Margaret Haugh; Marie-Pierre Chenard; Etienne Brain; Patricia de Cremoux; Jean-Pierre Bellocq

Clinicians can use biomarkers to guide therapeutic decisions in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. One such biomarker is cellular proliferation as evaluated by Ki-67. This biomarker has been extensively studied and is easily assayed by histopathologists but it is not currently accepted as a standard. This review focuses on its prognostic and predictive value, and on methodological considerations for its measurement and the cut-points used for treatment decision. Data describing study design, patients’ characteristics, methods used and results were extracted from papers published between January 1990 and July 2010. In addition, the studies were assessed using the REMARK tool. Ki-67 is an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival (HR 1.05–1.72) in multivariate analyses studies using samples from randomized clinical trials with secondary central analysis of the biomarker. The level of evidence (LOE) was judged to be I-B with the recently revised definition of Simon. However, standardization of the techniques and scoring methods are needed for the integration of this biomarker in everyday practice. Ki-67 was not found to be predictive for long-term follow-up after chemotherapy. Nevertheless, high KI-67 was found to be associated with immediate pathological complete response in the neoadjuvant setting, with an LOE of II-B. The REMARK score improved over time (with a range of 6–13/20 vs. 10–18/20, before and after 2005, respectively). KI-67 could be considered as a prognostic biomarker for therapeutic decision. It is assessed with a simple assay that could be standardized. However, international guidelines are needed for routine clinical use.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 1998

Resection of liver metastases from a noncolorectal primary: indications and results based on 147 monocentric patients

Dominique Elias; Andrea Cavalcanti de Albuquerque; Pascal Eggenspieler; Beniot Plaud; Michel Ducreux; Marc Spielmann; Christine Theodore; Sylvie Bonvalot; Philippe Lasser

BACKGROUND Very few series have reported indications for and results of hepatectomy for isolated unique or multiple liver metastases (LM) from a noncolorectal primary. We performed a prospective analysis of 147 patients submitted to hepatectomy for LM to evaluate the results and indications for this unusual type of treatment. STUDY DESIGN Of 538 patients submitted to hepatectomy for a malignant tumor between 1984 and 1996, 147 underwent operations for noncolorectal LM. Conventional and unconventional hepatectomy procedures were used with intermittent clamping of the hepatic pedicle, and in some patients with intermittent vascular occlusion of the liver. RESULTS Postoperative hospital mortality was 2%. The crude 5-year survival was 36%, and survival without progressive disease was 28%. No difference was observed in survival when synchronous and metachronous LM were compared, or when patients with more or fewer than three LM were compared. Five-year survival rates were 20% for 35 breast cancers, 74% for 27 neuroendocrine tumors, 46% for 20 testicular tumors, 18% for 13 sarcomas, and slightly less than 20% for 11 gastric carcinomas, 10 melanomas, and 7 tumors of the gallbladder, according to the primary. Survival exceeded 20% for 6 gynecologic tumors but was disappointing for head and neck cancers, when the primary was unknown, or when the tumor was truly undifferentiated. CONCLUSIONS Certain guidelines emerge from this series on the indications and uses of adjuvant chemotherapy. Indications for hepatectomy are relatively straightforward for neuroendocrine, testicular, and renal tumors. Hepatectomy for LM from other primaries appears beneficial in certain sarcomas, breast and gynecologic cancers, and perhaps melanoma, for which selection criteria, unfortunately, remain obscure.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1995

High-dose ifosfamide: circumvention of resistance to standard-dose ifosfamide in advanced soft tissue sarcomas.

A. Le Cesne; E Antoine; Marc Spielmann; T. Le Chevalier; Etienne Brain; C Toussaint; N. Janin; Louis Kayitalire; Fontaine F; J Genin

PURPOSE The study was designed to assess the toxicity and activity of high-dose ifosfamide (HDI) administered by continuous infusion at a dose of 4 g/m2/d over 3 days every 4 weeks in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (ASTS) pretreated with doxorubicin and/or a standard-dose ifosfamide (SDI)-containing regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 1991 and November 1993, 40 patients with progressive ASTS were entered onto the study. Twenty-eight patients had been pretreated with a multidrug regimen that contained SDI and were classified as follows: SDI-refractory (n = 21), SDI-resistant (n = 2), and indeterminate SDI-sensitive (n = 5). Patients were treated until progression or major toxicity. RESULTS One hundred forty-seven cycles of HDI were administered. Neutropenia was dose-limiting, with 100% of patients experiencing grade 3 to 4 toxicity and 12 admissions for febrile neutropenia (30% of patients). Neurotoxicity (17% of patients) was significantly associated with acute renal failure (n = 4) (P < .001), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (P < .01) and febrile neutropenia (P = .048). Chronic renal toxicity (n = 4) was significantly associated with retroperitoneal masses and/or prior nephrectomy (P = .008). Partial responses (PRs) were observed in 12 of 36 assessable patients (33%) and eight patients (22%) experienced disease stabilization. All but one response occurred in patients pretreated with SDI, with five PRs among SDI-refractory patients. Leiomyosarcomas appear resistant to HDI. The median response duration was 8 months (range, 6 to 13+) and the median overall survival time was 12 months. CONCLUSION The activity of HDI in these pretreated ASTS patients and the apparent circumvention of SDI resistance suggest a real dose-response relationship for ifosfamide and deserve further evaluation. Although toxic, this treatment appears feasible and manageable using routine clinical support. Since prophylaxis of ifosfamide-induced renal damage remains unknown, frequent monitoring of renal and tubular functions during therapy is highly recommended.


American Journal of Surgery | 2003

An attempt to clarify indications for hepatectomy for liver metastases from breast cancer

Dominique Elias; Franck Maisonnette; Michel Druet-Cabanac; Jean-François Ouellet; Jean-Marc Guinebretière; Marc Spielmann; Suzette Delaloge

BACKGROUND Liver metastases (LM) from breast cancer are generally considered as disseminated disease with a poor prognosis. However in selected patients hepatectomy may be an important adjunct to systemic treatment. METHODS Fifty-four breast cancer patients (mean age 49.2 +/- 5.2 years) with LM as the sole site of metastatic disease (except for bone metastases in 3 patients) underwent hepatectomy between 1986 and 2000. The mean number of LM was 4.0 +/- 8. All patients presented either a stable disease or an objective response to chemotherapy. The last 25 patients also underwent hepatic artery catheter installation in order to receive postoperative hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). RESULTS The postoperative morbidity was 12.9%. There was no postoperative mortality. R0 and R1-R2 resections were obtained in, respectively, 81.5% and 18.5% of patients. After a median follow-up of 32 months the median survival was 34 +/- 9 months, with 3- and 5-year overall survival rates of 50% and 34%, and 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates of 42% and 22%, respectively. The number of LM, the presence of hilar lymph nodes (33%), and the completeness of resection had no significant prognostic impact. The only factor influencing survival in both the univariate and multivariate analysis was the hormone receptor status (P = 0.03): the relative risk of death was increased by 3.5-fold when negative. In the HAIC group, the liver recurrence rate decreased from 60.5% to 31.2% without any impact on global survival. CONCLUSIONS Hepatectomy is beneficial for selected patients with isolated LM. Indications should be based more on technical (low operative risk, probable R0 resection) than on oncologic criteria. The decision is simple for young patients but more difficult for older patients in whom a negative hormone receptor status appears to be a contraindication.

Collaboration


Dive into the Marc Spielmann's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fabrice Andre

Université Paris-Saclay

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. Arriagada

Institut Gustave Roussy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas Tursz

Institut Gustave Roussy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Le Cesne

Institut Gustave Roussy

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge