Marcel A. Beijk

Two-Year Clinical, Angiographic, and Intravascular Ultrasound Follow-Up of the XIENCE V Everolimus-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions The SPIRIT II Trial

Background—This article reports the 2-year clinical, angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound outcomes of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) compared with the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in the randomized SPIRIT II trial. Methods and Results—This was a prospective, single-blind clinical trial in which a total of 300 patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions were randomized to either EES or PES in a 3:1 fashion. Clinical follow-up was planned at 2 years in all patients. A subset of 152 patients underwent serial angiographic and intravascular ultrasound analyses at 6 months and 2 years. After 2 years, target lesion failure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) rates were 6.6% and 11% in EES and PES, respectively (P=0.31). At 6 months, a significant reduction in angiographic in-stent late loss and percentage volume obstruction measured by intravascular ultrasound was observed in the EES group. However, at 2-year follow-up, a late increased intimal hyperplasia growth after implantation of an EES was observed. There were no significant differences between EES and PES for in-stent late loss (EES, 0.33±0.37 mm versus PES, 0.34±0.34 mm; P=0.84) and percentage volume obstruction (EES, 5.18±6.22% versus PES, 5.80±6.31%; P=0.65) at 2 years. The incidence of stent thrombosis was low and comparable in both groups (EES, 0.9%; PES, 1.4%). Conclusions—Although the previously reported angiographic and clinical superiority of the EES has vanished over time, this report confirms and extends the previously demonstrated noninferiority in terms of in-stent late loss of the EES when compared with the PES up to 2-year follow-up. There were no significant differences between EES and PES in clinical, angiographic and intravascular ultrasound outcomes at 2 years.

Genous™ endothelial progenitor cell capturing stent vs. the Taxus Liberté stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions with a high-risk of coronary restenosis: a randomized, single-centre, pilot study

Aims The purpose of this study was to evaluate the GenousTM endothelial progenitor cell capturing stent vs. the Taxus Liberté paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions with a high-risk of coronary restenosis. Methods and results We randomly assigned 193 patients with lesions carrying a high risk of restenosis to have the Genous stent or the Taxus stent implanted. Lesions were considered high risk of restenosis if one of the following applied: chronic total occlusion, lesion length >23 mm, vessel diameter <2.8 mm, or any lesion in a diabetic patient. At 1-year, the rate of the primary end point, target vessel failure (TVF), was 17.3% in the Genous stent group when compared with 10.5% in the Taxus stent group [risk difference (RD) 6.8%, 95% CI −3.1 to 16.7%], a difference predominantly due to a higher incidence of repeat revascularization in patients treated with the Genous stent. In contrast, no stent thrombosis was observed in the Genous stent group compared to 4 stent thromboses in the Taxus stent group (RD −4.2%; 95% CI −10.3 to 0.3%). Repeat angiography between 6 and 12 months in a subgroup of patients showed a significantly higher late loss in the Genous stent compared with the Taxus stent (1.14 ± 0.64 and 0.55 ± 0.61 mm). Conclusion In patients with lesions carrying a high risk of restenosis, the Genous stent resulted in a non-significant higher rate of TVF compared with the Taxus stent mainly due to more repeat revascularizations in the Genous stent group. There were four stent thromboses with Taxus stent, none with the Genous stent.

Multiple Biomarkers at Admission Significantly Improve the Prediction of Mortality in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

OBJECTIVES We investigated whether multiple biomarkers improve prognostication in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND Few data exist on the prognostic value of combined biomarkers. METHODS We used data from 1,034 STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention center in the Netherlands and investigated whether combining N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, glucose, C-reactive protein, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and cardiac troponin T improved the prediction of mortality. A risk score was developed based on the strongest predicting biomarkers in multivariate Cox regression. The additional prognostic value of the strongest predicting biomarkers to the established prognostic factors (age, body weight, diabetes, hypertension, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, anterior myocardial infarction, and time to treatment) was assessed in multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS During follow-up (median, 901 days), 120 of the 1,034 patients died. In Cox regression, glucose, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide were the strongest predictors for mortality (p < 0.05, for all). A risk score incorporating these biomarkers identified a high-risk STEMI subgroup with a significantly higher mortality when compared with an intermediate- or low-risk subgroup (p < 0.001). Addition of the 3 biomarkers to established prognostic factors significantly improved prediction for mortality, as shown by the net reclassification improvement (0.481, p < 0.001) [corrected] and integrated discrimination improvement (0.0226, p = 0.03) [corrected]. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that addition of a multimarker to a model including established risk factors improves the prediction of mortality in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Furthermore, the use of a simple risk score based on these biomarkers identifies a high-risk subgroup.

Clinical results after coronary stenting with the Genous™ Bio-engineered R stent™: 12-month outcomes of the e-HEALING (Healthy Endothelial Accelerated Lining Inhibits Neointimal Growth) worldwide registry.

AIMS e-HEALING is a worldwide, internet-based registry designed to capture post marketing clinical data on the use of the Genous™ EPC capturing R stent™. Rapid restoration of a healthy endothelial layer after stent placement by capturing circulating endothelial progenitor cells may reduce both stent thrombosis (ST) and in-stent-restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS We planned a 5,000 patient registry with ≥1 lesion suitable for stenting. The 12-month primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF), defined as target vessel-related cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularisation. Secondary outcomes were the composite of cardiac death, MI or target lesion revascularisation (TLR), and individual outcomes including ST. A total of 4,939 patients received ≥1 Genous stent between 2005 and 2007. Baseline characteristics showed a median age of 63 years, 79% males, 25% diabetics, and 37% with prior MI. A total of 49% of lesions treated were ACC/AHA type B2 or C; 1.1 stents per lesion were used. At 12 months, TVF occurred in 8.4% and the composite of cardiac death, MI or TLR in 7.9%. Twelve-month TLR and ST were 5.7% and 1.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Coronary stenting with the Genous results in good clinical outcomes, and low incidences of repeat revascularisation and ST.

XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system: a novel second generation drug-eluting stent.

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been shown to be safe and significantly reduce clinical events and angiographic restenosis in the percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease. Currently, three DES have been approved in Europe and Northern America: the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) and the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES). Everolimus, an analog of sirolimus, is an immunosuppressive and antiproliferative agent. In three studies, the SPIRIT I, FUTURE I and II, the everolimus-eluting stent has proven to be safe, well-tolerated and has shown very favorable clinical and angiographic results. Compared with earlier-generation DES, the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system (Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc., an Abbott Vascular Company, CA, USA) may provide enhanced deliverability, radiopacity with thinner strut filaments and, owing to a durable polymer, sustained drug elution and vascular compatibility.

Genous™ endothelial progenitor cell-capturing stent system: a novel stent technology

Drug-eluting stents have been demonstrated to significantly reduce clinical and angiographic restenosis in patients with coronary artery disease compared with bare-metal stents. Intuitively, however, a prohealing approach for the prevention of in-stent restenosis by promoting accelerated re-endothelialization is favored over the aggressive pharmacologic cytotoxic and cytostatic approach of the drug-eluting stents. The endothelial progenitor cell-capturing stent attracts circulating CD43+ progenitor cells that bind to the stent surface and differentiate into a functional endothelial layer. It is theorized that the accelerated establishment of the endothelial layer covering the stent struts will reduce the risk of neointimal hyperplasia and smooth muscle cell proliferation. The safety and efficacy have been demonstrated in the nonrandomized Healthy Endothelial Accelerated Lining Inhibits Neointimal Growth (HEALING) studies, and the device received a CE mark in 2005. This article reviews the realization of the endothelial progenitor cell-capturing stent, its relevance compared with other stent types, current evidence on clinical performance, and future perspectives. At present, the larger randomized Tri-stent Adjudication Study (TRIAS) that is ongoing will directly compare the clinical usefulness of this new endothelial progenitor cell-capturing stent with bare-metal stents and drug-eluting stents.

Two-year follow-up of the Genous™ endothelial progenitor cell capturing stent versus the Taxus Liberté stent in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions with a high-risk of restenosis: a randomized, single-center, pilot study

In the prospective randomized TRIAS pilot study, the bio‐engineered Genous™ endothelial progenitor cell capturing stent was compared with the Taxus Liberté™ SR paclitaxel‐eluting stent. At 1 yr, a statistically nonsignificant difference in the rates of target vessel failure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization) was observed. We have evaluated the safety and efficacy up to 2 yr.

Two-year results of a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in de novo coronary artery stenosis (The SPIRIT FIRST Trial).

AIMS The successful use of everolimus on a durable polymer was earlier reported with 6 and 12 months data from this first-in-man study. This reports the long-term follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent. METHODS AND RESULTS This prospective, single-blinded, randomised, multicentre clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system versus an identical bare metal stent in the treatment of patients with a single de novo coronary artery stenosis of >/=50% and <100% and a vessel diameter of 3.0 mm as assessed by on-line quantitative coronary angiography that could be covered by a single 18 mm stent.Sixty patients were randomised and at two-year follow-up, clinical data was available in 96% and 97% of patients in the everolimus and control arm, respectively. Four patients were excluded due to protocol violations and two patients withdrew consent.In the everolimus arm no additional death, myocardial infarction, clinically driven TLR, or TVR events were observed between one and two-year follow-up. The 2-year hierarchical MACE rate for the everolimus arm remained 15.4% (4/26). In the control group, two patients had a clinically driven target lesion revascularisation. MACE rate increased from 21.4% (6/28) to 25.0% (7/28) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS This report confirms and extends the safety and efficacy results of the durable polymer XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent up to two years as compared to identical bare metal stents.

p27kip1–838C>A Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Is Associated With Restenosis Risk After Coronary Stenting and Modulates p27kip1 Promoter Activity

Background— The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27kip1 is a key regulator of smooth muscle cell and leukocyte proliferation in vascular disease, including in-stent restenosis. We therefore hypothesized that common genetic variations or single nucleotide polymorphisms in p27kip1 may serve as a useful tool in risk stratification for in-stent restenosis. Methods and Results— Three single nucleotide polymorphisms concerning the p27kip1 gene (−838C>A, rs36228499; −79C>T, rs34330; +326G>T, rs2066827) were determined in a cohort of 715 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty and stent placement. We discovered that the p27kip1-838C>A single nucleotide polymorphism is associated with clinical in-stent restenosis; the −838AA genotype decreases the risk of target vessel revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.10 to 0.77). This finding was replicated in another cohort study of 2309 patients (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.93). No association was detected between this end point and the p27kip1-79C>T and +326G>T single nucleotide polymorphisms. We subsequently studied the functional importance of the −838C>A single nucleotide polymorphism and detected a 20-fold increased basal p27kip1 transcriptional activity of the −838A allele containing promoter. Conclusions— Patients with the p27kip1-838AA genotype have a decreased risk of in-stent restenosis corresponding with enhanced promoter activity of the −838A allele of this cell-cycle inhibitor, which may explain decreased smooth muscle cell proliferation.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of an Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Culprit Lesion in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction

OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate 30-day all-cause mortality of patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) presenting with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) due to an unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) culprit lesion. In addition, an average estimated mortality rate was extrapolated from the available data. BACKGROUND There are limited data available on clinical outcome after primary PCI in patients presenting with AMI with unprotected left main as the infarct-related coronary artery. METHODS Medical literature databases were searched to identify cohort studies reporting on primary PCI for unprotected left main-related AMI. A total of 13 retrospective studies meeting all pre-specified criteria were included in the meta-analysis. No randomized trials were available. The primary endpoint for the meta-analysis was 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS This meta-analysis comprises a total of 977 patients, of which 252 (26%) presented in cardiogenic shock. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was evaluated using a forest plot analysis and showed higher event rates in patients presenting with cardiogenic shock among all subgroups. The average estimated 30-day all-cause mortality was 15% in patients presenting without signs of cardiogenic shock and 55% in patients presenting with cardiogenic shock (relative risk: 3.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.95 to 4.76, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this large meta-analysis of patients treated with primary PCI for AMI due to an ULMCA culprit lesion, the 30-day all-cause mortality in patients presenting with shock is much higher than in patients not presenting with shock. The estimated all-cause mortality data may serve as a benchmark for future reference.