Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Marcel F. Jonker is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Marcel F. Jonker.


The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | 2015

Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide

Esther W. de Bekker-Grob; Bas Donkers; Marcel F. Jonker; Elly A. Stolk

Discrete-choice experiments (DCEs) have become a commonly used instrument in health economics and patient-preference analysis, addressing a wide range of policy questions. An important question when setting up a DCE is the size of the sample needed to answer the research question of interest. Although theory exists as to the calculation of sample size requirements for stated choice data, it does not address the issue of minimum sample size requirements in terms of the statistical power of hypothesis tests on the estimated coefficients. The purpose of this paper is threefold: (1) to provide insight into whether and how researchers have dealt with sample size calculations for healthcare-related DCE studies; (2) to introduce and explain the required sample size for parameter estimates in DCEs; and (3) to provide a step-by-step guide for the calculation of the minimum sample size requirements for DCEs in health care.


Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health | 2014

The effect of urban green on small-area (healthy) life expectancy

Marcel F. Jonker; F.J. van Lenthe; Bas Donkers; J. P. Mackenbach; Alex Burdorf

Background Several epidemiological studies have investigated the effect of the quantity of green space on health outcomes such as self-rated health, morbidity and mortality ratios. These studies have consistently found positive associations between the quantity of green and health. However, the impact of other aspects, such as the perceived quality and average distance to public green, and the effect of urban green on population health are still largely unknown. Methods Linear regression models were used to investigate the impact of three different measures of urban green on small-area life expectancy (LE) and healthy life expectancy (HLE) in The Netherlands. All regressions corrected for average neighbourhood household income, accommodated spatial autocorrelation, and took measurement uncertainty of LE, HLE as well as the quality of urban green into account. Results Both the quantity and the perceived quality of urban green are modestly related to small-area LE and HLE: an increase of 1 SD in the percentage of urban green space is associated with a 0.1-year higher LE, and, in the case of quality of green, with an approximately 0.3-year higher LE and HLE. The average distance to the nearest public green is unrelated to population health. Conclusions The quantity and particularly quality of urban green are positively associated with small-area LE and HLE. This concurs with a growing body of evidence that urban green reduces stress, stimulates physical activity, improves the microclimate and reduces ambient air pollution. Accordingly, urban green development deserves a more prominent place in urban regeneration and neighbourhood renewal programmes.


American Journal of Epidemiology | 2012

Comparison of Bayesian Random-Effects and Traditional Life Expectancy Estimations in Small-Area Applications

Marcel F. Jonker; Frank J. van Lenthe; Peter Congdon; Bas Donkers; Alex Burdorf; Johan P. Mackenbach

There are several measures that summarize the mortality experience of a population. Of these measures, life expectancies are generally preferred based on their simpler interpretation and direct age standardization, which makes them directly comparable between different populations. However, traditional life expectancy estimations are highly inaccurate for smaller populations and consequently are seldom used in small-area applications. In this paper, the authors compare the relative performance of traditional life expectancy estimation with a Bayesian random-effects approach that uses correlations (i.e., borrows strength) between different age groups, geographic areas, and sexes to improve the small-area life expectancy estimations. In the presented Monte Carlo simulations, the Bayesian random-effects approach outperforms the traditional approach in terms of bias, root mean square error, and coverage of the 95% confidence intervals. Moreover, the Bayesian random-effects approach is found to be usable for populations as small as 2,000 person-years at risk, which is considerably smaller than the minimum of 5,000 person-years at risk recommended for the traditional approach. As such, the proposed Bayesian random-effects approach is well-suited for estimation of life expectancies in small areas.


Health & Place | 2013

The impact of nursing homes on small-area life expectancies

Marcel F. Jonker; Frank J. van Lenthe; Bas Donkers; Peter Congdon; Alex Burdorf; Johan P. Mackenbach

The geographical distribution of nursing homes can significantly distort small-area life expectancy estimations. Consequently, uncorrected life expectancies should not be used for small-area life expectancy comparisons. Instead, several nursing home corrections have been proposed. The practical use of these corrections, however, is severely limited by data availability. This paper introduces a new, model-based nursing home correction that requires considerably less detailed nursing home data. A formal comparison shows that the proposed model-based approach is the recommended correction for all small-area life expectancy estimations where detailed previous residential address information of the nursing home population is not available. This makes the approach highly relevant for a wide range of empirical applications.


Epidemiology | 2015

Estimating the Impact of Health-related Behaviors on Geographic Variation in Cardiovascular Mortality: A New Approach Based on the Synthesis of Ecological and Individual-level Data.

Marcel F. Jonker; Bas Donkers; Basile Chaix; Frank J. van Lenthe; Alex Burdorf; Johan P. Mackenbach

Background: Incidence of and mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD) exhibit a strong geographical pattern, with inhabitants of more affluent neighborhoods showing a substantially lower risk of CVD mortality than inhabitants of deprived neighborhoods. Thus far, there is insufficient evidence as to what extent these differences can be attributed to differences in health-related behaviors. Methods: Using a Hierarchical Related Regression approach, we combined individual and aggregate (ecological) data to investigate the extent to which small-area variation in CVD mortality in Dutch neighborhoods can be explained by several behavioral risk factors (i.e., smoking, drinking, overweight, and physical inactivity). The proposed approach combines the benefits of both an ecological analysis (in terms of data availability and statistical power) and an individual-level analysis (in terms of identification of the parameters and interpretation of the results). Results: After correcting for differences in age and sex, accounting for differences in the behavioral risk factors reduces income-related inequalities in CVD mortality by approximately 30%. Conclusions: Direct targeting of the excess prevalence of unhealthy behaviors in deprived neighborhoods is identified as a relevant strategy to reduce inequalities in CVD mortality. Our results also show that the proposed Hierarchical Related Regression approach provides a powerful method for the investigation of small-area variation in health outcomes.


BMJ Open | 2017

ABC Index: quantifying experienced burden of COPD in a discrete choice experiment and predicting costs

Lucas M.A. Goossens; Maureen Rutten-van Mölken; Melinde Boland; Bas Donkers; Marcel F. Jonker; Annerika Slok; Philippe L. Salome; Onno C. P. van Schayck; Johannes C. C. M. in 't Veen; Elly A. Stolk

Objective The Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool supports shared decision making between patient and caregiver. It includes a coloured balloon diagram to visualise patients’ scores on burden indicators. We aim to determine the importance of each indicator from a patient perspective, in order to calculate a weighted index score and investigate whether that score is predictive of costs. Design Discrete choice experiment. Setting and participants Primary care and secondary care in the Netherlands. 282 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 252 members of the general public participated. Methods Respondents received 14 choice questions and indicated which of two health states was more severe. Health states were described in terms of specific symptoms, limitations in physical, daily and social activities, mental problems, fatigue and exacerbations, most of which had three levels of severity. Weights for each item-level combination were derived from a Bayesian mixed logit model. Weights were rescaled to construct an index score from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Regression models were used to find a classification of this index score in mild, moderate and severe that was discriminative in terms of healthcare costs. Results Fatigue, limitations in moderate physical activities, number of exacerbations, dyspnoea at rest and fear of breathing getting worse contributed most to the burden of disease. Patients assigned less weight to dyspnoea during exercise, listlessness and limitations with regard to strenuous activities. Respondents from the general public mostly agreed. Mild, moderate and severe burden of disease were defined as scores <20, 20–39 and ≥40. This categorisation was most predictive of healthcare utilisation and annual costs: €1368, €2510 and €9885, respectively. Conclusions The ABC Index is a new index score for the burden of COPD, which is based on patients’ preferences. The classification of the index score into mild, moderate and severe is predictive of future healthcare costs. Trial registration number NTR3788; Post-results.


Vaccine | 2018

The impact of vaccination and patient characteristics on influenza vaccination uptake of elderly people : A discrete choice experiment

Esther W. de Bekker-Grob; Jorien Veldwijk; Marcel F. Jonker; Bas Donkers; Jan Huisman; Sylvia Buis; Joffre Swait; Emily Lancsar; Cilia Witteman; Gouke J. Bonsel; Patrick J. E. Bindels

OBJECTIVES To improve information for patients and to facilitate a vaccination coverage that is in line with the EU and World Health Organization goals, we aimed to quantify how vaccination and patient characteristics impact on influenza vaccination uptake of elderly people. METHODS An online discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted among 1261 representatives of the Dutch general population aged 60 years or older. In the DCE, we used influenza vaccination scenarios based on five vaccination characteristics: effectiveness, risk of severe side effects, risk of mild side effects, protection duration, and absorption time. A heteroscedastic multinomial logit model was used, taking scale and preference heterogeneity (based on 19 patient characteristics) into account. RESULTS Vaccination and patient characteristics both contributed to explain influenza vaccination uptake. Assuming a base case respondent and a realistic vaccination scenario, the predicted uptake was 58%. One-way changes in vaccination characteristics and patient characteristics changed this uptake from 46% up to 61% and from 37% up to 95%, respectively. The strongest impact on vaccination uptake was whether the patient had been vaccinated last year, whether s/he had experienced vaccination side effects, and the patients general attitude towards vaccination. CONCLUSIONS Although vaccination characteristics proved to influence influenza vaccination uptake, certain patient characteristics had an even higher impact on influenza vaccination uptake. Policy makers and general practitioners can use these insights to improve their communication plans and information regarding influenza vaccination for individuals aged 60 years or older. For instance, physicians should focus more on patients who had experienced side effects due to vaccination in the past, and policy makers should tailor the standard information folder to patients who had been vaccinated last year and to patient who had not.


PharmacoEconomics | 2018

Severity-Stratified Discrete Choice Experiment Designs for Health State Evaluations

Sesil Lim; Marcel F. Jonker; Mark Oppe; Bas Donkers; Elly A. Stolk

BackgroundDiscrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly used for health state valuations. However, the values derived from initial DCE studies vary widely. We hypothesize that these findings indicate the presence of unknown sources of bias that must be recognized and minimized. Against this background, we studied whether values derived from a DCE are sensitive to how well the DCE design spans the severity range.MethodsWe constructed an experiment involving three variants of DCE tasks for health state valuation: standard DCE, DCE-death, and DCE-duration. For each type of DCE, an experimental design was generated under two different conditions, enabling a comparison of health state values derived from current best practice Bayesian efficient DCE designs with values derived from ‘severity-stratified’ designs that control for coverage of the severity range in health state selection. About 3000 respondents participated in the study and were randomly assigned to one of the six study arms.ResultsImposing the severity-stratified restriction had a large effect on health states sampled for the DCE-duration approach. The unstratified efficient design returned a skewed distribution of selected health states, and this introduced bias. The choice probability of bad health states was underestimated, and time trade-offs to avoid bad states were overestimated, resulting in too low values. Imposing the same restriction had limited effect in the DCE-death approach and standard DCE.ConclusionVariation in DCE-derived values can be partially explained by differences in how well selected health states spanned the severity range. Imposing a ‘severity stratification’ on DCE-duration designs is a validity requirement.


Scandinavian Journal of Public Health | 2017

The effect of regional politics on regional life expectancy in Italy (1980-2010)

Marcel F. Jonker; Edoardo D'Ippolito; Terje A. Eikemo; Peter Congdon; Nicola Nante; Johan P. Mackenbach; Carlijn B. M. Kamphuis

Background: The evidence on the association between politics and health is scarce considering the importance of this topic for population health. Studies that investigated the effect of different political regimes on health outcomes show inconsistent results. Methods: Bayesian time-series cross-section analyses are used to examine the overall impact of regional politics on variations in Italian regional life expectancy (LE) at birth during the period 1980–2010. Our analyses control for trends in and unobserved determinants of regional LE, correct for temporal as well as spatial autocorrelation, and employ a flexible specification for the timing of the political effects. Results: In the period from 1980 to 1995, we find no evidence that the communist, left-oriented coalitions and Christian Democratic, centre-oriented coalitions have had an effect on regional LE. In the period from 1995 onwards, after a major reconfiguration of Italy’s political regimes and a major healthcare reform, we again find no evidence that the Centre-Left and Centre-Right coalitions have had a significant impact on regional LE. Conclusion: The presented results provide no support for the notion that different regional political regimes in Italy have had a differential effect on regional LE, even though Italian regions have had considerable and increasing autonomy over healthcare and health-related policies and expenditures.


Environment International | 2016

High resolution exposure modelling of heat and air pollution and the impact on mortality

Saskia Willers; Marcel F. Jonker; Lisette Klok; Menno Keuken; Jennie Odink; Sef van den Elshout; Clive E. Sabel; Johan P. Mackenbach; Alex Burdorf

Collaboration


Dive into the Marcel F. Jonker's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bas Donkers

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elly A. Stolk

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alex Burdorf

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Johan P. Mackenbach

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frank J. van Lenthe

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lucas M.A. Goossens

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Congdon

Queen Mary University of London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Melinde Boland

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge