Marcel Wainwright

Hydrodynamic ultrasonic sinus floor elevation--an experimental study in sheep.

PURPOSE The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pressure forces appearing to elevate the sinus membrane by comparing the hydraulic and pneumatic pressure. Also, the relation between the time and volume of the applied liquid and the achieved lift-volume were determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 190 fresh, half sheep heads were used for the present investigation. An ultrasound surgical device (Piezotome; Acteon, Bordeaux, France) was tested to evaluate the pressure increase at different flow rates. The elevation volume at different flow rates and activation times of the ultrasound hand piece were measured. RESULTS To detach the sinus membrane pneumatically from the sinus floor, a mean average pressure of 29.54 millibars was required. Using the hydraulic technique, a mean average pressure of 19.8 millibars was determined. Comparing the different flow rates, the elevated volume increased to 0.52 mL when a flow of 60 mL/minute was used. Using an activation time of 20 seconds, a lifted volume of 3.92 mL could be measured on average. If the flow was set to a maximum of 60 mL/minute, the created volume increased to 5.58 mL. A comparison using the chi(2) test showed a significant correlation (P = .03) between the application time and the created sinus lift volume. Even at high flow rates of 60 mL/minute of the activated Piezotome for a 20-second period, no rupture of the sinus membrane of the sheep heads occurred in 190 experiments. CONCLUSION From these results, we have concluded that hydrodynamic ultrasound could be used as an alternative method for sinus floor elevations of any size and volume with a mere 3-mm-diameter transcrestal approach, if findings from clinical investigations confirm the results of the present animal study.

Hydrodynamic ultrasonic maxillary sinus lift: Review of a new technique and presentation of a clinical case

Objectives: Placing implants in the posterior maxillary area has the drawback of working with scarce, poor quality bone in a significant percentage of cases. Numerous advanced surgical techniques have been developed to overcome the difficulties associated with these limitations. Subsequent to reports on the elevation of the maxillary sinus through the lateral approach, there were reports on the use of the crestal approach, which is less aggressive but requires a minimal amount of bone. Furthermore, it is more sensitive to operator technique, as the integrity of the sinus membrane is checked indirectly. The aim of this paper is to review the technical literature on minimally invasive sinus lift and compare the advantages of different techniques with Intralift™, a new technique. Study Design: The present study is a review of techniques used to perform minimally invasive sinus lift published in Cochrane, Embase and Medline over the past ten years and the description of the crestal sinus lift technique based on minimally invasive piezosurgery, with the example of a case report. Results: Only eight articles were found on minimally invasive techniques for sinus lift. The main advantage of this new technique, Intralift, is that it does not require a minimum amount of crestal bone (indeed, the smaller the width of the crestal bone, the better this technique is performed). The possibility of damage to the sinus membrane is minimised by using ultrasound based hydrodynamic pressure to lift it, while applying a very non-aggressive crestal approach. Conclusions: We believe that this technique is an advance in the search for less traumatic and aggressive techniques, which is the hallmark of current surgery. Key words: Sinus lift, surgical technique, minimally invasive surgery, ultrasound surgery.

Biological Principles and Physiology of Bone Regeneration under the Schneiderian Membrane after Sinus Lift Surgery: A Radiological Study in 14 Patients Treated with the Transcrestal Hydrodynamic Ultrasonic Cavitational Sinus Lift (Intralift).

Introduction. Sinus lift procedures are a commonly accepted method of bone augmentation in the lateral maxilla with clinically good results. Nevertheless the role of the Schneiderian membrane in the bone-reformation process is discussed controversially. Aim of this study was to prove the key role of the sinus membrane in bone reformation in vivo. Material and Methods. 14 patients were treated with the minimal invasive tHUCSL-Intralift, and 2 ccm collagenous sponges were inserted subantrally and the calcification process followed up with CBCT scans 4 and 7 months after surgery. Results. An even and circular centripetal calcification under the sinus membrane and the antral floor was detected 4 months after surgery covering 30% of the entire augmentation width/height/depth at each wall. The calcification process was completed in the entire augmentation volume after 7 months. A loss of approximately 13% of absolute augmentation height was detected between the 4th and 7th month. Discussion. The results of this paper prove the key role of the sinus membrane as the main carrier of bone reformation after sinus lift procedures as multiple experimental studies suggested. Thus the importance of minimal invasive and rupture free sinuslift procedures is underlined and does not depend on the type of grafting material used.

Rupture length of the sinus membrane after 1.2 mm puncture and surgical sinus elevation: an experimental animal cadaver study.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the rupture length of the sinus membrane after applying a defined 1.2 mm defect comparing 3 different techniques: Summers lift, balloon-assisted technique (BASL), and hydrodynamic ultrasonic cavitational sinus lift (HUCSL). STUDY DESIGN Thirty fresh sheep heads (60 maxillary sinuses) were investigated. The sinus membrane was ruptured using a 1.2 mm pilot drill. Then Summers lift, BASL, and HUCSL were each performed on 20 sinuses, creating a 5 mm vertical lift of the sinus membrane. The length of the ruptured sinus membrane was measured before and after the experiment. The results of the different sinus lift techniques were compared using t tests. RESULTS The t test showed that the Summers lift leads to a significantly higher rupture length (P = .05) than BASL. The comparison between Summers lift and HUCSL showed a significantly higher rupture length with the Summers lift (P < .005). The same significance (P < .005) was found when BASL was compared with HUCSL. Comparing the increasing rupture length of the sinus membrane during the experiment, the t test showed a significantly greater rupture using BASL or the Summers lift compared with HUCSL. CONCLUSIONS The HUCSL technique yielded the lowest increase of rupture length compared with BASL and Summers lift. The technique therefore shows the lowest risk of a growing rupture of the sinus membrane in case of an iatrogenic puncture during preparation of the transcrestal approach.

Primary implant stability in augmented sinuslift-sites after completed bone regeneration: a randomized controlled clinical study comparing four subantrally inserted biomaterials.

Implant-Insertion-Torque-Value (ITV) proved to be a significant clinical parameter to predict long term implant success-rates and to decide upon immediate loading. The study evaluated ITVs, when four different and commonly used biomaterials were used in sinuslift-procedures compared to natural subantral bone in two-stage-implant-procedures. The tHUCSL-INTRALIFT-method was chosen for sinuslifting in 155 sinuslift-sites for its minimal invasive transcrestal approach and scalable augmentation volume. Four different biomaterials were inserted randomly (easy-graft CRYSTAL n = 38, easy-graft CLASSIC n = 41, NanoBone n = 42, BioOss n = 34), 2 ccm in each case. After a mean healing period of 8,92 months uniform tapered screw Q2-implants were inserted and Drill-Torque-Values (DTV) and ITV were recorded and compared to a group of 36 subantral sites without need of sinuslifting. DTV/ITV were processed for statistics by ANOVA-tests. Mean DTV/ITV obtained in Ncm were: Control Group 10,2/22,2, Bio-Oss 12,7/26,2, NanoBone 17,5/33,3, easy-graft CLASSIC 20,3/45,9, easy-graft CRYSTAL 23,8/56,6 Ncm, significance-level of differences throughout p < 0,05. Within the limits of this study the results suggest self-hardening solid-block-like bone-graft-materials to achieve significantly better DTV/ITV than loose granulate biomaterials for its suspected improvement of vascularization and mineralization of the subantral scaffold by full immobilization of the augmentation site towards pressure changes in the human sinus at normal breathing.

Schneiderian Membrane Detachment Using Transcrestal Hydrodynamic Ultrasonic Cavitational Sinus Lift: A Human Cadaver Head Study and Histologic Analysis

PURPOSE Recent studies have suggested the osteogenic layer of the periosteum at the base of the sinus membrane to play a key role in bone regeneration after sinus lift procedures. Thus, atraumatic detachment of the sinus membrane with an intact periosteum seems mandatory. The present histologic study of fresh human cadaver heads investigated the detachment behavior and histologic integrity of the detached periosteum after application of the transcrestal hydrodynamic ultrasonic cavitational sinus lift (tHUCSL-INTRALIFT). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 15 sinuses in 8 fresh human cadaver heads were treated using tHUCSL-INTRALIFT. After surgery, they were checked macroscopically for damage to the sinus membrane and then processed for histologic inspection under light microscopy. A total of 150 histologic specimens, randomly selected from the core surgical sites, were investigated using hematoxylin-eosin (HE), Azan, and trichrome staining. RESULTS None of the 150 inspected specimens showed any perforation or dissection of the periosteum from the subepithelial connective tissue and respiratory epithelium and were fully detached from the bony antrum floor. The connecting Sharpey fibers revealed to be cleanly separated from the sinus floor in all specimens. CONCLUSIONS The results of the present study suggest tHUCSL-INTRALIFT should be used to perform predictable and safe detachment of the periosteum from the bony sinus floor as a prerequisite for undisturbed and successful physiologic subantral bone regeneration.

Histological and histomorphometric study using an ultrasonic crestal sinus grafting procedure: a multicenter case study

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a hydrodynamic ultrasonic driven transcrestal sinus grafting procedure (Intralift ®, Acteon Company, Bordeaux, France) and the use of a bovine high temperature sintered grafting material in sinus sites with less than 5 mm remaining bone height with no additional autogenous bone in order to create a sufficient recipient site for implants. Material and Methods 12 patients (16 sinus) in this multicenter case study were included. Using a crestal approach, bone under the sinus was prepared with ultrasonic tips until the Schneiderian membrane was reached. With a trumpet shaped instrument, the Schneiderian membrane was elevated. In the new created subantral space a high temperature sintered bovine grafting material was introduced (Bego Oss, BEGO Implant Systems GmbH & Co. KG, Bremen, Germany). After 6 months biopsies were taken with a trephine bur and histologies were generated following histomorphometric analysis. Results The results showed new vital bone in average of 33.4% ± 17.05%, and 43.6% ± 16.70 of bone substitute material. No signs of abnormal inflammation were observed. Conclusions This procedure (Intralift ®) allows, using a bovine material with no additional autogenous bone, new bone formation in the sinus in order to allow place implant subantraly. Key words:Bone regeneration, sinus, intralift ®, xenogenic bone graft

Cutting bone with drills, burs, lasers and piezotomes: A comprehensive systematic review and recommendations for the clinician

Background: New tools for bone-cutting were introduced to oral and maxillofacial surgery in the last decade, such as lasers and piezotomes. Purpose: to evaluate most recent evidence, when surgical procedures performed with drills or burs are compared with laserand/or piezotome-surgical procedures in experimental and clinical studies and to assess possible advantages of their use in daily practice. Methods: a systematic search of various medical databases with specifi c keywords was performed, excluding studies published before 2006 for their possible invalidity by technological progress. Systematic reviews were assigned to Group 1, experimental studies ex vivo to Group 2, in vivo to Group 3 and clinical studies to Group 4. All studies in each of the groups 2 – 4 were appraised regarding their evidence, starting with a value of 0 for no evidence of advantages of lasers and/or piezotomes compared to rotary instruments, 1 for moderate evidence with verifi ed clinical impact and 2 for strong evidence and signifi cant clinical impact and statistically processed for their Evidence Value (EV) in each group and their Overall mean Evidence Value (OmEV). Results: 129 studies were fi nally included for evaluation. Two systematic reviews concluded lack of evidence for lasers to be advantageous over burs/drills. Nine reviews for piezotomes reveal strong evidence piezotome-surgery to signifi cantly reduce morbidity and to enhance soft-tissue preservation. Comparative experimental and clinical studies of burs/drills vs lasers revealed a low EV in Group 2 (EV:0,8), Group 3 (EV:0,5) and Group 4 (EV:0,5) with an OmEV of 0,6. Comparative studies burs/drills vs piezotomes resulted in a signifi cant EV in all groups (Group 2: 1,4, Group 3: 1,3, Group 4: 1,59) with an OmEV of 1,4. Conclusions: the results suggest too little evidence to establish lasers as an alternative to rotary instruments. Piezotomes seem to defi ne a possible new gold-standard in bone cutting due to their improved bone-healing, almost bone-lossless and precise osteotomy design, precise depth-control, softtissue protection as well as reduced intrasurgical and post-surgical morbidity. Review Article Cutting bone with drills, burs, lasers and piezotomes: A comprehensive systematic review and recommendations for the clinician Angelo Troedhan1*, Ziad Tarek Mahmoud2, Marcel Wainwright3 and Mohamed Moataz Khamis4 1Institute for Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry, General Hospital “Krankenhaus Hietzing” of the City of Vienna, Vienna 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt 3School of Dentistry, University of Seville, Spain 4Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt Dates: Received: 29 July, 2017; Accepted: 12 August, 2017; Published: 14 August, 2017 *Corresponding author: Angelo Troedhan, Krankenhaus Hietzing, Institute for Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry, Wolkersbergenstraße 1, 1130 Vienna, Austria, Tel: 0043 664 5009246; Fax: 0043 1 544912821; Email: