Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Marcella De Maglie is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Marcella De Maglie.


EFSA Journal | 2017

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pethoxamid

Maria Arena; Domenica Auteri; Stefania Barmaz; Giulia Bellisai; Alba Brancato; Daniela Brocca; Laszlo Bura; Harry Byers; Arianna Chiusolo; Daniele Court Marques; Federica Crivellente; Chloe De Lentdecker; Marcella De Maglie; Mark Egsmose; Zoltan Erdos; Gabriella Fait; Lucien Ferreira; Marina Goumenou; Luna Greco; Alessio Ippolito; Frederique Istace; Judit Janossy; Samira Jarrah; Dimitra Kardassi; Renata Leuschner; Christopher Lythgo; Jose Oriol Magrans; Paula Medina; Ileana Miron; Tunde Molnar

Abstract The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Austria, and co‐rapporteur Member State, the Czech Republic, for the pesticide active substance pethoxamid are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of pethoxamid as a herbicide on maize and soya bean. The reliable endpoints, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.


EFSA Journal | 2017

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance mepanipyrim

Maria Arena; Domenica Auteri; Stefania Barmaz; Giulia Bellisai; Alba Brancato; Daniela Brocca; Laszlo Bura; Harry Byers; Arianna Chiusolo; Daniele Court Marques; Federica Crivellente; Chloe De Lentdecker; Marcella De Maglie; Mark Egsmose; Zoltan Erdos; Gabriella Fait; Lucien Ferreira; Marina Goumenou; Luna Greco; Alessio Ippolito; Frederique Istace; Samira Jarrah; Dimitra Kardassi; Renata Leuschner; Christopher Lythgo; Jose Oriol Magrans; Paula Medina; Ileana Miron; Tunde Molnar; Alexandre Nougadere

Abstract The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Belgium, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Greece, for the pesticide active substance mepanipyrim are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of mepanipyrim as a fungicide on table and wine grapes, and in field and protected strawberries and tomatoes. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.


EFSA Journal | 2017

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance terbuthylazine in light of confirmatory data submitted

Alba Brancato; Daniela Brocca; Laszlo Bura; Harry Byers; Arianna Chiusolo; Daniele Court Marques; Federica Crivellente; Chloe De Lentdecker; Marcella De Maglie; Mark Egsmose; Zoltan Erdos; Gabriella Fait; Lucien Ferreira; Marina Goumenou; Luna Greco; Frederique Istace; Samira Jarrah; Dimitra Kardassi; Renata Leuschner; Christopher Lythgo; Jose Oriol Magrans; Paula Medina; Ileana Miron; Tunde Molnar; Alexandre Nougadere; Laura Padovani; Juan Manuel Parra Morte; Ragnor Pedersen; Hermine Reich; Angela Sacchi

Abstract The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessment carried out by the competent authority of the rapporteur Member State, the United Kingdom, for the pesticide active substance metazachlor are reported. The context of the peer review was that requested by the European Commission following the submission and evaluation of confirmatory data regarding the groundwater exposure of metabolites and their toxicological relevance triggering an assessment. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of metazachlor as a herbicide on winter and spring rapeseed and on ornamental trees and shrubs. The reliable endpoints concluded as being appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, derived from the available studies and literature in the dossier peer reviewed, are presented. Concerns are identified.


EFSA Journal | 2018

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fenpicoxamid (XDE‐777)

Maria Arena; Domenica Auteri; Stefania Barmaz; Giulia Bellisai; Alba Brancato; Daniela Brocca; Laszlo Bura; Harry Byers; Arianna Chiusolo; Daniele Court Marques; Federica Crivellente; Chloe De Lentdecker; Marcella De Maglie; Mark Egsmose; Zoltan Erdos; Gabriella Fait; Lucien Ferreira; Marina Goumenou; Luna Greco; Alessio Ippolito; Frederique Istace; Samira Jarrah; Dimitra Kardassi; Renata Leuschner; Christopher Lythgo; Jose Oriol Magrans; Paula Medina; Ileana Miron; Tunde Molnar; Alexandre Nougadere

Abstract The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authority of the rapporteur Member State, the United Kingdom, for the pesticide active substance fenpicoxamid (XDE‐777) and the assessment of applications for maximum residue levels (MRLs) are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative use of fenpicoxamid (XDE‐777) as a fungicide on cereals (winter and spring wheat, durum wheat, rye and triticale). MRLs were assessed in rye and wheat (including triticale and spelt). An MRL application for the import tolerance on bananas was also assessed. The reliable endpoints, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment and the proposed MRLs, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.


EFSA Journal | 2017

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance chlorpropham

Maria Arena; Domenica Auteri; Stefania Barmaz; Giulia Bellisai; Alba Brancato; Daniela Brocca; Laszlo Bura; Harry Byers; Arianna Chiusolo; Daniele Court Marques; Federica Crivellente; Chloe De Lentdecker; Marcella De Maglie; Mark Egsmose; Zoltan Erdos; Gabriella Fait; Lucien Ferreira; Marina Goumenou; Luna Greco; Alessio Ippolito; Frederique Istace; Samira Jarrah; Dimitra Kardassi; Renata Leuschner; Christopher Lythgo; Jose Oriol Magrans; Paula Medina; Ileana Miron; Tunde Molnar; Alexandre Nougadere

Abstract The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, the Netherlands, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Spain, for the pesticide active substance chlorpropham and the assessment of applications for maximum residue levels (MRLs) are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of chlorpropham as a plant growth regulator on potatoes and as a herbicide on glasshouse and field lettuce, field onion and field flower bulbs. MRLs were assessed in potato and animal commodities. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment and the proposed MRLs, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.


EFSA Journal | 2017

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Clonostachys rosea strain J1446 (approved in Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as Gliocladium catenulatum strain J1446)

Maria Arena; Domenica Auteri; Stefania Barmaz; Giulia Bellisai; Alba Brancato; Daniela Brocca; Laszlo Bura; Harry Byers; Arianna Chiusolo; Daniele Court Marques; Federica Crivellente; Chloe De Lentdecker; Marcella De Maglie; Mark Egsmose; Zoltan Erdos; Gabriella Fait; Lucien Ferreira; Marina Goumenou; Luna Greco; Alessio Ippolito; Frederique Istace; Samira Jarrah; Dimitra Kardassi; Renata Leuschner; Christopher Lythgo; Jose Oriol Magrans; Paula Medina; Ileana Miron; Tunde Molnar; Alexandre Nougadere

Abstract The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Hungary, and co‐rapporteur Member State, the Netherlands, for the pesticide active substance Clonostachys rosea strain J1446, currently approved as Gliocladium catenulatum strain J1446, are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of Clonostachys rosea strain J1446 as a fungicide in agriculture and horticulture. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.


EFSA Journal | 2017

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Beauveria bassiana IMI389521

Maria Arena; Domenica Auteri; Stefania Barmaz; Giulia Bellisai; Alba Brancato; Daniela Brocca; Laszlo Bura; Harry Byers; Arianna Chiusolo; Daniele Court Marques; Federica Crivellente; Chloe De Lentdecker; Marcella De Maglie; Mark Egsmose; Zoltan Erdos; Gabriella Fait; Lucien Ferreira; Marina Goumenou; Luna Greco; Alessio Ippolito; Frederique Istace; Samira Jarrah; Dimitra Kardassi; Renata Leuschner; Christopher Lythgo; Jose Oriol Magrans; Paula Medina; Ileana Miron; Tunde Molnar; Alexandre Nougadere

Abstract The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authority of the rapporteur Member State, the Netherlands, for the pesticide active substance Beauveria bassiana IMI389521 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative use of Beauveria bassiana IMI389521 as an insecticide in empty post‐harvest storage facilities. The reliable endpoints, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.


EFSA Journal | 2017

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance laminarin

Maria Arena; Domenica Auteri; Stefania Barmaz; Giulia Bellisai; Alba Brancato; Daniela Brocca; Laszlo Bura; Harry Byers; Arianna Chiusolo; Daniele Court Marques; Federica Crivellente; Chloe De Lentdecker; Marcella De Maglie; Mark Egsmose; Zoltan Erdos; Gabriella Fait; Lucien Ferreira; Marina Goumenou; Luna Greco; Alessio Ippolito; Frederique Istace; Samira Jarrah; Dimitra Kardassi; Renata Leuschner; Christopher Lythgo; Jose Oriol Magrans; Paula Medina; Ileana Miron; Tunde Molnar; Alexandre Nougadere

Abstract The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, the Netherlands, and co‐rapporteur Member State, France, for the pesticide active substance laminarin are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of laminarin as elicitor on apple, pear, vine, kiwi, green bean, lettuce, strawberry, tomato, cucurbits, aubergine and pepper. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.


EFSA Journal | 2017

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance tribenuron‐methyl

Maria Arena; Domenica Auteri; Stefania Barmaz; Giulia Bellisai; Alba Brancato; Daniela Brocca; Laszlo Bura; Harry Byers; Arianna Chiusolo; Daniele Court Marques; Federica Crivellente; Chloe De Lentdecker; Marcella De Maglie; Mark Egsmose; Zoltan Erdos; Gabriella Fait; Lucien Ferreira; Marina Goumenou; Luna Greco; Alessio Ippolito; Frederique Istace; Samira Jarrah; Dimitra Kardassi; Renata Leuschner; Christopher Lythgo; Jose Oriol Magrans; Paula Medina; Ileana Miron; Tunde Molnar; Alexandre Nougadere

Abstract The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Sweden, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Latvia, for the pesticide active substance tribenuron‐methyl are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of tribenuron‐methyl as a herbicide on winter and spring cereals (wheat, barley, oat, rye, triticale, durum, spelt), pasture, sunflower (tribenuron‐methyl‐tolerant varieties) and olive. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.


EFSA Journal | 2017

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance forchlorfenuron

Maria Arena; Domenica Auteri; Stefania Barmaz; Giulia Bellisai; Alba Brancato; Daniela Brocca; Laszlo Bura; Harry Byers; Arianna Chiusolo; Daniele Court Marques; Federica Crivellente; Chloe De Lentdecker; Marcella De Maglie; Mark Egsmose; Zoltan Erdos; Gabriella Fait; Lucien Ferreira; Marina Goumenou; Luna Greco; Alessio Ippolito; Frederique Istace; Samira Jarrah; Dimitra Kardassi; Renata Leuschner; Christopher Lythgo; Jose Oriol Magrans; Paula Medina; Ileana Miron; Tunde Molnar; Alexandre Nougadere

Abstract The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Spain, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Greece, for the pesticide active substance forchlorfenuron are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of forchlorfenuron as a plant growth regulator on kiwifruit and grapes. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concern is identified.

Collaboration


Dive into the Marcella De Maglie's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dimitra Kardassi

European Food Safety Authority

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frederique Istace

European Food Safety Authority

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Luna Greco

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Egsmose

European Food Safety Authority

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Renata Leuschner

European Food Safety Authority

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tunde Molnar

European Food Safety Authority

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gabriella Fait

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alessio Ippolito

University of Milano-Bicocca

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Domenica Auteri

European Food Safety Authority

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge