Marcello Tiseo

Pemetrexed Versus Pemetrexed and Carboplatin As Second-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of the GOIRC 02-2006 Randomized Phase II Study and Pooled Analysis With the NVALT7 Trial

PURPOSE To compare efficacy of pemetrexed versus pemetrexed plus carboplatin in pretreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced NSCLC, in progression during or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed (arm A) or pemetrexed plus carboplatin (arm B). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). A preplanned pooled analysis of the results of this study with those of the NVALT7 study was carried out to assess the impact of carboplatin added to pemetrexed in terms of overall survival (OS). RESULTS From July 2007 to October 2009, 239 patients (arm A, n = 120; arm B, n = 119) were enrolled. Median PFS was 3.6 months for arm A versus 3.5 months for arm B (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.36; P = .706). No statistically significant differences in response rate, OS, or toxicity were observed. A total of 479 patients were included in the pooled analysis. OS was not improved by the addition of carboplatin to pemetrexed (HR, 90; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.10; P = .316; P heterogeneity = .495). In the subgroup analyses, the addition of carboplatin to pemetrexed in patients with squamous tumors led to a statistically significant improvement in OS from 5.4 to 9 months (adjusted HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.91; P interaction test = .039). CONCLUSION Second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with pemetrexed plus carboplatin does not improve survival outcomes as compared with single-agent pemetrexed. The benefit observed with carboplatin addition in squamous tumors may warrant further investigation.

Epidermal growth factor receptor targeted therapy by ZD 1839 (Iressa) in patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

PURPOSE We report four cases of Brain Metastases (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) responding to ZD 1839 therapy after standard therapy failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS Four patients with BM from NSCLC, pretreated with two or more lines of chemotherapy, received ZD 1839 (Iressa), on a compassionate use basis, at the daily dose of 250 mg until disease progression. Three patients received Iressa after whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) failure. RESULTS After 3 months of ZD 1839 therapy, one patient had complete response on the brain with stabilization of extracranial disease, while the other three patients had partial response both on the brain and on extracranial sites. At the time of this analysis, two patients discontinued the treatment after 5 and 7 months for disease progression, while two patients are still on treatment with no evidence of treatment failure after 3+ and 12+ months. ZD 1839 was generally well tolerated, with skin toxicity recorded in two patients. CONCLUSION ZD 1839 may be effective in NSCLC patients with pretreated BM. Large and prospective trials need to clarify the role of ZD 1839 in the treatment of BM from NSCLC.

Brigatinib in Patients With Crizotinib-Refractory Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase–Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter Phase II Trial

Purpose Most crizotinib-treated patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene ( ALK)-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ALK-positive NSCLC) eventually experience disease progression. We evaluated two regimens of brigatinib, an investigational next-generation ALK inhibitor, in crizotinib-refractory ALK-positive NSCLC. Patients and Methods Patients were stratified by brain metastases and best response to crizotinib. They were randomly assigned (1:1) to oral brigatinib 90 mg once daily (arm A) or 180 mg once daily with a 7-day lead-in at 90 mg (180 mg once daily [with lead-in]; arm B). Investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was the primary end point. Results Of 222 patients enrolled (arm A: n = 112, 109 treated; arm B: n = 110, 110 treated), 154 (69%) had baseline brain metastases and 164 of 222 (74%) had received prior chemotherapy. With 8.0-month median follow-up, investigator-assessed confirmed ORR was 45% (97.5% CI, 34% to 56%) in arm A and 54% (97.5% CI, 43% to 65%) in arm B. Investigator-assessed median progression-free survival was 9.2 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 15.6) and 12.9 months (95% CI, 11.1 to not reached) in arms A and B, respectively. Independent review committee-assessed intracranial ORR in patients with measurable brain metastases at baseline was 42% (11 of 26 patients) in arm A and 67% (12 of 18 patients) in arm B. Common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (arm A/B, 33%/40%), diarrhea (arm A/B, 19%/38%), headache (arm A/B, 28%/27%), and cough (arm A/B, 18%/34%), and were mainly grades 1 to 2. A subset of pulmonary adverse events with early onset (median onset: day 2) occurred in 14 of 219 treated patients (all grades, 6%; grade ≥ 3, 3%); none occurred after escalation to 180 mg in arm B. Seven of 14 patients were successfully retreated with brigatinib. Conclusion Brigatinib yielded substantial whole-body and intracranial responses as well as robust progression-free survival; 180 mg (with lead-in) showed consistently better efficacy than 90 mg, with acceptable safety.

EGFR and EML4-ALK gene mutations in NSCLC: A case report of erlotinib-resistant patient with both concomitant mutations

The fusion gene EML4-ALK (echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 gene and the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene) was recently identified as a novel genetic alteration in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EML4-ALK translocations correlate with specific clinical and pathological features, in particular lack of EGFR and K-ras mutations, and may be associated with resistance to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Here, we report a case of a patient with a concomitant EGFR mutation and ALK translocation resistant to erlotinib. Considering this report, ALK status should be investigated in unexplained cases of EGFR-TKI-resistance of EGFR mutated NSCLCs.

Grading the neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: an evidence-based proposal.

Lung neuroendocrine tumors are catalogued in four categories by the World Health Organization (WHO 2004) classification. Its reproducibility and prognostic efficacy was disputed. The WHO 2010 classification of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms is based on Ki67 proliferation assessment and proved prognostically effective. This study aims at comparing these two classifications and at defining a prognostic grading system for lung neuroendocrine tumors. The study included 399 patients who underwent surgery and with at least 1 year follow-up between 1989 and 2011. Data on 21 variables were collected, and performance of grading systems and their components was compared by Cox regression and multivariable analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided. At Cox analysis, WHO 2004 stratified patients into three major groups with statistically significant survival difference (typical carcinoid vs atypical carcinoid (AC), P=0.021; AC vs large-cell/small-cell lung neuroendocrine carcinomas, P<0.001). Optimal discrimination in three groups was observed by Ki67% (Ki67% cutoffs: G1 <4, G2 4-<25, G3 ≥25; G1 vs G2, P=0.021; and G2 vs G3, P≤0.001), mitotic count (G1 ≤2, G2 >2-47, G3 >47; G1 vs G2, P≤0.001; and G2 vs G3, P≤0.001), and presence of necrosis (G1 absent, G2 <10% of sample, G3 >10% of sample; G1 vs G2, P≤0.001; and G2 vs G3, P≤0.001) at uni and multivariable analyses. The combination of these three variables resulted in a simple and effective grading system. A three-tiers grading system based on Ki67 index, mitotic count, and necrosis with cutoffs specifically generated for lung neuroendocrine tumors is prognostically effective and accurate.

Activity of Pemetrexed on brain metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

UNLABELLED Brain metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer are usually associated with poor prognosis and up to now chemotherapy has shown a modest activity upon cerebral localizations. We investigated the role of Pemetrexed, a new, well tolerated multi-target antifolate, on brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS We collected 39 patients with evidence of cerebral nervous system (CNS) localizations from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) before starting treatment with Pemetrexed as second-line or further-line therapy. RESULTS We confirmed the good tolerability of Pemetrexed even in that setting of patients and we reported a progressive disease (PD) in 12 patients (30.8%), a stable disease (SD) and partial response (PR) in 12 (30.8%) and 15 (38.4%) patients respectively, with an overall clinical benefit obtained in 69% of patients. The cerebral response to Pemetrexed was interesting with a cerebral radiological benefit obtained in 32 patients (82%), while 7 patients only showed brain progressive disease. Overall median survival was 10 months. All irradiation-naïve patients and those with clear radiological evidence of cerebral progression after brain radiotherapy and before Pemetrexed, overall 22 patients, were included in one group, in order to avoid overlapping effects between brain radiotherapy and Pemetrexed over CNS localizations. Within that setting, we demonstrated an overall clinical benefit (SD+PR) and cerebral benefit in 63% and 68%, of patients respectively. Distribution of patients by overall response to Pemetrexed and CNS response was highly suggestive of activity of Pemetrexed on brain metastases. CONCLUSION We demonstrated the good tolerability of Pemetrexed even in patients with advanced NSCLC and brain metastases, and we found a very good overall response rate with evidence of activity on brain localizations.

Decline in Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Cytokeratin 19 Fragment During Chemotherapy Predicts Objective Response and Survival in Patients With Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

The authors assessed the predictive and prognostic role of decline in the serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21‐1) during chemotherapy in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Predictors of gefitinib outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): study of a comprehensive panel of molecular markers.

A number of different clinical characteristics and molecular markers related to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation have been reported to singly correlate with therapeutic activity of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was designed to evaluate the predictive value on gefitinib outcomes of a comprehensive panel of molecular parameters in advanced NSCLC patients. EGFR and K-ras mutations were detected by direct sequencing on tumor DNA from paraffin embedded samples. EGFR and HER2 gene copy number was assessed by FISH. EGFR protein expression was quantified by immunohistochemistry. EGFR gene intron 1 polymorphism was assessed on genomic DNA isolated from venous whole blood samples. Ninety-one patients were prospectively enrolled and the overall gefitinib response rate was 18.7% (2 complete and 15 partial responses). Sex (p=0.005), non-smoking status (p=0.010), skin toxicity (p=0.020), EGFR gene mutations (p<0.001) and EGFR FISH positivity (p=0.016) were found to be associated with gefitinib response. K-ras mutation was detected in only seven non-responder patients. The median overall survival was of 10 months. Only non-smoking status and EGFR intron 1 polymorphism showed a statistically significant correlation with survival (p=0.031 and 0.044, respectively). In conclusion, we have confirmed the role of EGFR gene mutation as predictor of response to EGFR TKIs. Moreover, EGFR gene copy number and, potentially, also EGFR intron 1 polymorphism could aid in better prediction of EGFR TKI responsiveness in advanced NSCLC.

Everolimus restores gefitinib sensitivity in resistant non-small cell lung cancer cell lines

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a validated target for therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Most patients, however, either do not benefit or develop resistance to specific inhibitors of the EGFR tyrosine kinase activity, such as gefitinib or erlotinib. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a key intracellular kinase integrating proliferation and survival pathways and has been associated with resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In this study, we assessed the effects of combining the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001) with gefitinib on a panel of NSCLC cell lines characterized by gefitinib resistance and able to maintain S6K phosphorylation after gefitinib treatment. Everolimus plus gefitinib induced a significant decrease in the activation of MAPK and mTOR signaling pathways downstream of EGFR and resulted in a growth-inhibitory effect rather than in an enhancement of cell death. A synergistic effect was observed in those cell lines characterized by high proliferative index and low doubling time. These data suggest that treatment with everolimus and gefitinib might be of value in the treatment of selected NSCLC patients that exhibit high tumor proliferative activity.

Accuracy of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Pathological Typing of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: Histological typing of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has an increasing clinical relevance due to the emerging differences in medical treatment between squamous and nonsquamous tumors. However, most NSCLCs are diagnosed in an advanced stage, and the diagnosis is often obtained exclusively by cytology either exfoliative or following fine needle aspiration. We investigated the accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in NSCLC typing as compared with histology. Methods: Over the period 2000–2009, 1182 transbronchial needle aspirate or transthoracic needle aspirate samples were obtained from patients with suspicious thoracic lesions. In 474 patients, a cytological diagnosis of primary NSCLC was obtained, and 186 (39%) of them (108 transbronchial needle aspirates and 78 transthoracic needle aspirates) received a parallel or subsequent histologic diagnosis on endoscopic biopsy (112) or surgery (74). Results: At cytology, 158 (85%) NSCLC cases were typed (89 adenocarcinoma and 69 squamous cell carcinoma), while 28 (15%) were classified as NSCLC not otherwise specified. At histology, 183 (98%) cases were typed (109 adenocarcinoma, 69 squamous cell carcinoma, 3 adenosquamous carcinoma, and 2 large cell carcinoma), and only 3 (2%) were classified as NSCLC not otherwise specified. Cytological and histological typing was concordant in 137 of 156 (88%) cases (K = 0.755; p < 0.001). The positive predictive value of FNAC in typing NSCLC was 92% for adenocarcinoma and 82% for squamous cell carcinoma. Conclusion: FNAC in expert hands is fairly accurate for typing NSCLC and can be regarded as an acceptable procedure for diagnostic and medical treatment planning purposes in most NSCLC cases, especially when more invasive approaches are unfeasible. In poorly differentiated and doubtful cases, the use of ancillary techniques, such as immunocytochemistry, may be required to improve the diagnostic yield.