Marcelo S. Cury

Effect of Institution-Wide Policy of Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time ≥7 Minutes on Polyp Detection

BACKGROUND & AIMS Practice guidelines recommend that endoscopists spend at least 7 minutes examining the colonic mucosa during colonoscopy withdrawal to optimize polyp yield. The aim of this study was to determine if the implementation of an institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes was associated with an increase in colon polyp detection. METHODS All 42 endoscopists at our institute were asked to attain a colonoscopy withdrawal time of at least 7 minutes. Compliance with 7-minute withdrawal time was recorded for all nontherapeutic colonoscopies. Polyp detection ratio (number of polyps detected divided by number of colonoscopies performed) was computed. Regression models were used to assess the association between compliance with 7-minute withdrawal time and polyp detection. RESULTS During the study period, 23,910 colonoscopies were performed. The average age of patients was 56.8 years, and 54% were female. Colon cancer screening or surveillance was the indication for 42.5% of colonoscopies. At the beginning of the study, the polyp detection ratio was 0.48. Compliance with 7-minute withdrawal time for nontherapeutic procedures increased from 65% at the beginning of the initiative to almost 100%. However, no increase in polyp detection ratio was noted over the same period for all polyps (slope, 0.0006; P = .45) or for polyps 1-5 mm (slope, 0.001; P = .26), 6-9 mm (slope, 0.002; P = .43), or > or = 10 mm (slope, 0.006; P = .13). No association was detected when only colonoscopies performed for screening or surveillance were analyzed. CONCLUSIONS An institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes had no effect on colon polyp detection.

Comparison of carcinoembryonic antigen and molecular analysis in pancreatic cyst fluid

BACKGROUND Pancreatic-cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and molecular analysis are useful diagnostic tests in differentiating mucinous from nonmucinous cysts. OBJECTIVE To assess agreement between CEA and molecular analysis for differentiating mucinous from nonmucinous cysts. DESIGN Retrospective analysis. SETTING Academic medical center. METHODS Patients who underwent EUS-guided FNA for evaluation of pancreatic cysts were identified. The following information was used to designate a cyst mucinous: the CEA criterion was CEA level >or=192 ng/mL and the molecular analysis criteria were DNA quantity >or=40 ng/microL and/or k-ras 2-point mutation and/or >or=2 allelic imbalance mutations. Pathologic analysis of cysts served as the criterion standard. RESULTS From 2006 to 2007, 100 patients met the study criteria. The average age of the patients was 63 years, 65% were women, and 30% were symptomatic. The mean diameter of pancreatic cysts was 2.5 cm. The median CEA value was 83 ng/mL (range 1-50,000 ng/mL), the mean DNA content was 16 ng/microL (range 1-212 ng/microL), 11% had K-ras mutations, and 43% had >or=2 allelic imbalance mutations. When using prespecified criteria, there was poor agreement between CEA and molecular analysis for the classification of mucinous cysts (kappa = 0.2). Poor agreement existed between CEA and DNA quantity (Spearman correlation = 0.2; P = .1), K-ras mutation (kappa = 0.3), and >or=2 allelic imbalance mutations (kappa = 0.1). Of the 19 patients for whom a final pathologic diagnosis was available, CEA had a sensitivity of 82% compared with 77% for molecular analysis. When CEA and molecular analysis were combined, 100% sensitivity was achieved. LIMITATIONS Retrospective analysis and small sample size. CONCLUSION There was poor agreement between CEA levels and molecular analysis for diagnosis of mucinous cysts. Diagnostic sensitivity was improved when results of CEA levels and molecular analysis were combined.

International consensus guidelines for surgical resection of mucinous neoplasms cannot be applied to all cystic lesions of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND & AIMS International consensus guidelines, aimed at predicting malignancy, are available for surgical resection of mucinous cysts but not for other cystic lesions of the pancreas. We sought to determine whether the consensus guidelines can be applied to all cystic lesions of the pancreas. METHODS We identified all patients who underwent surgical resection of pancreatic cysts from 2001-2007. Pathology analyses of surgical specimens served as the reference standard. Surgical resection criteria proposed by the Sendai Guidelines and 5 modifications of these criteria were tested to determine their accuracy for diagnosis of malignant cysts. RESULTS Patients with cystic lesions of the pancreas (n = 154; mean age, 59.8 years; 64% women) underwent resection and met prespecified study criteria. Twenty-one patients had a malignancy. The classification cyst size > or = 3 cm had an accuracy of 56%, negative predictive value of 84%, and identified only 57% of the malignant cysts. The classification cyst size > or = 3 cm or cyst with main pancreatic duct > or = 10 mm had an accuracy of 55%, negative predictive value of 86%, and identified 66% of malignant cysts. The modified criterion of cyst size > or = 3 cm or cyst with main pancreatic duct > 3 mm had an accuracy of 48%, negative predictive value of 94%, and identified 91% (19/21) of the malignancies. Cyst size (odds ratio, 1.05) and pancreatic duct dilation > 3 mm (odds ratio, 10.5) were strong and independent predictors of malignancy. CONCLUSIONS When applied to all cystic lesions of the pancreas, the international consensus criteria cause some malignant cysts to be missed. Modified criteria could identify most malignant cysts, although overall accuracy remains low.