Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Marcie S. Rubin is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Marcie S. Rubin.


Epidemiologic Reviews | 2013

The Dynamic Relationship Between Physical Function and Cognition in Longitudinal Aging Cohorts

Paul Brewster; Diana Kuh; Marcus Richards; Rachel Cooper; Rebecca Hardy; Marcie S. Rubin; Scott M. Hofer

On average, older people remember less and walk more slowly than do younger persons. Some researchers argue that this is due in part to a common biologic process underlying age-related declines in both physical and cognitive functioning. Only recently have longitudinal data become available for analyzing this claim. We conducted a systematic review of English-language research published between 2000 and 2011 to evaluate the relations between rates of change in physical and cognitive functioning in older cohorts. Physical functioning was assessed using objective measures: walking speed, grip strength, chair rise time, flamingo stand time, and summary measures of physical functioning. Cognition was measured using mental state examinations, fluid cognition, and diagnosis of impairment. Results depended on measurement type: Change in grip strength was more strongly correlated with mental state, while change in walking speed was more strongly correlated with change in fluid cognition. Examining physical and cognitive functioning can help clinicians and researchers to better identify individuals and groups that are aging differently and at different rates. In future research, investigators should consider the importance of identifying different patterns and rates of decline, examine relations between more diverse types of measures, and analyze the order in which age-related declines occur.


American Journal of Public Health | 2010

Examination of Inequalities in HIV/AIDS Mortality in the United States From a Fundamental Cause Perspective

Marcie S. Rubin; Cynthia G. Colen; Bruce G. Link

OBJECTIVES We examined changes in socioeconomic status (SES) and Black to White inequalities in HIV/AIDS mortality in the United States before and after the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). METHODS Taking a fundamental cause perspective, we used negative binomial regression to analyze trends in county-level gender-, race-, and age-specific HIV/AIDS mortality rates among those aged 15 to 64 years during the period 1987-2005. RESULTS Although HIV/AIDS mortality rates decreased once HAART became available, the declines were not uniformly distributed among population groups. The associations between SES and HIV/AIDS mortality and between race and HIV/AIDS mortality, although present in the pre-HAART period, were significantly greater in the peri- and post-HAART periods, with higher SES and White race associated with the greatest declines in mortality during the post-HAART period. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the fundamental cause hypothesis, as the introduction of a life-extending treatment exacerbated inequalities in HIV/AIDS mortality by SES and by race. In addition to a strong focus on factors that improve overall population health, more effective public health interventions and policies would facilitate an equitable distribution of health-enhancing innovations.


The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal | 2012

Parameters of Care for Craniosynostosis

Joseph G. McCarthy; Stephen M. Warren; Joseph Bernstein; Whitney Burnett; Michael L. Cunningham; Jane C. Edmond; Alvaro A. Figueroa; Kathleen A. Kapp-Simon; Brian I. Labow; Sally J. Peterson-Falzone; Mark R. Proctor; Marcie S. Rubin; Raymond W. Sze; Terrance A. Yemen; Eric Arnaud; Scott P. Bartlett; Jeffrey P. Blount; Anne Boekelheide; Steven R. Buchman; Patricia D. Chibbaro; Mary Michaeleen Cradock; Katrina M. Dipple; Jeffrey A. Fearon; Ann Marie Flannery; Chin-To Fong; Herbert E. Fuchs; Michelle Gittlen; Barry H. Grayson; Mutaz M. Habal; Robert J. Havlik

Background A multidisciplinary meeting was held from March 4 to 6, 2010, in Atlanta, Georgia, entitled “Craniosynostosis: Developing Parameters for Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management.” The goal of this meeting was to create parameters of care for individuals with craniosynostosis. Methods Fifty-two conference attendees represented a broad range of expertise, including anesthesiology, craniofacial surgery, dentistry, genetics, hand surgery, neurosurgery, nursing, ophthalmology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthodontics, otolaryngology, pediatrics, psychology, public health, radiology, and speech-language pathology. These attendees also represented 16 professional societies and peer-reviewed journals. The current state of knowledge related to each discipline was reviewed. Based on areas of expertise, four breakout groups were created to reach a consensus and draft specialty-specific parameters of care based on the literature or, in the absence of literature, broad clinical experience. In an iterative manner, the specialty-specific draft recommendations were presented to all conference attendees. Participants discussed the recommendations in multidisciplinary groups to facilitate exchange and consensus across disciplines. After the conference, a pediatric intensivist and social worker reviewed the recommendations. Results Consensus was reached among the 52 conference attendees and two post hoc reviewers. Longitudinal parameters of care were developed for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of craniosynostosis in each of the 18 specialty areas of care from prenatal evaluation to adulthood. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first multidisciplinary effort to develop parameters of care for craniosynostosis. These parameters were designed to help facilitate the development of educational programs for the patient, families, and health-care professionals; stimulate the creation of a national database and registry to promote research, especially in the area of outcome studies; improve credentialing of interdisciplinary craniofacial clinical teams; and improve the availability of health insurance coverage for all individuals with craniosynostosis.


Prehospital and Disaster Medicine | 2007

Factors associated with high-rise evacuation: qualitative results from the World Trade Center Evacuation Study.

Robyn R. M. Gershon; Kristine Qureshi; Marcie S. Rubin; Victoria H. Raveis

INTRODUCTION Due to the fact that most high-rise structures (i.e., >75 feet high, or eight to ten stories) are constructed with extensive and redundant fire safety features, current fire safety procedures typically only involve limited evacuation during minor to moderate fire emergencies. Therefore, full-scale evacuation of high-rise buildings is highly unusual and consequently, little is known about how readily and rapidly high-rise structures can be evacuated fully. Factors that either facilitate or inhibit the evacuation process remain under-studied. OBJECTIVE This paper presents results from the qualitative phase of the World Trade Center Evacuation Study, a three-year, five-phase study designed to improve our understanding of the individual, organizational, and environmental factors that helped or hindered evacuation from the World Trade Center (WTC) Towers 1 and 2, on 11 September 2001. METHODS Qualitative data from semi-structured, in-depth interviews and focus groups involving WTC evacuees were collected and analyzed. RESULTS On the individual level, factors that affected evacuation included perception of risk (formed largely by sensory cues), preparedness training, degree of familiarity with the building, physical condition, health status, and footwear. Individual behavior also was affected by group behavior and leadership. At the organizational level, evacuation was affected by worksite preparedness planning, including the training and education of building occupants, and risk communication. The environmental conditions affecting evacuation included smoke, flames, debris, general condition and degree of crowdedness on staircases, and communication infrastructure systems (e.g., public address, landline, cellular and fire wardens telephones). CONCLUSIONS Various factors at the individual, organizational, and environmental levels were identified that affected evacuation. Interventions that address the barriers to evacuation may improve the full-scale evacuation of other high-rise buildings under extreme conditions. Further studies should focus on the development and evaluation of targeted interventions, including model emergency preparedness planning for high-rise occupancies.


Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | 2012

Parameters of care for craniosynostosis: craniofacial and neurologic surgery perspectives.

Stephen M. Warren; Mark R. Proctor; Scott P. Bartlett; Jeffrey P. Blount; Steven R. Buchman; Whitney Burnett; Jeffrey A. Fearon; Robert F. Keating; Karin M. Muraszko; Gary F. Rogers; Marcie S. Rubin; Joseph G. McCarthy

Background: A multidisciplinary meeting was held from March 4 through 6, 2010, in Atlanta, Georgia, to conceptualize, map out, and operationalize the variables most relevant to the care of patients with craniosynostosis. In this article, the authors highlight the development of the craniofacial and neurologic surgery parameters of care. Methods: Fifty-two conference attendees, representing a broad range of expertise in craniosynostosis care and 16 professional societies, participated in this working group. Literature and expert opinion were used to identify the variables important for the care of patients with craniosynostosis. In an iterative manner, specialty-specific data were compiled into draft recommendations and presented to all conference attendees. Cross-discipline analysis was used to assess the completeness of the data, facilitate exchange of ideas, and achieve consensus. Results: Consensus was reached among the 52 conference attendees and two post hoc reviewers in 18 areas of craniosynostosis care. Longitudinal parameters of care were developed for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of craniosynostosis in each of the specialty areas of care, from prenatal evaluation to completion of care in adulthood. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first multidisciplinary effort to develop parameters of care and best practices for craniosynostosis. In conjunction with patient input, these parameters may help to heuristically develop core outcome sets that are important not only to patients and their families, but also to health care providers and health services and outcome researchers. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.


Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness | 2008

Participatory action research methodology in disaster research: Results from the world trade center evacuation study

Robyn R. M. Gershon; Marcie S. Rubin; Kristine Qureshi; Allison N. Canton; Frederick Matzner

OBJECTIVE Participatory action research (PAR) methodology is an effective tool in identifying and implementing risk-reduction interventions. It has been used extensively in occupational health research, but not, to our knowledge, in disaster research. A PAR framework was incorporated into the World Trade Center evacuation study, which was designed to identify the individual, organizational, and structural (environmental) factors that affected evacuation from the World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 on September 11, 2001. PAR teams-comprising World Trade Center evacuees, study investigators, and expert consultants-worked collaboratively to develop a set of recommendations designed to facilitate evacuation from high-rise office buildings and reduce risk of injury among evacuees. METHODS Two PAR teams worked first separately and then collectively to identify data-driven strategies for improvement of high-rise building evacuation. RESULTS The teams identified interventions targeting individual, organizational, and structural (environmental) barriers to safe and rapid evacuation. CONCLUSIONS PAR teams were effective in identifying numerous feasible and cost-effective strategies for improvement of high-rise emergency preparedness and evacuation. This approach may have utility in other workplace disaster prevention planning and response programs.


American Journal of Public Health | 2013

Fundamental Causes of Colorectal Cancer Mortality in the United States: Understanding the Importance of Socioeconomic Status in Creating Inequality in Mortality

Nallely Saldana-Ruiz; Marcie S. Rubin; Cynthia G. Colen; Bruce G. Link

OBJECTIVES We used the fundamental cause hypothesis as a framework for understanding the creation of health disparities in colorectal cancer mortality in the United States from 1968 to 2005. METHODS We used negative binomial regression to analyze trends in county-level gender-, race-, and age-adjusted colorectal cancer mortality rates among individuals aged 35 years or older. RESULTS Prior to 1980, there was a stable gradient in colorectal cancer mortality, with people living in counties of higher socioeconomic status (SES) being at greater risk than people living in lower SES counties. Beginning in 1980, this gradient began to narrow and then reversed as people living in higher SES counties experienced greater reductions in colorectal cancer mortality than those in lower SES counties. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the fundamental cause hypothesis: once knowledge about prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer became available, social and economic resources became increasingly important in influencing mortality rates.


Social Science & Medicine | 2014

A fundamental cause approach to the study of disparities in lung cancer and pancreatic cancer mortality in the United States

Marcie S. Rubin; Bruce G. Link

This study examines how associations between socioeconomic status (SES) and lung and pancreatic cancer mortality have changed over time in the U.S. The fundamental cause hypothesis predicts as diseases become more preventable due to innovation in medical knowledge or technology, individuals with greater access to resources will disproportionately benefit, triggering the formation or worsening of health disparities along social cleavages. We examine socioeconomic disparities in mortality due to lung cancer, a disease that became increasingly preventable with the development and dissemination of knowledge of the causal link between smoking cigarettes and lung cancer, and compare it to that of pancreatic cancer, a disease for which there have been no major prevention or treatment innovations. County-level disease-specific mortality rates for those ≥45 years, adjusted for sex, race, and age during 1968-2009 are derived from death certificate and population data from the National Center for Health Statistics. SES is measured using five county-level variables from four decennial censuses, interpolating values for intercensal years. Negative binomial regression was used to model mortality. Results suggest the impact of SES on lung cancer mortality increases 0.5% per year during this period. Although lung cancer mortality rates are initially higher in higher SES counties, by 1980 persons in lower SES counties are at greater risk and by 2009 the difference in mortality between counties with SES one SD above compared to one SD below average was 33 people per 100,000. In contrast, we find a small but significant reverse SES gradient in pancreatic cancer mortality that does not change over time. These data support the fundamental cause hypothesis: social conditions influencing access to resources more greatly impact mortality when preventative knowledge exists. Public health interventions and policies should facilitate more equitable distribution of new health-enhancing knowledge and faster uptake and utilization among lower SES groups.


Milbank Quarterly | 2012

Fundamental Causes of Colorectal Cancer Mortality: The Implications of Informational Diffusion

Andrew Y. Wang; Marcie S. Rubin; Cynthia G. Colen; Bruce G. Link

CONTEXT Colorectal cancer is a major cause of mortality in the United States, with 52,857 deaths estimated in 2012. To explore further the social inequalities in colorectal cancer mortality, we used fundamental cause theory to consider the role of societal diffusion of information and socioeconomic status. METHODS We used the number of deaths from colorectal cancer in U.S. counties between 1968 and 2008. Through geographical mapping, we examined disparities in colorectal cancer mortality as a function of socioeconomic status and the rate of diffusion of information. In addition to providing year-specific trends in colorectal cancer mortality rates, we analyzed these data using negative binomial regression. FINDINGS The impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on colorectal cancer mortality is substantial, and its protective impact increases over time. Equally important is the impact of informational diffusion on colorectal cancer mortality over time. However, while the impact of SES remains significant when concurrently considering the role of diffusion of information, the propensity for faster diffusion moderates its effect on colorectal cancer mortality. CONCLUSIONS The faster diffusion of information reduces both colorectal cancer mortality and inequalities in colorectal cancer mortality, although it was not sufficient to eliminate SES inequalities. These findings have important long-term implications for policymakers looking to reduce social inequalities in colorectal cancer mortality and other, related, preventable diseases.


Journal of Craniofacial Surgery | 2015

Comparative Study of Early Secondary Nasal Revisions and Costs in Patients With Clefts Treated With and Without Nasoalveolar Molding.

Parit A. Patel; Marcie S. Rubin; Frank Lalezaradeh; Lawrence E. Brecht; Court B. Cutting; Pradip R. Shetye; Stephen M. Warren; Barry H. Grayson

AbstractThe present study aims to determine the risk of early secondary nasal revisions in patients with complete unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate (U/BCLP) treated with and without nasoalveolar molding (NAM) and examine the associated costs of care. A retrospective cohort study from 1990 to 1999 was performed comparing the risk of early secondary nasal revision surgery in patients with a CLP treated with NAM and surgery (cleft lip repair and primary surgical nasal reconstruction) versus surgery alone in a private practice and tertiary level clinic. The NAM treatment group consisted of 172 patients with UCLP and 71 patients with BCLP, whereas the non-NAM-prepared group consisted of 28 patients with UCLP and 5 with BCLP. The risk of secondary nasal revision for patients with UCLP was 3% in the NAM group and 21% in the non-NAM group. The risk of secondary nasal revision for patients with BCLP was 7% in the NAM group compared with 40% in the non-NAM group. Using multicenter averages, the non-NAM revision rates were calculated at 37.8% and 48.5% for U/BCLP, respectively. Applying these risks of revision, NAM treatment led to an estimated savings of between

Collaboration


Dive into the Marcie S. Rubin's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alvaro A. Figueroa

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark R. Proctor

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Beth Nivin

New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian I. Labow

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey A. Fearon

Medical City Dallas Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge