Marcio Debiasi
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Marcio Debiasi.
Lancet Oncology | 2015
Kathrin Strasser-Weippl; Yanin Chavarri-Guerra; Cynthia Villarreal-Garza; Brittany L. Bychkovsky; Marcio Debiasi; Pedro E.R. Liedke; Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis; Don S. Dizon; Eduardo Cazap; Gilberto de Lima Lopes; J Nunes; Jessica St. Louis; Caroline Vail; Alexandra Bukowski; Pier Ramos-Elias; Karla Unger-Saldaña; Denise Froes Brandao; Mayra Ferreyra; Silvana Luciani; Angélica Nogueira-Rodrigues; Aknar Calabrich; Marcela G. del Carmen; J.A. Rauh-Hain; Kathleen M. Schmeler; Raúl Sala; Paul E. Goss
Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, and an increasing threat in low-income and middle-income countries. Our findings in the 2013 Commission in The Lancet Oncology showed several discrepancies between the cancer landscape in Latin America and more developed countries. We reported that funding for health care was a small percentage of national gross domestic product and the percentage of health-care funds diverted to cancer care was even lower. Funds, insurance coverage, doctors, health-care workers, resources, and equipment were also very inequitably distributed between and within countries. We reported that a scarcity of cancer registries hampered the design of credible cancer plans, including initiatives for primary prevention. When we were commissioned by The Lancet Oncology to write an update to our report, we were sceptical that we would uncover much change. To our surprise and gratification much progress has been made in this short time. We are pleased to highlight structural reforms in health-care systems, new programmes for disenfranchised populations, expansion of cancer registries and cancer plans, and implementation of policies to improve primary cancer prevention.
Journal of Global Oncology | 2017
Marcio Debiasi; Tomás Reinert; Rafael Kaliks; Gilberto Amorim; Maira Caleffi; Carlos Sampaio; Gustavo dos Santos Fernandes; Carlos H. Barrios
Purpose Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive metastatic tumors treated in the public health system in Brazil do not have access to trastuzumab. This study aimed to estimate the impact of the lack of access to anti-HER2 therapies on the mortality of these patients. Methods On the basis of published data, the number of patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer in 2016 who should receive anti-HER2 targeted therapy was estimated. Three different treatment groups were considered for this hypothetical cohort: chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, and chemotherapy plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The number of patients alive after 2 years of follow-up was estimated on the basis of the efficacy results of the pivotal trials considering these interventions. Results It was calculated that 2,008 women will be diagnosed with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer in Brazil in 2016. It was estimated that only 808 women would be alive in 2018 if they receive only chemotherapy (which is the treatment offered by the public health system). On the other hand, the bar rises to 1,408 women alive in 2018 if they receive chemotherapy plus trastuzumab and 1,576 women alive in 2018 if they receive the gold standard of chemotherapy plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Conclusion Trastuzumab is included in the WHO’s list of essential medications, but the Brazilian public health system does not yet provide this treatment to its population with advanced disease. The introduction of trastuzumab and pertuzumab would have a positive effect, preventing premature deaths in women with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in Brazil.
Revista Bioética | 2017
Gustavo Franco Carvalhal; Marcelino Espírito Hofmeister Poli; Fabiano Kingeski Clementel; Gabriel Chittó Gauer; Graziela Hax Marques; Inês Guimarães da Silveira; João Manuel Piccoli; Lívia Haygert Pithan; Luiz Gustavo Guilhermano; Magda Ferreira; Marcelo Bonhemberger; Maria Antonia Zancanaro de Figueiredo; Maria Estelita Gil; Mariangela Badalotti; Marcio Debiasi; Paulo Vinícius Sporleder de Souza; Raquel Milani El Kik; Vera Maria Petersen; Délio José Kipper
Concerns regarding the bioethical aspects of the privacy of the individual and the confidentiality of their medical treatment data is increasing in the medical community. The current preliminary clinical and therapeutic processes require the multidisciplinary involvement of a number of individuals, especially in the case of hospitalization. The transmission and storage of clinical and laboratory patient information involves different media, with inherent problems of accessibility and protection of information. The authors describe hypothetical situations that exemplify issues commonly addressed in the work of a clinical bioethics committee, contextualizing these problems in Brazil and globally, and suggest steps to minimize potential problems of the breaching of privacy and confidentiality.
Cancer Discovery | 2017
Karina J. Matissek; Maristela L. Onozato; Sheng Sun; Zongli Zheng; Andrew Schultz; Jesse Lee; Kristofer Patel; Piiha Lotta Jerevall; Srinivas Vinod Saladi; Allison Macleay; Mehrad Tavallai; Tanja Badovinac-Crnjevic; Carlos H. Barrios; Nuran Beşe; Arlene Chan; Yanin Chavarri-Guerra; Marcio Debiasi; Elif Demirdogen; Unal Egeli; Sahsuvar Gokgoz; Henry Gomez; Pedro Emanuel Rubini Liedke; Ismet Tasdelen; Sahsine Tolunay; Gustavo Werutsky; Jessica St. Louis; Nora Horick; Dianne M. Finkelstein; Long P. Le; Aditya Bardia
We sought to uncover genetic drivers of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, using a targeted next-generation sequencing approach for detecting expressed gene rearrangements without prior knowledge of the fusion partners. We identified intergenic fusions involving driver genes, including PIK3CA, AKT3, RAF1, and ESR1, in 14% (24/173) of unselected patients with advanced HR+ breast cancer. FISH confirmed the corresponding chromosomal rearrangements in both primary and metastatic tumors. Expression of novel kinase fusions in nontransformed cells deregulates phosphoprotein signaling, cell proliferation, and survival in three-dimensional culture, whereas expression in HR+ breast cancer models modulates estrogen-dependent growth and confers hormonal therapy resistance in vitro and in vivo Strikingly, shorter overall survival was observed in patients with rearrangement-positive versus rearrangement-negative tumors. Correspondingly, fusions were uncommon (<5%) among 300 patients presenting with primary HR+ breast cancer. Collectively, our findings identify expressed gene fusions as frequent and potentially actionable drivers in HR+ breast cancer.Significance: By using a powerful clinical molecular diagnostic assay, we identified expressed intergenic fusions as frequent contributors to treatment resistance and poor survival in advanced HR+ breast cancer. The prevalence and biological and prognostic significance of these alterations suggests that their detection may alter clinical management and bring to light new therapeutic opportunities. Cancer Discov; 8(3); 336-53. ©2017 AACR.See related commentary by Natrajan et al., p. 272See related article by Liu et al., p. 354This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 253.
Frontiers in Oncology | 2018
Marcio Debiasi; Carisi Anne Polanczyk; Patricia Ziegelmann; Carlos H. Barrios; Hongyuan Cao; James J. Dignam; Paul E. Goss; Brittany L. Bychkovsky; Dianne M. Finkelstein; Rodrigo Santa Cruz Guindalini; Paulo Ricardo Santos Nunes Filho; Caroline Albuquerque; Tomás Reinert; Evandro de Azambuja; Olufunmilayo I. Olopade
Background Several (neo)adjuvant treatments for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have been compared in different randomized clinical trials. Since it is not feasible to conduct adequate pairwise comparative trials of all these therapeutic options, network meta-analysis offers an opportunity for more detailed inference for evidence-based therapy. Methods Phase II/III randomized clinical trials comparing two or more different (neo)adjuvant treatments for HER2-positive breast cancer patients were included. Relative treatment effects were pooled in two separate network meta-analyses for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results 17 clinical trials met our eligibility criteria. Two different networks of trials were created based on the availability of the outcomes: OS network (15 trials: 37,837 patients); and DFS network (17 trials: 40,992 patients). Two studies—the ExteNET and the NeoSphere trials—were included only in this DFS network because OS data have not yet been reported. The concept of the dual anti-HER2 blockade proved to be the best option in terms of OS and DFS. Chemotherapy (CT) plus trastuzumab (T) and lapatinib (L) and CT + T + Pertuzumab (P) are probably the best treatment options in terms of OS, with 62.47% and 22.06%, respectively. In the DFS network, CT + T + Neratinib (N) was the best treatment option with 50.55%, followed by CT + T + P (26.59%) and CT + T + L (20.62%). Conclusion This network meta-analysis suggests that dual anti-HER2 blockade with trastuzumab plus either lapatinib or pertuzumab are probably the best treatment options in the (neo)adjuvant setting for HER2-positive breast cancer patients in terms of OS gain. Mature OS results are still expected for the Aphinity trial and for the sequential use of trastuzumab followed by neratinib, the treatment that showed the best performance in terms of DFS in our analysis.
Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2016
Pablo M. Barrios; Marcio Debiasi; Gilberto Lopes; Carlos H. Barrios
first-line chemotherapy planned ( 6 weeks total), and screening hemoglobin 11 g/dL. Approximately 3,000 patients from up to 500 global sites will be randomized 2:1 to DA (500 mcg) or placebo every 3 weeks (Q3W) until disease progression or end of chemotherapy. At hemoglobin > 12 g/dL, study drug is withheld until hemoglobin 12 g/dL. Transfusions are allowed when necessary. Endpoints include overall survival (OS; primary) and progression-free survival (PFS; secondary), and will be analyzed when w2,700 deaths have occurred. Additional safety endpoints include tumor response and rate of thromboembolic events. Superiority of DA to placebo in transfusion rates will be tested if noninferiority is achieved for OS and PFS. Results: As of April 15, 2016, a total of 2,215 patients have enrolled. The independent data monitoring committee has conducted 9 reviews of unblinded data (which included a planned formal interim analysis at 40% of planned total number of 2,700 deaths to test for harm), and has recommended continuation of the trial without changes. Conclusion: Study 20070782 is the largest clinical trial in NSCLC to date, and will provide comprehensive data on the safety and efficacy of DA in patients with CIA.
Sao Paulo Medical Journal | 2010
Marcio Debiasi; Marluce Hehnemann; Bernardo Garicochea
CONTEXT Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is a lymphoproliferative B-cell disorder that has a favorable prognosis, with estimated overall five-year survival of 70%. The majority of symptomatic patients undergo splenectomy, while a few receive first-line chemotherapy, especially with purine analogues. There are no specific treatment guidelines for patients for whom splenectomy fails to provide a cure. It is still unclear whether these patients should undergo cytotoxic chemotherapy, considering they have now a relapsed lymphoma (which is theoretically more aggressive), or whether they should be spared from treatments of greater toxicity, given that their disease usually develops with a more indolent course, even when it recurs. CASE REPORT Here, we present two patients whose disease recurred after splenectomy and for whom rituximab monotherapy provided satisfactory treatment. From these cases, it can be suggested that postponement of cytotoxic treatments may be possible in at least some situations. It needs to be emphasized that the evidence to support this approach is based only on case reports, since there are no randomized clinical trials on this subject.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016
Raphael Brandao Moreira; Marcio Debiasi; Fernando C. Maluf; Joaquim Bellmunt; Andre Poisl Fay; Toni K. Choueiri; Fabio Augusto Barros Schutz
Journal of Cancer Therapy | 2017
Marcio Debiasi; Franklin Fernandes Pimentel; Paula Juliana Seadi Pereira; Carlos H. Barrios
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2018
Tomás Reinert; Marcio Debiasi; José Bines; Carlos H. Barrios
Collaboration
Dive into the Marcio Debiasi's collaboration.
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer
View shared research outputsEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer
View shared research outputsUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre
View shared research outputs