Marco Benasso

Treatment of Advanced Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck with Alternating Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND For patients with advanced, unresectable squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck, radiotherapy is the standard treatment but has poor results. We therefore designed a randomized trial to determine whether alternating chemotherapy with radiotherapy would improve the survival of such patients. METHODS Patients in the trial had biopsy-confirmed unresectable, previously untreated Stage III or IV, squamous-cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, pharynx, or larynx. They were randomly assigned to chemotherapy consisting of four cycles of intravenous cisplatin (20 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day for five consecutive days) and fluorouracil (200 mg per square meter per day for five consecutive days) alternating with radiotherapy in three two-week courses (20 Gy per course; 2 Gy per day, five days per week), or to radiotherapy alone (up to 70 Gy; 2 Gy per day, five days per week). RESULTS The 80 patients given chemotherapy alternating with radiotherapy and the 77 given radiotherapy alone were comparable in terms of age, sex, performance status, disease stage, and site of the primary tumor. Complete responses were obtained in 42 percent of the patients in the combined-therapy group and 22 percent of those in the radiotherapy group (P = 0.037). The median survival was 16.5 months in the combined-therapy group and 11.7 months in the radiotherapy group (P less than 0.05); the 3-year survival was 41 percent and 23 percent, respectively. Severe mucositis occurred in 19 percent of the patients in the combined-therapy group and 18 percent of those in the radiotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS In patients with advanced unresectable squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck, chemotherapy alternating with radiotherapy increases the median survival and doubles the probability of survival for three years as compared with radiotherapy alone. However, since local disease cannot be controlled in over half the patients who receive the combined treatment and since almost two thirds die within three years, further improvements in management are necessary.

Combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy in advanced inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The final report of a randomized trial

Between 1983 and 1986, the National Institute for Cancer Research in Genoa and affiliated institutions conducted a randomized study to compare two different ways of combining chemotherapy (CT) and radiation therapy (RT). One hundred sixteen patients were randomized to receive neoadjuvant CT followed by definitive RT (treatment arm A) or alternating CT and RT. In treatment arm A, RT consisted of 70 Gy to the involved areas and 50 Gy to the uninvolved neck at 2 Gy/fraction, five fractions per week. In treatment arm B, RT consisted of 60 Gy to involved areas and 50 Gy to the uninvolved neck in three courses of 20 Gy each, 2 Gy/fraction, ten fractions/2 weeks alternated with four courses of CT. CT consisted of vinblastine 6 mg/m2 intravenously followed 6 hours later by bleomycin 30 IU intramuscularly, day 1; methotrexate 200 mg intravenously, day 2; leucovorin rescue, day 3. CT was repeated every 2 weeks up to four courses. The same CT was used in both treatment arms of the study. Fifty‐five patients were entered in treatment arm A and 61 in treatment arm B. Complete responses were 7/48 and 19/57 in treatment arms A and B, respectively (P < 0.03). Four‐year progression‐free survival was 4% in treatment arm A and 12% in treatment arm B (P < 0.02), and four‐year survival was 10% in A and 22% in B (P < 0.02). Mucosal tolerance was significantly worse in treatment arm B (P < 0.00004). The subgroup analysis shows the major improvement of alternating CT and RT in patients with the worst prognostic characteristics.

Alternating chemoradiotherapy versus partly accelerated radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Results from a phase III randomized trial

The authors previously have found that in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC‐HN), alternating chemoradiotherapy (ALT) was superior to low‐total‐dose conventional radiotherapy alone. The purpose of this randomized trial was to compare the same chemoradiotherapy approach with high‐total‐dose partly accelerated radiotherapy.

Sequential versus alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy in stage III-IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase III study.

A cooperative randomized study was begun in August 1983 to compare a sequential program of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive treatment, arm A, with an alternation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy (three courses of 20 Gy in ten daily fractions), arm B. The same chemotherapy was used in both arms: 6 mg/m2, vinblastine, hour 0; 30 mg, bleomycin, hour 6; 200 mg, methotrexate, hours 24 to 26; 45 mg, leucovorin, hour 48. One hundred sixteen patients entered the study, 55 in arm A and 61 in arm B. The patients all had previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Forty-five patients had stage III and 71 had stage IV disease. The two arms were fully comparable. As of April 1986, 116 patients were evaluable for survival, while 112 were evaluable for toxicity and 105 for response. Response analysis shows that there were 14 complete responses (CR) and 11 partial responses (PR), for an overall response rate (ORR) of 52% in arm A, and 30 CRs and seven PRs, for an ORR of 64.9% in arm B. The difference in terms of CR between the two arms was statistically significant (P less than .03). Progression-free survival (PFS) was also statistically different, with an advantage for arm B (P less than .05), but without differences in overall survival. Arm B correlates with a significant increase in mucositis compared with arm A (P less than .001).

Gemcitabine, cisplatin, and radiation in advanced, unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a feasibility study.

Alternating chemoradiotherapy was shown by our institution to be superior to standard radiation in patients with nonsurgical squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC-HN). Gemcitabine has shown in vitro and in vivo radiosensitizing properties, synergistic activity with cisplatin, and cytotoxic activity against SCC-HN. Thus, the authors tested the feasibility and antitumoral activity of a modified alternating chemoradiotherapy program that includes gemcitabine. Fourteen patients with stage IV (nine patients) or relapsed after surgery (five patients) unresectable SCC-HN were enrolled. None had previously received chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The treatment plan consisted of cisplatin, 20 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5, weeks 1 and 5, and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2, day 5, weeks 1, 2, 3, and 5, 6, 7. Radiation was administered during weeks 2, 3, and 4 and 6, 7, and 8 with conventional fractionation up to 60 Gy. At the end of the combined therapy, patients had to receive two additional courses of cisplatin, 20 mg/m2/day, and fluorouracil, 200 mg/m2/day, for 5 days every 21 days. All the patients are evaluable for toxicity and 11 for response. Main grade III–IV toxicities and frequencies were: neutropenia (79%), neutropenia with fever (50%), thrombocytopenia (57%), anemia (35%), mucositis (100%), and cutaneous toxicity (14%). Ten patients (71%) had a weight loss greater than 10%. All but two patients needed hospitalization and tube feeding or parenteral nutrition. The median relative dose intensity of gemcitabine actually delivered was 83%. Two patients died 1 month after the end of treatment before the final evaluation. One patient died of sepsis during the additional cisplatin and fluorouracil courses before response assessment. Ten patients reached a complete response (intention to treat: 71%), and 1 patient had a partial response (9%). At a median follow-up of 34 months, the actuarial 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival are 41% and 63%, respectively. The estimated 3-year locoregional control is 70%. Considering the expected poor prognosis of the enrolled patients, this combined regimen showed an impressive antitumoral activity, but the severity of acute local and hematologic toxicity correlated makes the exportation of this regimen unproposable. However, the activity observed warrants the exploration of different, less toxic, chemo-radiotherapy programs including gemcitabine.

Randomized comparison of two chemotherapy, radiotherapy schemes for stage iii and iv unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Between August 1983 and December 1986, 116 previously untreated patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomized to receive induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy given in conventional fractions (55 patients, arm A) or an alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy (3 courses of 20 Gy, 10 daily fractions each; 61 patients, arm B). The same chemotherapy was used in both arms: 6 mg/m2 vinblastine sulfate, hour 0; 30 mg bleomycin, hour 6; 200 mg methotrexate, hours 24 to 26; 45 mg leucovorin, hour 48. Forty‐five patients had stage III disease and 71 had stage IV disease. All patients were evaluated for survival, 112 for toxicity, and 105 for analyses of response and time from the start of treatment until progression of disease. At the end of the combined treatment, we observed an overall response rate of 52% in arm A and an overall response rate of 64.9% in arm B. The incidence of mucositis was more relevant in arm B compared to arm A (P >.00004). The difference in complete response, progression‐free survival, and survival was statistically significant, with an advantage for arm B (P >.03, P >.02, and P >.03, respectively). The analysis at a median follow‐up of 36 months (range = 19 to 59) demonstrates a higher effectiveness for the alternating program.

Concomitant Alpha-interferon and Chemotherapy in Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

The combination of chemotherapy and interferons has been tested in several human tumors but, until now, no clinical data have been reported in head and neck cancer. At the Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro of Genoa, 14 patients with previously treated SCC-HN underwent the following regimen: cisplatin, 20 mg/m2/day, 5-fluorouracil, 200 mg/m2/day i.v. bolus and recombinant interferon-alpha-2b (r-IFN-alpha-2b) (Intron-A, Shering-Plough), 3 MIU/day i.m., for 5 consecutive days. Recombinant IFN-alpha-2b was also administered, at the same dosage, 3 times per week during the 2 weeks interval among cycles. Grade III-IV hematological toxicity was recorded in 43% of patients. Increasing fatigue, anorexia, and flu-like symptoms were experienced by most patients. For these reasons 9 of 14 patients needed a chemotherapy delay and a r-IFN-alpha-2b discontinuation. Therefore, due to the heavy toxicity observed, accrual was terminated early. The overall response rate was 54% (31% CR, 23% PR). Among the 5 patients who never delayed chemotherapy and discontinued r-IFN-alpha-2b, all but one responded. In conclusion, a synergistic activity between chemotherapy and r-IFN-alpha-2b in head and neck cancer cannot be excluded, but, in our opinion, further investigations should consider less aggressive regimens and/or more selected patients.

Evidence of cell kinetics as predictive factor of response to radiotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck cancer

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate the potential clinical relevance of cell kinetics parameters to the locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival of patients affected by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HN-SCC) treated by conventional radiotherapy, partly accelerated radiotherapy, or alternating chemoradiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between January 1993 and June 1996,115 patients with HN-SCC at Stage III and IV entered the study. Multiple primary tumor biopsies were obtained 6 h after in vivo infusion of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd), an analogue of thymidine that is incorporated in DNA-synthesizing cells. In vivo S-phase fraction labeling index (LI), duration of S-phase (Ts), and potential doubling time (Tpot) were obtained by analysis of the flow cytometric content of BrdUrd and DNA. Eighty-two patients were randomly assigned to receive either alternating chemoradiotherapy or partly accelerated radiotherapy, whereas 33 other matching patients received conventional radiotherapy. RESULTS Univariate LRC analysis showed that LI value was a prognostically significant factor, independent of type of therapy. Multivariate analysis failed to show cell kinetics parameters as statistically significant factors affecting LRC probability and overall survival. However, subgroup analysis showed that LRC probability at 4 years for fast proliferating tumors characterized by a LI >/= 8% was significantly better for patients treated either with alternating chemoradiotherapy or partly accelerated radiotherapy than it was for those treated with conventional radiotherapy. Conversely, LRC probability for slow proliferating tumors (LI < 8%) treated with the three treatment modalities was similar. CONCLUSIONS These results showed that, independent of type of treatment, pretreatment cell kinetics provided only a weak prognostic role of outcome in HN-SCC. However, this report raises the hypothesis that fast growing HN-SCC may be more likely to benefit from intensified therapy, as given in this series. Cell kinetics parameters studied by the in vivo BrdUrd/flow cytometry method might be considered predictive factors of response, providing information on which type of treatment may be selected according to tumor proliferation rate.

Paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase II trial from an Italian cooperative group.

The aim of this multicenter trial was to test the feasibility and the activity of a three-drug combination where paclitaxel is added to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Patients with metastatic or relapsed SCC-HN unsuitable for further loco-regional radical treatment, not previously treated with chemotherapy, were eligible to receive paclitaxel 160 mg/m2 (3-hr infusion) day 1, CDDP 25 mg/m2/day and 5-FU 250 mg/m2/day bolus on days 1, 2, 3 every three weeks up to a maximum of five courses. Fourty-seven patients were enrolled by five Institutions in Italy. Main grade III–IV toxicities were: neutropenia (48%), thrombocytopenia (6%), anemia (4%), diarrhea (2%), mucositis (2%). Six patients had a complete response (13.3%) and eight a partial response (17.8%). Median progression free survival and overall survival are 4.1 and 7.9 months. One-year progression free survival and overall survival are 16% and 29%. This three-drug regimen has an excellent safety profile. The activity in the palliation of recurrent SCC-HN, however, does not appear to be improved in comparison with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil or cisplatin and paclitaxel regimens. Recent studies indicate a more promising role of taxanes including triplets in the induction therapy of previously untreated patients.

Induction chemotherapy followed by alternating chemo-radiotherapy in stage IV undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma

In locally advanced undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (UNPC), concomitant chemo-radiotherapy is the only strategy that gave better results over radiation alone in a phase III trial. Adding effective chemotherapy to a concomitant chemo-radiotherapy programme may be a way to improve the results further. 30 patients with previously untreated T4 and/or N2–3 undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma were consecutively enrolled and initially treated with 3 courses of epidoxorubicin, 90 mg/m2, day 1 and cisplatin, 40 mg/m2, days 1 and 2, every 3 weeks. After a radiological and clinical response assessment patients underwent 3 courses of cisplatin, 20 mg/m2/day, days 1–4 and fluorouracil, 200 mg/m2/day, days 1–4, i.v. bolus, (weeks 1, 4, 7) alternated to 3 courses of radiation (week 2–3, 5–6, 8–9–10), with a single daily fractionation, up to 70 Gy. WHO histology was type 2 in 30% and type 3 in 70% of the patients. 57% had T4 and 77% N2–3 disease. All the patients are evaluable for toxicity and response. All but one received 3 courses of induction chemotherapy. Toxicity was mild to moderate in any case. At the end of the induction phase 10% of CRs, 83.3% of PRs and 6.7% of SD were recorded. All the patients but one had the planned number of chemotherapy courses in the alternating phase and all received the planned radiation dose. One patient out of 3 developed grade III–IV mucositis. Haematological toxicity was generally mild to moderate. At the final response evaluation 86.7% of CRs and 13.3% of PRs were observed. At a median follow-up of 31 months, 13.3% of patients had a loco-regional progression and 20% developed distant metastases. The 3-year actuarial progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 64% and 83%. Induction chemotherapy followed by alternating chemo-radiotherapy is feasible and patients’ compliance optimal. This approach showed a very promising activity on locally advanced UNPC and merits to be investigated in phase III studies.