Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Marco De Sio is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Marco De Sio.


Urologia Internationalis | 2002

Early and Late Complications of Double Pigtail Ureteral Stent

Rocco Damiano; Andrea Oliva; C. Esposito; Marco De Sio; Riccardo Autorino; Massimo D’Armiento

Objectives: To analyze the early and late complications of indwelling ureteral stents in a series of 146 patients with nephroureteral lithiasis. Materials and Methods: 146 patients with obstructing nephrolitiasis were treated for urinary diversion with double pigtail ureteral stent before extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and following ureterorenoscopic treatment of lithiasis. All patients were scheduled for stent removal or replacement at specific 3-month intervals until stone-free status was achieved. Results: Early complications during the first 4 weeks after stent insertion were stent discomfort (37.6%), irritative bladder symptoms (18.8%), hematuria (18.1%), bacteriuria (15.2%), fever >104F (12.3%) and flank pain (25.3%); late complications included hydronephrosis (5.7%), and stent migration (9.5%), encrustation (21.6%), fragmentation (1.9%) and breakage (1.3%). Conclusions: Ureteral stents have proven to be an invaluable tool for endourologists. Morbidity is minimal for up to three months but longer indwelling times are associated with an increasing frequency of incrustation, infections, secondary stone formation and obstruction of the stented tract.


European Urology | 2008

Modified Supine versus Prone Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones Treatable with a Single Percutaneous Access: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Marco De Sio; Riccardo Autorino; Giuseppe Quarto; Francesco Calabrò; Rocco Damiano; Francesco Giugliano; Salvatore Mordente; Massimo D'Armiento

OBJECTIVES To compare operative time, safety, and effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine versus prone position in a prospective randomized trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS From October 2005 to June 2007, 75 patients (33 men, 42 women; mean age, 39.3 yr) were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into group A (39 patients, supine position) and group B (36 patients, prone position). Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of single or multiple renal stones (pelvic-caliceal) treatable with a single percutaneous access, stone diameter >2.5cm, body mass index (BMI) <30kg/m(2), and no contraindications to perform the operation in the prone position. Exclusion criteria were stones in more than one calyx, complete staghorn stones, and coexisting renal anomalies. RESULTS The two groups were comparable in age, BMI, male-to-female ratio, and stone size. No significant difference was ascertained between the two groups in terms of stone-free rate (group A, 88.7% vs. group B, 91.6%, p=0.12), mean blood loss (group A, Delta hemoglobin -2.3g/dl vs. group B, -2.2g/dl, p=0.23), and mean hospital stay (group A, 4.3 d vs. group B, 4.1 d, p=0.18). The only significant difference reported was mean operative time (group A, 43min vs. group B, 68min, p<0.001). No blood transfusions were needed and no organ injuries were reported. CONCLUSIONS In this carefully selected patient population with uncomplicated renal stones, the supine position was similar to the prone position for percutaneous stone removal.


European Urology | 2015

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Shuba De; Riccardo Autorino; Fernando J. Kim; Homayoun Zargar; Humberto Laydner; Raffaele Balsamo; Fabio Cesar Miranda Torricelli; Carmine Di Palma; Wilson R. Molina; Manoj Monga; Marco De Sio

CONTEXT Recent advances in technology have led to the implementation of mini- and micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) as well as retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the management of kidney stones. OBJECTIVE To provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing RIRS with PCNL techniques for the treatment of kidney stones. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic literature review was performed in March 2014 using the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies. Article selection proceeded according to the search strategy based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis criteria. A subgroup analysis was performed comparing standard PCNL and minimally invasive percutaneous procedures (MIPPs) including mini-PCNL and micro-PCNL with RIRS, separately. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Two randomised and eight nonrandomised studies were analysed. PCNL techniques provided a significantly higher stone-free rate (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 2.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53-3.13; p<0.00001) but also higher complication rates (odds ratio [OR]: 1.61; 95% CI, 1.11-2.35; p<0.01) and a larger postoperative decrease in haemoglobin levels (WMD: 0.87; 95% CI, 0.51-1.22; p<0.00001). In contrast, RIRS led to a shorter hospital stay (WMD: 1.28; 95% CI, 0.79-1.77; p<0.0001). At subgroup analysis, RIRS provided a significantly higher stone-free rate than MIPPs (WMD: 1.70; 95% CI, 1.07-2.70; p=0.03) but less than standard PCNL (OR: 4.32; 95% CI, 1.99-9.37; p=0.0002). Hospital stay was shorter for RIRS compared with both MIPPs (WMD: 1.11; 95% CI, 0.39-1.83; p=0.003) and standard PCNL (WMD: 1.84 d; 95% CI, 0.64-3.04; p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS PCNL is associated with higher stone-free rates at the expense of higher complication rates, blood loss, and admission times. Standard PCNL offers stone-free rates superior to those of RIRS, whereas RIRS provides higher stone free rates than MIPPs. Given the added morbidity and lower efficacy of MIPPs, RIRS should be considered standard therapy for stones <2 cm until appropriate randomised studies are performed. When flexible instruments are not available, standard PCNL should be considered due to the lower efficacy of MIPPs. PATIENT SUMMARY We searched the literature for studies comparing new minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of kidney stones. The analysis of 10 available studies shows that treatment can be tailored to the patient by balancing the advantages and disadvantages of each technique.


The Journal of Sexual Medicine | 2009

Effects of Intensive Lifestyle Changes on Erectile Dysfunction in Men

Katherine Esposito; Miryam Ciotola; Francesco Giugliano; Maria Ida Maiorino; Riccardo Autorino; Marco De Sio; Giovanni Giugliano; Gianfranco Nicoletti; Francesco D'Andrea; Dario Giugliano

INTRODUCTION Limited data are available supporting the notion that treatment of lifestyle risk factors may improve erectile dysfunction (ED). AIM In the present study, we analyzed the effect of a program of changing in lifestyle designed to improve erectile function in subjects with ED or at increasing risk for ED. METHODS Men were identified in our database of subjects participating in randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of lifestyle changes. A total of 209 subjects were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. The 104 men randomly assigned to the intervention program received detailed advice about how to reduce body weight, improve quality of diet, and increase physical activity. The 105 subjects in the control group were given general information about healthy food choices and general guidance on increasing their level of physical activity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Changes in erectile function score (International Index of Erectile Function-5 [IIEF-5]; items 5, 15, 4, 2, and 7 from the full-scale IIEF-15) and dependence of the restoration of erectile function on the changes in lifestyle that were achieved. RESULTS Erectile function score improved in the intervention group. At baseline, 35 subjects in the intervention group and 38 subjects in the control group had normal erectile function (34% and 36%, respectively). After 2 years, these figures were 58 subjects in the intervention group and 40 subjects in the control group, respectively (56% and 38%, P = 0.015). There was a strong correlation between the success score and restoration of erectile function. CONCLUSIONS It is possible to achieve an improvement of erectile function in men at risk by means of nonpharmacological intervention aiming at weight loss and increasing physical activity.


European Urology | 2009

Four-Year Outcome of a Prospective Randomised Trial Comparing Bipolar Plasmakinetic and Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

Riccardo Autorino; Rocco Damiano; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Giuseppe Quarto; Sisto Perdonà; Massimo D’Armiento; Marco De Sio

BACKGROUND No data have been published on the midterm efficacy of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). OBJECTIVE To evaluate 4-yr results from a prospective randomised trial comparing bipolar TURP with standard monopolar TURP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Seventy patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia were enrolled in this prospective randomised controlled trial in a tertiary-care institution. Inclusion criteria were age > 50 yr, good performance status, urinary retention, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) > or = 18, and maximal flow rate (Q(max)) < or = 15 ml/s. Exclusion criteria were prostate volume < 30 cm(3), documented or suspected prostate cancer, neurogenic bladder, bladder stone or diverticula, urethral stricture, and maximal bladder capacity > 500 ml. INTERVENTION Patients underwent standard or bipolar plasmakinetic TURP performed by the same surgeon using the same surgical technique. MEASUREMENTS Treatment efficacy was evaluated at 1, 2, 3, and 4 yr by comparing urinary flow rates, IPSS, and estimated postvoid residual (PVR) urine volume. Midterm complications were also recorded. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The number of dropouts was not statistically significantly different in the two groups (p=0.2). The significant improvements in both groups were maintained at 4 yr for the IPSS, quality of life score, Q(max), and PVR versus baseline values. The main outcome variables at 4 yr for bipolar and monopolar TURP were mean IPSS 6.9 and 6.4 (p=0.58); mean Q(max) 19.8 ml/s and 21.2 ml/s (p=0.44), and mean PVR volume 42 ml and 45 ml (p=0.3). Overall, 2 of 32 (6.2%) and 3 of 31 (9.6%) patients required reoperation because of late complications (p=0.15). The major study limitation was the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS This study represents the secondary, midterm analysis of a previously published trial. Our 4-yr data confirm our initial positive findings for the efficacy and safety of bipolar plasmakinetic TURP. Larger well-designed studies are needed to corroborate these findings.


Journal of Endourology | 2008

Effect of tamsulosin in preventing ureteral stent-related morbidity: a prospective study.

Rocco Damiano; Riccardo Autorino; Marco De Sio; Alessandro Giacobbe; Italo M. Palumbo; Massimo D'Armiento

PURPOSE We conducted a randomized study to evaluate the effect of tamsulosin in improving symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in patients with indwelling double-pigtail ureteral stents, using both generic and specific questionnaires. MATERIALS AND METHODS We prospectively enrolled 75 patients (29 men, 46 women; mean age, 42.3 years), who underwent ureteral stent positioning and were assigned to one of two study groups. In group A (n = 38), patients were discharged with a prescription for tamsulosin, 0.4 mg once daily. In group B (n = 37), patients received no alpha(1)-blocker (control group). RESULTS One week after stent placement (visit week 1 [W1]), analysis of the ureteral stent symptoms questionnaire showed a significant worsening of urinary symptoms (13.1 v 26.4, P = 0.008) and pain (4.1 v 21.6, P = 0.002) in patients not receiving tamsulosin. There was also a significant difference in the mean visual analog score (VAS) of health scale between the two groups (P < 0.001) compared with the result obtained at the W4 evaluation (visit). The proportion of patients reporting level 2 or 3 for the pain/discomfort domain in the QoL questionnaire from W4 to W1 varied between the two groups in a highly statistically significant manner (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that administration of tamsulosin has a positive effect on stent-related urinary symptoms and QoL. Further clinical research in this area is warranted to better define the role of alpha(1)-blockers in current clinical practice.


Cancer | 2010

Gemcitabine versus bacille Calmette-Guérin after initial bacille Calmette-Guérin failure in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter prospective randomized trial.

Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Sisto Perdonà; Rocco Damiano; Adriana Faiella; Francesco Cantiello; Sandro Pignata; Paolo Antonio Ascierto; Ester Simeone; Marco De Sio; Riccardo Autorino

The efficacy of intravesical gemcitabine was evaluated compared with repeated administration of bacille Calmette‐Guérin (BCG) after BCG failure in high‐risk, non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (BC).


Lancet Oncology | 2005

Efficacy of tamoxifen and radiotherapy for prevention and treatment of gynaecomastia and breast pain caused by bicalutamide in prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial

Sisto Perdonà; Riccardo Autorino; Sabino De Placido; Massimo D'Armiento; Antonio Gallo; Rocco Damiano; Domenico Pingitore; Luigi Gallo; Marco De Sio; Angelo Raffaele Bianco; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo

BACKGROUND Gynaecomastia and breast pain are frequent adverse events with bicalutamide monotherapy, and might cause some patients to withdraw from treatment. We aimed to compare tamoxifen with radiotherapy for prevention and treatment of gynaecomastia, breast pain, or both during bicalutamide monotherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS 51 patients were randomly assigned to 150 mg bicalutamide per day, 50 patients to 150 mg bicalutamide per day and to 10 mg tamoxifen per day for 24 weeks, and 50 patients to 150 mg bicalutamide per day and radiotherapy (one 12-Gy fraction on the day of starting bicalutamide). 35 of the 51 patients allocated bicalutamide alone developed gynaecomastia or breast pain and were subsequently randomly allocated to tamoxifen (n=17) or radiotherapy (n=18) soon after symptoms started (median 180 days, range 160-195). Gynaecomastia and breast pain were assessed once a month. Severity of gynaecomastia was scored on the basis of the largest diameter. Breast pain was scored as none, mild, moderate, or severe. The primary outcome was frequency of gynaecomastia or breast pain; secondary outcomes were safety and tolerability, relapse-free survival, as assessed by concentration of prostate specific antigen, and quality of life. Analyses were by intention to treat. RESULTS 35 of 51 patients assigned bicalutamide alone developed gynaecomastia, compared with four of 50 assigned bicalutamide and tamoxifen (odds ratio [OR] 0.1 [95% CI 0.08-0.12], p=0.0009), and with 17 of 50 assigned bicalutamide and radiotherapy (0.51 [0.47-0.54], p=0.008). Breast pain was seen in 29 of 51 patients allocated bicalutamide alone, compared with three allocated bicalutamide and tamoxifen (0.1 [0.07-0.11], p=0.009), and with 15 allocated bicalutamide and radiotherapy (0.43 [0.40-0.45], p=0.02) In 35 patients assigned bicalutamide alone who subsequently developed gynaecomastia, breast pain, or both, tamoxifen significantly reduced the frequency of gynaecomastia (0.2 [0.18-0.22], p=0.02). INTERPRETATION Antioestrogen treatment with tamoxifen could help patients with prostate cancer to tolerate the hypergonadotropic effects of bicalutamide monotherapy.


European Urology | 2014

Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Luis Felipe Brandao; Riccardo Autorino; Humberto Laydner; Georges Pascal Haber; Idir Ouzaid; Marco De Sio; Sisto Perdonà; Robert J. Stein; Francesco Porpiglia; Jihad H. Kaouk

CONTEXT Over the last decade, robot-assisted adrenalectomy has been included in the surgical armamentarium for the management of adrenal masses. OBJECTIVE To critically analyze the available evidence of studies comparing laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic literature review was performed in August 2013 using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic search engines. Article selection proceeded according to the search strategy based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis criteria. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Nine studies were selected for the analysis including 600 patients who underwent minimally invasive adrenalectomy (277 robot assisted and 323 laparoscopic). Only one of the studies was a randomized clinical trial (RCT) but of low quality according to the Jadad scale. However, the methodological quality of included nonrandomized studies was relatively high. Body mass index was higher for the laparoscopic group (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 3.01 to -1.74; p<0.00001). A transperitoneal approach was mostly used for both techniques (72.5% of robotic cases and 75.5% of laparoscopic cases; p=0.27). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of conversion rate (odds ratio [OR]: 0.82; 95% CI, 0.39-1.75; p=0.61) and operative time (WMD: 5.88; 95% CI, -6.02 to 17.79; p=0.33). There was a significantly longer hospital stay in the conventional laparoscopic group (WMD: -0.43; 95% CI, -0.56 to -0.30; p<0.00001), as well as a higher estimated blood loss (WMD: -18.21; 95% CI, -29.11 to -7.32; p=0.001). There was also no statistically significant difference in terms of postoperative complication rate (OR: 0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.00; p=0.05) between groups. Most of the postoperative complications were minor (80% for the robotic group and 68% for the conventional laparoscopic group). Limitations of the present analysis are the limited sample size and including only one low-quality RCT. CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted adrenalectomy can be performed safely and effectively with operative time and conversion rates similar to laparoscopic adrenalectomy. In addition, it can provide potential advantages of a shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, and lower occurrence of postoperative complications. These findings seem to support the use of robotics for the minimally invasive surgical management of adrenal masses.


Cancer | 2008

Bladder-sparing, combined-modality approach for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multi-institutional, long-term experience.

Sisto Perdonà; Riccardo Autorino; Rocco Damiano; Marco De Sio; Brunello Morrica; Luigi Gallo; Giustino Silvestro; Antonio Farella; Sabino De Placido; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo

The authors evaluated their long‐term experience with combined‐modality, conservative treatment in patients with muscle‐invasive bladder cancer.

Collaboration


Dive into the Marco De Sio's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Riccardo Autorino

Virginia Commonwealth University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Giuseppe Di Lorenzo

University of Naples Federico II

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sisto Perdonà

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Massimo D’Armiento

Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Francesco Giugliano

Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Giuseppe Quarto

Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Luca Cindolo

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carmelo Quattrone

Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Davide Arcaniolo

Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge