Marco Hernández-Guedea

Is Ischemic Preconditioning a Useful Therapeutic Strategy in Liver Transplantation? Results from the First Pilot Study in Mexico.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS The protective effect of ischemic preconditioning (IP) in liver transplantation (LT) has been studied with controversial results. We undertook this study to investigate whether IP of cadaveric donor livers is protective to allografts. METHODS IP (LT + IP, n = 6) was induced by 10-min hilar clamping. These were compared to cadaver donors with no IP (LT, n = 7). Clinical data and blood were obtained in donors and recipients for biochemical and inflammatory mediator (IM) measurements (P-selectin, leukotriene B4, myeloperoxidase, ICAM-1, IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α). Liver tissue samples were obtained from donors and recipients (90 min after reperfusion). RESULTS No significant differences were found in demographic characteristics between donors and recipients. When comparing both groups (LT + IP vs. LT only), ICU stay was longer in LT + IP group. For biochemical parameters, a significant difference was found only with a higher total bilirubin at postoperative day 3 in LT + IP group. There was no statistical difference in IM between LT and LT + IP groups at different stages of the study. Histological analysis of donor grafts indicated the presence of steatosis (50%) in one graft from the LT + IP group. However, in post-reperfusion biopsies neither neutrophil infiltration nor grade of necrosis showed significant difference between groups. No incidence of primary graft nonfunction (PGNF) was observed and graft and patient survival was similar in the two groups at 24 months. CONCLUSION IP does not seem to protect against I/R injury in cadaveric LT, and no PGNF was seen.

Modulation of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning by Proinflammatory Cytokines in Renal Transplant Recipients

ABSTRACT Aim: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been used as a strategy to reduce acute renal injury and ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in renal transplantation (RT) with controversial results. Objective: To determine if RIPC modifies IRI in cadaveric RT recipients through inflammatory mediators and graft function. Methods: Twenty-nine RT recipients were studied, 12 in the control group (CG) and 17 in the RIPC group. RIPC which was performed on donors using a pneumatic tourniquet placed on both thighs for 10 min followed by the determination of IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, VEGF, and ICAM-1, and hematological and biochemical parameters in different phases of RT. Results: Serum creatinine levels were significantly lower in the RIPC group versus the CG at 15 and 30 days; however, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) showed no significant difference in any phase between either group, only TNF-α showed significantly higher values in the RIPC group versus the CG in almost all phases of the study, meanwhile IL6 was increased at 72 hours (hr) and 30 days, IL1 at 72 hr and 15 days and ICAM-1 post reperfusion, contrary to this VEGF showed a decrease at 7 and 15 days. Conclusion: RIPC did not improve eGFR or serum creatinine; however, it modifies the inflammatory response in RT recipients.

Identificación de flora bacteriana en cultivos de bilis y pared de vesícula biliar de pacientes sometidos a colecistectomía laparoscópica en el Hospital Universitario «Dr. José Eleuterio González»

BACKGROUND Through experience it has been accepted that bile in normal conditions remains sterile. Bactibilia is a common finding in individuals at high risk or with complicated cholecystolithiasis, however few data prevails about the prevalence of bactibilia in patients operated on for uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There is s common usage of preoperative and postoperative antibiotics in the different patients without the existence of any actual bacteriologic and epidemiologic evidence. MATERIAL AND METHODS 183 patients with diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis postoperated of laparoscopic cholecystectomy had their bile sent to bacteriology. RESULTS Bactibilia was identified in 31.95% of the cultures of mild cholecystitis and in 35.71% for moderate (p<.0001). A total of 125 negative cultures were obtained (68.3) and 58 positive (31.69%) with a prevalence of enterobacteria group (43.10%) and Enterococcus (27.58). CONCLUSIONS Comparing the groups according to severity there is a significant difference with regard to the presence of bactibilia, in addition to the bacterial groups cultivated. Fluoroquinolones and metronidazole is an option for the treatment of patients with the suspicion of bactibilia. The use of antibiotics is not justified in patients at low risk.