Marco Mojoli

Unravelling the (arte)fact of increased pacemaker rate with the Edwards SAPIEN 3 valve.

AIMS Early data on the Edwards SAPIEN 3 valve (S3-THV) have shown low rates of paravalvular leaks and vascular complications but relatively high 30-day permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) rates. No direct comparisons on clinical outcomes including PPMI rates are available for the S3-THV and the Edwards SAPIEN XT (XT-THV). We aimed to compare the 30-day PPMI rates in patients treated with the two prostheses and to assess the interplay among valve type, depth of implantation and PPMI rate. METHODS AND RESULTS Two hundred and nine patients treated by TAVI were considered. The S3-THV was associated with higher PPMI rates compared to the XT-THV, both overall and in subgroups matched for several predictors of PPMI. However, in the S3-THV group, 30-day PPMI was strictly associated with deep valve implantation, and PPMI risk of high-implanted S3-THVs was similar to that of the overall XT-THV matched group. No cases of significant paravalvular leak were observed in the S3-THV group. CONCLUSIONS The S3-THV was associated with a higher incidence of PPMI compared to the XT-THV. In the S3-THV group, pacemaker implantation was strictly associated with deep valve implantation. An implantation technique involving higher initial placement of the central marker (from 0 to 3 mm above the base of the aortic cusps) and, as a consequence, higher final valve depth might help in preventing post-TAVI PPMI with the S3-THV, without affecting the risk of paravalvular leak.

Neuropsychological profile in a large group of heart transplant candidates.

Background Recent studies have reported that patients with end-stage heart disease can have cognitive deficits ranging from mild to severe. Little is known, however, about the relationship between cognitive performance, neurophysiological characteristics and relevant clinical and instrumental indexes for an extensive evaluation of patients with heart failure, such as: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and other haemodynamic measures, maximum oxygen uptake during cardiopulmonary exercise testing, comorbidities, major cardiovascular risk factors and disease duration. Our purpose was to outline the cognitive profiles of end-stage heart disease patients in order to identify the cognitive deficits that could compromise the quality of life and the therapeutic adherence in end-stage heart disease patients, and to identify the variables associated with an increased risk of cognitive deficits in these patients. Methods 207 patients with end-stage cardiac disease, candidates for heart transplant, were assessed by complete neuropsychological evaluation and by electroencephalographic recording with EEG spectral analysis. Results Pathological scores in one or more of the cognitive tests were obtained by 86% of the patients, while 36% performed within the impaired range on five or more tests, indicating poor performance across a broad range of cognitive domains. The executive functions were the cognitive domain most impaired (70%). Poor performances were not related to the aetiology of heart disease, but rather to cerebral dysfunction secondary to haemodynamic impairment and to comorbidities. Conclusions Severe heart failure induces significant neurophysiological and neuropsychological alterations, which may produce an impairment of cognitive functioning and possibly compromise the quality of life of patients and the therapeutic adherence.

Atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: epidemiology, timing, predictors, and outcome

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia in patients with aortic stenosis. When these patients are treated medically or by surgical aortic valve replacement, AF is associated with increased risk of adverse events including death. Growing evidence suggests a significant impact of AF on outcomes also in patients with aortic valve stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Conversely, limited evidence is available regarding the optimal management of this condition. This review aims to summarize prevalence, pathophysiology, prognosis, and treatment of AF in patients undergoing TAVI.

Documento di posizione SICI-GISE: Utilizzo di Absorb BVS nella pratica clinica

Drug-eluting stents (DES) are the current gold standard for percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease. However, DES are associated with a non-negligible risk of long-term adverse events related to persistence of foreign material in the coronary artery wall. In addition, DES implantation causes permanent caging of the native vessel, thus impairing normal vasomotricity and the possibility of using non-invasive coronary imaging or preforming subsequent bypass surgery. On the contrary, coronary bioresorbable stents (BRS) may provide temporary mechanical support to coronary wall without compromising the subsequent recovery of normal vascular physiology, and have the potential to prevent late adverse events related to permanent elements. Several types of BRS have been introduced into clinical practice in Europe or are being tested. However, most of available clinical data relate to a single BRS, the Absorb bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (Absorb BVS) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA). Despite encouraging clinical results, no societal guidelines are available on the use of BRS in clinical practice.A panel of Italian expert cardiologists assembled under the auspices of the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (SICI-GISE) for comprehensive discussion and consensus development, with the aim to provide recommendations on the use of bioresorbable stents in terms of clinical indications, procedural aspects, post-percutaneous coronary angioplasty pharmacologic treatment and follow-up. Based on current evidence and BRS availability in Italian cath-labs, the panel decided unanimously to provide specific recommendations for the Absorb BVS device. These recommendations do not necessarily extend to other BRS, unless specified, although significant overlap may exist with Absorb BVS, particularly in terms of clinical rationale.

Takayasu arteritis and NYHA III/IV idiopathic cardiomiopathy: Tocilizumab proves effective and safe

Joint Bone Spine - In Press.Proof corrected by the author Available online since mercredi 1 janvier 2014

Documento di posizione della Societá Italiana di Cardiologia Interventistica (SICI-GISE): terapia antitrombotica nel paziente anziano con sindrome coronarica acuta

With the ageing of the population in the Western world, an increasing proportion of patients seen in cardiology practice is represented by the elderly. Although approximately one third of patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are >75 years old and the mortality rate in this age group is doubled compared with younger patients, this population is underrepresented in randomized controlled trials and, consequently, clinical guidelines do not always provide clear indications for the management of elderly patients. Therefore, there is an unmet need for clinical guidance regarding this rapidly growing subset of ACS patients, also considering that decisions about optimal antithrombotic treatment strategies in the elderly are often challenging, mostly due to age-related organ dysfunction, the frequency of comorbidities and concomitant medications and an increased risk of both ischemic and bleeding events. A panel of Italian cardiology experts assembled under the auspices of the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (SICI-GISE) for comprehensive discussion and consensus development, with the aim to provide practical recommendations, for both clinical and interventional cardiologists, regarding optimal management of antithrombotic therapy in patients with ACS aged ≥75 years. In this position paper, various clinical scenarios in patients with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina are presented and discussed, including special subsets (e.g., patients aged ≥85 years, patients with chronic renal disease or previous cerebrovascular events, patients requiring triple therapy or long-term antithrombotic therapy), with the panels recommendations being provided for each scenario.

Clinical outcomes of overlapping versus non-overlapping everolimus-eluting absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: An analysis from the multicentre prospective RAI registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02298413)

To compare clinical outcomes of patients treated with overlapping versus non‐overlapping Absorb BVS. Background: Limited data are available on the clinical impact of stent overlap with the Absorb BVS bioresorbable stent. Methods: We compared outcomes of patients receiving overlapping or non‐overlapping Absorb BVS in the multicenter prospective RAI Registry. Results: Out of 1,505 consecutive patients treated with Absorb BVS, 1,384 were eligible for this analysis. Of these, 377 (27%) were in the overlap group, and 1,007 (73%) in the non‐overlap group. The most frequent overlap configuration was the marker‐to‐marker type (48%), followed by marker‐over‐marker (46%) and marker‐inside‐marker (6%) types. Patients of the overlap group had higher prevalence of multivessel disease and higher SYNTAX score, and required more frequently the use of intravascular imaging. At a median follow‐up of 368 days, no difference was observed between overlap and non‐overlap groups in terms of a device‐related composite endpoint (cardiac death, TV‐MI, ID‐TLR) (5.8% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.20) or of a patient‐related composite endpoint (any death, any MI, any revascularization) (15.4% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.18). Cardiac death (1.0% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.54), MI (4.5% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.51), TVR (4.5% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.51) and stent thrombosis (1.1 vs. 1.5%, P = 1.00) were also comparable between groups. When assessing outcomes of the overlap population according to overlap configurations used, no difference was observed in terms of the device‐ or patient‐related composite endpoints. Conclusions: Outcomes of patients with or without overlapping BVS were comparable at mid‐term follow‐up despite higher angiographic complexity of the overlap subset.

TCT-425 Bioresorbable vascular scaffold technology for small vessel coronary artery disease: results from the Italian multicenter RAI Registry

RESULTS A total of 207 patients with at least one SV were included in this analysis. Mean follow-up time was 22.4 months 14.9 with 85.8 % of patients having at least 1 year of follow-up. Clinical presentation of pts. (72.4% male, mean age 58.5 11.7 years, 16.4% diabetics, 25.6% with previous PCI and/or CABG) was ACS in 55.1%. Multivessel treatment was perfomed in 17,9% (37 pz). Mean lesion length by QCA was 23.7 11.0 mm and mean RVD was 2.2 0.3 mm with 14.5% of moderate/sever calcification lesions and 19.8 % of bifurcation treatment. Pre-dilatation was performed in 93.2% and post-dilatation in 57.9%. The mean scaffold length was 28.1 15.0 mm with 30.9% of cases using overlapping scaffolds. OCT or IVUS was used in 26.0%. Device success was 99.0% (failure to deliver in 2 pts). Over the entire follow-up period, death occurred in 3.4 % (7/207), myocardial infarction (MI) in 5.3% (11/207), target lesion revascularization in 7.2 % (15/207), target vessel revascularization (TVR) in 8.2% (17/207), non-target vessel revascularization in 2.9 (6/207) %. Overall MACE (death, MI, TVR) rate was 12.0% (25/207). Definite stent thrombosis (ST) occurred in 6 pts. (2.9%), of whom early ST occurred in 4 pts and late ST in 2 pts.

Mitral paravalvular leak closure by antegrade percutaneous approach: Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic guided multiple amplatzer implantation by a modified sequential anchoring-based technique

We describe the technical aspects and the possible advantages of a modified anchoring‐based technique for the implantation of multiple Amplatzer devices, in a case of large anteroseptal mitral paravalvular leak causing massive regurgitation, which was manaed by antegrade transseptal, single‐stage, percutaneous approach. Real‐time three‐dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic guidance was crucial to ensure successful recrossings of the target defect and the optimal anatomical closure.

Current concepts on coronary revascularization using BRS in patients with diabetes and small vessels disease

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and small vessel (SV) disease are two major predictors of adverse outcome in patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), even when last generation metallic drug-eluting stents (DES) are used. Bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) technology has been recently developed to overcome the disadvantages of metallic DES due to their permanent struts. Through the resorption process, BRS may provide a vascular restoration that appears very attractive especially when distal or diffusely diseased coronary segments are involved, as in diabetic patients and SV disease. However, robust evidence on the use of BRS in diabetics is lacking, and recent data have raised concerns on the use of BRS in SVs, particularly when reference vessel diameter (RVD) is <2.25 mm. This review aims at summarizing current evidence related to the use of BRS in diabetics and SV disease.