Marco Moscarelli

What Is the Role of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery in High-Risk Patients? A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

BACKGROUND Minimally invasive valve surgery is related to certain better postoperative outcomes. We aimed to assess the role of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in high-risk patients. METHODS A systematic literature review identified eight studies of which seven fulfilled criteria for meta-analysis. Outcomes for a total of 1,254 patients (731 were conventional standard sternotomy and 523 were minimally invasive mitral valve surgery) were submitted to meta-analysis using random effects modeling. Heterogeneity and subgroup analysis with quality scoring were assessed. The primary end point was early mortality. Secondary end points were intraoperative and postoperative outcomes and long-term follow-up. RESULTS Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery conferred comparable early mortality to standard sternotomy (p = 0.19); it was also associated with a lower number of units of blood transfused (weighted mean difference, -1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.04 to -0.82; p = 0.0006) and atrial fibrillation rate (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.74; p = 0.0007); however, cardiopulmonary bypass time was longer (weighted mean difference, 20.88; 95% CI, -1.90 to 43.65; p = 0.07). There was no difference in terms of valve repair rate (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.89 to 2.54; p = 0.12), and the incidence of stroke was significantly lower in the high-quality analysis with no heterogeneity (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.82; p = 0.02; χ(2), 1.67; I(2), 0%; p = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is a safe and comparable alternative to standard sternotomy in patients at high risk, with similar early mortality and repair rate and better postoperative outcomes, although a longer cardiopulmonary bypass time is required.

Systematic review on the predictive ability of frailty assessment measures in cardiac surgery

Objectives Patient frailty is increasingly recognised as contributing to adverse postoperative outcomes in cardiothoracic surgery. The goal of this review is to evaluate the predictive ability of frailty scoring systems and their limitations in risk assessment of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods Frailty studies were identified by searching electronic databases. Studies in which the measuring instrument was defined as a multidimensional tool focusing on a population undergoing cardiac operations were included. The focus was on the predictive ability of frailty in this population and a comparison with conventional risk scoring systems. Unfortunately, the lack of a significant number of studies with the same postoperative outcome precluded a formal meta-analysis. Results Of 783 studies identified in our initial search, 6 fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Frailty was identified as a predictor of mortality, morbidity and/or prolonged hospital stay in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Our systematic review revealed the increased application of frailty scores compared to standardized risk stratification scores in cardiothoracic patients. In approximately 50% of these studies, frailty scores continued to be predictive even after adjusting for the conventional risk scoring systems. Conclusions The assessment of frailty may enhance the preoperative workup and offer an optimized risk stratification measure in patients undergoing cardiothoracic procedures even though the reporting standards of calibration and classification measures have been relatively poor.

Surgical management of moderate ischemic mitral valve regurgitation: Where do we stand?

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) represents a common complication after myocardial infarction. The valve is anatomically normal and the incompetence is the result of papillary muscles displacement and annular dilatation, causing leaflets tethering. Functionally the leaflets present a restricted systolic motion due to tethering forces that displaces the coaptation surface toward the left ventricle apex. The patients present poor left ventricular function at the time of surgery and the severity of the mitral regurgitation increases the risk of mortality. Currently there is general agreement to treat surgically severe IMR nevertheless strong evidences for patient with moderate insufficiency remains poor and proper treatment debated. The most effective surgical approach for the treatment of IMR remains debated. Some authors demonstrated that coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) alone is beneficial in patients with IMR. Conversely, in most patients, moderate IMR will persist or worsen after CABG alone which translate in higher long-term mortality as a function of residual mitral regurgitation severity. A probable reason for this unclear surgical management of functional MR is due to the contemporary suboptimal results of reparative techniques. The standard surgical treatment of chronic IMR is CABG associated with undersized annuloplasty using complete ring. Though, the recurrence of mitral regurgitation remains high (> 30%) because of continous left ventricle remodeling. To get better long term results, in the last decade, several subvalvular procedures in adjunct to mitral anuloplasty have been developed. Among them, surgical papillary muscle relocation represents the most appreciated option capable to restore normal left ventricle geometry. In the next future new preoperative predictors of increased mitral regurgitation recurrence are certainly needed to find an individual time period of treatment in each patient with moderate IMR.

Non-sutureless minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: mini-sternotomy versus mini-thoracotomy: a series of 1130 patients.

OBJECTIVES Aortic valve replacement through conventional sternotomy still represents the gold-standard surgical approach for aortic valve disease. However, given the increasing number of patients with comorbidities, strategies that can improve operative results are always sought. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery, although related to a steep learning curve, might be associated with improved postoperative outcomes. The main aim of this study was to assess whether significant differences exist in terms of operative and early results between a mini-sternotomy and a right mini-thoracotomy approach for isolated aortic valve replacement without sutureless technologies. METHODS This is an observational retrospective multicentre study from nine Italian cardiac centres that analyses prospectively collected data of patients who underwent isolated minimally invasive aortic valve replacement between January 2010 and December 2014. Two approaches are considered (mini-sternotomy and mini-thoracotomy) and compared in terms of operative and early outcomes. RESULTS After interrogation of the centralized database, a total of 1130 patients were retrieved (854 mini-sternotomy and 276 mini-thoracotomy). Patients in the mini-sternotomy group had a higher risk profile. There was no difference in terms of early mortality; cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time did not differ significantly between the groups; and a significantly higher number of reoperations for bleeding was observed in the right mini-thoracotomy group. CONCLUSIONS Both mini-sternotomy and mini-thoracotomy could be performed safely, with low mortality and postoperative morbidity. The mini-thoracotomy approach was associated with a significantly higher rate of reoperation for bleeding. Uptake among cardiac centres was low. Sutureless technologies could potentially increase surgical volume by simplifying the mini-thoracotomy procedure.

Remote ischaemic preconditioning: is it a flag on the field?

Ischaemic preconditioning is one of several different techniques that have been proposed to render the heart more resistant to ischaemia/reperfusion injuries. A significant reduction of troponin release is ‘proof of concept’, however, whether ischaemic preconditioning leads to improved clinical outcomes is still to be proven. Moreover, the exact mechanism of action still remains unknown since very few studies have investigated the signal transmission in humans.

Should we consider off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndrome?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting should be considered as an alternative to the conventional on-pump surgery (ONCAB) in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring emergency revascularization. Eighty-two papers were identified by a systematic search, of which nine were judged to best answer the clinical question. Of these, one was a randomized controlled trial and the remaining eight were retrospective observational studies. The author, journal, date, patient group, country of publication, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses were tabulated. In total, these nine studies included 3001 patients (n = 817 OPCAB, 2184 ONCAB) undergoing emergency revascularization in the setting of ACS. The timing between the onset of ACS and operative intervention ranged from 6 to 72 h. All cases were categorized as urgent/emergent according to the National confidential enquiry into patient outcome and death classification of intervention. Six studies included patients with preoperative cardiogenic shock; however the majority of patients were haemodynamically stable at the time of surgery. Three out of nine studies showed an improvement in 30-day mortality with OPCAB although the remaining six reveal no significant mortality benefit. No difference in long-term mortality was observed between the two techniques. OPCAB was associated with significantly fewer grafts per patient (six studies) and less complete revascularization (two studies). We conclude that whilst OPCAB may have a beneficial effect on 30-day mortality in haemodynamically stable patients undergoing emergency revascularization, there is a lack of high-quality data with clearly defined patient demographics. Future studies must ensure adequate preoperative matching between OPCAB and ONCAB groups and clearly categorize haemodynamic status, disease pattern and time to surgery in order to determine the patients in whom OPCAB may confer the greatest benefit.

Surgical revascularisation of the acute coronary artery syndrome.

Although the European Society of Cardiology and American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines provide some suggestions regarding coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the exact indications for surgery in this diverse spectrum of disease requires further clarification. ACS may present with different scenarios, from NSTEMI to cardiogenic shock. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the first-line treatment in most cases; however, there may be a subgroup of ACS patients in whom CABG may be preferred over percutaneous coronary intervention, particularly in the setting of triple vessel disease. CABG can be performed with reasonably low mortality and excellent outcome, particularly in the case of NSTEMI. Furthermore, off-pump or on-pump beating heart techniques may further improve the feasibility and outcomes of CABG. Where possible every patient should be immediately referred to a tertiary centre and evaluated by the ‘heart team’. Here risk stratification and intervention according to the expert consensus may be rapidly implemented in order to improve both morbidity and mortality.

Mid-term results of bicuspid aortic valve repair guided by morphology and function assessment.

OBJECTIVES Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is frequently associated with aortic insufficiency (AI) due to cusp disease and/or aortic root dilatation. Based on functional classification and morphology, a systematic surgical approach was used for aortic valve repair (AVr). METHODS From 2004 to 2014, 152 consecutive patients (mean age 55 ± 7 years) with BAV underwent AVr with or without concomitant aortic root surgery. Cusp pathology was treated with central plication in 60 (39.5%) patients, free edge reinforcement in 45 (29.6%), triangular resection in 28 (18.4%) and pericardial patch in 19 (12.5%). Aortic root dilatation was corrected with valve sparing reimplantation in 65 patients. Mean follow-up was 68 ± 36 months. RESULTS In-hospital death was 1.3%. Overall 5-year survival was 88.6 ± 3.6%. Freedom from recurrent ≥ grade 2 AI requiring reoperation at 5-year was 93 ± 3.1%. Five-year freedom from reintervention was 98.4 ± 1.6%, 93.3 ± 6.4% and 82.6 ± 9.6 in the group of patients treated with AVr and reimplantation technique, AVr and subcommissural plasty and AVr repair alone (log-rank P  = 0.005). Commissural orientation <160°, type 2 Sievers BAV and preoperative annulus diameter >29 mm were identified as predictors for recurrent ≥ grade 2 AI. CONCLUSIONS BAV repair could be achieved with low incidence of recurrent AI, especially when concomitant annulus stabilization was performed. Systematic preoperative morphological and functional characteristics of the aortic valve should be carried out in order to reduce the risk of repair failure.

Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery.

Aortic valve disease is a prevalent disorder that affects approximately 2% of the general adult population. Surgical aortic valve replacement is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic patients. This treatment has demonstrably proven to be both safe and effective. Over the last few decades, in an attempt to reduce surgical trauma, different minimally invasive approaches for aortic valve replacement have been developed and are now being increasingly utilized. A narrative review of the literature was carried out to describe the surgical techniques for minimally invasive aortic valve surgery and report the results from different experienced centers. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement is associated with low perioperative morbidity, mortality and a low conversion rate to full sternotomy. Long-term survival appears to be at least comparable to that reported for conventional full sternotomy. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery, either with a partial upper sternotomy or a right anterior minithoracotomy provides early- and long-term benefits. Given these benefits, it may be considered the standard of care for isolated aortic valve disease.

Accuracy of EuroSCORE II in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

OBJECTIVES EuroSCORE II has been implemented with the view to providing better performance than the previous logistic EuroSCORE. However, until now, no external validations have been carried out in the minimally invasive context. Therefore, we sought to validate the accuracy of EuroSCORE II in a retrospective series of consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. METHODS Data of 1609 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The accuracy of EuroSCORE II was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration. Discrimination was tested via analysis of the area under the curve of receiver operator characteristic; calibration was achieved by calculating the observed versus expected mortality ratio and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for test probability; global accuracy was assessed by using Briers score; results were compared with the previous logistic EuroSCORE version. EuroSCORE II performance was also tested for discrimination of postoperative complications. Discrimination subgroup analysis was carried out for single surgeon results, and for high-risk patients those outliers were defined after boxplot analysis (EuroSCORE II ≥6%). RESULTS EuroSCORE II showed good discrimination power (area under the curve 0.846), and was statistically superior to logistic EuroSCORE (P = 0.01). In terms of calibration, both EuroSCORE II and logistic over-predicted mortality; with regard to adverse events, the discrimination of EuroSCORE II was adequate for acute renal failure, low-output syndrome and increased intensive care unit stay; area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic for high-risk patients with EuroSCORE ≥6% was suboptimal (0.654); single surgeon results did not influence the discrimination of EuroSCORE II. CONCLUSIONS EuroSCORE II showed good discrimination power in our series of minimally invasive mitral valve patients; however, it over-predicted mortality. Individual performance did not influence discrimination. Performance was suboptimal for prediction of complications and for high-risk subgroup in-hospital mortality.