Marco Perna

Systemic therapies and cognitive impairment for breast cancer: an overview of the current literature

Both endocrine and chemotherapy can be utilized for breast cancer patients’ management, in multiple setting (i.e., primary systemic therapy, adjuvant, metastatic treatment). Health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors can be significantly influenced by cognitive impairment, which has been related in several previously reported experiences to systemic therapies administration. However, although the growing body of literature, the impact of both chemo- and endocrine therapy on cognitive function is currently unclear, due to many confounding factors (i.e., multiple therapies, duration of therapy, comorbidity, age). The aim of the present review is to present an overview of the current literature concerning the possible influence of endocrine and systemic therapy on breast cancer patients’ cognitive impairment.

Safety of concurrent adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma

Introduction: This retrospective study analyzes the safety and feasibility of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in adjuvant treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Methods: A total of 158 patients with STS were retrospectively analyzed. Anthracycline-based computed tomography was performed in high-risk patients. Acute radiotherapy toxicity and chemotherapy-related toxicity were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0; late radiotherapy toxicity was recorded according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. Results: Fifty-four (34.2%) patients received CRT. Mean follow up was 5.4 years (range .2–21.1 years). Local DFS–recurrence-free survival, distant DFS–relapse-free survival, and overall survival were 79.1%, 76.4%, and 64.6%, respectively, at last follow-up. Leukopenia occurred in 11.4% of patients. Skin acute toxicity developed in 60.1% of patients and determined interruption of radiotherapy treatment in 19 (12%) patients. Nineteen patients (12%) experienced moderate fibrosis (grade 2). Mild and moderate joint stiffness was recorded in 16 (10.1%) patients. Size ≥5 cm was the only predictor of local recurrence at multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 9.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28–72.83, p = .028). Age and stage resulted as independent distant relapse predictors (HR 4.77, 95% CI 1.81–12.58, p = .002 and HR 4.83, CI 1.41–16.57, p = .012, respectively). At Cox regression univariate analysis, Karnofsky Performance Status, size, and stage were significant survival predictors (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.02–4.87, p = .045; HR 2.88, 95% CI 1.10–7.52, p = .031; HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.11–6.04, p = .028). Conclusions: Concurrent CRT is a well-tolerated treatment option with no additional toxicity compared to exclusive radiotherapy or sequential CRT.

Afatinib with subsequent surgery in stage III NSCLC with EGFR mutation: Lessons learned from two clinical experiences:

Afatinib, a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is effective as first-line treatment in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report 2 cases of EGFR-mutated locally advanced NSCLC treated in neoadjuvant setting with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor at University of Florence/Careggi Hospital. In both cases, afatinib was used for up to 3 months, until 1 week before surgery. Both patients achieved significant reduction (downstaging) of the pulmonary mass and lymphadenopathies and after surgery, it was decided for both cases to restore afatinib treatment up to a further 4 months. Both patients experienced local and distant disease relapses after 9 and 10 months, respectively, and then we restored the afatinib treatment.

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma stimulation for prevention of 5-fluorouracil-induced oral mucositis in mice

Oral mucositis is a side effect of treatment regimens containing 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU). The purpose of this study was to present our evaluation to see if rosiglitazone (RGZ) protected normal tissues from chemotherapy‐induced oral mucositis.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy as an Alternative to Lobectomy in Patients With Medically Operable Stage I NSCLC: A Retrospective, Multicenter Analysis

Background: Stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SBRT) has evolved as the standard treatment for patients with inoperable stage I non–small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report the results of a retrospective analysis conducted on a large, well‐controlled cohort of patients with stage I to II NSCLC who underwent lobectomy (LOB) or SBRT. Materials and Methods: One hundred eighty‐seven patients with clinical‐stage T1a‐T2bNoMO NSCLC were treated in 2 academic hospitals between August 2008 and May 2015. Patients underwent LOB or SBRT; those undergoing SBRT were sub‐classified as surgical candidates and nonsurgical candidates, according to the presence of surgical contraindications or comorbidities. Results: In univariate analysis, no significant difference was found in local control between patients who underwent SBRT and LOB, with a trend in favor of surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07‐1.01; P < .053). Univariate analysis showed that overall survival (OS) was significantly better in patients who underwent LOB (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23‐0.85) with a 3‐year OS of 73.4% versus 65.2% for surgery and radiation therapy patients, respectively (P < .01). However, no difference in OS was observed between operable patients undergoing SBRT and patients who underwent LOB (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 0.72‐3.90). Progression‐free survival was comparable between patients who underwent LOB and SBRT (HR, 0.61; P = .09). Conclusion: SBRT is a valid therapeutic approach in early‐stage NSCLC. Furthermore, SBRT seems to be very well‐tolerated and might lead to the same optimal locoregional control provided by surgery for patients with either operable or inoperable early‐stage NSCLC.

PO-0695: Lobectomy vs Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in NSCLC:a multicentric series in four centers

S325 ________________________________________________________________________________ Patients were treated consecutively in the University Hospitals of Leuven between 2005 and 2014 and their data were retrospectively retrieved. PORT MPM patients were treated with RT doses up to 64 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. PORT NSCLC were treated with RT doses up to 60 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. Non-surgical patients were treated with RT doses up to 66 Gy in 2.75 Gy sequentially with chemotherapy or up to 70 Gy in 2 Gy fractions concurrently with chemotherapy. Dyspnea scores (CTCAE 4.03) before and after RT were retrieved and delta dyspnea was calculated as the difference between the dyspnea after RT (worse at any time point) and before RT. For every patient, 2 CT scans were retrieved: 1) CT0: a free breathing planning CT scan; 2) CT3M: deep inspiration breath-hold diagnostic follow up CT scan 3-6 months after the end of RT. CT0 and CT3M were non-rigidly co-registered in MIM. Differences in Hounsfield Unit (delta HU=HU3M-HU0) were represented as the slope of the dosedependent delta HU between 0 and 20 Gy (expressed in delta HU/Gy). Primary endpoint was delta dyspnea >= 2. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed in order to identify significant predictors of delta dyspnea >= 2. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.