Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos
Sao Paulo State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Hotspot
Dive into the research topics where Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos is active.
Publication
Featured researches published by Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos.
BMC Genomics | 2016
Mariana Piatto Berton; Larissa Fernanda Simielli Fonseca; Daniela F. J. Gimenez; Bruno L. Utembergue; Aline S. M. Cesar; Luiz Lehmann Coutinho; Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos; Carolyn Aboujaoude; Angélica Simone Cravo Pereira; Rafael Medeiros de Oliveira Silva; N. B. Stafuzza; Fabieli Loise Braga Feitosa; Hermenegildo Lucas Justino Chiaia; Bianca Ferreira Olivieri; Elisa Peripolli; Rafael Lara Tonussi; Daniel Gustavo Mansan Gordo; Rafael Espigolan; Adrielle Mathias Ferrinho; Lenise Freitas Mueller; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque; Henrique Nunes de Oliveira; S. K. Duckett; Fernando Baldi
BackgroundFatty acid type in beef can be detrimental to human health and has received considerable attention in recent years. The aim of this study was to identify differentially expressed genes in longissimus thoracis muscle of 48 Nellore young bulls with extreme phenotypes for fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat by RNA-seq technique.ResultsDifferential expression analyses between animals with extreme phenotype for fatty acid composition showed a total of 13 differentially expressed genes for myristic (C14:0), 35 for palmitic (C16:0), 187 for stearic (C18:0), 371 for oleic (C18:1, cis-9), 24 for conjugated linoleic (C18:2 cis-9, trans11, CLA), 89 for linoleic (C18:2 cis-9,12 n6), and 110 genes for α-linolenic (C18:3 n3) fatty acids. For the respective sums of the individual fatty acids, 51 differentially expressed genes for saturated fatty acids (SFA), 336 for monounsaturated (MUFA), 131 for polyunsaturated (PUFA), 92 for PUFA/SFA ratio, 55 for ω3, 627 for ω6, and 22 for ω6/ω3 ratio were identified. Functional annotation analyses identified several genes associated with fatty acid metabolism, such as those involved in intra and extra-cellular transport of fatty acid synthesis precursors in intramuscular fat of longissimus thoracis muscle. Some of them must be highlighted, such as: ACSM3 and ACSS1 genes, which work as a precursor in fatty acid synthesis; DGAT2 gene that acts in the deposition of saturated fat in the adipose tissue; GPP and LPL genes that support the synthesis of insulin, stimulating both the glucose synthesis and the amino acids entry into the cells; and the BDH1 gene, which is responsible for the synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies used in the synthesis of ATP.ConclusionSeveral genes related to lipid metabolism and fatty acid composition were identified. These findings must contribute to the elucidation of the genetic basis to improve Nellore meat quality traits, with emphasis on human health. Additionally, it can also contribute to improve the knowledge of fatty acid biosynthesis and the selection of animals with better nutritional quality.
Animal Production Science | 2018
Carolyn Aboujaoude; Angélica Simone Cravo Pereira; F. L. B. Feitosa; Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos; Hermenegildo Lucas Justino Chiaia; Mariana Piatto Berton; Elisa Peripolli; Rafael Medeiros de Oliveira Silva; Adrielle Mathias Ferrinho; Lenise Freitas Mueller; Bianca Ferreira Olivieri; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque; Henrique Nunes de Oliveira; Humberto Tonhati; Rafael Espigolan; Rafael Lara Tonussi; Daniel Gustavo Mansan Gordo; Ana Magalhaes; F. Baldi
The aim of the present study was to estimate covariance components and genetic parameters for beef fatty acid (FA) composition of intramuscular fat in the longissimus thoracis muscle in Nelore bulls finished in feedlot. Twenty-two FAs were selected. The heritability estimates for individual FAs ranged from 0.01 to 0.35. The heritability estimates for myristic (0.25 ± 0.09), palmitic (0.18 ± 0.07), oleic (0.28 ± 0.09), linoleic (0.16 ± 0.06) and α-linolenic (0.35 ± 0.10) FAs were moderate. Stearic, elaidic, palmitoleic, vaccenic, conjugated linoleic acid, docosahexanoic, eicosatrienoic and arachidonic FAs had heritability estimates below 0.15. The genetic-correlation estimates between the individual saturated FAs (SFAs) were low and negative between myristic and stearic FAs (–0.22 ± 0.84), moderate between palmitic and myristic FAs (0.58 ± 0.56) and negative between palmitic and stearic FAs (–0.69 ± 0.45). The genetic correlations between the individual long-chain polyunsaturated FAs (PUFAs) were positive and moderate (>0.30). However, the genetic-correlation estimates between long-chain PUFAs and α-linolenic acid were low (<0.30), except for the correlation between arachidonic and α-linolenic acids. The genetic correlation estimates of the sums of SFAs with monounsaturated fatty acids and omega 6 FAs were low (0.25 ± 0.59 and –0.02 ± 0.51 respectively), high with PUFAs and omega 9 FAs (–0.85 ± 0.15 and 0.86 ± 0.17 respectively) and moderate with omega 3FAs (–0.67 ± 0.26). The present study demonstrated the existence of genetic variation and, hence, the possibility to increase the proportion of healthy and favourable beef FAs through selection. The results obtained in the study have provided knowledge to elucidate the additive genetic influence on FA composition of intramuscular fat. In addition, genetic-relationship estimates of intramuscular FA profile help seek strategies for genetic selection or genetic-based diet management to enhance the FA profile in Zebu cattle.
PLOS ONE | 2017
Rafael Lara Tonussi; Rafael Medeiros de Oliveira Silva; Ana Magalhaes; Rafael Espigolan; Elisa Peripolli; Bianca Ferreira Olivieri; Fabieli Loise Braga Feitosa; Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos; Mariana Piatto Berton; Hermenegildo Lucas Justino Chiaia; Angélica Simone Cravo Pereira; Raysildo Barbosa Lôbo; Luiz Antônio Framartino Bezerra; Cláudio Ulhôa Magnabosco; D. A. L. Lourenco; I. Aguilar; Fernando Baldi
The objective of this study was to investigate the application of BLUP and single step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) models in different scenarios of paternity uncertainty with different strategies of scaling the G matrix to match the A22 matrix, using simulated data for beef cattle. Genotypes, pedigree, and phenotypes for age at first calving (AFC) and weight at 550 days (W550) were simulated using heritabilities based on real data (0.12 for AFC and 0.34 for W550). Paternity uncertainty scenarios using 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% of multiple sires (MS) were studied. The simulated genome had a total length of 2,333 cM, containing 735,293 biallelic markers and 7,000 QTLs randomly distributed over the 29 BTA. It was assumed that QTLs explained 100% of the genetic variance. For QTL, the amount of alleles per loci randomly ranged from two to four. The BLUP model that considers phenotypic and pedigree data, and the ssGBLUP model that combines phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information were used for genetic evaluations. Four ways of scaling the mean of the genomic matrix (G) to match to the mean of the pedigree relationship matrix among genotyped animals (A22) were tested. Accuracy, bias, and inflation were investigated for five groups of animals: ALL = all animals; BULL = only bulls; GEN = genotyped animals; FEM = females; and YOUNG = young males. With the BLUP model, the accuracies of genetic evaluations decreased for both traits as the proportion of unknown sires in the population increased. The EBV accuracy reduction was higher for GEN and YOUNG groups. By analyzing the scenarios for YOUNG (from 0 to 100% of MS), the decrease was 87.8 and 86% for AFC and W550, respectively. When applying the ssGBLUP model, the accuracies of genetic evaluation also decreased as the MS in the pedigree for both traits increased. However, the accuracy reduction was less than those observed for BLUP model. Using the same comparison (scenario 0 to 100% of MS), the accuracies reductions were 38 and 44.6% for AFC and W550, respectively. There were no differences between the strategies for scaling the G matrix for ALL, BULL, and FEM groups under the different scenarios with missing pedigree. These results pointed out that the uninformative part of the A22 matrix and genotyped animals with paternity uncertainty did not influence the scaling of G matrix. On the basis of the results, it is important to have a G matrix in the same scale of the A22 matrix, especially for the evaluation of young animals in situations with missing pedigree information. In these situations, the ssGBLUP model is an appropriate alternative to obtain a more reliable and less biased estimate of breeding values, especially for young animals with few or no phenotypic records. For accurate and unbiased genomic predictions with ssGBLUP, it is necessary to assure that the G matrix is compatible with the A22 matrix, even in situations with paternity uncertainty.
Journal of Applied Genetics | 2018
Hermenegildo Lucas Justino Chiaia; Elisa Peripolli; Rafael Medeiros de Oliveira Silva; Fabiele Loise Braga Feitosa; Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos; Mariana Piatto Berton; Bianca Ferreira Olivieri; Rafael Espigolan; Rafael Lara Tonussi; Daniel Gustavo Mansan Gordo; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque; Henrique Nunes de Oliveira; Adrielle Mathias Ferrinho; Lenise Freitas Mueller; Sabrina Kluska; Humberto Tonhati; Angélica Simone Cravo Pereira; I. Aguilar; Fernando Baldi
The aim of the present study was to compare the predictive ability of SNP-BLUP model using different pseudo-phenotypes such as phenotype adjusted for fixed effects, estimated breeding value, and genomic estimated breeding value, using simulated and real data for beef FA profile of Nelore cattle finished in feedlot. A pedigree with phenotypes and genotypes of 10,000 animals were simulated, considering 50% of multiple sires in the pedigree. Regarding to phenotypes, two traits were simulated, one with high heritability (0.58), another with low heritability (0.13). Ten replicates were performed for each trait and results were averaged among replicates. A historical population was created from generation zero to 2020, with a constant size of 2000 animals (from generation zero to 1000) to produce different levels of linkage disequilibrium (LD). Therefore, there was a gradual reduction in the number of animals (from 2000 to 600), producing a “bottleneck effect” and consequently, genetic drift and LD starting in the generation 1001 to 2020. A total of 335,000 markers (with MAF greater or equal to 0.02) and 1000 QTL were randomly selected from the last generation of the historical population to generate genotypic data for the test population. The phenotypes were computed as the sum of the QTL effects and an error term sampled from a normal distribution with zero mean and variance equal to 0.88. For simulated data, 4000 animals of the generations 7, 8, and 9 (with genotype and phenotype) were used as training population, and 1000 animals of the last generation (10) were used as validation population. A total of 937 Nelore bulls with phenotype for fatty acid profiles (Sum of saturated, monounsaturated, omega 3, omega 6, ratio of polyunsaturated and saturated and polyunsaturated fatty acid profile) were genotyped using the Illumina BovineHD BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA) with 777,962 SNP. To compare the accuracy and bias of direct genomic value (DGV) for different pseudo-phenotypes, the correlation between true breeding value (TBV) or DGV with pseudo-phenotypes and linear regression coefficient of the pseudo-phenotypes on TBV for simulated data or DGV for real data, respectively. For simulated data, the correlations between DGV and TBV for high heritability traits were higher than obtained with low heritability traits. For simulated and real data, the prediction ability was higher for GEBV than for Yc and EBV. For simulated data, the regression coefficient estimates (b(Yc,DGV)), were on average lower than 1 for high and low heritability traits, being inflated. The results were more biased for Yc and EBV than for GEBV. For real data, the GEBV displayed less biased results compared to Yc and EBV for SFA, MUFA, n-3, n-6, and PUFA/SFA. Despite the less biased results for PUFA using the EBV as pseudo-phenotype, the b(Yi,DGV estimates obtained for the different pseudo-phenotypes (Yc, EBV and GEBV) were very close. Genomic information can assist in improving beef fatty acid profile in Zebu cattle, since the use of genomic information yielded genomic values for fatty acid profile with accuracies ranging from low to moderate. Considering both simulated and real data, the ssGBLUP model is an appropriate alternative to obtain more reliable and less biased GEBVs as pseudo-phenotype in situations of missing pedigree, due to high proportion of multiple sires, being more adequate than EBV and Yc to predict direct genomic value for beef fatty acid profile.
Archive | 2017
Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos; Angélica Simone Cravo Pereira; InaêCristina Regatieri; F. L. B. Feitosa; Fernando Baldi
In relation the nutritional attributes of beef meat quality, the composition of fatty acid is important not only because it affects the meat palatability, but also it can affect the human health. The fatty acids harmful to human health have received attenuating attention in recent years. Some studies, with taurine breed, have shown that there is a genetic variation for the trait fatty acid profile of the meat and, therefore, the possibility of genetic improvement of this trait in beef cattle. Meantime, in zebu cattle, the genetic parameter estimates for fatty acid profile are scarce. Furthermore, the trait meat fatty acid profile is something difficult and costly to measure and for this kind of trait is indicated the use of genomic selection, which is a type of marker-assisted selection. The objective of this chapter is showing the genetic variability of meat fatty acid profile different cattle breeds and makes an approach of the implement models and methods that use genomic information to improve the fatty acid composition of beef meat.
BMC Genomics | 2016
Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos; Hermenegildo Lucas Justino Chiaia; Mariana Piatto Berton; Fabieli Loise Braga Feitosa; Carolyn Aboujaoud; Gregório Miguel Ferreira de Camargo; Angélica Simone Cravo Pereira; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque; Adrielle Mathias Ferrinho; Lenise Freitas Mueller; Mônica Roberta Mazalli; Joyce de Jesus Mangini Furlan; Roberto Carvalheiro; Daniel Gustavo Mansan Gordo; Rafael Lara Tonussi; Rafael Espigolan; Rafael Medeiros de Oliveira Silva; Henrique Nunes de Oliveira; S. K. Duckett; I. Aguilar; Fernando Baldi
Journal of Applied Genetics | 2017
Fabieli Loise Braga Feitosa; Bianca Ferreira Olivieri; Carolyn Aboujaoude; Angélica Simone Cravo Pereira; Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos; Hermenegildo Lucas Justino Chiaia; Mariana Piatto Berton; Elisa Peripolli; Adrielle Matias Ferrinho; Lenise Freitas Mueller; Mônica Roberta Mazalli; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque; Henrique Nunes de Oliveira; Humberto Tonhati; Rafael Espigolan; Rafael Lara Tonussi; Rafael Medeiros de Oliveira Silva; Daniel Gustavo Mansan Gordo; Ana Fabrícia Braga Magalhães; I. Aguilar; F. Baldi
Meat Science | 2017
Hermenegildo Lucas Justino Chiaia; Elisa Peripoli; Rafael Medeiros de Oliveira Silva; Carolyn Aboujaoude; Fabiele Loise Braga Feitosa; Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos; Mariana Piatto Berton; Bianca Ferreira Olivieri; Rafael Espigolan; Rafael Lara Tonussi; Daniel Gustavo Mansan Gordo; Tiago Bresolin; Ana Fabrícia Braga Magalhães; Gerardo Alves Fernandes Júnior; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque; Henrique Nunes de Oliveira; Joyce de Jesus Mangini Furlan; Adrielle Mathias Ferrinho; Lenise Freitas Mueller; Humberto Tonhati; Angélica Simone Cravo Pereira; Fernando Baldi
Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production | 2018
Elisa Peripolli; Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos; Rafael Lara Tonussi; Fabieli Loise Braga Feitosa; Bianca Ferreira Olivieri; Sabrina Kluska; N. B. Stafuzza; Rafael Medeiros de Oliveira Silva; Raysildo Barbosa Lôbo; Cláudio Ulhôa Magnabosco; Fernando Di Croce; Jason B. Osterstock; Fernando Baldi
Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production | 2018
Sabrina Amorim; Joanir Pereira Eler; E.C. Mattos; Lais Grigoleto; Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos; Fernando Baldi; José Bento Sterman Ferraz