Marcus A. Björnsson

Clinical pharmacokinetics of the cyclooxygenase inhibiting nitric oxide donator (CINOD) AZD3582.

The pre‐clinical pharmacokinetics of AZD3582 (4‐(nitrooxy)butyl‐(2S)‐2‐(6‐methoxy‐2‐naphthyl) propanoate) and its primary metabolites (naproxen and nitrate) were evaluated. AZD3582 had intermediate and passive intestinal permeability (40 times lower than for naproxen), high systemic plasma clearance (CL), substantial gastrointestinal hydrolysis, intermediate volume of distribution (Vss; ≥3.4 L kg−1) and half‐life (t1/2; 7 h), negligible plasma protein binding (∼0.1%), low/intermediate oral uptake (≥13% as intact substance) and low and varying oral bioavailability (mean 1.4% in minipigs and 3.9% in dogs). Following administration of therapeutically relevant oral doses, plasma concentrations of AZD3582 were very low (≤ 13 nM in minipigs and ≤442 nM in dogs; rat data not available) and varying, and accumulation was not apparent. The pharmacokinetics of AZD3582 did not show apparent dose‐, time‐ or gender‐related dependency. In blood and intestine, AZD3582 was hydrolysed to naproxen, nitrate and other metabolites. The rate of this conversion was higher in rats than in non‐rodents, including man. Despite near‐complete to complete uptake of the oral dose, AZD3582 administration resulted in a lower bioavailability (F) of total naproxen than naproxen administration: 55% and 85% relative bioavailability (Frel) in rats and minipigs, respectively. An increased distribution to metabolizing tissues of naproxen (as AZD3582), and thereby enhanced naproxen CL, is believed to be responsible. Following dosing of AZD3582 or naproxen, the t1/2 of naproxen was 5, 9–10 and >40 h in rats, minipigs and dogs, respectively. The Vss and CL for naproxen were small. Plasma protein binding was extensive, and saturation was observed within the therapeutic dose and concentration range. Intake of food prolonged the systemic absorption of naproxen in the minipig. The pharmacokinetics of naproxen did not show apparent time‐ or gender‐related dependency. Following oral dosing of [3H]‐, [14C]‐ and [15N]‐AZD3582, most [14C]‐ and [3H]‐activity was excreted in urine and expired air, respectively. Seventeen per cent of [15N] was recovered in minipig urine as [15N]‐nitrate. About 30% of [3H]‐activity (naproxen and/or naproxen‐related metabolites) was excreted in bile and re‐absorbed. Concentrations of [14C]‐activity (nitrooxy‐butyl group and/or its metabolites) in milk were higher than in plasma and [3H]‐activity in milk. [3H]‐ and [14C]‐excretion data indicated that intact AZD3582 was not excreted in urine, bile or milk to a significant extent. There was no apparent consistency between tissue distribution of [14C]‐ and [3H]‐activity in the rat, which suggests rapid and extensive metabolism of extravascularly distributed AZD3582. A substantial increase of plasma nitrate levels was found after single and repeated oral doses of AZD3582 in the minipig. No inhibition or induction of CYP450 was found.

Experiences with an adaptive design for a dose-finding study in patients with osteoarthritis

Dose-finding studies in non-oncology areas are usually conducted in Phase II of the development process of a new potential medicine and it is key to choose a good design for such a study, as the results will decide if and how to proceed to Phase III. The present article has focus on the design of a dose-finding study for pain in osteoarthritis patients treated with the TRPV1 antagonist AZD1386. We describe different design alternatives in the planning of this study, the reasoning for choosing the adaptive design and experiences with conduct and interim analysis. Three alternatives were proposed: one single dose-finding study with parallel design, a programme with a smaller Phase IIa study followed by a Phase IIb dose-finding study, and an adaptive dose-finding study. We describe these alternatives in detail and explain why the adaptive design was chosen for the study. We give insights in design aspects of the adaptive study, which need to be pre-planned, like interim decision criteria, statistical analysis method and setup of a Data Monitoring Committee. Based on the interim analysis it was recommended to stop the study for futility since AZD1386 showed no significant pain decrease based on the primary variable. We discuss results and experiences from the conduct of the study with the novel design approach. Huge cost savings have been done compared to if the option with one dose-finding design for Phase II had been chosen. However, we point out several challenges with this approach.

Modelling of pain intensity and informative dropout in a dental pain model after naproxcinod, naproxen and placebo administration

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Modelling has been used to describe the pain relief and dropout for a few non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • This study shows the relationship between dose, plasma concentration, pain intensity and dropout for naproxen and naproxcinod. It also extends previous models by using a visual analogue scale for pain intensity instead of modelling pain relief on a categorical scale, and shows the value of including informative dropout in the simulations for visual predictive checks. AIMS To describe pain intensity (PI) measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and dropout due to request for rescue medication after administration of naproxcinod, naproxen or placebo in 242 patients after wisdom tooth removal. METHODS Non-linear mixed effects modelling was used to describe the plasma concentrations of naproxen, either formed from naproxcinod or from naproxen itself, and their relationship to PI and dropout. Goodness of fit was assessed by simultaneous simulations of PI and dropout. RESULTS Baseline PI for the typical patient was 52.7 mm. The PI was influenced by placebo effects, using an exponential model, and by naproxen concentrations using a sigmoid E(max) model. Typical maximal placebo effect was a decrease in PI by 20.2%, with an onset rate constant of 0.237 h(-1). EC(50) was 0.135 µmol l(-1). A Weibull time-to-event model was used for the dropout, where the hazard was dependent on the predicted PI and by the PI at baseline. Since the dropout was not at random, it was necessary to include the simulated dropout in visual predictive checks (VPC) of PI. CONCLUSIONS This model describes the relationship between drug effects, PI and the likelihood of dropout after naproxcinod, naproxen and placebo administration. The model provides an opportunity to describe the effects of other doses or formulations, after dental extraction. VPC created by simultaneous simulations of PI and dropout provides a good way of assessing the goodness of fit when there is informative dropout.

First Human Study of the Investigational Sedative and Anesthetic Drug AZD3043: A Dose-Escalation Trial to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of a 30-Minute Infusion in Healthy Male Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: AZD3043 is a positive allosteric modulator of the &ggr;-aminobutyric acid type A receptor that is rapidly metabolized to an inactive metabolite by esterases present in blood and liver. Preclinical results suggest that AZD3043 has the potential as a short-acting IV sedative/anesthetic drug with rapid and predictable recovery characteristics and a favorable safety and tolerability profile. METHODS: Our primary objective in this phase 1, single-center, open-label study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of AZD3043 after IV infusion and to estimate the maximal tolerated dose. Secondary objectives included the evaluation of AZD3043 pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy. Sequential ascending-dose cohorts of 5 or 6 healthy male volunteers aged 18 to 45 years received a single 30-minute IV infusion of AZD3043. Assessments included adverse events, vital signs, blood gases, laboratory values, clinical signs of sedation/anesthesia, and bispectral index. RESULTS: Fifty-three subjects received AZD3043 in infusion rate cohorts of 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 27, 36, 54, and 81 mg/kg/h. There were no discontinuations, and dose escalation was stopped on reaching the predefined exposure limit. Adverse events occurring in >1 subject were headache (n = 4), erythema (n = 3), chest discomfort (n = 2), nausea (n = 2), and dyspnea (n = 2). The frequency and character of adverse events appeared unrelated to dose. There were no spontaneous reports of pain on injection and no clinically relevant changes in respiratory rate or arterial blood pressure. However, heart rate increased dose-dependently at infusion rates >18 mg/kg/h. Occurrence of sedation/anesthesia corresponded with dose; the lowest applied infusion rate to induce anesthesia according to clinical signs of sedation/anesthesia at predefined time points was 12 mg/kg/h (1 of 6 subjects anesthetized), and all subjects in the 3 highest dose groups were anesthetized. The onset of anesthesia ranged from 4 minutes in the highest infusion rate group to 29 minutes in the 12-mg/kg/h infusion rate group. Return of response to oral command occurred at 3 minutes after the end of infusion in the single subject who was anesthetized in the 12-mg/kg/h group and median 25 minutes in the 81-mg/kg/h group. Involuntary movements ranging from minor twitches to extensive movements were accompanied by increased muscle tone. CONCLUSIONS: AZD3043 was well tolerated in this first human study and seems to exhibit rapid onset and recovery, indicating potential use as a short-acting drug for anesthesia and sedation.

Performance of Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models in the Presence of Informative Dropout

ABSTRACTInformative dropout can lead to bias in statistical analyses if not handled appropriately. The objective of this simulation study was to investigate the performance of nonlinear mixed effects models with regard to bias and precision, with and without handling informative dropout. An efficacy variable and dropout depending on that efficacy variable were simulated and model parameters were reestimated, with or without including a dropout model. The Laplace and FOCE-I estimation methods in NONMEM 7, and the stochastic simulations and estimations (SSE) functionality in PsN, were used in the analysis. For the base scenario, bias was low, less than 5% for all fixed effects parameters, when a dropout model was used in the estimations. When a dropout model was not included, bias increased up to 8% for the Laplace method and up to 21% if the FOCE-I estimation method was applied. The bias increased with decreasing number of observations per subject, increasing placebo effect and increasing dropout rate, but was relatively unaffected by the number of subjects in the study. This study illustrates that ignoring informative dropout can lead to biased parameters in nonlinear mixed effects modeling, but even in cases with few observations or high dropout rate, the bias is relatively low and only translates into small effects on predictions of the underlying effect variable. A dropout model is, however, crucial in the presence of informative dropout in order to make realistic simulations of trial outcomes.

A Bolus and Bolus Followed by Infusion Study of AZD3043, an Investigational Intravenous Drug for Sedation and Anesthesia: Safety and Pharmacodynamics in Healthy Male and Female Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: AZD3043 (THRX-918661) is an investigational phenylpropanoid sedative/anesthetic that is rapidly metabolized by esterases in blood and liver. In the first-in-man study, a 30-minute constant IV infusion of AZD3043 induced anesthesia without major safety or tolerability concerns and with rapid recovery characteristics. METHODS: The primary objective of this phase 1, single-center, open-label study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00984880) was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of AZD3043 administered as a single IV bolus and as a bolus followed by infusion. Secondary objectives included evaluation of AZD3043 pharmacodynamics and efficacy. Sequential ascending dose cohorts of 8 healthy volunteers aged 18 to 65 years received either a single 1-minute bolus IV infusion (part A) or a 1-minute bolus followed by a 30-minute infusion (part B). Assessments included adverse events, vital signs, blood gases, laboratory values, clinical signs of sedation/anesthesia, and bispectral index score. RESULTS: Seventy-two subjects (8 females, 64 males) received AZD3043 doses of 1, 1.5, 2, 4, and 6 mg/kg bolus over 1 minute (part A) or 0.8 + 10, 1 + 15, 3 + 30, and 4 + 40 mg/kg bolus + mg/kg/h infusion for 30 minutes (part B). There were no discontinuations. Adverse events occurring in >1 subject were headache (n = 15; 21%), nausea (n = 7; 10%), vomiting (n = 3; 4%), and fatigue (n = 2; 3%). Twenty-one subjects experienced at least 1 adverse event. There seemed to be no dose relationship associated with any adverse event. Ventilation was maintained, but there was a dose-dependent increase in heart rate. There were no spontaneous reports of pain on injection. Thirty-two subjects were anesthetized, including all subjects in the highest dose group in part A and all subjects in the 2 highest dose groups in part B. Recovery from anesthesia was rapid, with swift return of orientation and proprioception. All subjects were able to walk 10 m without support at their first assessment, 30 minutes after end of dosing, except for 1 subject in each of the 2 mg/kg bolus (part A) and 4 mg/kg bolus + 40 mg/kg/h 30-minute infusion (part B) dose groups, who passed this test at the subsequent assessment, 45 minutes after the end of dosing. Involuntary movements were observed at higher doses, accompanied by increased muscle tone. CONCLUSIONS: AZD3043 provided rapid recovery from anesthesia with maintained ventilation. Further studies are warranted in a clinical setting.

A Recirculatory Model for Pharmacokinetics and the Effects on Bispectral Index After Intravenous Infusion of the Sedative and Anesthetic AZD3043 in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND: AZD3043 is a positive allosteric modulator of the &ggr;-aminobutyric acid type A receptor, with sedative and anesthetic properties. We describe a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of arterial and venous concentrations of AZD3043 and the pharmacodynamic effects on bispectral index (BIS) in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Arterial and venous plasma concentrations of AZD3043 and BIS were measured in 2 clinical studies in 125 healthy volunteers, where AZD3043 was given as a 1-minute bolus (1–6 mg/kg), a 30-minute infusion (1–81 mg/kg/h), or 0.8 + 10, 1 + 15, 3 + 30, and 4 + 40 (mg/kg bolus + mg/kg/h infusion for 30 minutes). Population PK/pharmacodynamic analysis was performed with NONMEM. RESULTS: A recirculatory model, comprising a series of 5 compartments for the transit of drug between venous and arterial plasma, 2 peripheral distribution compartments, and 1 compartment for the nondistributive transit of drug from arterial to venous plasma, described the PK of AZD3043. Systemic clearance was high (2.2 L/min; 95% confidence interval, 2.12–2.25), and apparent volumes of distribution were low, leading to a short elimination half-life. The apparent volumes of distribution of the arterial and peripheral compartments increased with increasing administered dose, giving a total apparent volume of distribution of 15 L after the lowest dose and 37 L after the greatest dose. A sigmoid maximum effect (E max) model with an EC 50 of 15.6 µg/mL and a &ggr; of 1.7 described the relationship between AZD3043 effect-site concentrations and BIS. The between-subject variability in EC 50 was 37%. An effect compartment model, with a half-life of the equilibration rate constant ke0 of 1.1 min, described the delay in effect in relation to the arterial plasma concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: AZD3043 had a high clearance and a low apparent volume of distribution, leading to a short half-life. However, the apparent volume of distribution was dose dependent (P < 0.001), leading to an increased half-life with increasing dose. The distribution to the effect site was fast and together with the short plasma half-life led to a fast onset and offset of effects.

Experiences with an adaptive design for a dose-finding study in osteoarthritis

Abstract Aims Many new potential medicines fail in early clinical development. AZD1386 is a TRPV1 antagonist and was developed for treatment of osteoarthritis pain at AstraZeneca. Following preclinical studies to characterize the compound, translational studies and first time in man studies the challenge is great to select the right doses and study population for the first clinical studies on efficacy in phase II of the drug development process. Methods Different design alternatives in the planning of the dose-finding study for AZD1386 in OA were analysed with regard to statistical considerations, timelines and costs for the different options. Results Based on datasimulations and cost/benefit analysis a 4 week study with adaptive design with interim analysis at 2 weeks for possible dose adjustment or futility stop was chosen. The study was initiated with AZD1386 at to doses 30 and 90 mg and placebo. Based on the fact that the one-sided p-value for the primary analysis (comparison of 90 mg versus placebo) was 0.2891 and larger than 0.2, the data monitoring committee decided that the study was to be stopped after the interim analysis due to lack of efficacy. Conclusions The chosen adaptive design in this Phase IIa/b study enabled an early futility stop. This meant several advantages. Further exposure of patients of a non-efficacious drug could be stopped and resources could be re-allocated earlier as well as monetary savings.