Marcus D'Ayala

Impact of transrenal aortic endograft placement on endovascular graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

PURPOSE Successful endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) requires the creation of a hemostatic seal between the endograft and the underlying aortic wall. A short infrarenal aortic neck may be responsible for incomplete aneurysm exclusion and procedural failure. Sixteen patients who had an endograft positioned completely below the lowest renal artery and 37 patients in whom a porous portion of an endograft attachment system was deliberately placed across the renal arteries were studied to identify if endograft positioning could impact on the occurrence of incomplete aneurysm exclusion. METHODS Fifty-three patients underwent aortic grafting constructed from a Palmaz balloon expandable stent and an expandable polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) graft implanted in an aorto-ilio-femoral, femoral-femoral configuration. Arteriography, duplex ultrasonography and spiral CT scans were performed in each patient before and after endografting to evaluate for technical success, the presence of endoleaks, and renal artery perfusion. RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference in patient demography, AAA size, or aortic neck length or diameter between patients who had their endografts placed below or across the renal arteries. However, significantly more proximal aortic endoleaks occurred in those patients with infrarenal endografts (P < or = .05). Median serum creatinine level before and after endografting was not significantly different between the 2 patient subgroups, with the exception of 2 patients who had inadvertent coverage of a single renal orifice by the endograft. Median blood pressure and the requirement for antihypertensive therapy remained the same after transrenal aortic stent grafting. Significant renal artery compromise did not occur after appropriately positioned transrenal stents as shown by means of angiography, CT scanning, and duplex ultrasound scan. Mean follow-up time was 10.3 months (range, 3 to 18 months). Patients who had significant renal artery stenosis (> or =50%) before aortic endografting did not show progression of renal artery stenosis after trans-renal endografting. Two patients with transrenal aortic stent grafts had inadvertent coverage of 1 renal artery by the endograft because of device malpositioning, which resulted in nondialysis dependent renal insufficiency. In addition, evidence of segmental renal artery infarction (<20% of the kidney), which did not result in an apparent change in renal function, was shown by means of follow-up CT scans in 2 patients with transrenal endografts. CONCLUSION Transrenal aortic endograft fixation using a balloon expandable device in patients with AAAs can result in a significant reduction in the risk of proximal endoleaks. Absolute attention to precise device positioning, coupled with the use of detailed imaging techniques, should reduce the risk of inadvertent renal artery occlusion from malpositioning. Long-term follow-up is essential to determine if there will be late sequelae of transrenal fixation of endografts, which could adversely effect renal perfusion.

Does the efficacy of dorsalis pedis artery bypasses vary among diabetic patients of different ethnic backgrounds

Hispanic patients suffer from a high rate of leg amputations, far beyond what would be expected from the high prevalence of diabetes in this population. This raises questions about the efficacy of bypass operations across ethnic lines. We focused this review on dorsalis pedis bypasses, as these are frequently performed in diabetic patients. We compared outcomes between Hispanics and non-Hispanics and sought to identify factors predictive of failure or complications. The authors conducted a retrospective review of 144 dorsalis pedis bypasses in 106 men and 29 women with a mean age of 62 years. Eighty-two percent were Hispanic; 96% of cases were done for tissue loss, and 4% for rest pain. Twenty-five percent of patients experienced perioperative complications; these were more frequent in non-Hispanics than Hispanics (40% vs 22%, p = 0.05). The most frequent complications were wound related (11%). The 30-day mortality was 1.5% and 30-day graft thrombosis was 5%. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 62 months and averaged 12 months. Eighty-one percent of the limbs at risk were saved, although 36% of cases required minor foot amputations. Estimated primary graft patency was 68% at 30 months. The 30-month Kaplan-Meier curves for primary patency, assisted patency, and limb salvage were not statistically different between Hispanics and non-Hispanics (p > 0.4). Grafts that remained patent had higher duplex-derived intraoperative flow velocities in the dorsalis pedis artery than grafts that eventually failed (121 +/-69 vs 74 +/-26 cm/sec, p = 0.02). In grafts that remained patent, dorsalis pedis velocity decreased from the perioperative period to the 8 to 12 weeks time point, whereas no change was seen in grafts that eventually failed (mean decline of 48 +/-76 vs 1 +/-58 cm/sec, p = 0.02). No other factors were predictive of graft failure. The results of dorsalis pedis bypass in Hispanic patients compare favorably to those seen in other ethnic groups. This suggests that other factors must account for the high amputation rates seen in Hispanics, such as a frequent occurrence of nonreconstructible disease or unaccounted for cardiovascular risk factors. The usefulness of duplex-derived flow velocities in the dorsalis pedis to predict long-term graft patency warrants further investigation.

ENDOVASCULAR GRAFTING FOR ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS

Despite the initial success of endovascular grafts in a very difficult patient population, many problems remain. These procedures are often time-consuming and quite complicated, requiring the close cooperation of an experienced team of vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists. Access may be difficult through occluded, stenotic, and tortuous vessels. Inadequate graft deployment may result in arterial rupture or graft migration, which could potentially lead to acute occlusion of the renal or iliac arteries. Occlusion of the inferior mesenteric artery may result in ischemic colitis. Also, endovascular grafts may fail to exclude an aneurysm from systemic arterial blood pressure, not protecting the patient against impending rupture, and embolization and thrombosis are ever-present dangers. Concerns have been raised regarding radiation exposure and intravenous contrast loads used during these procedures. Clearly, more experience must be gained and technologic advancements made before the use of these devices becomes commonplace, something that may not be too far off in the future.

Lower extremity bypass graft revision in diabetics

Revision of lower extremity bypass graft stenoses identified by surveillance duplex scanning is frequently required in diabetic patients. The authors evaluated (1) the value of routine angiography before graft revision in diabetics, (2) factors that predict patients in whom angiography alters management, and (3) the incidence of recurrent stenosis and factors that might predict it. Forty-two infrainguinal primary vein bypasses undergoing primary revision were retrospectively studied. The initial graft stenosis was detected at a mean of 1 1.5 ±3.6 months after the original bypass. Angiograms were obtained in 38 cases, revealing additional findings in 29 of 38 cases (76%), with a resultant alteration of the operative plan in 27 cases (71%). The most frequent additional angiographic finding was the identification or localization of a lesion in the inflow or outflow tracts (18 of 27 cases). Cases where the angiogram altered the management plan had a mean systolic velocity ratio across the stenosis (Vr) of 7.3 ±6.1, versus a Vr of 4.8 ±1.3 for cases where the angiogram did not alter the management plan (p < 0.04). Duplex scanning identified 4 lesions that were not seen on angiography; 3 of 4 were confirmed as webs at surgery. Twenty of 42 grafts (48%) developed recurrent stenoses at a mean of 4.9 ±3.8 months from initial revision. Restenosis occurred in 69% of female limbs as compared to 38% of male limbs (p = 0.06). Recurrent stenosis was not a predictor of ultimate graft failure, unless left untreated. Four of 10 untreated grafts ultimately failed. A total of 9 of the 42 grafts eventually failed (21%), leading to 3 amputations (7%). The authors conclude that failing infrainguinal bypass grafts identified by duplex in diabetics should undergo a detailed angiographic evaluation. This frequently leads to an alteration in the management plan, especially in the presence of a high Vr across stenoses. High rates of limb salvage (93%) and assisted primary graft patency (79%) despite a high recurrent stenoses rate (48%) justify routine duplex surveillance, preoperative angiography, and aggressive graft revision in diabetic patients with infrainguinal grafts.

Endovascular treatment of innominate artery stenosis in a bovine aortic arch a case report

Recent reports have established the feasibility and safety of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement in the treatment of innominate artery occlusive disease. Although the long-term durability of these endovascular approaches has not been clearly established, they are particularly attractive in patients who are not considered good candidates for surgical reconstruction. The authors present a case involving a morbidly obese Hispanic woman who had undergone previous coronary artery bypass and complained of right visual symptoms, dizziness, and right upper extremity claudication. Because of her unusual bovine anatomy and the desire to avoid reoperating in her chest, a unique approach with a left subclavian-to-carotid bypass and innominate artery angioplasty and stenting was used.