Marcus Wiedmann

Surgical and palliative management and outcome in 184 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: palliative photodynamic therapy plus stenting is comparable to r1/r2 resection.

Objective:First, to analyze the strategy for 184 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma seen and treated at a single interdisciplinary hepatobiliary center during a 10-year period. Second, to compare long-term outcome in patients undergoing surgical or palliative treatment, and third to evaluate the role of photodynamic therapy in this concept. Summary Background Data:Tumor resection is attainable in a minority of patients (<30%). When resection is not possible, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy have been found to be an ineffective palliative option. Recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been evaluated as a palliative and neoadjuvant modality. Methods:Treatment and outcome data of 184 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma were analyzed prospectively between 1994 and 2004. Sixty patients underwent resection (8 after neoadjuvant PDT); 68 had PDT in addition to stenting and 56 had stenting alone. Results:The 30-day death rate after resection was 8.3%. Major complications occurred in 52%. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 69%, 30%, and 22%, respectively. R0, R1, and R2 resection resulted in 5-year survival rates of 27%, 10%, and 0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified R0 resection (P < 0.01), grading (P < 0.05), and on the limit to significance venous invasion (P = 0.06) as independent prognostic factors for survival. PDT and stenting resulted in longer median survival (12 vs. 6.4 months, P < 0.01), lower serum bilirubin levels (P < 0.05), and higher Karnofsky performance status (P < 0.01) as compared with stenting alone. Median survival after PDT and stenting, but not after stenting alone, did not differ from that after both R1 and R2 resection. Conclusion:Only complete tumor resection, including hepatic resection, enables long-term survival for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Palliative PDT and subsequent stenting resulted in longer survival than stenting alone and has a similar survival time compared with incomplete R1 and R2 resection. However, these improvements in palliative treatment by PDT will not change the concept of an aggressive resectional approach.

Neoadjuvant photodynamic therapy as a new approach to treating hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A Phase II pilot study

Only 20–30% of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinomas (CC) are candidates for potentially curative resection. However, even after curative (R0) resection, these patients have a disease recurrence rate of up to 76%. The current prospective Phase II study investigated photodynamic therapy (PDT) as a neoadjuvant treatment for CC.

Photodynamic therapy in patients with non-resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: 5-year follow-up of a prospective phase II study

BACKGROUND Median survival of patients with non-resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma is 3 to 6 months, even after biliary drainage. Therefore, a single-arm phase II study was conducted (July 1996 to October 1998) to investigate the effect of local photodynamic therapy; a significant improvement in survival (74%) was noted at 6 months. The present study is an analysis of the long-term follow-up for patients enrolled in that phase II study. METHODS Five-year follow-up data for the 23 patients enrolled in the original prospective study were analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis. RESULTS Median survival after treatment was 11.2 months for patients without distant metastases (M0) and 9.3 months for all patients (M0+M1). The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 4-year survival rates were estimated to be 47%, 21%, 11% and 5%, respectively, for patients with stage M0 cholangiocarcinoma, and 39%, 17%, 9%, and 4%, respectively, for patients with stages M0 and M1. Of the patients who died, 73.9% (n=17) were because of tumor progression; 26.1% (n=6) died as a result of cholangitis (n=4), septic shock (n=1), or appendicitis/peritonitis (n=1). For all patients, except one with diffuse liver metastases, there was improvement in cholestasis, performance, and quality of life, which was maintained for an extended period. CONCLUSIONS This 5-year follow-up study confirms that photodynamic therapy is safe and effective for non-resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma, although it does not prevent progression of the disease.

Molecularly targeted therapy for gastrointestinal cancer.

Receptor and non-receptor tyrosine kinases (TKs) have emerged as clinically useful drug target molecules for treating gastrointestinal cancer. Imatinib mesilate (STI-571, Gleevec(TM)), an inhibitior of bcr-abl TK, which was primarily designed to treat chronic myeloid leukemia is also an inhibitor of c-kit receptor TK, and is currently the drug of choice for the therapy of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), which frequently express constitutively activated forms of the c-kit-receptor. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is involved in cell proliferation, metastasis and angiogenesis, is another important target. The two main classes of EGFR inhibitors are the TK inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. Gefitinib (ZD1839, Iressa(TM)) has been on trial for esophageal and colorectal cancer (CRC) and erlotinib (OSI-774, Tarceva(TM)) on trial for esophageal, colorectal, hepatocellular, and biliary carcinoma. In addition, erlotinib has been evaluated in a Phase III study for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Cetuximab (IMC-C225, Erbitux(TM)), a monoclonal EGFR antibody, has been FDA approved for the therapy of irinotecan resistant colorectal cancer and has been tested for pancreatic cancer. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR) are critical regulators of tumor angiogenesis. Bevacizumab (Avastin(TM)), a monoclonal antibody against VEGF, was efficient in two randomized clinical trials investigating the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. It is also currently investigated for the therapy of pancreatic cancer in combination with gemcitabine. Other promising new drugs currently under preclinical and clinical evaluation, are VEGFR2 inhibitor PTK787/ZK 222584, thalidomide, farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 (tipifarnib, Zarnestra(TM)), matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors, proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (Velcade(TM)), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGF-R) inhibitors, protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) 1/2 inhibitors, Rous sarcoma virus transforming oncogene (SRC) kinase inhibitors, histondeacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, small hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) inhibitors, aurora kinase inhibitors, hedgehog inhibitors, and TGF-beta signalling inhibitors.

Neoadjuvant photodynamic therapy before curative resection of proximal bile duct carcinoma

BACKGROUND Hilar bile duct carcinoma has an 80% probability of local recurrence after curative resection, which might be reduced if neoadjuvant photodynamic therapy is feasible. CASE AND TREATMENT: After intravenous injection of sodium porfimer we treated an adenocarcinoma of the proximal common bile duct (T2 N0 M0, Bismuth type II) in a 72-year-old man with red laser light (applied from the lumen at a dose 250 Joules/cm2), and the adjacent right and left hepatic and common bile duct at a dose of 125 Joules/cm2. After 23 days the tumor was completely resected (adenocarcinoma pT2 pNO; G2). RESULTS In the lumenal, 4-mm-thick layer the bile duct specimen exhibited complete tumor necrosis with pigmentation of photodegraded porfimer and no viable tumor cells, while in the outer layer of the wall (at 5-8-mm depth) viable cancer cell nests without degraded porfimer were seen. The bile duct tissue showed little damage. Eighteen months after surgery, neither tumor recurrence nor stricture formation was found at the pretreated bilioenteric anastomoses. CONCLUSIONS a) Photodynamic therapy with sodium porfimer seems to be confined to the superficial 4-mm layer of bile duct cancer. b) Neoadjuvant photodynamic therapy is feasible for hilar bile duct carcinoma.

Irinotecan with 5-FU/FA in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinomas: a multicenter phase II trial.

Objectives:Biliary cancer has a poor prognosis and lacks a standard palliative chemotherapy. The purpose of this prospective single-arm phase II study was to determine the activity and tolerability of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and folinic acid in advanced biliary cancer. Patients and Methods:Patients with inoperable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) or gallbladder cancer (GBC) and no prior chemotherapy were eligible. Irinotecan 80 mg/m2, followed by folinic acid 500 mg/m2 and 5-FU 2000 mg/m2 infused over 24 hours (Fufiri) were administered weekly 6 times, every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was response rate, and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Results:Seventeen patients with ICC and 13 patients with GBC were enrolled. All patients were evaluable for safety. WHO grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events occurred in 8 patients (27%), consisting of diarrhea and leukopenia in 5 and 3 patients, respectively. One patient with diarrhea grade 4 finally succumbed to sepsis. Objective response rate was 10% (95% confidence interval, 2.1%–26.5%), with an additional 10% of patients showing stable disease. Median overall survival was 166 days and 273 days, and median progression-free survival was 84 days and 159 days for ICC and GBC, respectively. Conclusions:Fufiri is a well-tolerated regimen in patients with ICC and GBC but has only modest activity in advanced biliary tract cancer.

Imatinib Mesylate for Palliative Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Bicentric Phase II Study

inclusion criteria were age between 18 and 75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≤ 2, a life expectancy of > 3 months, and adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function. Primary endpoints of this study were objective response rate (complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included imatinib pharmacokinetics (PK), rate of disease control (CR, PR, and stable disease (SD)) and time to tumor progression (TTP), frequency and severity of adverse events, and overall survival (OS). All patients received the following regimen: imatinib mesylate 400 mg/day orally for 1 week followed by a dose escalation to 600 mg/day if tolerable. CT scans or MRI for tumor measurement were performed at baseline and every 12 weeks, Ffluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([F]FDG-PET) scans at baseline, week 1 and week 12. The plasma concentrations of imatinib mesylate and N-demethylated piperazine derivative (CGP74588) were determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography method on day 1, according to a specified time schedule and in weeks 2, 4, 6, 18, 30, and 42 of the study prior to the morning dosage administration. Immunohistochemical staining was carried out at the end of our study since c-kit-R positivity was no criterion for study enrollment. To be of interest for further studies, imatinib mesylate would have to produce a response rate (RR) of at least 25%. Based on previous studies, a number of 40 patients was needed to generate a 95% confidence interval with a range of 28 percent points. Nine patients were enrolled between 05/2006 and 08/2009 (table 1) and the study was stopped prematurely due to poor recruitment. Treatment was continued for at least 3 months in 5 patients. However, all of these patients required intermittent dose reductions due to (serious) adverse events. No objective responses were observed in an intention-to-treat analysis. 5 patients experienced disease progression (PD), with a median TTP of 79 days (range 38–116 days). 4 patients

A pilot study of bendamustine in advanced bile duct cancer

We performed a pilot study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of bendamustine in patients with advanced hilar bile duct cancer and impaired liver function. Six patients with histologically proven, unresectable adenocarcinoma of the hilar bile duct were treated with bendamustine 140 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of the first cycle and with bendamustine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 of the second to fourth cycle. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days. Primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of the treatment; secondary endpoints were response rate, time to progression and overall survival. Transient lymphopenia grade 3 occurred in all six patients. No other grade 3 or 4 toxicities were present. The most common nonhematologic toxicity was mouth dryness grade 2 in six patients. Three patients had stable disease. No partial or complete responses were observed. Median time to progression was 3.3 months; median overall survival was 6 months. Our study demonstrates that bendamustine can be safely administered in patients with hilar bile duct cancer and impaired liver function. A potential role of bendamustine in combination therapies for bile duct cancer will be a subject of further trials.

Therapeutical Concepts and Results for Klatskin Tumors

INTRODUCTION Most hilar cholangiocarcinomas (Klatskin tumors) are diagnosed at an advanced stage. This article aims to review the literature of resection and palliative treatment in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS All studies with evidence levels I and II and relevant trials with evidence level III from 1996 to 04/2007 were included. RESULTS The definition of resectability depends not only on tumor stage but also on operator experience. The best long-term results are achieved by hilar resection combined with extended liver resection. No clear clinical benefit has been demonstrated for neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies. The role of liver transplantation requires redefinition in view of good long-term survival after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and the possibility of living-donor liver transplantation. Initial studies of a combination of biliary stenting and photodynamic therapy (PDT) for palliation have shown significantly prolonged survival times compared with stenting alone. There is no established standard palliative chemotherapy. DISCUSSION The prognosis of patients with Klatskin tumors has been significantly improved by extended resection procedures. The combination of stenting and PDT is a useful palliative approach.

Radiochemotherapy followed by gemcitabine and capecitabine in extrahepatic bile duct cancer: a phase I/II trial.

Objective:Both radiotherapy and chemotherapy with gemcitabine and capecitabine have efficacy in biliary cancer. Our aim was to determine the toxicity and efficacy of a postoperative regimen combining both treatment modalities in extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Methods:Patients were eligible after surgery for extrahepatic bile duct adenocarcinoma. Surgery included resection of lymph node positive cancer, incomplete resections and diagnostic laparotomy in unresectable tumors. Patients received a fractionated radiotherapy of 49.6 Gy accompanied by gemcitabine once a week. After a 2-week rest, patients were treated with gemcitabine and capecitabine on a 3-week cycle. The treatment continued for 6 cycles in nonmeasurable disease or until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Results:There were 18 patients (resection/laparotomy 7/11) enrolled between August 2003 and April 2005. Radiotherapy was completed in all patients and a total of 66 cycles of chemotherapy was applied. Fatigue and nausea were the most common mild adverse events. Grade 3 and 4 toxicity was rare after resection but frequent in unresectable disease and consisted of fatigue, nausea, duodenal ulcer, cachexia, and cholangitis in 1, 2, 2, 4, and 4 patients, respectively. We observed a 50% disease stabilization rate in patients with measurable disease. Median overall survival was 7.9 months in patients with unresectable tumors. Median overall survival in patients after resection has not been reached at a median follow-up of 19.5 months. Conclusions:Radiochemotherapy using gemcitabine followed by gemcitabine and capecitabine is an active regimen with manageable toxicity after resection of extrahepatic bile duct cancer but has significant toxicity in unresectable disease.