Marden E. Alder
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Marden E. Alder.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2004
Robert M. Campbell; Melvin D. Smith; Thomas C. Mayes; John A Mangos; Donna Beth Willey-Courand; Nusret Köse; Ricardo F. Pinero; Marden E. Alder; Hoa L. Duong; Jennifer L. Surber
BACKGROUND Thoracic insufficiency syndrome is the inability of the thorax to support normal respiration or lung growth and is seen in patients who have severe congenital scoliosis with fused ribs. Traditional spinal surgery does not directly address this syndrome. METHODS Twenty-seven patients with congenital scoliosis associated with fused ribs of the concave hemithorax had an opening wedge thoracostomy with primary longitudinal lengthening with use of a chest-wall distractor known as a vertical, expandable prosthetic titanium rib. Repeat lengthenings of the prosthesis were performed at intervals of four to six months. Radiographs were analyzed with respect to correction of the spinal deformity, as indicated by a change in the Cobb angle, and lateral deviation of the spine, as indicated by the interpedicular line ratio. Spinal growth was assessed by measuring the change in the length of the spine. Correction of the thoracic deformity and thoracic growth were assessed on the basis of the increase in the height of the concave hemithorax compared with the height of the convex hemithorax (the space available for the lung), the increase in the thoracic spinal height, and the increase in the thoracic depth and width. The thoracic deformity in the transverse plane was measured with computed tomography, and the scans were analyzed for spinal rotation, thoracic rotation, and the posterior hemithoracic symmetry ratio. Clinically, the patients were assessed on the basis of the relative heights of the shoulders and of head and thorax compensation. Pulmonary status was evaluated on the basis of the respiratory rate, capillary blood gas levels, and pulmonary function studies. RESULTS The mean age at the time of the surgery was 3.2 years (range, 0.6 to 12.5 years), and the mean duration of follow-up was 5.7 years. All patients had progressive congenital scoliosis, with a mean increase of 15 degrees /yr before the operation. The scoliosis decreased from a mean of 74 degrees preoperatively to a mean of 49 degrees at the time of the last follow-up. Both the mean interpedicular line ratio and the space available for the lung ratio improved significantly. The height of the thoracic spine increased by a mean of 0.71 cm/yr. At the time of the last follow-up, the mean percentage of the predicted normal vital capacity was 58% for patients younger than two years of age at the time of the surgery, 44% for those older than two years of age (p < 0.001), and 36% for those older than two years of age who had had prior spine surgery. In a group of patients who had sequential testing, all increases in the volume of vital capacity were significant (p < 0.0001), but the changes in the percentages of the predicted normal vital capacity were not. There was a total of fifty-two complications in twenty-two patients, with the most common being asymptomatic proximal migration of the device through the ribs in seven patients. CONCLUSIONS Opening wedge thoracostomy with use of a chest-wall distractor directly treats segmental hypoplasia of the hemithorax resulting from fused ribs associated with congenital scoliosis. The operation addresses thoracic insufficiency syndrome by lengthening and expanding the constricted hemithorax and allowing growth of the thoracic spine and the rib cage. The procedure corrects most components of chest-wall deformity and indirectly corrects congenital scoliosis, without the need for spine fusion. The technique requires special training and should be performed by a multispecialty team.
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology | 1999
Marden E. Alder; S. Thomas Deahl; Stephen R. Matteson; Joseph E. Van Sickels; B.D. Tiner; John D. Rugh
OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to quantify condylar position changes after mandibular advancement surgery with rigid fixation (screws). Radiographic changes in condylar position were determined in all planes (X, Y, and Z). Computed tomography with image reconstruction was used. STUDY DESIGN A consecutive population of patients who elected to have rigid fixation for surgical stabilization method were studied (n = 21). Computed tomography data were acquired in the axial plane through use of abutting 1.5-mm-thick slices. Data acquisition occurred 1 week preoperatively and 8 weeks postoperatively. Measurements were made from 2-dimensional reconstructions. RESULTS The averages were as follows: lateral displacement from midline, 1.2 mm (55% of patients); medial displacement from midline, 1.5 mm (45% of patients; range, 3.2 mm); condyle angle increase from coronal plane, 3.5 degrees (60% of patients); condyle angle decrease from coronal, 4.3 degrees (40% of patients; range, 8.5 degrees); superior rotation of proximal segment, 3.2 degrees (39% of patients); inferior rotation of proximal segment, 8.6 degrees (61% of patients; range, 15.6 degrees); superior displacement, 1.2 mm (60% of patients); inferior displacement, 1.0 mm (40% of patients; range, 2.5 mm); anterior displacement, 1.6 mm (33% of patients); posterior displacement, 1.6 mm (67% of patients; range, 2.8 mm). CONCLUSIONS Changes occurred in all planes, but the most common postoperative condyle position was more lateral; with increased angle, the coronoid process was higher and the condyle was more superior and posterior in the fossa.
International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry | 1997
Philip J. Boyne; Robert E. Marx; Myron Nevins; Gilbert Triplett; Emmanuel Lazaro; Leslie C. Lilly; Marden E. Alder; Pirkka V. Nummikoski
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2003
Robert M. Campbell; Melvin D. Smith; Thomas C. Mayes; John A Mangos; Donna Beth Willey-Courand; Nusret Köse; Ricardo F. Pinero; Marden E. Alder; Hoa L. Duong; Jennifer L. Surber
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | 1995
Marden E. Alder; S. Thomas Deahl; Stephen R. Matteson
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | 1999
Michael D Harris; Joseph R Van Sickels; Marden E. Alder
International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry | 2001
Bruce E. Houser; James T. Mellonig; Michael A. Brunsvold; David L. Cochran; Roland M. Meffert; Marden E. Alder
Journal of the American Dental Association | 2001
Richard Monahan; Karen Seder; Pravin K. Patel; Marden E. Alder; Stephen Grud; Mary O'Gara
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | 1997
Joseph E. Van Sickels; B.D. Tiner; Marden E. Alder
European Journal of Oral Sciences | 2006
David G. Gantt; John Kappleman; Richard A. Ketcham; Marden E. Alder; Thomas H. Deahl
Collaboration
Dive into the Marden E. Alder's collaboration.
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputs