Marek Szymczak

Treatment of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: liver transplantation or partial external biliary diversion.

Abstract: Progressive intrahepatic familial cholestasis (PFIC), previously called Byler’s disease, is a syndrome in which children develop severe cholestasis progressing to biliary cirrhosis and chronic liver failure, usually during the first decade of life. Clinical features include jaundice, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, growth retardation and severe pruritis. Laboratory tests demonstrate elevated bilirubin and bile acids, without an increase in serum gamma‐glutamyl‐transpeptidase or cholesterol. This study was performed to evaluate our experience with medical therapy as well as two types of surgical treatment used in children with PFIC, particularly partial external biliary diversion (PEBD) as an alternative method of therapy to liver transplantation (OLTx). Between 1979 and 1998 we have treated 46 children with PFIC (27 boys and 19 girls), aged 10 months to 19 yr (at the time of this study). Medical treatment with ursodeoxycholic (UDCA) was used in 39 patients for the period between 6 and 82 months. PEBD (cholecysto‐jejuno‐cutaneostomy) was performed in 16 patients, OLTx in eight children (including one after unsuccessful PEBD). Retrospective analysis of the clinical course and selected laboratory tests (bilirubin, ASPAT, ALAT, bile acids), and histopathological examinations were performed. Results of treatment were assessed by means of influence of the type of treatment on clinical symptoms, laboratory tests, progress of liver cirrhosis and hepatic failure, as well as physical development and survival. Medical therapy was effective in the long term in four (10%) of the patients resulting in clinical and biochemical normalization. Both surgical methods of therapy of PFIC, PEBD and OLTx, resulted in an 80% success rate and therefore should be used as complementary therapies. In patients before established liver cirrhosis, PEBD should be the first choice of treatment. Patients presenting with cirrhosis or after ineffective PEBD should qualify for OLTx. With this strategy most children with PIFC can be cured.

Liver transplantation in children with hepatocellular carcinoma Do Milan criteria apply to pediatric patients

Abstract:  HCC constitutes 25–30% of primary malignant liver tumors in children. Conventional surgical excision is not possible in more than 50% of patients. LTx has recently become an important therapeutic option for adults and children with primary liver tumors. The aim of this study was a retrospective analysis of the clinical and pathological data of children with HCC treated with LTx in relation to Milan criteria assessed at diagnosis and then immediately before transplantation, in comparison with a group of patients treated conventionally. Between 1990 and 2007 we have treated 21 children diagnosed with HCC. Patients were divided into two groups: group I, 10 children treated conventionally and group II, 11 children treated with LTx regardless of previous therapy. The outcome of our patients treated conventionally with resection and chemotherapy is very poor ‐ the disease‐free survival rate is 30%. In contrast, despite that only 3 children having fulfilled adult Milan criteria, early clinical results of LTx are much superior. Total hepatectomy followed by LTx is the main treatment option for the majority of children with HCC. Decisions on the type of surgical treatment is made individually, but very early in the course of treatment.

Single pretransplant bolus of recombinant activated factor VII ameliorates influence of risk factors for blood loss during orthotopic liver transplantation

Abstract:  Large blood loss and transfusions during liver transplantation (LTx) may lead to serious complications and have a negative impact on post‐transplant mortality and morbidity. In the retrospective study we compared two groups of recipients of primary cadaveric liver transplantation: group I (study group), consisted of 28 patients with preoperative risk of high intraoperative blood loss, including severe uncorrected coagulopathy. This group was given a bolus of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) just before LTx. Group II (control group) included 61 patients without a particular risk for increased intraoperative blood loss. These patients were not given rFVIIa. We analyzed both groups for: coagulation parameters before, during and after surgery (INR, APTT, factor VII activity), blood and FFP transfusions, operative time, postoperative complications (vascular thrombosis, reoperation for bleeding), postoperative ICU stay, post‐transplant hospitalization time and mortality. Patients from the study group (I) had significantly worse coagulation parameters than patients in the control group (II) at the start of the surgical procedure; however, after administration of a bolus of rFVIIa there was immediate correction of coagulation in all recipients. No significant differences in intraoperative blood transfusions were observed between study and control groups (1980 ± 311.4 mL vs. 1527 ± 154.2 mL, respectively), operating time (8.7 h vs. 8.9 h) or ICU and hospital stay (7.03 days vs. 6.15 days and 40.89 days vs. 41.1 days). Re‐exploration because of bleeding was performed in three patients from group I (10.7%) and in seven patients (11.5%) from group II. No single case of vascular thrombosis was observed in the study group, while in the control group there were three hepatic artery thromboses, two portal vein thromboses and one hepatic vein thrombosis. We conclude that rFVIIa given preoperatively to liver transplant recipients with several risk factors for high intraoperaive bleeding adjusts these patients to a normal risk group, without an increased risk for thrombotic complications.

Aspergillosis in children after liver transplantation: Single center experience.

Abstract:  Aspergillus infection in immunocompromised patients is associated with high morbidity and mortality. We retrospectively reviewed cases of Aspergillosis (A), in a series of 277 children who received LTx between 1990 and 2006. All children were given antifungal prophylaxis after transplantation. Aspergillosis was identified in 10 cases (3.6%) and diagnosis was confirmed when clinical symptoms were associated with identification of Aspergillus sp. or detection of galactomannan antigen. Incidence of Aspergillosis considerably decreased from 6.9% to 0.6% when liposomal amphotericin B was introduced as prophylaxis in high‐risk patients. Mean time since LTx to Aspergillosis was 14.5 days. Histologically, Aspergillosis was diagnosed in two cases. Galactomannan antigen was present in two recipients. Aspergillus infection occurs usually within first 30 days after transplantation as a result of a combination of several risk factors. Following risk factors were observed: multiple antibiotic therapy, prolonged intensive care unit stay, poor graft function, retransplantation, relaparotomies, co‐infection. Amphotericin B was administered in all cases. Two patients (20%) died because of Aspergillosis Liposomal Amphotericin B prophylaxis in high‐risk children decreases the incidence of Aspergillus infection. High index of suspicion and early diagnosis followed by intensive treatment with amphotericin B facilitates achieving mortality rate lower than presented in other reports.

Nasogastric tube as protection for recurrent oesophageal stricture: A case report

This report presents the case of an 8.5-year-old boy with Down syndrome after experiencing extensive caustic injury to the oesophagus and stomach resulting from the accidental ingestion of concentrated sulphuric acid. The patient had undergone 32 unsuccessful endoscopic oesophageal stricture dilatations and stenting procedures performed over a period of 15 mo following the accident. Surgical reconstruction of the oesophagus was not possible due to previous gastric and cardiac surgeries for congenital conditions. Before referring the patient for salivary fistula surgery, the patient received a nasogastric tube with perforations located above the upper margin of the oesophageal stenosis for the passage of saliva and fluid. The tube was well tolerated and improved swallowing; however the backflow of gastric contents caused recurrent infections of the respiratory tract. To overcome these problems, we developed a double lumen, varying diameter, perforated tube for protection of the oesophageal closure. This nasogastric tube was found to be safe and decreased the need for hospitalization and further endoscopic procedures. This newly developed tube can thus be considered as a treatment option for patients with recurrent oesophageal stenosis and contraindications for surgical oesophageal reconstruction.

Acute liver failure in children—Is living donor liver transplantation justified?

Objectives Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients with acute liver failure (ALF) has become an acceptable alternative to transplantation from deceased donors (DDLT). The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes of LDLT in pediatric patients with ALF based on our center’s experience. Material and methods We enrolled 63 children (at our institution) with ALF who underwent liver transplantation between 1997 and 2016. Among them 24 (38%) underwent a LDLT and 39 (62%) received a DDLT. Retrospectively analyzed patient clinical data included: time lapse between qualification for transplantation and transplant surgery, graft characteristics, postoperative complications, long-term results post-transplantation, and living donor morbidity. Overall, we have made a comparison of clinical results between LDLT and DDLT groups. Results Follow-up periods ranged from 12 to 182 months (median 109 months) for LDLT patients and 12 to 183 months (median 72 months) for DDLT patients. The median waiting time for a transplant was shorter in LDLT group than in DDLT group. There was not a single case of primary non-function (PNF) in the LDLT group and 20 out of 24 patients (83.3%) had good early graft function; 3 patients (12.5%) in the LDLT group died within 2 months of transplantation but there was no late mortality. In comparison, 4 out of 39 patients (10.2%) had PNF in DDLT group while 20 patients (51.2%) had good early graft function; 8 patients (20.5%) died early within 2 months and 2 patients (5.1%) died late after transplantation. The LDLT group had a shorter cold ischemia time (CIT) of 4 hours in comparison to 9.2 hours in the DDLT group (p<0.0001). Conclusions LDLT is a lifesaving procedure for pediatric patients with ALF. Our experience showed that it may be performed with very good results, and with very low morbidity and no mortality among living donors when performed by experienced teams following strict procedures.

Cavo-portal transposition in pediatric liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND Cavo-portal transposition (CPT) at liver transplantation (LTx) allows portal revascularization of the liver in recipients in whom portal system thrombosis does not allow performance of porto-portal anastomosis. The aim was to present the cases of 2 children who underwent LTx and CPT in our institution. CASE REPORT 1. A 10-year-old boy, after Kasai procedure and living donor LTx, was qualified for retransplantation 9 years after first LTx complicated with late portal vein thrombosis, portal hypertension, hypersplenism, and multiple GI bleeding episodes, after splenectomy and meso-caval shunt preventing GI bleeding. At retransplant surgery, CPT was done. Actual follow-up was 40 months. Doppler ultrasound and angio CT show normal flow within the grafts portal vein. Biochemical parameters were within normal range. There was no bleeding from the gastrointestinal tract. 2. A 14-month-old child after Kasai procedure was qualified for living donor liver transplantation. During surgery, thrombosis of the recipient portal system was found, which was not diagnosed before. The CPT was done. There were no complications during the postoperative course. The actual follow-up was 32 months, and the patient is doing well, with normal liver and renal function, without hypersplenism or ascites. There was no gastrointestinal bleeding. Doppler ultrasound showed normal intrahepatic portal and arterial flow in the transplanted liver. CONCLUSIONS Cavo-portal transposition is an important option in portal vein revascularization in liver transplant recipients without access to the portal system. Long-term observation of these 2 cases did not show any late problems (e.g., bleeding from the gastrointestinal tract, renal function, hyperammonemia, ascites) related to cavo-portal transposition.