Margarita Velarde

Cardiac Toxicity and Efficacy of Trastuzumab Combined with Pertuzumab in Patients with Trastuzumab-Insensitive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Purpose: To evaluate safety and efficacy of trastuzumab with pertuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive metastatic breast cancer who had progressive disease on trastuzumab-based therapy. Experimental Design: Patients with measurable HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, ≤3 trastuzumab-based regimens, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥55% received 8 or 6 mg/kg trastuzumab and 840 mg pertuzumab i.v. followed by 6 mg/kg trastuzumab and 420 mg pertuzumab every 3 weeks. Cardiac evaluation and tumor response were assessed every 3 and 6 weeks, respectively. Results: Eleven patients received 64 cycles of trastuzumab plus pertuzumab. A total of 92 echocardiograms and 8 cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies were done. With the lower limit of normal LVEF 55%, left ventricular systolic dysfunction was observed in six patients, three grade 1, two grade 2, and one grade 3 according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. The objective response rate was 18%. Two patients had partial responses, three had stable disease, and six had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 6 weeks. In baseline tumors from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary and/or metastatic tumor biopsies, pHER2-Y1248 trended toward an increase in patients with partial response compared with those with stable disease/progressive disease (P = 0.095). Conclusion: Trastuzumab plus pertuzumab may have clinical benefit in selected patients who have previously been treated with trastuzumab. Cardiac toxicity, although asymptomatic in most cases, was associated with this treatment. Further evaluation of efficacy of this combination is required to define the overall risks and benefits.

Cardiac toxicity and efficacy of trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab in patients with [corrected] human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Purpose: To evaluate safety and efficacy of trastuzumab with pertuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive metastatic breast cancer who had progressive disease on trastuzumab-based therapy. Experimental Design: Patients with measurable HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, ≤3 trastuzumab-based regimens, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥55% received 8 or 6 mg/kg trastuzumab and 840 mg pertuzumab i.v. followed by 6 mg/kg trastuzumab and 420 mg pertuzumab every 3 weeks. Cardiac evaluation and tumor response were assessed every 3 and 6 weeks, respectively. Results: Eleven patients received 64 cycles of trastuzumab plus pertuzumab. A total of 92 echocardiograms and 8 cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies were done. With the lower limit of normal LVEF 55%, left ventricular systolic dysfunction was observed in six patients, three grade 1, two grade 2, and one grade 3 according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. The objective response rate was 18%. Two patients had partial responses, three had stable disease, and six had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 6 weeks. In baseline tumors from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary and/or metastatic tumor biopsies, pHER2-Y1248 trended toward an increase in patients with partial response compared with those with stable disease/progressive disease (P = 0.095). Conclusion: Trastuzumab plus pertuzumab may have clinical benefit in selected patients who have previously been treated with trastuzumab. Cardiac toxicity, although asymptomatic in most cases, was associated with this treatment. Further evaluation of efficacy of this combination is required to define the overall risks and benefits.

The VEGF inhibitor axitinib has limited effectiveness as a therapy for adrenocortical cancer

CONTEXT Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis in need of more effective treatment options. Published evidence indicates many ACCs express the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), suggesting inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor signaling could potentially impact tumor growth. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to determine the antitumor efficacy of axitinib (AG-013736), a potent, selective inhibitor of VEGFR1, -2, and -3. DESIGN This was a phase II, open-label trial using a two-stage design. PATIENTS Thirteen patients with metastatic ACC previously treated with at least one chemotherapy regimen with or without mitotane participated in the study. INTERVENTION Starting axitinib dose was 5 mg orally twice daily. Dose escalations were permitted if the administered dose was tolerable. RESULTS Thirteen patients were enrolled. Dose escalation was possible in seven patients, but the majority could not tolerate a dose higher than the starting 5 mg, twice-daily dose for prolonged periods of time. All patients experienced known grade 1/2 toxicities, and 10 of 13 patients had at least one grade 3/4 adverse event. No patient tumor could be scored as a Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response, although the growth rate on therapy compared with that prior to starting axitinib was reduced in 4 of the 13 patients. The median progression-free survival was 5.48 months, and the median overall survival was longer than 13.7 months. CONCLUSION Axitinib has limited effectiveness in ACC. Together with 48 patients previously reported who received either sorafenib or sunitinib, a total of 61 ACC patients have now been treated with a VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor without an objective Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response. Future trials in ACC should look to other targets for possible active agents.

Adrenocortical Cancer: A Molecularly Complex Disease Where Surgery Matters.

The development of new therapies has lagged behind for rare cancers without defined therapeutic targets. Adrenocortical cancer is no exception. Mitotane, an older agent considered “adrenolytic,” is used both to control symptoms in advanced disease and as adjuvant therapy after surgical resection. Molecular characterization of adrenocortical cancer has deepened our understanding of this genetically complex disease while identifying subgroups whose importance remains to be determined. Unfortunately, such studies have yet to demonstrate a therapeutic target for drug development, and to date, no targeted therapy has achieved meaningful outcomes. Consequently, first-line therapy for metastatic disease remains a combination regimen of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatinum established in a randomized clinical trial. In addition to evaluating recent studies in adrenocortical cancer, we raise one critical clinical issue—the risk of peritoneal dissemination following laparoscopic resection of adrenocortical cancer. In a retrospective case series of 267 patients referred to the NCI for the treatment of recurrent or advanced adrenocortical cancer, we found extensive peritoneal dissemination in 25 of the 45 patients (55.6%) who had undergone laparoscopic resection, compared with only 7 of the 222 patients (3%) who had undergone an open resection (P < 0.0001). Although this has been debated in the literature, our data argue for an end to laparoscopic resection of adrenocortical cancers to avoid peritoneal dissemination, a complication of laparoscopy that is uniformly fatal. Clin Cancer Res; 22(20); 4989–5000. ©2016 AACR. See all articles in this CCR Focus section, “Endocrine Cancers: Revising Paradigms.”

Brain Metastasis in Patients With Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Clinical Series

INTRODUCTION Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a heterogeneous and rare disease. At presentation or at the time of a recurrence, the disease commonly spreads to the liver, lungs, lymph nodes, and bones. The brain has only rarely been reported as a site of metastases. OBJECTIVE The aims of this report were to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with ACC who developed brain metastasis and were evaluated at the National Cancer Institute. METHODS We describe the history and clinical presentation of six patients with ACC and metastatic disease in the brain. Images of the six patients and pathology slides were reviewed when available. RESULTS The median age at the time of the diagnosis of ACC was 42 years. The median time from the initial diagnosis until the presentation of brain metastasis was 43 months. As a group the patients had previously received multiples lines of chemotherapy (median of three), and they presented with one to three metastatic brain lesions. Four patients underwent metastasectomy, one had radiosurgery, and one had both modalities. Two patients are still alive, three died, between 2 and 14 months after the diagnosis of brain metastases, and one was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION Patients with advanced ACC can rarely present with metastasis to the brain, most often long after the initial diagnosis. Timely diagnosis of brain metastasis with appropriate intervention after discussion in a multidisciplinary meeting can improve the prognosis in this particular scenario.

A Phase II Multi‐Center Study of Bevacizumab in Combination with Ixabepilone in Subjects with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Abstract Lessons Learned. Accrual to renal cell carcinoma trials remains a challenge despite the lack of prolonged response to the available treatments. The observation of three responses among the 30 patients with median progression‐free survival and overall survival of 8.3 and 15 months, respectively, indicates the combination has some activity, but it is not sufficient for further development. Background. Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains suboptimal. Preclinical data have previously shown that ixabepilone, a microtubule‐stabilizing agent approved for the treatment of breast cancer, is active in taxane‐sensitive and ‐resistant cells. In this single‐arm phase II trial, we investigated a combination of ixabepilone plus bevacizumab in patients with refractory mRCC. Methods. We enrolled 30 patients with histologically confirmed mRCC, clear cell subtype, who had not been previously treated with ixabepilone or bevacizumab but had received at least one prior U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)‐approved treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The treatment regimen consisted of 6 mg/m2 ixabepilone per day for 5 days and 15 mg/kg bevacizumab every 21 days. After 6 cycles, the treatment interval could be extended to every 28 days. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Secondary endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the toxicity of the combination. Results. The median number of prior therapies was two (range per patient one to five). Patients received a median of 8 cycles of ixabepilone plus bevacizumab (range 2–54). The median follow‐up was 36.4 months (range 23.5–96.5). Nineteen patients (63.3%) had stable disease as a best response. Three patients (10%) had a partial response. The median PFS was 8.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.9–10.6) and the median OS was 15.0 months (95% CI, 11.3–28.8). The total number of cycle for safety evaluation was 289. Grade 3/4 adverse events (>5% incidence) included lymphopenia (16.7%), hypertension (6.7%), and leukopenia (6.7%). Conclusion. The combination of ixabepilone and bevacizumab was well tolerated, with modest activity in second ‐ or later‐line mRCC, but it is not recommended as a therapy without further clinical development. Alternative combinations with these agents could be explored in future studies.

Cardiac toxicity and efficacy of trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab in patients with trastuzumab-insensitive HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Purpose: To evaluate safety and efficacy of trastuzumab with pertuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive metastatic breast cancer who had progressive disease on trastuzumab-based therapy. Experimental Design: Patients with measurable HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, ≤3 trastuzumab-based regimens, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥55% received 8 or 6 mg/kg trastuzumab and 840 mg pertuzumab i.v. followed by 6 mg/kg trastuzumab and 420 mg pertuzumab every 3 weeks. Cardiac evaluation and tumor response were assessed every 3 and 6 weeks, respectively. Results: Eleven patients received 64 cycles of trastuzumab plus pertuzumab. A total of 92 echocardiograms and 8 cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies were done. With the lower limit of normal LVEF 55%, left ventricular systolic dysfunction was observed in six patients, three grade 1, two grade 2, and one grade 3 according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. The objective response rate was 18%. Two patients had partial responses, three had stable disease, and six had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 6 weeks. In baseline tumors from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary and/or metastatic tumor biopsies, pHER2-Y1248 trended toward an increase in patients with partial response compared with those with stable disease/progressive disease (P = 0.095). Conclusion: Trastuzumab plus pertuzumab may have clinical benefit in selected patients who have previously been treated with trastuzumab. Cardiac toxicity, although asymptomatic in most cases, was associated with this treatment. Further evaluation of efficacy of this combination is required to define the overall risks and benefits.