Margitta Retz

Adjuvant Cisplatin Plus Methotrexate Versus Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Epirubicin, and Cisplatin in Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer: Results of a Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial (AUO-AB 05/95)

PURPOSE Radical cystectomy as standard treatment of muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder cures less than 50% of patients with locally advanced bladder cancer. We compared two adjuvant combination chemotherapies in patients with stage pT3a-4a and/or pathologic node-positive transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder after radical cystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 327 patients were randomly assigned to either adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with three cycles of cisplatin 70 mg/qm(2) on day 1 and methotrexate 40 mg/qm(2) on days 8 and 15 of a 21-day cycle (CM) or three cycles of methotrexate 30 mg/qm(2) on days 1, 15, and 22, vinblastine 3 mg/qm(2) on days 2, 15, and 22, epirubicin 45 mg/qm(2) on day 2, and cisplatin 70 mg/qm(2) on day 2 of a 28-day cycle (M-VEC). RESULTS The hazard ratio for progression-free survival as the primary end point was 1.13 (90% CI, 0.86 to 1.48) for 163 CM patients compared with 164 M-VEC patients whose right-hand limit remained below the upper bound compatible with the noninferiority hypothesis (alpha = .0403). The 5-year progression-free, tumor-specific, and overall survival rates (point estimates +/- SE) for CM versus M-VEC were 46.3% +/- 4.6% v 48.8% +/- 4.5%, 52.0% +/- 4.6% v 52.3% +/- 4.8%, and 46.1% +/- 4.3% v 45.1% +/- 4.6%, respectively. WHO grade 3 and 4 leukopenia occurred in 7.0% of patients treated with CM and 22.2% of patients treated with M-VEC (P < .0001). CONCLUSION CM cannot be considered inferior to M-VEC with regard to progression-free survival of patients with locally advanced bladder cancer after radical cystectomy. Moreover, patients receiving adjuvant CM combination therapy experienced significantly less grade 3 and 4 leukopenia than patients treated with M-VEC.

Antimicrobial peptides of the Cecropin-family show potent antitumor activity against bladder cancer cells.

BackgroundThis study evaluated the cytotoxic and antiproliferative efficacy of two well-characterized members of the Cecropin-family of antimicrobial peptides against bladder tumor cells and benign fibroblasts.MethodsThe antiproliferative and cytotoxic potential of the Cecropins A and B was quantified by colorimetric WST-1-, BrdU- and LDH-assays in four bladder cancer cell lines as well as in murine and human fibroblast cell lines. IC50 values were assessed by logarithmic extrapolation, representing the concentration at which cell viability was reduced by 50%. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to visualize the morphological changes induced by Cecropin A and B in bladder tumor cells and fibroblasts.ResultsCecropin A and B inhibit bladder cancer cell proliferation and viability in a dose-dependent fashion. The average IC50 values of Cecropin A and B against all bladder cancer cell lines ranged between 73.29 μg/ml and 220.05 μg/ml. In contrast, benign fibroblasts were significantly less or not at all susceptible to Cecropin A and B. Both Cecropins induced an increase in LDH release from bladder tumor cells whereas benign fibroblasts were not affected. SEM demonstrated lethal membrane disruption in bladder cancer cells as opposed to fibroblasts.ConclusionCecropin A and B exert selective cytotoxic and antiproliferative efficacy in bladder cancer cells while sparing targets of benign murine or human fibroblast origin. Both peptides may offer novel therapeutic strategies for the treatment of bladder cancer with limited cytotoxic effects on benign cells.

Novel amplification unit at chromosome 3q25-q27 in human prostate cancer.

In prostate carcinoma, amplification of the genes c‐MYC, Her2/NEU, and the androgen receptor gene has been documented, with gene amplification being related to progressive tumor growth. Recently, using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), we provided evidence for DNA copy number gains at chromosome 3q25–q26 in prostate cancer [Sattler et al.: Prostate 39:79–86, 1999].

Expression of human beta-defensins 1 and 2 in kidneys with chronic bacterial infection

BackgroundConstitutive expression and localization of antimicrobial human β-defensin-1 (HBD-1) in human kidneys as a potential mechanism of antimicrobial defense has been previously reported. Inducible expression of human β-defensin-2 (HBD-2) has been described in various epithelial organs but not for the urogenital tract.MethodsWe investigated the gene- and protein expression of HBD-1 and HBD-2 by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, and immunohistochemistry in 15 normal human kidney samples and 15 renal tissues with chronic bacterial infection. Additionally, cell culture experiments were performed to study HBD gene expression by real-time RT-PCR in response to inflammatory cytokines TNFα and IL-1β as well as lipopolysaccharide from Gram-negative bacteria.ResultsConstitutive HBD-1 gene- and protein expression was detected in normal renal tissue and kidneys with chronic infection. As a novel finding, inducible HBD-2 gene- and protein expression was demonstrated in tubulus epithelia with chronic infection but not in normal renal tissue. In pyelonephritic kidneys HBD-1 and HBD-2 expression showed a similar pattern of localizaton in distal tubules, loops of Henle and in collecting ducts of the kidney. Furthermore, real-time RT-PCR of kidney derived cell lines stimulated with inflammatory agents TNF-α, IL-1β and LPS revealed a strong increase in relative HBD-2 transcription level and also a slight increase in relative HBD-1 transcription level.ConclusionsUpregulated HBD-2 expression in renal tubulus epithelium indicates a role of a wider range of human defensins for antimicrobial host defense in the urogenital tract than previously recognized.

CXCR4 expression reflects tumor progression and regulates motility of bladder cancer cells

Transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder remains life threatening due to the high occurrence of metastases. Emerging evidence suggests that chemokines and their receptors play a critical role in tumor metastases. In our study, we performed a systematic analysis of the mRNA and protein expression levels of all 18 chemokine receptors in normal urothelium and bladder cancer. CXCR4 was the only chemokine receptor whose mRNA expression level was upregulated in bladder cancer cell lines as well as in invasive and locally advanced bladder cancer tissue samples (pT2–pT4). In contrast, superficial bladder tumors (pTa and pT1) displayed low CXCR4 expression levels and normal urothelial cells were negative for CXCR4. Immunohistochemistry of a bladder cancer tissue microarray (TMA) confirmed that a subgroup of invasive bladder cancers revealed a high CXCR4 protein expression, while superficial bladder tumors showed low immunoreactivity. To investigate the functional significance of CXCR4 expression, we performed migration and invasion assays. Exposure of CXCR4‐positive bladder cancer cells to CXCL12 in a Boyden chamber type assay provoked a significant increase in migration as well as invasion across a Matrigel barrier. Enhanced migration and invasion were inhibited by a CXCR4‐specific blocking antibody. In contrast, normal urothelial cells did not respond to CXCL12 and lacked chemotactic migration. In conclusion, bladder cancer cells express CXCR4 progressively with advanced tumorigenesis and this receptor interacts with CXCL12 to mediate tumor chemotaxis and invasion through connective tissue. These properties identify CXCR4 as a potential target for the attenuation of bladder cancer metastases.

The superior prognostic value of humoral factors compared with molecular proliferation markers in renal cell carcinoma

The American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer have acknowledged routine laboratory parameters, such as serum calcium, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), as predictors of survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma. The predictive value of these parameters compared with proliferation markers, such as Ki‐67, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), topoisomerase II‐α, and p100, has not been determined.

Chemotherapy in the post-MVAC era: the case for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Abstract. Radical cystectomy for muscle invasive and locally advanced bladder cancer is the standard treatment modality in most of the Western industrialised countries. Rates of perioperative mortality from radical cystectomy have decreased to less than 2% over the past two decades due to advances in surgical technique and perioperative care. However, at least 40% of patients with pT3 bladder cancer and 70% of patients with lymph node-positive disease develop tumour recurrence after radical treatment within the first 5 years when treated with radical cystectomy alone. After the efficacy of combination chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial cancer using methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin and cisplatin (MVAC) was first described in 1985, several cisplatin-based systemic regimens have been investigated as adjunctive treatment before or after therapy for locally advanced bladder cancer by radical surgery or radiation therapy. Three randomised studies have reported superior results of postoperative adjuvant systemic chemotherapy compared to radical cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. All three studies demonstrated a significant survival benefit for bladder cancer patients receiving adjuvant combination therapy. Studies have been criticised for small patient numbers and statistical shortcomings. New effective antineoplastic agents, such as paclitaxel and gemcitabine, have evolved during the past decade as promising substances for the treatment of urothelial cancer. This article reviews adjuvant studies from the era of MVAC combination chemotherapy, as well as contemporary studies that discuss new antineoplastic agents for systemic adjuvant chemotherapy of locally advanced bladder cancer.

Rational indication for docetaxel rechallenge in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer

Study Type – Therapy (case series)

Is there standard chemotherapy for metastatic bladder cancer? Quality of life and medical resources utilization based on largest to date randomized trial

A large multinational phase III trial performed during the late 1990s compared two systemic chemotherapy regimens gemcitabine plus cisplatin and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin (M-VAC) in more than 400 patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. This trial has been discussed to landmark the beginning of a new era following M-VAC polychemotherapy which has dominated treatment of advanced urothelial cancer throughout the previous decade. Despite the fact that gemcitabine/cisplatin combination therapy did not surpass M-VAC therapy in regard to patient survival as initially intended, this combination demonstrated a more favourable toxicity profile with improved tolerability and superior cost effectiveness, rendering this combination an attractive alternative to M-VAC. This review on the largest to date phase III trial for advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer will focus on issues of quality of life including indicators such as performance status and changes in body weight. Furthermore, data on medical resources utilization as accounted during systemic polychemotherapy and related toxic events will be reconsidered, particularly under the impression of decreasing health care resources worldwide.

Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Cancer with Paclitaxel and Everolimus in a German Phase II Trial (AUO Trial AB 35/09).

Objective: The efficacy of second-line treatment after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial cancer is limited. Based on encouraging preclinical and clinical phase I data, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of paclitaxel and everolimus in these patients. Methods: In this trial, patients having failed to respond to prior platinum-based combination treatment of urothelial cancer were treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 i.v., 3-weekly) and the mTOR-inhibitor everolimus (10 mg p.o., once daily). The patients were treated until tumor progression or until a maximum of 6 cycles was completed. A one-stage design was used to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint. Results: A total of 27 patients (67% male; median age 63 years) were enrolled. The most frequent grade III/IV toxicities were anemia (28%), peripheral neuropathy (28%), and fatigue (24%). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Complete and partial remissions were observed in 0/24 and 3/24 patients eligible for efficacy analysis, respectively (ORR 13%). Progression-free survival was 2.9 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.9-4.2], and the median overall survival was 5.6 months (95% CI 4.8-10.2). Conclusion: The combination of paclitaxel and everolimus has not achieved the expected efficacy in second-line treatment of urothelial cancer and should not be further explored.