Margitta Worm

Anaphylaxis: guidelines from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Anaphylaxis is a clinical emergency, and all healthcare professionals should be familiar with its recognition and acute and ongoing management. These guidelines have been prepared by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Taskforce on Anaphylaxis. They aim to provide evidence‐based recommendations for the recognition, risk factor assessment, and the management of patients who are at risk of, are experiencing, or have experienced anaphylaxis. While the primary audience is allergists, these guidelines are also relevant to all other healthcare professionals. The development of these guidelines has been underpinned by two systematic reviews of the literature, both on the epidemiology and on clinical management of anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis is a potentially life‐threatening condition whose clinical diagnosis is based on recognition of a constellation of presenting features. First‐line treatment for anaphylaxis is intramuscular adrenaline. Useful second‐line interventions may include removing the trigger where possible, calling for help, correct positioning of the patient, high‐flow oxygen, intravenous fluids, inhaled short‐acting bronchodilators, and nebulized adrenaline. Discharge arrangements should involve an assessment of the risk of further reactions, a management plan with an anaphylaxis emergency action plan, and, where appropriate, prescribing an adrenaline auto‐injector. If an adrenaline auto‐injector is prescribed, education on when and how to use the device should be provided. Specialist follow‐up is essential to investigate possible triggers, to perform a comprehensive risk assessment, and to prevent future episodes by developing personalized risk reduction strategies including, where possible, commencing allergen immunotherapy. Training for the patient and all caregivers is essential. There are still many gaps in the evidence base for anaphylaxis.

Usefulness of specific immunotherapy in patients with atopic dermatitis and allergic sensitization to house dust mites: a multi‐centre, randomized, dose–response study

Background:  The effect of specific immunotherapy (SIT) on eczema in atopic dermatitis is not known. Therefore, a multi‐centre, randomized dose–response trial, double‐blind with respect to the efficacy of a biologically standardized depot house dust mite preparation was performed.

Mast cells as initiators of immunity and host defense

Abstract: Until recently, mast cells have been viewed primarily as harmful because of their key role as effector cells of allergic and potentially lethal anaphylactic reactions. Their contribution to human health appeared instead to be limited to the elimination of parasites. There is, however, growing evidence for additional beneficial functions of mast cells, particularly regarding the initiation of acquired immune reactions. Thus, mast cells can phagocytize diverse particles, take up antigens, and express a number of receptors, particularly MHC class I and II antigens, ICAM‐1 and ‐3, CD43, CD80, CD86 and CD40L which allow them to interact with T and B lymphocytes. They can also secrete numerous cytokines that induce and enhance recruitment and functions of lymphocytes. Finally, there is good evidence that mast cells present e.g. pollen and bacterial antigens, respond to bacterial superantigens, but fail to react to endogenously produced antigens or superantigens. Mast cells can also activate B cells directly to produce IgE, but this activity and the ability to produce IL‐4 or IL‐13 is restricted primarily to basophil leukocytes and mucosal mast cells. Finally, recent evidence attributes a pivotal role to the cells in natural immunity to bacteria. There is also emerging evidence that mast cells can downmodulate the immune response. While these data require further clarification, the basic ability of mast cells to initiate innate and acquired immune reactions can no longer be questioned.

2012 Update: World Allergy Organization Guidelines for the assessment and management of anaphylaxis.

Purpose of reviewThe World Allergy Organization (WAO) Guidelines for the assessment and management of anaphylaxis published in early 2011 provide a global perspective on patient risk factors, triggers, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of anaphylaxis. In this 2012 Update, subsequently published, clinically relevant research in these areas is reviewed. Recent findingsPatient risk factors and co-factors that amplify anaphylaxis have been documented in prospective studies. The global perspective on the triggers of anaphylaxis has expanded. The clinical criteria for the diagnosis of anaphylaxis that are promulgated in the Guidelines have been validated. Some aspects of anaphylaxis treatment have been prospectively studied. Novel investigations of self-injectable epinephrine for treatment of anaphylaxis recurrences in the community have been performed. Progress has been made with regard to measurement of specific IgE to allergen components (component-resolved testing) that might help to distinguish clinical risk of future anaphylactic episodes to an allergen from asymptomatic sensitization to the allergen. New strategies for immune modulation to prevent food-induced anaphylaxis and new insights into subcutaneous immunotherapy to prevent venom-induced anaphylaxis have been described. SummaryResearch highlighted in this Update strengthens the evidence-based recommendations for assessment, management, and prevention of anaphylaxis made in the WAO Anaphylaxis Guidelines.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Pimecrolimus Cream 1% in Adults with Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

Background: Pimecrolimus cream 1% is a non-steroid, selective inflammatory cytokine inhibitor indicated for atopic dermatitis (AD). Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1%-based treatment versus conventional therapy in adults with moderate AD. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive pimecrolimus cream 1% (n = 62) or vehicle (n = 68) at the first signs/symptoms of AD, for 24 weeks as required. A moderately potent topical corticosteroid (prednicarbate 0.25% cream) was allowed in both groups to treat flares. Results: Corticosteroids were required on fewer days in the pimecrolimus group, compared with the vehicle group (9.7 vs. 37.8%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, 59.7% of pimecrolimus-treated patients experienced no flares during the study period, compared with 22.1% of vehicle-treated patients (p < 0.001). Pimecrolimus cream 1% was well tolerated throughout the study. Conclusion: For adults with moderate AD, pimecrolimus cream 1% is well tolerated, reduces the incidence of flares, reduces/eliminates corticosteroid use, improves long-term disease control and enhances the patients’ quality of life.

Frequency of disease-associated and other nuclear autoantibodies in patients of the German network for systemic scleroderma: correlation with characteristic clinical features

IntroductionIn the present study, we analysed in detail nuclear autoantibodies and their associations in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients included in the German Network for Systemic Scleroderma Registry.MethodsSera of 863 patients were analysed according to a standardised protocol including immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, line immunoassay and immunodiffusion.ResultsAntinuclear antibodies (ANA) were detected in 94.2% of patients. In 81.6%, at least one of the autoantibodies highly associated with SSc or with overlap syndromes with scleroderma features was detected, that is, anti-centromere (35.9%) or anti-topoisomerase I (30.1%), followed in markedly lower frequency by antibodies to PM-Scl (4.9%), U1-ribonucleoprotein (U1-RNP) (4.8%), RNA polymerases (RNAPs) (3.8%), fibrillarin (1.4%), Ku (1.2%), aminoacyl-transfer RNA synthetases (0.5%), To (0.2%) and U11-RNP (0.1%). We found that the simultaneous presence of SSc-associated autoantibodies was rare (1.6%). Furthermore, additional autoantibodies were detected in 55.4% of the patients with SSc, of which anti-Ro/anti-La, anti-mitochondrial and anti-p25/p23 antibodies were most frequent. The coexistence of SSc-associated and other autoantibodies was common (43% of patients). SSc-associated autoantibodies disclosed characteristic associations with clinical features of patients, some of which were previously not acknowledged.ConclusionsThis study shows that five autoantigens (that is, centromere, topoisomerase I, PM-Scl, U1-RNP and RNAP) detected more than 95% of the known SSc-associated antibody responses in ANA-positive SSc patients and characterise around 79% of all SSc patients in a central European cohort. These data confirm and extend previous data underlining the central role of the determination of ANAs in defining the diagnosis, subset allocation and prognosis of SSc patients.

Clinical relevance of food additives in adult patients with atopic dermatitis

Adverse reactions to food play an important role in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD). In infancy and childhood, food allergies are observed in up to 30%, whereas nonallergic hypersensitivity reactions (pseudoallergic reactions) towards food additives have been reported to occur between 2 and 7%. By contrast, sensitizations towards food allergens are rarely of clinical relevance in adults and little data is available on nonallergic hypersensitivity reactions. To date the role of pseudoallergic reactions as an aggravating factor in AD of adult patients remains controversial. However, many adult patients report on food‐related aggravation of the disease and nonallergic hypersensitivity reactions have been incriminated repeatedly.

Successful retreatment with alitretinoin in patients with relapsed chronic hand eczema

Summary Background  Patients with severe chronic hand eczema (CHE) often respond to therapy with oral alitretinoin (9‐cis retinoic acid). However, the efficacy of alitretinoin after disease relapse has not been demonstrated.

Introducing Genetic Testing for Adult-Type Hypolactasia

Background and Aims: To evaluate genotyping for two DNA variants (c.1993+327C>T and c.1438+117G>A), recently found to be associated with adult-type hypolactasia, in the diagnosis of lactose intolerance. Methods: In total, 166 consecutive patients with gastrointestinal symptoms mimicking hypolactasia admitted to the clinic between March 2002 and December 2002 were included. Genotyping for the two DNA variants (c.1993+327C>T and c.1438+117G>A) and standard H2 breath test was performed. Results: Among 116 patients with positive H2 breath test, the c.1993+327C variantwas detectablein 106 (91.4%) patients. Among 50 patients with negative H2 breath test, the c.1993+327Cvariantwas seen in 2 patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for the c.1993+327C variant were 91.4, 96.0, 98.1 and 82.8%, respectively. Genotyping for the c.1438+117G variant did not bring any additional information. Among 4 of the 10 patients with positive H2 breath test but negative for the c.1993+327C and the c.1438+117G variant,further evaluation revealed other diseases known to cause secondary hypolactasia such as celiac disease and short bowel syndrome. Conclusion: In symptomatic patients, genotyping for the DNA variant c.1993+327C is a reliable test for adult-type hypolactasia with high sensitivity and specificity and thus provides a new tool in the diagnostic workup of hypolactasia.

Increased leukotriene production by food additives in patients with atopic dermatitis and proven food intolerance

Recently, we identified a subgroup of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) with a clinical relevant food intolerance proven by double blind placebo controlled challenge. In search of possible pathomechanisms involved in this food intolerance, which leads to aggravation of the disease, the aim of the present study was to determine sulfidoleukotriene production in these patients using isolated leucocytes from the peripheral blood after stimulation with different food additives.